Speaking With Intent

Paul Adams
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Education
  • Weekly

Most people think they are communicating clearly. They are not. Speaking With Intent explores what is happening beneath the surface of high-stakes conversations - where authority shifts and influence is earned. This podcast breaks down negotiation psychology, power dynamics, and deliberate speech for people who operate under pressure. No scripts. No gimmicks. No hacks. Just clarity, control, and communication that commands respect. Book: Speaking With Intent - Clarity, Authority, and Influence When It Matters https://www.amazon.com/author/pauleadams

  1. Oct 28

    The Meeting Wasn't Productive. Everyone Just Stopped Talking.

    A meeting ends. Everyone appears to agree. The manager is satisfied. The decisions are made. But was anything actually accomplished? Some of the most damaging communication failures in professional environments aren't caused by what people say. They're caused by what others never get the opportunity to say. In this episode of Speaking With Intent, we explore the subtle power dynamics that shape workplace conversations, why dominating a discussion can be mistaken for competence, and how seemingly successful meetings can conceal serious failures of judgment. Because silence isn't always agreement. And the person controlling the conversation may be the very person preventing a better decision. Research and References: - Murtaza, G., Laker, B., Khan, R., and Hameed, A. (2026). "What Interruptions Say About Your Organizational Culture." MIT Sloan Management Review, October 27, 2026. - Dupas, P., Handlan, A., Modestino, A. S., Niederle, M., Seré, M., Sheng, H., Wolfers, J., and Seminar Dynamics Collective (2026). "Gender Differences in Economics Seminars." American Economic Review, 116(2), 749–789. - Jett, Q. R., and George, J. M. (2003). "Work Interrupted: A Closer Look at the Role of Interruptions in Organizational Life." Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 494–507. #SpeakingWithIntent #ProfessionalCommunication #Leadership #WorkplaceCommunication #CommunicationSkills #ExecutiveLeadership #DecisionMaking

  2. Oct 21

    When Your Words Are Used Against You - Without Anyone Lying

    What if someone could quote you accurately and still completely misrepresent you? It's a subtle communication problem with potentially serious consequences for your credibility, professional relationships, and authority. In this episode of Speaking With Intent, we explore the uncomfortable territory between what we say, what others hear, and what gets repeated when we're no longer in the room. Because sometimes the most misleading version of a conversation contains nothing but the truth. #SpeakingWithIntent #EffectiveCommunication #CommunicationSkills #LeadershipCommunication #Credibility #ProfessionalCommunication #Influence

  3. Oct 14

    The Most Dangerous Agreement Is the One Nobody Meant

    Two people have a conversation. Both say yes. Both walk away satisfied. And somehow, they leave with two completely different agreements. We tend to associate communication failures with arguments, dishonesty, or people who simply refuse to listen. But some of the most damaging misunderstandings happen when everyone believes the conversation went perfectly. In this episode of Speaking With Intent, I explore why agreement doesn't necessarily mean understanding, how seemingly harmless assumptions turn into broken expectations, and why one additional question can prevent an entirely unnecessary conflict. From workplace commitments to personal relationships, the problem isn't always that someone broke their word. Sometimes, the two people involved never agreed on what those words meant. The question worth asking: "Did we actually reach an agreement, or did we just stop talking?" Because getting someone to say yes isn't the same as being understood. #SpeakingWithIntent #EffectiveCommunication #CommunicationSkills #Leadership #Relationships #ConflictResolution #ProfessionalDevelopment

  4. Oct 7

    Who Decided That Was the Problem?

    Before you defend yourself - or agree to a solution - ask whether the problem has been correctly identified. Two missed deadlines become “a lack of commitment.” Falling sales become “our prices are too high.” Once an explanation is accepted, it can steer every decision that follows - even when nobody has checked it. In this episode of Speaking With Intent, Paul Adams explores how the way we define a problem shapes conversations about responsibility, performance, and trust. Learn how to separate what happened from what someone assumes it means, question an explanation without sounding defensive, and recognize when your own labels deserve closer scrutiny. Take one practical question into your next difficult conversation: “What tells us that’s the cause?” Before you get better at defending your answer, check who wrote the question. #SpeakingWithIntent #CommunicationSkills #CriticalThinking #Leadership

  5. Sep 30

    Every Word Was True. You Were Still Misled.

