D-Minus Diaries Podcast

Jim Jones Writes

Life changes one small step at a time. Sometimes we walk alone, sometimes with others, and sometimes we feel completely lost in a crowded room. But no matter where we stand, our stories matter — yours and mine. And somewhere between them is the truth we’re all trying to figure out. The D-Minus Diaries is a place for anyone learning, stumbling, rebuilding, or pushing forward when life refuses to give clear instructions. No topic is off limits. We talk about self-reliance, critical thinking, forgiveness, humor, failure, resilience, how politics shapes us, getting screwed over, and the life lessons that show up uninvited. Some stories are funny, some sting, and some remind us how thin the line is between chaos and clarity. I share experiences from an adopted kid in the Appalachian mountains with a D-minus average who went from bag boy to the Coast Guard, to Special Forces, to decades as a senior civil servant supporting America’s most elite units and its veterans. This podcast isn’t just about where I’ve been. It’s about where you’re going. New episodes weekly. Best enjoyed while driving. If you want it even shorter or punchier, I can cut it down again. dminusdiaries.substack.com

  1. 2d ago

    By Order of the President

    By Jim Jones I am going to start off with a philosophical question. We say we are a country of laws. In the military you take an oath where actions have consequences. Whether it is a civilian courtroom or military courts-martial if the act is so horrible and the death penalty is given but not executed, have we not undermined the whole process? In a country where half of the people hate what the other half thinks, it is hard to find peace. Last week it was about a botched execution in Tennessee. This week is about a military officer who by definition became a traitor when he killed his fellow soldiers and military civilian. He was also a doctor who broke his oath “to do no harm”. He was tried, convicted, and sentenced to death by a military court-martial. Once President Trump approved his execution, the Secretary of War said it would be public, which caused outrage among many people. It is my observation that some of the same people in the media and on social media who cheered when President Trump and Charlie Kirk were shot are now outraged by the idea that a murderer would be executed by a firing squad. Unlike the civilian justice system, the military operates under a different court system, where punishments are often harsh. Those punishments are based in law. In 2011, President Barack Obama reportedly made a startling observation about his administration’s counterterrorism operations. According to the 2013 book Double Down, Obama told advisers, “Turns out I’m really good at killing people.” The remark reportedly came on the same day a U.S. drone strike killed Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen, in Yemen. His administration had deliberately targeted an American citizen for death without a criminal trial. Meanwhile, Hasan, who murdered his fellow Americans at Fort Hood, was prosecuted for murder rather than terrorism. Under the Obama administration, it was acceptable to target an American citizen overseas as a terrorist, without a trial, but when an Army major opened fire on his fellow soldiers at home, the Pentagon called it “workplace violence”? The first soldier executed after a court-martial in George Washington’s Continental Army was Thomas Hickey, a member of Washington’s own guard. A general court-martial convicted him on June 26, 1776, of mutiny, sedition, and treacherous correspondence with the enemy. The next day Washington approved the sentence in his general orders and directed that Hickey be hanged at eleven o’clock the following morning. On June 28, near the Bowery then a rural area on the outskirts of New York City, Hickey was publicly hanged before an estimated 20,000 soldiers and civilians. Washington said he hoped Hickey’s fate would be “a warning to every soldier in the Army.” From the Commanding General of the Continental Army to the President of the United States, the authority to approve military executions has rested with the nation’s highest military leadership. With the stroke of a pen, he could spare a man’s life or allow the military to take it. No matter how many generals, lawyers, politicians, or polls weighed in, the final decision in those cases rested with the President of the United States. Here we are, more than 250 years later, preparing to witness another chapter in that long military tradition. On October 2, 2026, President Donald Trump approved the death sentence of former Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the man convicted of the Fort Hood killings. The Army has scheduled his execution for December 3, 2026, and the method will be a firing squad. After President Trump approved Hasan’s execution, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced plans to livestream it, sparking controversy. However, President Trump later rejected the livestream, and while victims’ families may be permitted to witness the execution, it remains unclear whether the general public will be allowed to attend. If the execution proceeds, it will be the first carried out by the United States military in more than 65 years. Having spent much of my adult life in uniform, I find the history, the regulations, and the traditions surrounding military executions fascinating and sometimes frustrating. Few realize that the President serves as the Commander in Chief and is the final approving authority before a military death sentence can be carried out. President Lincoln became famous for granting pardons, particularly to young soldiers who had fallen asleep on guard duty or deserted out of fear. He was reportedly troubled by the thought of a boy being shot simply because exhaustion had overcome him. Did you catch that? Just falling asleep could get you killed in the military, but Lincoln was not opposed to every execution. Lincoln also authorized the execution of Dakota Indians following their war with the United States. In 1862, following the U.S.