Mythologizing the Bible

A Humanistic look at religious texts

Mythologizing the Bible (MTB) explores the Bible through the lens of “sacred myth.” Each week, we dive into three Bible readings, analyzing these ancient texts to uncover any helpful lessons that don't require belief in the supernatural. Whether you identify as a Christian, a non-believer, or somewhere in between, MTB offers fresh insights and new ways of thinking about stories you may already know well. www.thecodaproject.com

  1. 2d ago ·  Bonus

    Two Gods, One Chosen King?

    Cyrus was chosen by Yahweh… and Marduk. What happens when political power convinces us that our god, destiny, or history has chosen its leader? Imagine conquering an empire and then discovering that the people you’ve conquered believe their own god wanted you to win. That’s essentially what happened with Cyrus the Great. The Cyrus Cylinder portrays the Babylonian god Marduk as choosing Cyrus to rescue Babylon from an unworthy king. Meanwhile, Isaiah portrays Yahweh as choosing that very same Cyrus, even calling this foreign, non-Jewish ruler his anointed. Two gods. Two religious traditions. One remarkably well-endorsed emperor. But maybe the most interesting question isn’t which god really chose Cyrus. Maybe we should ask why human beings are so eager to believe that our leaders have been chosen at all. Because once political authority becomes part of a sacred story, accountability gets complicated. And while most of us aren’t waiting for Marduk to endorse our next president, we still tend to create messiahs, chosen leaders, indispensable billionaires, inevitable movements, and people we’re convinced are somehow destined to save us all. The mythology changes. The temptation doesn’t. So, let’s dive into that… in this episode of Afterthoughts! CODA Project is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to CODA Project at www.thecodaproject.com/subscribe

  2. 6d ago ·  Bonus

    We All “Edit” Jesus

    Why do we soften the troubling Jesus found in the Bible? Maybe our selective editing reveals something important about how human morality has evolved. I spent decades around Christianity, and I know a lot of thoughtful, compassionate Christians (including clergy who have studied scripture far more deeply than I have). They know the troubling passages are there. But when we talk about who Jesus really was, we tend to emphasize the Good Samaritan, the Beatitudes, forgiveness, compassion, and love of neighbor. When Jesus starts talking about swords, hating your family, burning cities, or throwing people into outer darkness, suddenly we need context, metaphor, translation, theology, and sometimes a pretty impressive amount of interpretive gymnastics. And that raises an uncomfortable question: If these words belong to the Jesus Christians want us to follow, why do we so often need to soften them before we’re comfortable hearing them? It would be easy for me, as an atheist and humanist, to stop there; to point at Christians and accuse them of editing Jesus into someone who better reflects their modern values. But that’s NOT where I’m gonna stop… because I think the far more interesting question isn’t whether we reinterpret the past. I think the far more interesting question is why we reinterpret the past. What moral framework are we using? And are we even willing to admit that we’re doing it? So, let’s dive into that… in this episode of Afterthoughts! CODA Project is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to CODA Project at www.thecodaproject.com/subscribe

  3. Oct 2

    The Courage to Call Out Your Own Side

    Courage means holding our own institutions accountable, resisting manufactured outrage, and defending our values when doing so comes at a cost. I’ve noticed something about courage: we tend to admire it most when someone else is paying the price. We celebrate the whistleblower who exposes corruption, the protester who challenges injustice, and the person who stands up to an abusive institution. But when the criticism turns toward a church we belong to, a political movement we support, or a leader we’ve defended for years, our enthusiasm for accountability can suddenly become a lot more complicated. Apparently, courage is a wonderful virtue right up until it threatens our own comfortable little corner of the world. We were given several important images in the Bible readings we covered in the main episode this week. Isaiah’s rotten vineyard, Paul’s advice about where we direct our attention, and Matthew’s corrupt tenants all raise a question that reaches well beyond religion: What are our values worth when practicing them carries a cost? Because courage isn’t about being fearless, and it certainly isn’t about being the loudest person in the room. It’s about what we do when fear, loyalty, and self-interest give us perfectly convenient reasons to look the other way. So, let’s dive into that… in this episode of Afterthoughts! CODA Project is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to CODA Project at www.thecodaproject.com/subscribe

About

Mythologizing the Bible (MTB) explores the Bible through the lens of “sacred myth.” Each week, we dive into three Bible readings, analyzing these ancient texts to uncover any helpful lessons that don't require belief in the supernatural. Whether you identify as a Christian, a non-believer, or somewhere in between, MTB offers fresh insights and new ways of thinking about stories you may already know well. www.thecodaproject.com