The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community

BDBF LLP

The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community is the authoritative podcast for the latest developments, expert analysis, and practical guidance within the constantly evolving field of employment law. Each episode presents in-depth discussions with prominent professionals, examining complex legal precedents, legislative amendments, and emerging trends that affect employers, employees, and legal practitioners. Whether seeking to remain current on recent judicial decisions, comprehend the practical ramifications of new regulations, or acquire actionable strategies for managing workplace issues, our podcast provides substantive content specifically designed for the employment law community. Subscribe to remain informed and equip yourself with the essential knowledge required in today’s dynamic legal environment.

Episodes

  1. May 26

    1997 vs 2027: What History Can Teach Us About the Employment Rights Act

    Can Blair's 1997 reforms help the employment law sector prepare for the forthcoming ERA changes? In this episode, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by BDBF managing partner Gareth Brahams to draw a direct line between Blair's 1997 employment law reforms and the major changes set to arrive with the Employment Rights Act in 2027. Drawing on three decades of practice, Gareth traces the parallels between then and now: the reduction of unfair dismissal qualifying periods, rising compensation caps, and the introduction of Working Time Regulations – and what they can tell us about what's coming next. Listeners will gain insights into: The scope and background of the Employment Rights Act reforms coming later this year and in 2027Practical implications for employers and employees, including changes to dismissal rights and compensationBuilding organisational capacity and adapting to evolving case lawNavigating political uncertainty and preparing for further legislative developmentsWith a generation-defining shift in employment law on the horizon, looking to the past might be our best way forward. Contact BDBFThank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk Find out more:Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/Email: info@bdbf.co.ukPhone: +44(0)20 3828 0350Connect with us:LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/Sign up to our newsletter:www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/ Gareth Brahams linkedin.com/in/garethbrahams Gareth Brahams is the managing partner at BDBF and a recognised leader in the field of employment law. He has nearly 30 years of experience in employment law advising senior executives and other employees in high value/high stakes cases, large and small employers, partners and members of LLPs.

    28 min
  2. May 11

    The Price of a Conditional Job Offer: Kankanalapalli v Loesche Energy Systems

    Can you withdraw a job offer once it’s been accepted? Lessons from Kankanalapalli v Loesche Energy Systems LTD. In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, partners Paula Chan and Gareth Brahams discuss the recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decision in Kankanalapalli v Loesche Energy Systems Ltd. This case explores what "reasonable notice" means when a job offer is withdrawn after a contract is formed but before the first day of work and draws out the key distinction between “conditions precedent” and “conditions subsequent”. Listeners will gain insights into: The factual background and the EAT’s decision in Kankanalapalli v Loesche Energy Systems.The crucial distinction between conditions "precedent" and conditions "subsequent."Why statutory minimum notice periods do not act as a ceiling for "reasonable notice."The risks of resigning from a current role before a new contract is fully signed and documented.Practical steps for employers to manage offer withdrawals and notice obligations.Best practices for candidates navigating the gap between offer acceptance and their start date.For employment lawyers and HR leaders, this is a tactical guide to managing the "resignation gap" and avoiding a pre-employment notice trap. Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF. Contact BDBF Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments. For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform. We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk  Find out more:Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/Email: info@bdbf.co.uk Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350 Connect with us:LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/ Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/ Sign up to our newsletter: www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/ Paula Chan https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulachan/ Specialist employment lawyer advising senior executives, partners, and employers, with experience in high-profile employee exits and significant disputes involving whistleblowing, breach of contract, and workplace discrimination. Gareth Brahams linkedin.com/in/garethbrahams Employment lawyer who has fought and won some of the biggest cases in whistleblowing, discrimination, restrictive covenants and stress at work claims.