-Dakota War in Minnesota, a military commission sentenced 303 Dakota men to death. The Dakota men were not U.S. soldiers and were not subject to ordinary U.S. Army courts-martial. They were tried by a military commission, whose jurisdiction and fairness remain subjects of historical criticism. Lincoln ordered the cases reviewed and ultimately approved 39 executions. One man received a reprieve, and on December 26, 1862, 38 Dakota men were hanged at Mankato, Minnesota. It is a remarkable contradiction. The President remembered for his compassion and the Emancipation Proclamation also authorized the largest mass execution in our nation’s history. On November 5, 2009, gunfire started at Fort Hood Texas. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, a military psychiatrist, started yelling Allah Akbar, and opened fire inside the Soldier Readiness Processing Center, where soldiers were getting medical checks and paperwork before deployment. When it was over, 13 people were dead, and 31 others had been wounded. Hasan was convicted of 13 murders, but one of those victims was pregnant with a 3-month old baby. Court records show that Private Francheska Velez just returned from Iraq and was crying, “my baby, my baby”, and then he shot her. Her unborn child’s death was never separately charged. Note: Military law actually allowed prosecutors to charge Hasan for the unborn child’s death. Article 119a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice specifically provides for a separate offense when an attack causes the death of an unborn child. For reasons that remain unclear, Army prosecutors did not pursue the additional charge. The rampage stopped when Sergeant Kimberly Munley and Sergeant Mark Todd, both Department of the Army civilian police officers confronted Major Hasan. Munley initially exchanged gunfire with Hasan and was shot in the hand and leg. She fell to the ground but continued firing until her gun malfunctioned. Hasan came over to her to shoot her again but his gun malfunctioned. He reloaded and continued picking people off. Sergeant Mark Todd then confronted Hasan and shot him multiple times, ending the attack. Hasan survived but was left paralyzed from the chest down. He was convicted of 13 murders and 32 counts of attempted murder. Note: 31 people was shot, but he missed one, resulting in 32 counts. In approximately ten minutes, reports say that Hasan fired 214 rounds and still had 177 rounds available and 16 magazines. He not only shot inside the building but went outside and shot people on the ground as other soldiers were trying to provide first aid before being shot himself. What followed was another controversy. During the Obama administration, the Department of Defense faced criticism for treating the attack as workplace violence rather than terrorism. The distinction was more than political terminology. It affected how the victims were recognized and whether they qualified for certain military honors and benefits. Congress eventually changed the eligibility requirements, allowing qualifying victims to receive Purple Hearts. Most Americans understand that the President is Commander in Chief of the armed forces. We associate that authority with sending troops into combat, directing military operations, and making decisions about national defense. But there is another responsibility that rarely makes the evening news. Under Article 57 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the President must approve a military death sentence before it can be carried out. That authority is not simply a tradition or an executive preference. It is federal law, enacted by Congress. The UCMJ establishes which military offenses may carry the death penalty. Article 18 authorizes general courts-martial to impose legally permitted punishments, including death for designated offenses. Article 118 covers murder, including premeditated murder. Article 52 establishes the unanimity requirements for capital cases, while Rule for Courts-Martial 1004 provides additional requirements for imposing a death sentence. The case must then pass through an extensive legal review process. Military appellate courts examine the conviction and sentence. Legal recommendations and clemency materials move through the chain of command, eventually reaching the President. Older military references identify Article 71 as the source of presidential approval authority. Congress subsequently moved that requirement to Article 57, effective in 2019. The Army announced that Hasan’s execution would take place at Fort Hood at 1 p.m. Central Time. The Secretary of the Army determines the method, date, and location under Army Regulation 190-55, Procedures for Military Executions, and in this case, the selected method is a firing squad. Now, before someone asks how a federal judge can interfere with an order from the Commander in Chief, there is another important distinction. The President’s approval does not eliminate judicial review. Hasan has exhausted his direct appeals, but he has not necessarily exhausted his legal options. Habeas corpus offers a narrow opportunity for federal court re

  2. Sep 18

    The Threesome You Didn’t Know You Were In

    The Threesome You Didn’t Know You Were In By Jim Jones You thought you married your spouse. Turns out Uncle Sam moved into the spare bedroom and brought paperwork. Inspired by Julie Nolke and Ryan George’s “The First Couple To Ever Get Married,” this D-Minus episode looks at marriage as a promise, a covenant, a financial arrangement, and a legal status. And asks a question: If your marriage license had to be renewed every five years, would you treat each other differently? Listen to D-Minus Diaries Your Way Links: The First Couple To Ever Get Married States with Adultery Charges Polk County Sheriff's Office & Adultery Charge Don't use podcasts? No problem. Click YouTube below and press Play. You do not need to know anything about podcasts to listen. ·       YouTube: Watch or listen. The easiest choice if you do not normally use podcast apps. Open ·       Apple Podcasts: A good choice for iPhone and iPad users. Open ·       Spotify: Listen in the Spotify app or website. Open ·       Overcast: For listeners who use the Overcast podcast app. Open ·       Pocket Casts: For listeners who use the Pocket Casts app. Open Read and Follow ·       D-Minus Diaries on Substack: dminusdiaries.substack.com ·       X: @jimjoneswrites Please Like, Follow, Subscribe, or Share wherever you listen. It helps D-Minus Diaries reach new readers and listeners more than you know. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit dminusdiaries.substack.com

