The Associates Did It

Todd Cohen
  • 5.0 (7)
  • Entrepreneurship

The official podcast of Carpenter & Associates - where Texas law meets real talk. Listen to our team of attorneys and special guests as we pull back the curtain on the legal world with insight, humor, and unfiltered stories from the courtroom and beyond. Each episode dives into the realities of law practice, from client challenges and courtroom chaos to the lessons that shape great attorneys. Whether we're breaking down billing, sharing funny stories, or discussing what separates good lawyers from bad, The Associates Did It gives listeners an authentic look inside life at one of Texas' most dynamic litigation firms. Produced by Carpenter & Associates - Dallas, Texas.

  1. 20h ago

    The Exorcism Trial of Anneliese Michel: Exorcisms, Starvation & the Failure to Intervene Part 3

    s Anneliese Michel’s condition deteriorated, those around her continued to seek a spiritual explanation. What happened when her need for medical care became overshadowed by the belief that she was possessed? Dr. Josh Carpenter examines the exorcisms, her worsening physical health, and the missed opportunities for intervention before her death. This episode explores the difficult intersection of mental health, religious belief, and responsibility, setting the stage for the investigation and trial that followed. Content note: Discussion of mental illness, starvation, and death. Takeaways Tragic intersection of faith and mental healthConsequences of neglecting medical care Mental health vs. spiritual beliefsImportance of medical intervention Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Annalise Michel's Story03:00 The Nature of Possession and Exorcism05:47 Annalise's Behavioral Changes and Deterioration09:52 The Role of Secrecy and Groupthink12:57 The Final Days of Annalise Michel16:10 The Legal Aftermath of Annalise's Death20:00 Understanding Annalise's Mental State23:59 The Medical Perspective on Annalise's Condition28:05 The Impact of Religious Beliefs on Treatment31:56 Conclusion: The Legacy of Annalise Michel44:40 The Life of Annalise Michelle48:11 Evidence and Interpretation55:00 The Downward Spiral01:01:01 The Role of Beliefs01:06:54 The Final Days01:19:07 Investigation and Accountability

    The Exorcism Trial of Anneliese Michel: Exorcisms, Starvation & the Failure to Intervene Part 3

  2. 5d ago

    The Exorcism Trial of Anneliese Michel: When Medicine, Mental Health & Faith Collide Part 2

    This episode of the Associates Did It Podcast continues the story of Anneliese Michel, examining the events that transformed the life of an intelligent, deeply religious young woman into one of the most controversial cases involving mental illness, faith, and exorcism. The episode traces Anneliese’s upbringing, her neurological and psychological struggles, recurring seizures, hallucination-like experiences, depression, and periods of severe sleep deprivation. As her condition became more complex and traditional medical treatment failed to provide clear answers, the people around her increasingly began interpreting her symptoms through a spiritual lens. What began as a medical problem gradually became something very different. Behaviors that could be viewed as neurological or psychiatric symptoms were increasingly understood by members of her family and religious community as evidence of demonic possession. The episode explores how those interpretations developed, how cultural and religious beliefs shaped the way her suffering was understood, and how prolonged sleep deprivation, physical deterioration, fear, guilt, and loss of control may have intensified her condition. At the center of the story is a difficult question: What happens when medicine, mental health, religious belief, and personal conviction all offer competing explanations for the same suffering? Rather than attempting to prove or disprove the supernatural, Dr. Josh Carpenter examines the evidence, the decisions made by the people surrounding Anneliese, and the consequences of allowing one explanation to become more powerful than every other possibility. As the story moves toward the authorization of formal exorcisms, the case becomes not simply a story about possession, but about responsibility, judgment, belief, and the devastating consequences that can occur when a vulnerable person is caught between competing systems of authority. Takeaways Understanding legal historyExploring mental health and spirituality Sleep deprivation worsens mental healthCultural perceptions shape guilt Chapters 00:00 Introduction to the Podcast01:06 Exploring Legal Principles02:34 Annalise Michel's Background03:05 Family and Religious Influences07:31 Annalise's Early Life and Education11:21 The Beginning of Neurological Issues12:51 Seizures and Medical Evaluations19:20 Health Decline and Hospitalization24:29 Hallucinations and Disturbing Experiences28:17 Return Home and Isolation30:13 Resurgence of Seizures37:14 University Life and Relationships44:17 The Role of Exorcism49:59 Transition to Spiritual Interpretation51:23 The Evolution of Symptoms52:54 The Impact of Sleep Deprivation58:00 The Nature of Hallucinations01:01:44 Understanding Guilt and Morality01:04:31 Annalise's Compulsive Behaviors01:10:53 The Role of Exorcism01:19:43 The Deterioration of Annalise01:28:38 Living Two Lives01:32:49 The Theology of Suffering

