Boys & Men Online

David Sasaki

The latest research, policy, and commentary about the online lives of boys and men. A project of the American Institute for Boys and Men. www.menonline.org

Episodes

  1. 1d ago

    Is Porn Addiction More Like Food Addiction or Alcoholism?

    Noelle Perdue is a writer, researcher, and media commentator focused on pornography, internet culture, censorship, and digital sexuality. She is known for bringing a nuanced, sex-positive but critical perspective to debates about pornography’s effects on relationships, intimacy, technology, and culture, including in the Netflix documentary Money Shot: The Pornhub Story. I first saw pornography when I was 19. Noelle’s experience was different. She first watched pornography around age 10 or 11 — much closer to the norm for today’s adolescents. Like many young people growing up online, pornography was available long before she had a lived experience of sex, intimacy, or relationships. I wanted to speak with Noelle because we approach pornography from different perspectives and generations. Noelle often defends the pornography industry against censorship, moral panic, and surveillance. I’m more concerned about pornography’s negative effects on relationships and compulsive digital habits among boys and young men. Unexpectedly, we ended up agreeing more than not. Noelle reminded me that society’s approach to sex before online pornography wasn’t ideal either. Ignorance, shame, coercion, and poor communication all pre-dated PornHub and the “tube sites.” Pornography did not create all of today’s many challenges facing sexual development. Rather, it filled a gap left by parents, schools, and policymakers unwilling to talk honestly about sex. Too often, pornography debates become moral arguments about whether porn is good or bad. But pornography is not one thing. It can support sexual exploration, but it can also replace it. It can help couples communicate about desire, or it can help them avoid difficult but necessary conversations. It can affirm a young person’s sexuality or convince them that sex is primarily a performance to be evaluated by body types, stamina, novelty, dominance, and escalation. We cover a lot of ground in this conversation, and we each reveal how our respective thinking has changed about pornography addiction, AI-generated porn, infidelity, sex education, and the ingredients of the good life. Much like gambling and gaming, the question is not whether pornography is good or bad in the abstract. My concern is less that pornography exists, and more that sexual desire is increasingly mediated by companies whose business model depends on attention, escalation, and habit formation. So where do we go from here? To start, researchers must go a level deeper: when does pornography help people live fuller embodied lives, and when does it pull them away from the lives they actually want? They’ll need funding to finance the studies, something most foundations and federal agencies have been reluctant to provide. As a starting point, and with Noelle’s helpful input, I’ve developed a list of potential positive and negative uses of pornography that ought to be tested as hypotheses, not taken as assumptions: Positive uses of pornography * Pleasure: Porn can be a source of sexual pleasure and fantasy. * Relief: Like any entertainment media, porn can offer a temporary escape from stress, anxiety, boredom, or loneliness. * Sexual curiosity: Porn can help people explore identities, fantasies, and boundaries privately before involving another person. * Affirmation: For anyone whose body type, sexuality, disability, ethnicity, age, or desires are rarely represented as attractive, porn can offer validation. * Inspiration: Porn can give individuals or couples ideas for new sexual acts, scenarios, conversations, or forms of play. * Arousal support: Porn can help some people get into an erotic mindset, especially when stress, fatigue, or mismatched libido makes desire harder to access. * Couples’ intimacy tool: Some couples use porn together to discuss desire, reduce inhibition, introduce novelty, or make sex feel more playful. * Sexual knowledge: Some people assess their sexual readiness and learn vocabulary, possibilities, or basic sexual concepts from it. Negative uses of pornography * Substitute for sex education: Porn can teach young people scripts about sex before they understand consent, communication, contraception, pleasure, or emotional intimacy. * Compulsive or habitual use: Porn can displace sleep, work, school, dating, exercise, friendships, or the life a person desires. * Avoidance of intimacy: Porn can become an easier substitute for asking someone out, repairing a relationship, tolerating loneliness, or having difficult conversations about desire. * Algorithmic escalation: Tube sites and social platforms often push users toward more extreme or attention-grabbing content, making it harder to know whether consumption reflects genuine desire or platform conditioning. * Shame and moral conflict: Some users feel guilt because their porn use conflicts with their values, politics, or religion. Shame can worsen secrecy and compulsive patterns rather than resolve them. * Unwanted exposure: Porn is no longer only something people seek out; it often finds and follows users through algorithmic feeds. * Distorted sexual scripts: Porn can normalize performance-heavy, aggressive, or one-sided sex. Some young people, especially women, report feeling pressured to engage in sexual practices they do not necessarily want. * Body image and performance anxiety: Porn can teach men that normal sex requires an unusually large penis, extreme stamina, muscular bodies, constant erection, and instant arousal. * Relationship conflict or secrecy: Pornography can be positive inside some relationships, but damaging when it is hidden, used to avoid a partner, or experienced by a partner as betrayal. * Parasocial dependency: OnlyFans and other camming platforms can blur the line between erotic entertainment and pseudo-intimacy, especially for lonely users. * AI pornography and dehumanization: Generative AI porn may remove the remaining human presence from sexual media, raising concerns about antisocial fantasy, isolation, and sexual habits increasingly detached from real human connection. What we still don’t know I’m grateful to Noelle for our conversation and for helping me think through the potential benefits and risks of pornography as it rapidly evolves from pixelated JPEG images to AI-generated, immersive virtual reality. Attempts to prohibit access to pornography rarely work and may backfire. Boys and young men will always have sexual desire and seek sexual fantasy. The task ahead is to ensure they can become men capable of restraint, consent, confidence, and real intimacy. Pornography can become less central to sexual formation if young people have access to better guidance, technology companies have fewer incentives to exploit human vulnerability, and research produces more practical answers. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.menonline.org

