Support my work and keep it sustainable: ko-fi.com/evolio In this episode I explain b******t to my friend, comedian Zach Jobe. Yes, b******t. It turns out it is a legit hard nosed topic of philosophical debate with decades of work and thousands of academic publications behind it. We talk about what it is, why people do it, who is vulnerable to it and how to recognize it in your everyday life. Building a robust detector it turns out is one of the best ways to to steel yourself against it. --- Created by: Ryan Pevey at evolio.org and Zach Jobe @zhjobe Concept: A science and comedy conversation about what philosophical b******t is and how to detect it. Tools: DaVinci Resolve, GIMP Intro music by Maksym Malko from Pixabay (pixabay.com/music/upbeat-podcast-interview-music-254186/) Podcast streams: redcircle.com/shows/04ecc7a3-3383-4ca0-bff3-c55d04100ed5 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hidden-science-stories/id1874450380 open.spotify.com/show/50xaIb6jjmSJv7georpfVt?si=16e6c0e030414593 music.amazon.com/podcasts/b0415a99-f209-4c66-80c5-d8eb2b490811/hidden-science-stories --- Citations: Frankfurt, Harry G. On B******t. Princeton University Press, 2005 [original essay 1986]. The foundational philosophical treatment. Essential starting point. 67 pages; highly readable. Frankfurt, Harry G. On Truth. Princeton University Press, 2006. Frankfurt’s follow-up, addressing why truth matters as a value. Reads as a companion to On B******t. Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J.A., Barr, N., Koehler, D.J., & Fugelsang, J.A. "On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound b******t." Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 549–563, 2015. The paper that launched empirical b******t research. Open access. Pennycook, G. & Rand, D.G. "Who falls for fake news? The roles of b******t receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking." Journal of Personality, 88(2), 185–200, 2020. Key empirical link between b******t receptivity and misinformation susceptibility. Bergstrom, Carl T. & West, Jevin D. Calling B******t: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World. Random House/Allen Lane, 2020. The best practical guide to b******t detection for a general audience; particularly strong on data-driven and scientific b******t. Course materials also freely available at callingbullshit.org. Cassam, Qassim. Vices of the Mind: From the Intellectual to the Political. Oxford University Press, 2018. Develops the concept of epistemic vices, including insouciance and malevolence, with political applications. Theoretical but accessible. Hicks, M.T., Humphries, J. & Slater, J. "ChatGPT Is B******t." Ethics and Information Technology, 26:38, 2024. The most cited academic paper applying Frankfurt’s framework to LLMs. Open access. Directly relevant to the AI segment. Szanto, Thomas. "Epistemically exploitative b******t: A Sartrean account." European Journal of Philosophy, 31(3), 711–730, 2023. Extends Frankfurt to cover politically weaponized b******t. Relevant to intersections of b******t and power. Serena Iacobucci, Roberta De Cicco. "A literature review of b******t receptivity: Perspectives for an informed policy making against misinformation." Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 6(S1), 23–40, 2022 Comprehensive review of empirical research on b******t receptivity from 2015–2021. Good for overview of the field. Vaidya, Anand Jayprakash. "Are LLMs Natural Born Bullshitters?" The Philosophers’ Magazine, 2024. Accessible philosophical analysis of the AI-b******t question for a general audience. A good bridge between the technical Hicks et al. paper and lay readers. 0:00 On B******t 11:44 Two types of B******t 18:14 The B******t Asymmetry Principle 21:43 Psychology of B******t 27:51 LLMs and the rise of Botshit 44:31 Propaganda is political B******t 49:22 The B******t of Pseudoscience 56:03 B******t detector 101 62:57 Point of Optimism 66:51 2026 Predictions Update