    The Exorcism Trial of Anneliese Michel: When Medicine, Mental Health & Faith Collide Part 2

  3. Oct 5

    The Exorcism Trial: Anneliese Michel, Faith, Medicine & the Law Part 1

    In this episode of the Associates Did It Podcast, Dr. Josh Carpenter begins an in-depth examination of the tragic and controversial case of Anneliese Michel, a 23-year-old German woman whose death in 1976 followed years of seizures, psychiatric symptoms, medical treatment, and ultimately a series of authorized exorcisms. Her parents and two priests were later charged and convicted of negligent homicide, turning her death into a landmark case involving faith, medicine, responsibility, and the limits of personal belief. Rather than treating the case as a simple supernatural story, Josh approaches it as an attorney and investigator. What did the evidence actually show? What did Anneliese’s doctors know? What did her family believe? What information reached the priests and bishop? And when did observations about her behavior become conclusions about demonic possession? The episode follows Anneliese’s diagnosis of temporal lobe epilepsy, worsening depression and hallucinations, years of unsuccessful treatment, and the growing belief among members of her family and community that her condition might have a spiritual cause. Members of the clergy initially resisted requests for an exorcism and recommended continued medical treatment before the rite was eventually authorized in 1975. At the center of the episode is a question bigger than whether demons are real: what responsibility do people have to protect a suffering person when faith, medicine, authority, and uncertainty collide? The case raises difficult questions about confirmation bias, expertise, good intentions, medical responsibility, religious authority, and the danger of allowing one explanation to overpower every other possibility. Most importantly, the episode keeps Anneliese herself at the center of the story. Before she became internationally known because of the exorcisms performed on her, she was a student who hoped to become a teacher and live an ordinary life. This series examines not simply what people believed happened to her, but how her life was lost, what decisions were made along the way, and what the courtroom would later say about responsibility. This episode contains discussion of serious mental illness, religious distress, self-harm, neglect, and death. Viewer and listener discretion is advised. Takeaways Complex interplay of faith and mental healthImportance of context in legal cases Evidence is crucial in decision-makingReligious beliefs can complicate medical treatment Chapters 00:00 The Case of Anneliese Michel04:00 Understanding the Context of the 1970s06:00 Exploring Anneliese's Background12:09 The Impact of Religious Beliefs20:02 Medical Diagnosis and Misunderstandings28:01 The Role of Exorcism in Anneliese's Life35:47 Authority and Responsibility in Care39:57 The Importance of Evidence in Care42:06 Annalise's Deteriorating Condition45:17 Community Beliefs and Exorcism Requests48:11 The Role of Experts in the Case51:10 Decision-Making in the Church54:55 Understanding Exorcism and Its Implications01:00:23 The Complexity of Parental Decisions01:02:04 The Authorization of the Exorcism01:07:05 Annalise's Personal Beliefs and Experiences01:10:20 The Path Forward After Authorization

