Dad, Did We Just Break America?

The Ribotsky Institute

What started out as dinner table conversation; part debate, part disbelief, turned into an ongoing attempt to make sense of the moment we're living in. "Dad, Did We Just Break America?" brings together two people from different generations trying to untangle how we got here - politically, culturally, and generationally, and what it says about where we might be headed. Because we can't be the only ones asking the question.

  1. 6d ago

    Nothing is What it Seems: Truth, Facts, & An "Altercation" at 35,000 feet

    How did we get to a point where the world seems more willing to condemn the people fighting terrorism than the people responsible for it? There was something almost surreal about watching the United Nations General Assembly this year. The president of Iran stood before the world representing a regime that brutally represses its own people, funds and arms terrorists, threatens Israel’s existence, and then portrayed Iran as the victim. He denied targeting civilians. The room listened. Benjamin Netanyahu took the same podium. Delegates walked out. The problem is not disagreement. The problem is what happens when facts become optional. At some point, “context” stops being a way to understand what happened and becomes a way to explain away what is directly in front of us. The United Nations was created in the aftermath of World War II and the Holocaust, after six million Jews were systematically massacred, while the world catastrophically failed to protect them. It was supposed to represent a promise that the world would never allow something like that to happen again... to anyone. More than eighty years later, the world that once failed to protect the Jews has somehow found itself walking out on them. There is an ugliness to that irony that should be impossible to miss. And perhaps an even uglier question underneath it: when did refusing to call something what it is become a virtue? A co-pilot stabbed his captain at 35,000 feet and attempted to hijack a commercial flight bound for Tel Aviv. Israeli passengers fought their way into the cockpit and stopped him. The headlines called it an “altercation.” A “brawl.” A “fight.” A “struggle.” Words so absurdly small for what happened that they almost tell a story of their own. At some point, the question isn’t whether we need more context. It’s why we have become so reluctant to call evil by its name.

  2. Sep 3

    The House of Wintour: Out of Vogue

    How many times should John Galliano have to pay for the same crime? Fifteen years after antisemitic and racist remarks destroyed his reputation and career, Galliano is still being asked to pay for them. He was convicted. He was disgraced. He lost nearly everything. He apologized, got sober, rebuilt his life and career, and spent more than a decade living with what he did. If that still isn’t enough, what exactly would be? And what happens when someone with the power to decide who gets welcomed back, who gets shut out, and whose past can never be escaped has never been forced to answer for her own? Because Galliano didn’t choose to honor himself at the Met Gala. Anna Wintour chose him. She bestowed the honor—and when the backlash came, his supposed longtime friend was nowhere to be found. Galliano took the fall. Anna called him courageous for doing it. For decades, Wintour has been celebrated as an icon while accounts of her cruelty, elitism, and treatment of others have become almost legendary themselves. But take away the sunglasses, the front rows, and the cultural cachet, and a far more troubling picture emerges. Because the questions surrounding Anna go beyond whether she is cruel. We look at the views, choices, and contradictions that have gone largely unanswered, including what we see as a glaring double standard when it comes to antisemitism: an industry that would rightfully recoil at hatred directed toward other minority groups has too often seemed willing to look the other way when that hatred is directed at Jews. And when virtually nothing surrounding the Met Gala happens without Anna Wintour’s approval—down to who sits where; it becomes much harder to separate those choices from the woman making them. At some point, the question isn’t simply what Anna tolerates. It’s what her choices tell us about what she believes. The deeper question isn’t how Anna Wintour became so powerful. It’s how someone with this many questions surrounding her character, her choices, and perhaps even her beliefs became so untouchable—and why an entire industry spent decades turning the very things that should have made us question her into reasons to revere her. For years, the sunglasses, the power, and the mythology made it easy to look away. Maybe Anna Wintour hasn’t changed at all. Maybe what’s changed is that we’re finally being forced to look directly at—and reckon with—who the woman behind the sunglasses has been all along.

About

What started out as dinner table conversation; part debate, part disbelief, turned into an ongoing attempt to make sense of the moment we're living in. "Dad, Did We Just Break America?" brings together two people from different generations trying to untangle how we got here - politically, culturally, and generationally, and what it says about where we might be headed. Because we can't be the only ones asking the question.