    21 min
  3. Apr 27

    Bounties Without Borders | How UK Employees Benefit from US Whistleblower Incentives

    Is the UK finally moving toward a "bounty" system for whistleblowers? In this episode of the BDBF Podcast, Partner Claire Dawson is joined by US expert Mary Inman to explore whistleblower reward programs. Under the US model, individuals who report wrongdoing to the authorities can receive between 10–30% of recovered funds – a powerful incentive that has already helped uncover billions in corporate fraud. Claire and Mary discuss how whistleblowers in the UK may look across the Atlantic to secure their financial futures through reward systems that have global reach. From the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act to HMRC’s newly revamped tax-evasion scheme, they unpick this shifting cultural tide and ask: what does the future of rewards for whistleblowing mean for culture and practice in the UK? Strategic Insights: The US rewards system focuses on “intel” while UK protection for whistleblowers still focuses on litigation. How UK whistleblowers may access life-changing US bounties anonymously.What the UK’s shift toward a "bounty" model for tax evasion may mean for other regulators in this country. This episode is a must-listen for the lawyers and leaders navigating the global whistleblower landscape. Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF. Contact BDBFThank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments. For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform. We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk Find out more:Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/Email: info@bdbf.co.ukPhone: +44(0)20 3828 0350 Connect with us:LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/Sign up to our newsletter:www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/ Guest InfoMary Inmanhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/mary-inman-81229/Mary Inman is a partner at Whistleblower Partners. She has 30 years of experience representing whistleblowers in the U.S. under the False Claims Act, as well as the SEC, CFTC, IRS, FinCEN, and NHTSA/DOT whistleblower programs.

    29 min
  4. Apr 6

    Osipov in the firing line | Rice v Wicked Vision & The Whistleblowing Loophole

    How long can whistleblowers continue to claim dismissal as a "detriment" against an individual colleague? Whistleblowing law in the UK is at a pivotal crossroads. In May this year, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal in Rice v Wicked Vision, in which the future of Timis v Osipov is in the firing line.   In this episode of the BDBF Podcast, Amanda Steadman is joined by Bruce Carr KC and Managing Partner Gareth Brahams who both acted for Mr Osipov, to dive into what the appeal in Rice v Wicked Vision means for personal liability in the workplace. Together, they unpick the "detriment of dismissal" loophole, tracking the legacy of Timis v Osipov and examining the contentious boundary between an "instruction to dismiss" and the "act of dismissal."  Listeners will also gain insights into: How the Timis v Osipov precedent continues to influence detriment claims.The statutory tension between Section 47B detriment and Part X unfair dismissal.Balancing the strict wording of the law with the need to protect whistleblowers.What the Rice decision means for the future of high-value whistleblowing claims.Speculation on a Supreme Court appeal and the long-term implications for employment law. Drawing on their extensive experience, this episode offers essential strategic insights for employment lawyers and HR leaders navigating these shifting legal waters. Cases discussed: Timis & Anor v Osipov & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 2321: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2018/2321Rice v Wicked Vision Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1466: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/1466BDBF’s briefing on Wicked Vision can be accessed here: https://www.bdbf.co.uk/employers-continue-to-be-vicariously-liable-for-detriment-of-dismissal-claims-brought-by-employee-whistleblowers-for-now-at-least/ Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF. Contact BDBFThank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments. For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform. We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk Find out more:Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/Email: info@bdbf.co.ukPhone: +44(0)20 3828 0350 Connect with us:LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/Sign up to our newsletter:www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

    37 min
  5. Mar 23

    Tailor Wasn’t Hemmed In By His Long Non-Compete | Tom James UK Ltd v Max Potter

    Was the 12-Month Non-Compete Agreement Enforceable? Analysing the High Court Ruling in Tom James UK Limited v Max Potter. In this episode of the BDBF Podcast, Tom McLaughlin and Jamie Barton explore the headline employment law dispute Tom James UK Limited v Max Potter, focusing on the enforceability of non-compete clauses, restrictive covenants and the risks of overly restrictive post-termination restraints. The episode follows Max Potter, a mid-level salesperson who found himself at the centre of a legal dispute after his employer attempted to enforce a 12-month non-compete clause following his resignation.  Tom and Jamie walk listeners through the events leading up to the court case, illustrating how aggressive restrictive covenants can backfire and the real-world consequences for both employers and employees. Listeners will gain insights into: How non-compete clauses and restrictive covenants work in practiceThe impact of harsh disciplinary measures on the enforceabilityThe High Court’s scrutiny of the 12-month non-compete clauseLegal and reputational risks for businesses enforcing overly broad post-termination restrictionsPractical steps employers and HR teams can take to protect their interests while remaining fair and compliant Packed with strategic insight, this episode is essential listening for employment lawyers, HR professionals, business leaders, and anyone managing employee departures or restrictive covenants. Contact BDBF Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments. For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform. We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk  Find out more:Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/Email: info@bdbf.co.uk Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350 Connect with us:LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/ Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/ Sign up to our newsletter: www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