    The Exorcism Trial: Anneliese Michel, Faith, Medicine & the Law Part 1

  4. Oct 5

    The $54 Million Pants, Part 2: How a Pair of Pants Became a 15-Year Legal War

    What starts as a dispute over a missing pair of suit pants somehow becomes an eight-figure lawsuit, a packed courtroom, years of appeals, professional discipline, and a legal battle that refuses to die. In Part 2 of the $54 Million Pants story, Dr. Josh Carpenter follows the case through trial and beyond. The damages demand eventually climbed above $67 million before being narrowed to the roughly $54 million figure that made the case famous. The number wasn't based on the value of the pants; it came from multiplying alleged statutory violations across defendants, signs, days, legal theories, and damages provisions. But the episode goes far beyond the absurd headline. Josh examines how a relatively ordinary consumer dispute became increasingly complicated as legal theories, discovery battles, emotional investment, and the need for vindication began overtaking the underlying question: what actually happened to the pants? The case ultimately demonstrates one of litigation's most important principles—believing something happened is not the same as being able to prove it. The story also becomes a study in escalation. Josh explores confirmation bias, commitment escalation, moralization, professional overconfidence, reactance, identity fusion, and grievance amplification—not as diagnoses, but as ways of understanding how a dispute can become tied to someone's identity until compromise starts feeling like surrender. The consequences lasted far longer than the original lawsuit. The civil case, appeals, and disciplinary proceedings stretched across roughly 15 years, while the family that operated the dry cleaner ultimately endured substantial financial and emotional costs despite prevailing in court. At its core, this episode isn't really about expensive pants. It's about knowing the difference between principle and obsession, understanding the economics of litigation, recognizing when a legal theory has stopped making sense, and remembering that sometimes even winning a lawsuit can cost far more than the dispute was ever worth. Sometimes the most important skill in litigation isn't knowing how to keep fighting. It's knowing when to stop. Takeaways Legal disputes can escalate absurdlyEmotional investment complicates cases Importance of evidence in legal casesConsequences of frivolous lawsuits Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Legal Insights02:21 The Case of the $54 Million Pants05:12 Understanding Legal Demands and Claims10:41 The Role of Statutory Damages17:00 Discovery and Its Complications22:47 The Trial Begins: A Legal Showdown26:19 The Challenges of Self-Representation29:30 Emotional Investment in Legal Battles31:53 The Complexity of Trial Evidence39:30 The Verdict: Balancing Evidence40:00 Understanding Legal Burdens of Proof42:52 The Role of Evidence in Court45:47 The Appeal Process and Its Challenges50:03 Consequences of Frivolous Lawsuits54:00 Psychological Factors in Litigation01:01:08 Professional Responsibility and Ethics01:05:01 The Long-Term Impact of Legal Disputes01:09:52 Lessons Learned from the Case

    The $54 Million Pants, Part 2: How a Pair of Pants Became a 15-Year Legal War

  5. Oct 2

    All Rise: Stand Up Again — Resilience, Failure & Moving Forward

    Life has a way of knocking everyone down eventually. The question is what you do next. In this episode of the Associated Data Podcast, Dr. Josh Carpenter steps away from a traditional case analysis to explore one of the most powerful lessons hidden inside the courtroom: “All rise.” Drawing from years spent in and around courtrooms, Josh examines the history and symbolism behind courtroom traditions, the uncertainty of litigation, and the reality that even the best preparation cannot guarantee the outcome you want. A witness can change their testimony. A judge can exclude evidence. A jury can surprise you. Sometimes, despite doing everything right, you still lose. But the lesson does not end with the verdict Josh connects those courtroom experiences to the setbacks everyone eventually faces—loss, rejection, disappointment, broken plans, criticism, grief, and moments when life leaves you wondering what comes next. His answer is simple: stand up again. Failure is an event; surrender is a decision. The episode also explores why resilience does not mean pretending that something did not hurt. Sometimes moving forward means learning from a mistake, changing strategy, forgiving someone, starting over, or accepting the same instruction attorneys occasionally hear from the bench: “Counsel, move on.” Ultimately, All Rise is about refusing to let yesterday's verdict determine tomorrow's life. You may lose a battle—or several—but what happens next is still yours to decide. Stand up. Take the next step. And if life knocks you down, stand up again. Takeaways Life's challenges require resilienceCourtroom experiences reflect life lessons Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Legal Insights02:47 The Psychology of Perseverance08:00 Courtroom Decorum and History19:20 The Significance of 'All Rise'24:40 Standing Up Again in Life32:30 Learning from Losses39:52 Moving On and Continuing the Fight

    All Rise: Stand Up Again — Resilience, Failure & Moving Forward

  6. Oct 2 ·  Bonus

    The Cornell Seven: Consent, Memory, and the Court of Public Opinion

    In this episode, Dr. Josh Carpenter delves into the controversial Cornell Seven case, exploring the complexities of the allegations surrounding a gang rape incident involving fraternity members. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the truth behind the allegations, the influence of media and public opinion, and the legal intricacies involved in such cases. In this conversation, Dr. Josh Carpenter delves into the complexities surrounding a case involving allegations of sexual misconduct at a fraternity. He emphasizes the importance of memory reliability, the nuances of consent, and the challenges of navigating public opinion in the pursuit of justice. Takeaways Importance of truth in legal casesImpact of public opinion on justice Memory can be unreliableContext matters in investigations Chapters 00:00 Introduction to the Podcast02:13 Overview of the Cornell Seven Case03:43 Understanding the Allegations06:27 Media Influence and Public Perception10:00 Details of the Incident12:20 The Role of Alcohol and Consent18:00 The Aftermath and Reporting24:00 District Attorney's Response30:08 Contrasting Statements and Legal Implications40:47 The Nature of Memory and Truth47:10 Understanding Consent and Intoxication01:01:01 The Complexity of Victim Narratives01:10:04 The Role of Evidence in Justice01:19:30 Navigating Public Opinion and Justice

