Koper's council sits tomorrow on a 270-day short-let cap, the most Slovenia's new law allows. It is still a cut, and Koper's own papers say so. Slovenia's hospitality act has applied since January. In May 2 ministers listed 14 municipalities where, for 2027 and 2028, the default falls to 60 days a year per dwelling. They include Ljubljana, Koper, Izola, Piran, Bled, Bohinj, Kranjska Gora and Radovljica. A listed council can substitute anything from 30 to 270 days. For that to apply from 1 January, it has to be adopted by 31 October, which falls on a Saturday, so the real deadline is the last council sitting before it. Koper proposes a flat 270 days municipality-wide. The analysis behind it mapped 3 zones, 90 days in Koper town, 120 in the wider urban belt and 270 in the rural hinterland, while also offering a uniform 120 to 270 option for the whole area. The proposer accepts its results, doubts the act will make housing more available, and asks for 270 everywhere, "which under the act is the maximum possible". Izola's paper has the arithmetic. On 2025 data, a 270-day threshold would directly reach 2 of the 432 establishments examined. At 180 days, 26. At 150 days, 51. At the 60-day default, 280. At 30 days, 387. So these councils are not choosing how hard to squeeze. They are choosing whether the default squeezes 280 businesses or 2. Even so, 270 is not generous: Koper notes companies and sole traders could let for 365 days under the old law. A natural person registered as a host is capped at 180 days nationally whatever the council decides, counted across every dwelling they operate. Izola took the same 270 figure on Thursday 17 September, at first reading only, with a new text and public consultation to follow. The moratorium operators expect does not legally exist. Parliament passed an act on 11 May touching these restrictions. It has never been published and is not in force. A public-sector union confederation lodged a referendum initiative on 18 May, parliament declared it inadmissible on 27 May, and the Constitutional Court annulled that on 24 July. Signatures restarted on 1 September and 40,000 are needed. Separate petitions against the letting provisions remain undecided, and nothing has been suspended. One rule outranks every cap. Letting in a building of 3 or more dwellings needs consent from co-owners holding over 75% of shares, plus every owner whose wall, floor or ceiling touches yours. It lasts 3 years and ends on any change of ownership. Consents under the old law run out on 31 December 2026. Which of the 14 are you in, and what is your council adopting?