    47 min
  2. Apr 8

    Everything you wanted to know about pornography

    We recently published a new commentary and landscape scan at AIBM.org to kick off our work on pornography—an issue that’s widely discussed, but rarely examined with clear, evidence-based thinking. The average American boy first encounters pornography around age 12. By the time he graduates high school, he’s spent years consuming content that looks very different from what researchers have studied—or what most parents imagine. But the research hasn’t kept pace. And neither have parents, educators, policymakers, or funders. As a result, young people are navigating unprecedented, always-on access to sexually explicit content with very little guidance or honest conversation. In this episode, we bring together leading researchers to take stock of what we know, what we don’t, and where the field needs to go next. You can view a recording of the webinar below, or listen to the audio on our podcast feed. Researchers: If you are studying these questions and would like to be part of a research convening this summer, please contact David at david@aibm.org. And stay tuned as we’ll continue publishing more interviews with pornography researchers over the coming weeks and months. Finally, if you want a good laugh, here’s a clever public service announcement from New Zealand’s Keep It Real Online initiative: This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.menonline.org

    51 min
  3. Jan 27

    How boys & men seek and sustain social connection

    The myth of male loneliness? Over the past few months, we’ve seen a useful correction to the discourse about the so-called male loneliness epidemic. My colleagues Isaac Bledsoe and Ben Smith found that social isolation has increased among both men and women. In most surveys, young women actually report slightly more loneliness than young men. Sam Pressler notes that “the actual crisis of disconnection in America falls largely on the shoulders of men without college degrees.” The statistical explanation is straightforward: Americans without degrees are significantly less connected to friends and community than their college-educated peers, and the vast majority of Americans without degrees are men. Lakshya Jain at The Argument found that while men are indeed experiencing loneliness and social isolation, it’s young women under 30 who may be suffering the most, despite hardly any coverage of a female loneliness crisis. Men and women both feel disconnected; the solutions may be different The lesson here isn’t to ignore male disconnection. We ought to address disconnection for everyone, but how we cultivate social connection for boys and men may differ from what works for girls and women. Kate Murphy is the author of the new book, Why We Click: The Emerging Science of Interpersonal Synchrony. In this conversation, we discuss: * Why the “loneliness epidemic” should be reframed as a challenge of connectedness * How men and women tend to seek and sustain social connections differently * Why simply telling men to “be more vulnerable” won’t necessarily lead to more or better friendships * But removing earbuds at the gym just might * The positive and negative effects of technology on our social lives * What it would look like to build a pro-connection society In an upcoming post, we’ll share some ideas for addressing male disconnection specifically. We’d love to hear yours, too. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.menonline.org

    32 min
  4. 12/19/2025

    The best-case scenario for AI companions

    The social distancing, mask-wearing, and spike in screen time during COVID prompted fears of a social and emotional recession for children and adolescents, who today say they missed out on the formative milestones that build social skills and emotional resilience. In the years since, Pew surveys have consistently found that nearly half of U.S. teens report being online “almost constantly.” Mental health diagnoses have outpaced the growth of service providers. And rates of loneliness and isolation have increased, especially for young people. More than a third of men say they do not feel meaningfully part of any group or community. When asked who or what they think contributes to loneliness in America, technology tops the list. Into that context comes a new kind of relationship: AI companions designed to provide emotionally-tailored support and simulate reciprocal relationships. According to a new report we commissioned from behavioralist Dr Rupert Gill: * Roughly three in four U.S. teens have used an AI companion * About half are now regular users * One in five say they spend as much or more time with AI companions as with human friends * Among top AI apps, a notable share are AI companions, not productivity apps Our new report explains what that shift means for boys and young men in particular, at a moment when friendship networks are thinning, loneliness is widespread and in-person emotional support is stretched. AI companions function less like digital assistants and more like digital painkillers, capable of providing relief from loneliness, but also of producing dependence and delaying the development of coping skills. I hope you enjoy this edited version of our Substack Live conversation in which we discuss: * The similarities between the emotional tactics of AI companions and romance scammers * The promise of AI companions to build up our social skills, confidence, and self-awareness * The risk of AI companions displacing our human relationships and financially exploiting our emotional vulnerability * The current market incentives — and a possible regulatory framework — to incentivize the design of AI companions for emotional wellbeing rather than dependency and displacement. I encourage you to read Rupert’s full commentary on the AIBM website and the extended report for further analysis of the evidence gaps to fill. Thanks to Jim Geschke, Hunter, Matthew Allaire, and many others for tuning in live. As a reminder, you can subscribe to our podcast feed on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you feed your queue. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.menonline.org

    30 min

About

The latest research, policy, and commentary about the online lives of boys and men. A project of the American Institute for Boys and Men. www.menonline.org