ONE MORE MISSION

JusticeForVeterans.uk

One More Mission is a JusticeForVeterans.uk podcast about what happens after service — when veterans and their families are dragged back into legacy cases with no new and compelling evidence, and the process becomes the punishment. We speak to veterans, lawyers, MPs, historians, and campaigners to cut through legal fog and political spin, ask plain questions about sovereignty and accountability, and defend a simple principle: duty offered, loyalty owed. This is not a culture-war show. It’s a serious conversation about fairness, finality, and what today’s serving personnel learn from how we treat yesterday’s.

  1. Jul 6

    The State’s Duty Does Not End When Service Does

    In this episode of One More Mission, JusticeforVeterans.uk speaks with former Parachute Regiment officer Lt Col Simon Barry about one of the central questions in the Northern Ireland legacy debate: What obligations does the state continue to owe those it sent into harm's way? The conversation examines the Armed Forces Covenant, retrospective investigations, military law, trust between government and the Armed Forces, and the wider implications for those serving today. Topics include: • The state's duty to those who serve. • The Armed Forces Covenant and whether it is being honoured. • Repeated legacy investigations. • Retrospective application of legal standards. • Accountability, finality and the rule of law. • The role of regimental associations. • The impact on serving personnel, recruitment and retention. • Whether current legacy proposals strengthen or weaken trust in government. • What a balanced legacy process might look like. Rather than focusing on personalities or political rhetoric, this discussion explores the principles that underpin the relationship between the nation and those who serve it. About One More Mission One More Mission is the podcast from JusticeforVeterans.uk, featuring in-depth conversations on the Northern Ireland legacy debate, military service, law, public policy and the Armed Forces Covenant. The aim is simple: to provide context, evidence and thoughtful discussion on issues affecting veterans and the wider military community. If you found this discussion valuable, please consider liking the video, subscribing to the channel and sharing it with others interested in these issues. #JusticeForVeterans #OneMoreMission #OperationBanner #NorthernIreland #ArmedForcesCovenant #Veterans #MilitaryHistory #BritishArmy #RuleOfLaw #Legacy

  2. Jun 11

    Healey Resigns: The Defence Question Will Not Go Away

    John Healey’s resignation as Defence Secretary has been presented as a dispute over budgets and spending targets.  In reality, it raises a much larger question: is Britain prepared to match its security challenges with the resources, policies and political decisions required to meet them? Healey reportedly concluded that it was not.  His departure follows a prolonged disagreement over defence spending, with concerns that investment is not keeping pace with the threats facing the UK and its allies. Coming ahead of a major NATO summit, the resignation inevitably focuses attention on Britain’s defence posture and long-term preparedness. JusticeforVeterans.uk asked former SAS commanders Dr Robert Parr and George Simm for their reaction. Both argued that defence cannot be reduced to equipment programmes and spending percentages alone.  They pointed to broader concerns about morale, retention, legal uncertainty, and the treatment of veterans.  Dr Parr argued that Britain faces growing pressure from adversaries operating in the grey zone between peace and conflict, while simultaneously undermining confidence among those who serve and have served.  George Simm described Healey’s resignation as the act of a politician following conviction rather than convenience and suggested that the disagreement over funding may have been only one part of a broader frustration with the direction of policy. Whether one agrees with their assessment or not, the underlying issue remains. Defence is ultimately about credibility.  Potential adversaries judge not only military hardware and budgets but also political resolve, national cohesion, and a country's willingness to support those it asks to serve.  Healey’s resignation does not end that debate. It may simply have made it harder to avoid.

  3. Apr 30

    Veterans Granted Ear at No.10 as Troubles Legislation Moves Forward

    A small delegation of senior veterans, led by former Parachute Regiment Major-General Dair Farrar-Hockley, met officials at No.10 just days after the Government voted to carry its Troubles legislation into the next parliamentary session. In this episode of One More Mission, those present speak candidly in the immediate aftermath. The meeting itself was described as cordial, with officials from the Ministry of Defence, the Northern Ireland Office, and Downing Street in attendance. While bound by confidentiality, the delegation makes clear that their concerns were heard—and, in some cases, recognised. But the underlying message is harder-edged. With around 1,200 unresolved deaths linked to Operation Banner, serious questions are raised about whether the Government’s stated aim of delivering “justice, information and answers for all” is achievable in practice—or whether the process risks becoming the punishment. Alongside this, the episode explores: WHY veterans believe the current approach repeats past failuresHOW legal processes are being experienced by those who servedWHAT is driving renewed coordination across veterans’ groupsWHETHER political pressure could yet shift the direction of the legislationFeaturing additional insight from Paul Young, this is a grounded, first-hand account from those directly involved—recorded at a moment when the issue is moving back to the centre of political and public debate. This is not history. It is ongoing. Subscribe for more episodes of One More Mission.

About

One More Mission is a JusticeForVeterans.uk podcast about what happens after service — when veterans and their families are dragged back into legacy cases with no new and compelling evidence, and the process becomes the punishment. We speak to veterans, lawyers, MPs, historians, and campaigners to cut through legal fog and political spin, ask plain questions about sovereignty and accountability, and defend a simple principle: duty offered, loyalty owed. This is not a culture-war show. It’s a serious conversation about fairness, finality, and what today’s serving personnel learn from how we treat yesterday’s.