    Someone can tell you the truth and still leave you believing something false. You ask about a deadline and hear about past success. You ask about authority and hear about “ownership.” The answer sounds reassuring - but does it establish what you need to know? In this episode of Speaking With Intent, Paul Adams explores paltering: deliberately using truthful statements to create a misleading impression. He also explains why an indirect answer doesn’t automatically mean deception - and how to get clarity without accusing someone of dishonesty. Through familiar workplace, hiring, and client conversations, you’ll learn how to: • Recognize when reassurance leaves your question unanswered. • Separate what someone actually said from what you assumed. • Ask specific follow-up questions before making a commitment. • Notice when your own technically accurate answers could mislead someone. Try this in your next important conversation: “I took that to mean ____. Is that what you’re saying?” That brief check gives the other person a chance to clarify - and gives you a better basis for your decision. Follow Speaking With Intent for practical conversations about communication, credibility, negotiation, and judgment under pressure. #SpeakingWithIntent #CommunicationSkills #CriticalThinking #Negotiation #Trust

  6. Sep 23

    Keeping the Peace Can Be a Form of Dishonesty

    A meeting ends with everyone apparently in agreement. Two weeks later, the problem someone saw coming becomes everyone’s problem. Why didn’t they speak up? Silence can be wise. But when people are making a decision, they may reasonably take your silence as agreement. The same thing happens when “It’s fine” lets someone close to you believe you’ve made a choice together. In this episode of Speaking With Intent, I examine what it means to raise a concern while it can still help. I also look at the leader’s responsibility: asking for objections means little if speaking honestly comes at a cost. You’ll hear practical ways to name a risk without turning it into an accusation - and a simple test for deciding when a concern needs to be said aloud. Sometimes a brief, uncomfortable conversation is what gives an agreement its value. #SpeakingWithIntent #DifficultConversations #LeadershipCommunication #DecisionMaking #CommunicationSkills

  7. Sep 16

    Why Over-Explaining Makes the Truth Sound Suspicious

    A clear answer can become suspicious when you keep explaining it. Many people believe that more detail creates more credibility. But in difficult conversations, adding unnecessary context, defending against accusations nobody made, and repeating an answer can produce the opposite effect. Instead of sounding thorough, you begin to sound nervous. In this episode of Speaking With Intent, communication coach and former military briefer Paul Adams explains why over-explaining weakens otherwise credible answers - and how to recognize when you have already said enough. In this episode: • Why unnecessary explanations create new reasons for doubt • How over-explaining can shift the burden of proof onto you • Why defending yourself against an unspoken accusation may introduce suspicion • The difference between a short answer and a complete answer • How silence protects your credibility after you have responded • Why you should never answer the second question before someone asks it • A practical structure for giving concise, authoritative explanations Strong communicators are not vague or evasive. They provide the information that matters - and recognize when their answer is complete. Before adding another explanation, ask yourself: “Am I making this clearer - or am I asking to be believed?” Because credibility does not always increase with every sentence. Sometimes, the sentence that protects your authority is the one you choose not to say. Follow Speaking With Intent for practical insights into communication, professional authority, leadership, negotiation psychology, and the hidden dynamics that determine how people respond to you. #SpeakingWithIntent #CommunicationSkills #LeadershipCommunication #ExecutivePresence #ProfessionalCommunication #Influence #Credibility #WorkplaceCommunication #Negotiation #PowerDynamics

  8. Sep 9

    You Don’t Have a Communication Problem. You Have a Consequence Problem.

    Sometimes people are not confused. They understand what you want, what they agreed to, and why it matters. They simply do not believe anything will happen if they ignore you. At that point, explaining yourself again may not strengthen your authority. It may weaken it. In this episode, I examine the point where communication must become accountability - and why repeating a clearly understood expectation can quietly teach people that your words carry no weight. In this episode: • How to distinguish a misunderstanding from deliberate inaction • Why endless reminders can weaken authority • The difference between a consequence, a punishment, and a threat • Three questions to ask before enforcing a boundary • Why credible consequences must be proportional, relevant, and enforceable • How empty warnings train people to ignore you • Why empathy and accountability are not opposites The goal is not to control people, punish mistakes, or turn every disagreement into a contest of authority. It is to make sure your behavior does not quietly contradict your words. Communication tells people what matters. Consequences reveal whether you meant it. Follow this podcast for weekly conversations about deliberate speech, leadership communication, credibility, negotiation psychology, power dynamics, and communication under pressure. #SpeakingWithIntent #CommunicationSkills #Leadership #Accountability #Boundaries

See All (42)

Trailer

About

Most people think they are communicating clearly. They are not. Speaking With Intent explores what is happening beneath the surface of high-stakes conversations - where authority shifts and influence is earned. This podcast breaks down negotiation psychology, power dynamics, and deliberate speech for people who operate under pressure. No scripts. No gimmicks. No hacks. Just clarity, control, and communication that commands respect. Book: Speaking With Intent - Clarity, Authority, and Influence When It Matters https://www.amazon.com/author/pauleadams

Information

  • Creator
    Paul Adams
  • Years Active
    2026
  • Episodes
    42
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © Paul Adams
  • Show Website
    Speaking With Intent