Injustice for All with Robert Simels

Robert Simels

Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over the course of his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials. As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged. Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness. Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  1. Navigating Mental Health in the Criminal Justice System

    Mar 5

    Navigating Mental Health in the Criminal Justice System

    Mental Disabilities in Criminal Defense and DOJ Appointment Controversies Host Robert Simels introduces his background as former prosecutor, longtime defense attorney, and former inmate, then criticizes prosecutorial ethics and discusses legal challenges tied to Trump DOJ U.S. attorney appointments, including the Comey prosecution where U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan allegedly secured an indictment without a grand jury vote and related appointments-clause disputes likely headed to appellate courts. Simels then interviews New York-based defense attorney Elizabeth Kelley, who practices nationwide representing clients with serious mental illness, intellectual/developmental disabilities (including autism and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder), and neurocognitive disorders like dementia. Kelley explains the need for specialized forensic mental health evaluations to connect diagnosis to conduct for plea negotiations, sentencing mitigation, and competency issues; describes barriers to experts, court time, and BOP conditions; discusses autism’s impact on interrogation and testimony (citing an amicus brief in Sam Bankman-Fried’s case); and advocates humanizing clients and using preferred, person-first language. 00:47 Host Background And Mission 02:00 Comey Case Grand Jury Misstep 08:10 Appointments Clause Showdown 11:49 Meet Elizabeth Kelly 15:03 How Her Specialty Began 17:50 Building A Mental Health Defense 21:45 Finding And Funding Experts 26:52 Making Disability Matter In Court 31:54 Training Lawyers And Changing Culture 35:16 Time Pressures And Court Buy In 38:51 Do Prosecutors Cooperate 39:01 Prosecutors Start to Listen 42:58 CTE Claims Need Proof 45:19 Prisons as Mental Health Warehouses 48:35 Fixing Treatment Behind Bars 49:35 Danbury Special Skills Critique 53:39 Dementia Defense Playbook 58:00 Second Look and Expert Access 01:02:31 SBF Autism and Trial Strategy 01:07:23 Autism on the Witness Stand 01:13:32 Narrative Medicine for Lawyers 01:16:56 Person First Language Matters Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    1h 20m
  2. Behind Bars: A Deep Dive into America's Prison System

    Mar 3

    Behind Bars: A Deep Dive into America's Prison System

    Inside the Federal Bureau of Prisons: Leadership Turmoil, Sentencing Reality, and Why the System Fails Host Robert Simels introduces “Injustice for All” and criticizes Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI head Patel for using personal attacks and avoiding answers in congressional hearings, including on the Epstein files, arguing this undermines public trust and transparency despite FOIA’s limits. Simels also cites politicized or flawed prosecutions (including an indictment of James Comey), a judge forced to resign in New Hampshire, and a ruling finding Alina Habba’s appointment as New Jersey U.S. Attorney illegal, potentially tainting cases. He then interviews prison expert Walter Pavlo, who explains BOP structure, security levels, DSCC designation and sentence computation, the decisive role of the PSR, and how public safety factors/management variables affect placement. Pavlo describes leadership turnover, staffing shortages, failing infrastructure, widespread cell phones, incomplete First Step Act/Second Chance Act implementation due to unchanged halfway-house capacity and limited programming, aging-inmate medical challenges, concerns about privatization, and his advocacy work and writing for Forbes. 02:14 Decorum and Bondi Hearing 04:38 Epstein Files and FOIA Limits 10:17 Politicized Prosecutions 15:37 System Failures and Bad Appointments 18:45 Introducing Walter Pavlo 21:06 What the BOP Does 22:46 The Federal Prison Guidebook 24:12 Prisonology and Mitigation Help 25:20 Security Levels Explained 27:13 Sentencing Strategy and Programs 29:51 PSR The Document That Rules 34:22 DSCC Designation and Computation 39:18 Public Safety and Management Variables 43:39 Working With DSCC to Fix Errors 44:38 Advocating to BOP 45:21 Director Turnover Explained 47:46 Budget Boost and Outlook 49:12 Union Loss and Staffing Crunch 51:14 Augmentation Non-Guard Roles 53:53 Case Managers and Counselors 55:08 Deputy Director Josh Smith 57:29 First Step Act Problems 59:22 Halfway Houses Bottleneck 01:02:13 Ineligible Crimes and Incentives 01:04:11 Facility Disrepair and Safety 01:06:25 Cell Phones and Contraband Economy 01:10:47 Aging and Medical Release Gaps 01:12:20 Private Prisons Debate 01:14:18 Why He Writes and CARES Act 01:17:05 Final Thoughts and Wrap Up Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    1h 18m
  3. Behind the Scenes of Goodfellas: A Journey from Courtrooms to Hollywood