  3. Sep 4

    Point of No Return

    By Jim Jones When I was in Special Forces, we had an acronym called PONR, pronounced “PO-NAR.” It stood for “Point of No Return.” In simple terms, there comes a point during a mission when you have gone too far, burned too much fuel, or committed too many resources to simply turn around and go back where you started. You have to keep going. Lately, I have been wondering if life has a Point of No Return. There is something about hitting 60 that changes the way you look at time. The hourglass seems to move faster, and somebody apparently keeps flipping the thing over when you aren’t looking. When you are young, time seems unlimited. At 20, wasting a year does not seem like a big deal because you have plenty more where that came from. At 30, you are still building things, careers, families, bank accounts, debt, and sometimes all four at once. Something happens during every decade. Some of it is physical, some is mental, and some of it is simply life changing around you. In our 20s, we know everything. The world is waiting, and we are pretty sure it has been waiting specifically for us. We have plenty of time, plenty of energy, and absolutely no appreciation for either one. We make decisions based on confidence instead of experience, stay out too late, spend money we don’t have, and recover from mistakes before breakfast. At that age, the future feels so far away that getting old seems like something that happens to other people. In the 30s, some people are starting a family, buying a home, having kids, and sadly, getting divorced. In some places, people in their late thirties are finally moving out of their parents’ house. In the mountains, some people in their late thirties are becoming grandparents. And these days, with divorce, housing prices, and bad decisions, some of them are moving right back in with their parents and grandparents. For me, my 30s was tough. Not only was I in the military, I went to night school for a bachelor’s degree, lost a child, got divorced (#1), took a reassignment, moved, got custody of my son, and finished a master’s degree while still on active duty. Somewhere in the middle of all that, around 35, my aunt passed away. She and my uncle had no children, and it turned out they had quietly named me medical power of attorney for him and executor of both their wills. Nobody told me any of this until she was gone. So, I inherited an uncle. I didn’t take it as a bad thing. I considered it an honor to be trusted that way. By Army standards, especially in Special Forces, I was becoming an old man. My medical records were bigger than my Bible, and I decided to focus on my son and let young guys do young guy things. I hit my 20 years of service and retired at 39. It was not easy. At that time, I was a single parent of one 14-year-old boy. My brother and I had to put our mom in a nursing home. Another move, a new job, and a new chapter. As I approached my last months in the Army, I noticed I wasn’t the only one getting old. The conversations around the team room were about work, war stories, comrades who didn’t make it, families, aches and pains, how to fill out disability paperwork, chicks, and the big question, “What’s next?” Then you hit 40. Somewhere around 40, you begin realizing you have burned a lot more fuel than you thought. This is traditionally called the midlife crisis. In my forties, I was averaging about three of them a year. People buy sports cars, motorcycles, boats, guitars, gym memberships, and other things designed to convince themselves that they are still young. Of course, I did them all. My son joined the Army, I started a new career, got remarried (#2), had a knee replacement (#1), and moved a few more times. Then came my 50s. The fifties are when you start noticing generational changes. You begin using phrases like “Back in my day,” “That’s not how we did it,” and “Kids today.” Once you hear yourself saying those things, congratulations, you have officially become one of the people you used to make fun of. As for me, I was doing well at work. I seemed to have hit my stride. I started making better decisions. At least I think I did. I could afford most of the things I wanted, and a new motorcycle. I also got another knee replacement (#2), divorced (#2), and remarried (#3). In your 50s, your body begins changing too. Some people age gracefully. AARP says you are a senior citizen at 50 (yes, you can pay for that privilege). At 55, most places offer a senior citizens discount. Others begin changing shape. Hair starts disappearing from the top of your head and mysteriously reappearing on your ears, shoulders, and back. Apparently, hair doesn’t die. It relocates. Extra skin starts showing up in places where you don’t remember ordering it. You discover that sleeping wrong can now cause an injury. Somewhere along the way, a good bowel movement becomes a noteworthy accomplishment. You probably won’t post it on Facebook, but you will consider calling somebody. Then you hit 60, and that one felt different to me. I began noticing that my “wedding and funeral suit” is being used considerably more for funerals. The conversations changed too. Now we talk about friends and family who didn’t make it, families, aches and pains, 401ks, Medicare, Social Security, chicks, and once again, “What’s next?” Apparently, chicks remain an important topic throughout the entire male life cycle. I sold a sports car, kept piling miles on the motorcycle, bought a new guitar, and got a neck replacement and prostate surgery. I