    The Cornell Seven: Consent, Memory, and the Court of Public Opinion

  7. Sep 25

    The $54 Million Pants Lawsuit: How a Small Dispute Spiraled

    Podcast and its focus on legal stories, principles, and lessons. It then delves into the absurdity of a lawsuit about a pair of pants, highlighting the legal battle, customer-service dispute, and the legal interpretation of a dry cleaner sign. The episode concludes with a discussion on the importance of appearance in the legal profession. The conversation delves into the significance of appearance in professional settings, highlighting the human element in a legal case, the importance of attention to detail, the development of a dispute and accusation, and the psychology of litigation, emphasizing the importance of effective communication and the potential pitfalls of being entrenched in one's position. Takeaways Legal System ComplexityConsumer Rights The significance of appearance in professional settingsThe psychology of litigation and the importance of effective communication Chapters 00:00 Introduction to the Podcast04:08 The Lawsuit About Pants08:01 The Dispute and Legal Proceedings09:05 The Legal Battle Over Pants09:53 The Customer-Service Dispute10:41 The Legal Interpretation of a Dry Cleaner Sign16:05 The Dispute Escalates27:21 The Importance of Appearance in the Legal Profession39:17 The Importance of Appearance39:44 The Human Element in the Case45:17 The Details Matter50:02 The Dispute and Accusation01:05:00 The Psychology of Litigation

    The $54 Million Pants Lawsuit: How a Small Dispute Spiraled

  8. Sep 25

    Lindsay Clancy: Was Criminal Responsibility Proven? | Deep Dive Part 7

    The narrative finale of the Lindsay Clancy trial is explored, revealing the challenges faced by the defense and prosecution. The testimony of Patrick Clancy, the emotional impact of the case, and the forensic evidence are key elements of the discussion. The Lindsay Clancy trial is a complex case involving evidence mishandling, mental illness, and the burden of proof. The investigation was flawed, and the prosecution's case lacked substantial evidence to prove Lindsay's guilt. The trial highlighted the challenges of determining criminal responsibility in cases involving severe mental illness. Takeaways Legal responsibility in the context of mental illnessThe emotional impact of a high-profile trial Evidence mishandling and flawed investigation led to a lack of substantial proof in the Lindsay Clancy trial.The case highlighted the challenges of determining criminal responsibility in cases involving severe mental illness. Chapters 00:00 Introduction to the Associates Data Podcast02:27 Personal Challenges and Life Happenings06:48 The Prosecution's Case and the Defense's Strategy29:15 The Testimony of Patrick Clancy43:41 Forensic Evidence and Crime Scene Investigation46:37 Flawed Investigation and Mishandled Evidence49:38 Challenges of Determining Criminal Responsibility51:14 The Impact of Mental Illness on Legal Proceedings56:15 The Burden of Proof in Severe Mental Illness Cases01:03:24 The Role of Experts and the War of Experts01:07:14 The Insufficiency of Evidence and the Impact on the Legal System01:25:43 The Importance of Proper Investigation and Evidence Handling

    Lindsay Clancy: Was Criminal Responsibility Proven? | Deep Dive Part 7
See All (74)

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
7 Ratings

About

The official podcast of Carpenter & Associates - where Texas law meets real talk. Listen to our team of attorneys and special guests as we pull back the curtain on the legal world with insight, humor, and unfiltered stories from the courtroom and beyond. Each episode dives into the realities of law practice, from client challenges and courtroom chaos to the lessons that shape great attorneys. Whether we're breaking down billing, sharing funny stories, or discussing what separates good lawyers from bad, The Associates Did It gives listeners an authentic look inside life at one of Texas' most dynamic litigation firms. Produced by Carpenter & Associates - Dallas, Texas.

Information

  • Creator
    Todd Cohen
  • Years Active
    2025 - 2026
  • Episodes
    74
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © 2026 Todd Cohen

You Might Also Like