    Feb 27

    Behind the Scenes of Goodfellas: A Journey from Courtrooms to Hollywood

    Goodfellas Anniversary, Prosecutorial Power, and Alleged Politicization of U.S. Justice Host Robert Simels opens “Injustice for All” by marking the 35th anniversary of Goodfellas and recounting his role in events that led to the book and film. He describes being appointed in May 1980 to represent Henry Hill, learning Hill was a key link to the Lufthansa Airport robbery investigation, and negotiating Hill’s witness protection deal by demanding dismissal of Nassau County charges and no federal prosecution. He then explains how he and Hill agreed to split interest in Hill’s life story, how Simon & Schuster ultimately approved the project after initial rejection, how author Nicholas Pileggi was chosen with Hill’s approval, and how the book became a New York Times bestseller that led to the film deal involving director Martin Scorsese and producer Irwin Winkler. Simels then shifts to broader themes about systemic corruption and prosecutorial power, stating the system is manipulated regardless of politics and previewing future episodes with guests from law enforcement and related fields. He discusses forum shopping in criminal and civil cases and cites examples involving social-issue litigation and President Trump’s New York Times lawsuit filed in Tampa, which a conservative judge dismissed as an improper “screed” and allowed to be refiled without biographical and political material. Finally, Simels previews upcoming interviews with former FBI agents and criticizes FBI Director Kash Patel’s conduct in congressional hearings, alleged inexperience, restructuring of FBI leadership and counterintelligence, handling of a recent shooting investigation while dining at Rao’s, and alleged loyalty tests. He describes a lawsuit by former senior FBI officials Brian Driscoll, Steven Jensen, and Spencer Evans alleging firings tied to political loyalty and portraying Patel as executing White House and DOJ directives, including references to Stephen Miller. Sims closes by saying the series will continue examining how to restore the justice system’s integrity. 00:19 Goodfellas Anniversary Setup 00:54 Meeting Henry Hill 03:41 Negotiating Witness Deal 05:12 Nassau Breaks Agreement 08:09 Selling The Life Story 12:14 From Bestseller To Scorsese 13:08 Systemic Corruption Today 14:49 Forum Shopping Explained 17:38 Trump NYT Lawsuit Fiasco 21:54 DOJ As Personal Weapon 27:59 Targeting Schiff Bolton 30:01 Holman Sting Dropped 31:32 Presidential Prejudicing Comments 33:24 Removing Oversight Watchdogs 35:32 NYPD Misconduct Under Adams 40:30 Loyalty Tests And Lawsuit Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    44 min
  4. The Truth About Mamdani's Justice Reform Proposals