moved back home (thanks to telework), retired, and decided to write these articles. Although I still don’t know what to call this work. Is it an article, blog, podcast, or just some guy yapping? Another strange thing happens in your sixties. Everybody becomes a medical expert. Get five people over 60 sitting around a table and within 20 minutes somebody will discuss a medical procedure in enough detail to ruin everybody’s lunch. I don’t have a medical degree, but I can now have a reasonably intelligent conversation about the numbers of one’s blood pressure, cholesterol, PSA, cataracts, knees, hips, medications, colonoscopies, and things that would have cleared the room when I was 30. Our doctors have us on more medication than our bathroom countertop can hold. Oh, and at 65, Medicare shows up. For most of us, Part A is free, Part B comes with a bill, and after a lifetime of carrying plastic insurance cards, Medicare hands you a piece of paper, like my 1976 driver’s license was. What they should do at this age is just send you a medical degree with it, because this group seems to know more about the medical system than most of the staff at a doctor’s office. Give someone in their 60s a prescription pad, and we are all set. By your 70s, you have pretty much earned the right to quit pretending you care what everybody thinks. You can wear whatever you want, eat dinner at 4:30, fall asleep in the recliner during the evening news, and call it “resting my eyes.” B***h about technology and why you can’t find anything on a TV with 600 stations. You also begin receiving senior discounts without being asked if you are a senior, which is society’s polite way of saying, “We know you’re getting close, so here’s 10 percent off.” By your 80s, I think all bets are off. If you make it that far, you should be allowed to say whatever you want. Nobody should correct you. Nobody should rush you. And if you want to tell the same story for the fifth time, everybody should sit there and listen because you have probably outlived half the people who could fact-check it anyway. Somewhere beyond 90, you aren’t old anymore. You are historical. At that point, people stop asking how old you are and start asking what black-and-white TV was like and, “Who was Elvis?” I have also discovered another mathematical principle of aging. I call it my 3X Rule. Right now, my multiplier is about three. It takes me roughly three times longer to accomplish the same physical task that I could do in my twenties. A project that once took an hour now requires three hours, six tools, two breaks, and at least three trips to Lowe’s. Getting underneath something isn’t the problem. Getting back up is. But there is another side to aging. I may be slower physically, but I think I am smarter about how I use my energy. At least I hope I am. I look for ways to save time, save effort, and save money. I have also become much better at recognizing people who are pushing rocks uphill for absolutely no reason. When I was younger, I might have helped them push. Now I tend to stand there, look at the hill, look at the rock, and ask, “Why the hell do you want that rock up there?” Maybe that is wisdom. Or maybe I am just tired. Either way, it works. Life expectancy is something I hate to think about, but looking back, I think that is why when we hit our 40s things start to feel heavy. It is the gravity of the downward side of the Bell Curve. The average American life expectancy is somewhere around the upper seventies, with women generally living longer than men. But averages can be misleading. I don’t know if this is factually true, but they say married men live longer, but I have noticed they’re more willing to die. If you have already made it to 65, statistically, you may still have many years remaining. That sounds encouraging until you think about how fast the last 20 years went. Twenty years ago doesn’t feel very long anymore. That is where aging begins changing your relationship with time. When you are 25, wasting an afternoon doesn’t seem like much. When you are 65, you understand that afternoon is part of a limited inventory. You don’t get it back. Maybe that is why older people sometimes seem impatient. Maybe we aren’t necessarily angrier. Maybe we are simply becoming less willing to waste what remains. We don’t want meet

    Point of No Return

About

Life changes one small step at a time. Sometimes we walk alone, sometimes with others, and sometimes we feel completely lost in a crowded room. But no matter where we stand, our stories matter — yours and mine. And somewhere between them is the truth we’re all trying to figure out. The D-Minus Diaries is a place for anyone learning, stumbling, rebuilding, or pushing forward when life refuses to give clear instructions. No topic is off limits. We talk about self-reliance, critical thinking, forgiveness, humor, failure, resilience, how politics shapes us, getting screwed over, and the life lessons that show up uninvited. Some stories are funny, some sting, and some remind us how thin the line is between chaos and clarity. I share experiences from an adopted kid in the Appalachian mountains with a D-minus average who went from bag boy to the Coast Guard, to Special Forces, to decades as a senior civil servant supporting America’s most elite units and its veterans. This podcast isn’t just about where I’ve been. It’s about where you’re going. New episodes weekly. Best enjoyed while driving. If you want it even shorter or punchier, I can cut it down again. dminusdiaries.substack.com