    29 min
  6. Mar 9

    Legal Risks of “Up or Out” | Pal v Accenture UK Limited

    Unfair Dismissal, Polkey Deductions and Performance Management: Lessons from Pal v Accenture UK Limited In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, Samantha Prosser and James Hockley analyse the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Pal v Accenture UK Limited – and what the ruling means for employers and claimants. Ms Pal, a 10-year Accenture manager, was dismissed in 2019 for allegedly not being “promotion-ready” under the firm’s controversial “up or out” model – all while managing significant symptoms of endometriosis. Samantha and James unpack the key issues this case raises around disability discrimination, procedural fairness and the application of Polkey reductions to compensation. Listeners will gain insights into: The factual background to Pal v Accenture UK LimitedThe legal issues raised by the “up or out” performance management modelThe tribunal’s errors in assessing disability discrimination and procedural fairness under the Equality ActThe EAT’s guidance on the application of Polkey deductionsPractical lessons for employers on maintaining fair dismissal procedures With significant changes to unfair dismissal law and compensation caps expected from 2027, this episode offers timely guidance for HR professionals, employment lawyers and business leaders navigating performance management and dismissal risk. Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF. Contact BDBFThank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments. For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform. We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk Find out more:Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/Email: info@bdbf.co.ukPhone: +44(0)20 3828 0350 Connect with us:LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/ Sign up to our newsletter:www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/ Samantha Prosserhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/samanthacprosser/Partner at BDBF, Samantha has extensive litigation experience in the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal. She specialises in whistleblowing and sex and disability discrimination claims, with particular expertise advising Consultants in the NHS and private practice. James Hockleyhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/james-hockley-9060a685/Senior Associate at BDBF, James advises both individuals and employers across Employment Tribunal, Employment Appeal Tribunal, High Court, and Court of Appeal proceedings. His practice focuses on discrimination, whistleblowing, unfair dismissal, employee competition, investigations, disciplinary and grievance matters, and negotiated exits.

    31 min
  7. Mar 2

    Reynolds v Abel Estate Agents Limited | Key Guidance on Detriment Claims and Early Conciliation

    When can a detriment claim bypass ACAS early conciliation? The Court of Appeal sets the rules in Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Limited.  In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by Knowledge Lawyer Rose Lim to unpack the Court of Appeal’s decision in Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Limited and its implications for ACAS early conciliation requirements. Tom and Rose break down the statutory framework behind early conciliation and the Court’s clarification of a critical distinction: bringing a new claim versus amending an existing one.  Listeners will gain insights into: The facts and procedural history of Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent LimitedWhen early conciliation operates as a jurisdictional barHow interim relief interacts with ACAS requirementsThe Court of Appeal’s approach to amendments and claim validityThe strategic implications for claimants, respondents and practitioners Packed with practical guidance and procedural insight, this episode is essential listening for employment lawyers, HR professionals and anyone navigating tribunal claims under the early conciliation regime. The podcast discusses the cases of: Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Clark & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 386 Pryce v Baxterstorey Limited [2022] EAT 61 Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF. Contact BDBF Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments. For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform. We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk  Find out more:Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/Email: info@bdbf.co.uk Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350 Connect with us:LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/ Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/ Sign up to our newsletter: www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/ Rose Lim https://www.linkedin.com/in/rose-l-40a345b0/ Rosie is a knowledge lawyer at BDBF, maintaining up-to-date knowledge of developments in employment law. She supports the delivery of first-class training and know-how for both the firm and its clients.