    Feb 24

    The Truth About Mamdani's Justice Reform Proposals

    Host Robert Simels of “Injustice for All” addresses Mr. Mandami, saying his criminal justice reform proposals are unrealistic and offering to explain why. Simels emphasizes the importance of defense attorneys “testing” the system, citing John Adams defending British soldiers after the 1770 Boston incident as an example of rule of law over mob rule. He also points to the Fulton County, Georgia Trump election-interference case, describing how defense investigation revealed a conflict involving DA Fani Willis and a special prosecutor, leading the Georgia Supreme Court to disqualify Willis and her office and, in Simels’ view, effectively ending the case. Simels then critiques political rhetoric and focuses on Manami’s NYC platform: closing Rikers Island by 2027, creating a billion-dollar Department of Community Safety with psychologists and social workers, cutting police overtime, taxing the wealthy, changing misdemeanor enforcement, and altering bail practices. Simels argues these plans overlook practical and legal constraints: federal litigation over Rikers before Judge Swain (SDNY) has led to contempt findings against the city and an order to appoint an independent remediation manager, which would limit mayoral control over the Department of Correction and potentially union rules. He describes Rikers as inhumane and dysfunctional, citing violence, poor medical care, suicides/deaths, officer disengagement, union protections, and massive spending. He questions whether borough-based jails will work, noting prior “house of detention” facilities did not function well. On policing, Simels discusses stop-and-frisk litigation, the disbanding and relabeling of anti-crime units, CompStat under Bratton/Maples, and current officer behavior (e.g., phone use), arguing culture change across roughly 30,000 officers is difficult. He raises concerns about dispatching non-police responders to potentially dangerous incidents and challenges the feasibility of funding through taxing the rich, arguing wealthy taxpayers may avoid or leave. Simels says a mayor cannot change New York State bail statutes and also cannot direct independently elected district attorneys, who set their own policies, nor control federal law enforcement task forces. He disputes claims that large police-misconduct settlement figures can reliably be redirected to new initiatives, citing that 2024 payouts included older protest-related cases and other outliers. Finally, Simels details how NYC criminal cases and jail-to-court logistics are slowed by multiple agencies and unions (police, corrections, court officers) and lengthy processing, often resulting in defendants spending a full day in transport/holding without appearing in court. He concludes by urging Manami to engage with the court and remediation manager, understand the system’s structure and constraints, and develop workable implementation plans. 00:00 Opening Challenge 01:22 Why Defense Matters 04:04 Fulton County Case Fallout 06:31 Politicians and Promises 07:46 Mandami Reform Agenda 10:33 Rikers Closure Plan 12:43 Federal Takeover Reality 17:42 Union Power at Rikers 20:17 Policing and Stop Frisk 24:24 Community Safety Problems 28:22 Misdemeanors and Discretion 31:28 Bail Limits and Authority 34:06 Excessive Force Myth 39:00 Terror and Diplomacy Limits 41:01 Mayors vs District Attorneys 45:13 How Cases Really Move 46:04 Court Transport Breakdown 50:48 Final Advice and Signoff Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    51 min
  5. Beyond the Beats: The Untold Story of Murder Inc.

    Jan 30

    Beyond the Beats: The Untold Story of Murder Inc.

    In this episode of 'Injustice For All,' host Robert Simels interviews his friend Chris Lorenzo, known to the public as Chris Gotti, co-founder of the music label Murder Inc. Alongside his brother Irv Gotti, Chris discusses their journey in building Murder Inc., which featured artists like Ashanti and Ja Rule. They delve into the federal prosecution they faced in the early 2000s due to alleged connections with narcotic trafficker Kenneth 'Supreme' McGriff. Throughout the interview, Chris explains the experience of being indicted, the impact on their business, and surviving the legal battle until their acquittal. Furthermore, the episode critiques the current and historical issues within the criminal justice system, highlighting cases of alleged judicial and governmental overreach. The discussion extends to Robert's analysis of the justice system's failings, recent legal controversies, and personal anecdotes from Chris about his business ventures post-Murder Inc., including ventures in sports management and filmmaking. 00:00 Introduction to the Podcast 00:25 Meet Chris Gotti: The Rise of Murder Inc. 01:41 The Week in Review: Justice System Critique 02:51 The Federal Indictments and Political Retribution 08:03 Challenges in the Criminal Justice System 10:40 The Case of the Sandwich Guy 14:00 Animal Rights Activism and Legal Battles 16:05 Chris Gotti's Early Life and Career Beginnings 17:59 Building Murder Inc.: From Humble Beginnings to Success 43:33 The Federal Investigation and Its Impact 48:42 The Murder Inc. Formula 49:45 Misunderstandings and Misinterpretations 52:24 Hiring Ex-Cons: A Positive Impact 56:34 The Kenneth Supreme McGriff Connection 01:00:39 Indictment and Legal Battles 01:15:26 Life After Murder Inc. 01:16:32 Current Ventures and Future Plans 01:28:45 Reflections and Closing Thoughts Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    1h 31m
  6. How Sentencing Really Works in the Criminal Justice System

    Jan 24

    How Sentencing Really Works in the Criminal Justice System

    In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' the host discusses the intricacies and flaws of the criminal justice system with Mark Allenbaugh, a sentencing and mitigation specialist. Mark explains the different components of the criminal justice process, emphasizing the significance of sentencing. He delves into the evolution and impact of the United States Sentencing Guidelines introduced in 1987, highlighting issues such as the decline in federal trial litigators and the effect of binding guidelines. Mark also discusses key concepts like downward departures, variances, restitution, and forfeiture, while critiquing the advisory nature of the guidelines post-2005. Additionally, they talk about the potential implications of the upcoming Ellenburg case on restitution and the importance of collateral attacks. The episode underscores the need for a more just and effective sentencing system and serves as an educational forum for understanding the complexities of federal sentencing. 00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All 00:24 Understanding the Criminal Justice System 01:03 The Impact of Sentencing Guidelines 02:08 The Decline of Federal Trials 05:50 The Role of Prosecutors 15:58 The Sentencing Commission and Its Influence 16:27 Mark Allenbaugh's Background and Role 20:37 The Evolution of Sentencing Guidelines 26:28 The Sentencing Table Explained 33:14 The Importance of Sentencing Data 38:22 Downward Departures and Variances 55:21 Intended Loss vs. Actual Loss in Sentencing 56:41 The Role of the Sentencing Commission 01:02:08 Restitution and Forfeiture Explained 01:11:21 Supreme Court Case: Ellenberg vs. United States 01:27:09 Open Pleas and Collateral Attacks 01:35:35 Federal Prison Guidebook and Conclusion Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    1h 38m
  7. Understanding the Flaws in the Judicial System

    Jan 16

    Understanding the Flaws in the Judicial System

    The video script for 'Injustice for All' covers a range of issues related to the judicial system and the influence of the media on legal processes. It begins by discussing how settlements in legal cases are often pursued for reasons other than guilt, emphasizing the complexities and injustices of the criminal justice system. The host then introduces Juda Engelmayer, a public relations expert specializing in crisis management, to explore these themes further. Engelmayer describes his career in politics and crisis management, including his work with notable figures and his transition into public relations focusing on high-profile legal cases. The discussion includes several case studies where media narratives played a significant role in the legal outcomes, illustrating the power of the First Amendment. It highlights the controversial case of OneTaste and its founders, the prosecution of Carlos Watson, and the broader implications of media influence on jury pools and legal fairness. The episode underscores ongoing efforts to expose and correct judicial failings, advocating for the critical role of free speech in the justice system. 00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All 01:47 The Role of Defense Attorneys 02:53 Grand Jury Dynamics 04:06 Case Study: Washington DC Protests 07:13 The Importance of the First Amendment 07:41 Interview with Juda Engelmayer 12:54 Juda's Career Journey 19:25 Crisis Management and Public Relations 23:56 The Impact of Media on Legal Cases 32:48 Social Media vs Traditional Media 37:06 Justice System Focus: Current vs. Previous Administration 37:45 Case Study: Carlos Watson and Ozzy Media 39:59 Media Companies and Market Competition 41:04 Prosecution and Racial Bias 42:46 Public Relations and Legal Strategy 44:38 Cooperating Witnesses and Legal Deals 49:31 Case Study: Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz 53:51 Media Influence on Legal Proceedings 01:00:26 First Amendment and Judicial Bias Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    1h 10m
  8. What’s Really Happening Inside the DOJ?

    Jan 12

    What’s Really Happening Inside the DOJ?

    This episode of 'Injustice for All' features attorney Paul Pelletier, who shares his extensive experience from his 27 years at the Department of Justice and the US Attorney's Office in Miami. Alongside host Robert, they discuss the current state of the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the DEA, touching upon issues of political influence, organizational flaws, and the importance of writing skills for federal prosecutors. Pelletier recounts his journey from law school to becoming a federal prosecutor, his views on the necessity of these agencies despite their flaws, and the concept of discretion in prosecution. The conversation also delves into the grand jury process, the importance of drafting compelling indictments, and the challenges of prosecuting white-collar crimes. They conclude by expressing concerns over recent political actions impacting these federal institutions and the long-term effects this may have. 00:00 Introduction and Overview 00:26 Guest Introduction: Paul Pelletier 00:45 Perry Mason and Legal Ethics 02:16 Current Issues in the Department of Justice 03:38 Historical Context of Federal Agencies 04:09 Challenges and Reforms in Law Enforcement 05:48 Interview with Paul Pelletier Begins 06:14 Paul Pelletier's Career Path 07:47 Clerkship Experience and Its Importance 09:36 Writing Skills in Legal Practice 15:39 Federal vs. State Prosecution 23:03 Discretion in Prosecution 30:56 Prosecutorial Discretion and Grand Juries 32:01 The Power and Responsibility of Federal Prosecutors 33:39 Differences Between Federal and State Grand Juries 34:33 The Role of Subpoenas in Federal Investigations 35:12 Handling Evidence in Grand Jury Investigations 36:44 Challenges in Presenting Evidence to Grand Juries 43:15 Unindicted Co-Conspirators and Legal Implications 49:29 Brady Information and Prosecutorial Discretion 53:40 The Decline of DOJ's White Collar Prosecutions 57:37 Political Influence and the Future of DOJ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    1h 2m

About

Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over the course of his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials. As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged. Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness. Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.