    14 min
  8. Feb 23

    A New Era for Unfair Dismissal | The Employment Rights Act Reforms Explained

    How Will the New Unfair Dismissal Regime Transform Employment Tribunal Claims for Employers and Employees? In this episode of The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, partners Claire Dawson and Paula Chan examine the sweeping reforms to unfair dismissal law coming into force on 1 January 2027 under the Employment Rights Act. Moving beyond the headlines, Claire and Paula unpack how shorter qualifying periods and uncapped compensation will affect unfair dismissal litigation, and what these changes mean in practice for the employment tribunal system. Listeners will gain insights into: How the new unfair dismissal framework will operate The anticipated rise in employment tribunal claims The implications of removing the unfair dismissal compensation capHow employers’ settlement strategies may need to adaptThe broader consequences for the tribunal system and public sector employers\ As the UK employment law landscape prepares for its most substantial transformation in decades, this episode is essential listening for employers, HR professionals and employment lawyers navigating a new and uncertain era in unfair dismissal law. Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF. Contact BDBFThank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments. For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform. We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk Find out more:Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/Email: info@bdbf.co.ukPhone: +44(0)20 3828 0350 Connect with us:LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/Sign up to our newsletter:www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/ Guest InfoClaire Dawson linkedin.com/in/claire-dawson/ Recognised leader in the field of employment law. Ranked in Band 1 as a leading individual for Employment: Senior Executive in Chambers UK 2025 and a Leading Partner for Employment: Senior Executives in Legal 500 UK 2026 Paula Chan linkedin.com/in/paulachan/ Ranked Band 1 by Chambers 2026 for Employment: Senior Executives and recognised as a leading partner by Legal 500 2026, specialist employment lawyer Paula Chan advises individuals, partners and employers. She has experience in high-profile employee and partner exits and significant disputes involving whistleblowing, breach of contract and discrimination.

    34 min
  9. Feb 16

    Litigating Informal Promises | The Dixon v GlobalData Plc Decision

    The Consequences of Informal Promises in Share Option Agreements: What Dixon v GlobalData Plc Means in Practice… In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by partner Paula Chan to unpack the High Court’s decision in Dixon v GlobalData Plc and its implications for informal promises made about share option agreements. Tom and Paula examine how verbal assurances about share options led to complex litigation after the employee’s departure, and what the decision means for employers and employees involved in equity-based reward structures. Listeners will gain insights into: The factual background to the Dixon v GlobalData Plc disputeHow proprietary estoppel can arise in share option agreement casesThe risks created by informal or poorly documented equity promisesThe court’s reasoning and approachPractical steps to reduce disputes in share plan and incentive arrangementsThe importance of clear drafting and legal advice in employment negotiations Packed with strategic insight, this episode is essential listening for employment lawyers, HR professionals, and business leaders dealing with share option agreements and executive incentive plans. Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF. Contact BDBF Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments. For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform. We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk  Find out more:Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/Email: info@bdbf.co.uk Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350 Connect with us:LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/ Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/ Sign up to our newsletter: www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/ Paula Chan https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulachan/ Specialist employment lawyer advising senior executives, partners, and employers, with experience in high-profile employee exits and significant disputes involving whistleblowing, breach of contract, and workplace discrimination.

    19 min
  10. Feb 9

    Gareth Brahams: 30 Years in Employment Law | Insights from a Founding Partner

    In a special episode of The BDBF Podcast, Tom McLaughlin sits down with BDBF founding partner Gareth Brahams to mark the firm’s 13th anniversary and Gareth’s 30-year career in employment law. Departing from the usual legal updates, the conversation offers a rich, reflective look at Gareth’s career journey, the evolution of the profession, and the landmark cases and trends that have shaped the field. The episode traces Gareth’s early career, from his first role in 1995 and the limited scope of employment law at the time, through his experiences in tribunal advocacy, senior executive cases, and the founding of BDBF. Along the way, Gareth shares candid stories about technological shifts, the rise of standalone employment practices, law firm mergers, and his most memorable cases – including whistleblowing, discrimination, bonus litigation, and restrictive covenants. Listeners will gain insights into: The early state of employment law and tribunal work in the 1990sThe impact of technology and client expectations on legal practiceKey mergers and consolidation in the legal sectorShifts in case trends, legislation, and workplace culture over 30 yearsMentorship, professional values, and advice Gareth would give his younger selfHow AI and technological advances are shaping the future of employment law Packed full of practical insight, this episode is essential listening for employment law practitioners and anyone interested in the human side of a long and distinguished legal career. Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF. Contact BDBF Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments. For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform. We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk Find out more:Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/Email: info@bdbf.co.ukPhone: +44(0)20 3828 0350 Connect with us:LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/X: www.x.com/BDBF_LLP Sign up to our newsletter: www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/ Tom McLaughlinwww.linkedin.com/in/emplwyrtomEmployment lawyer specialising in restrictive covenants, confidential information and team moves. Gareth Brahams linkedin.com/in/garethbrahams Employment lawyer who has fought and won some of the biggest cases in whistleblowing, discrimination, restrictive covenants and stress at work claims.

    28 min
  11. Feb 2

    The Henderson v GCRM Employment Tribunal Case | Balancing Protections & Employer Defenses

    The Henderson v GCRM Implication: What The EAT Decision Really Means In Practice In this episode of The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by employment law specialist Abdullah Ahmed to analyse the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Henderson v GCRM and its implications for whistleblowing protection under the Employment Rights Act 1996. Tom and Abdullah begin by setting out the factual background to the case, including the disclosures made by Mr Henderson, the alleged detriments he claimed to have suffered, and the findings of the Employment Tribunal at first instance. They also explore: - What qualifies as a protected disclosure under the legislation - The burden of proof in whistleblowing detriment claims - Establishing causation between disclosure and alleged detriment - The relevance of decision-maker knowledge and motivation Lessons from key authorities including Jhuti and Fecitt The discussion details the EAT's reasoning on protected disclosures, focusing on the challenge for claimants when the decision-maker is unaware of the disclosure. Tom and Abdullah examine vicarious liability, the split between individual and corporate responsibility, and the necessity of precise legal pleadings in whistleblowing cases. The episode ends with practical advice on the hurdles whistleblowers face (evidentiary/procedural) and best practices for employers managing disclosures. In addition to the lawyers mentioned in the Episode, Barry Ross of Crossland Solicitors instructed David Hay KC and Chris Milsom. Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF. Contact BDBF Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments. For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform. We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk Find out more:Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/Email: info@bdbf.co.uk Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350 Connect with us:LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/ X: www.x.com/BDBF_LLP Sign up to our newsletter: www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/ Tom McLaughlin www.linkedin.com/in/emplwyrtom           Employment lawyer specialising in restrictive covenants, confidential information and team moves Abdullah Ahmed www.linkedin.com/in/abdullah-idris-ahmed Specialist in employment law, acting as an Associate, with experience advising on the full scope of employment matters.

    23 min
  12. Jan 26

    Challenges in Cross-Border Employment Litigation | The Jurisdictional Jigsaw

    Cross-border Employment Claims After Brexit: What Prahl v Lapinski Means in Practice… In this episode of The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by colleagues: Partner Claire Dawson and Managing Associate Theo Nicou to unpack the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Prahl v Lapinski and its implications for international employment claims. The three explore the jurisdictional challenges that arise when overseas respondents are involved in UK employment tribunal proceedings, with a particular focus on how the post-Brexit legal landscape has reshaped established principles. Tom, Claire and Theo examine recent developments around the service of claim forms on international parties and the tribunals’ increasingly expansive interpretation of “employee” and “employer” in cross-border cases. The episode also explores: Jurisdictional hurdles in claims involving overseas respondentsService of tribunal claims under the post-Brexit regimeHow Brexit has affected enforceability and procedural strategyThe widening interpretation of employment relationshipsPractical steps to manage risk in international disputesThe ongoing Court of Appeal case and its impact on cross-border employment law.Packed with practical guidance and strategic insight, this episode is essential listening for employment law professionals advising on or litigating international employment claims in an increasingly complex jurisdictional environment. Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF. Contact BDBF Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments. For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform. We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk Find out more:Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/Email: info@bdbf.co.ukPhone: +44(0)20 3828 0350 Connect with us:LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/X: www.x.com/BDBF_LLP Sign up to our newsletter:www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

    28 min

About

The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community is the authoritative podcast for the latest developments, expert analysis, and practical guidance within the constantly evolving field of employment law. Each episode presents in-depth discussions with prominent professionals, examining complex legal precedents, legislative amendments, and emerging trends that affect employers, employees, and legal practitioners. Whether seeking to remain current on recent judicial decisions, comprehend the practical ramifications of new regulations, or acquire actionable strategies for managing workplace issues, our podcast provides substantive content specifically designed for the employment law community. Subscribe to remain informed and equip yourself with the essential knowledge required in today’s dynamic legal environment.

You Might Also Like