The Income Standard

Tod Long
  • 5.0 (1)
  • Investing

The Income Standard is where retirement income is engineered. Not guessed. For decades, investors were told to accumulate assets, stay diversified, and trust the markets. But retirement isn’t about accumulation — it’s about distribution. And distribution requires engineering. This podcast is for pre-retirees and retirees who want a measurable, structured approach to retirement income. Each episode breaks down the frameworks, math, risks, and decision architecture behind sustainable income planning. No hype. No fear tactics. No product pushing. Just disciplined thinking about how income should be built, tested, and held to a standard. If you’ve built something over your lifetime, this show is about how to live on it — intelligently.

  1. Oct 26

    Q&A Vol. 4 — Is the Floor Closed? (Season 2 Finale)

    Sixteen episodes across two seasons can feel like sixteen separate topics. They aren’t. There’s one question running underneath every one of them, and this episode names it before the season ends. In Episode 16, the Season 2 finale, Tod Long answers the last batch of listener questions and then puts the whole thing together — the through line from Episode 9 to Episode 15, and the four words that every episode has been circling: is the floor closed? This episode covers: Settling what counts as an “essential expense” when spouses genuinely disagree — the worst-year test that resolves itWhether the surviving-spouse analysis still applies when one spouse’s prognosis is already known, and which decisions move up the listUndoing a Social Security filing — withdrawal of application vs. voluntary suspension, the 12-month window, and the cash-flow trap inside the repaymentHow to know you actually have permission to spend, instead of being told you do by someone qualified to say itFive questions that reveal whether an advisor engineers income or just manages a portfolioWhere long-term care actually sits inside The Income Standard Review — as exposure, not as a product recommendationThe one thing more pre-retirees should understand before they retire: the number is not the planSeason 3 — confirmedOn the day you stop earning, the job of your money changes completely. Almost nobody is told that in advance. Schedule The Income Standard Review at theincomestandard.com — no cost, no pitch, just measurement.

  2. Oct 12

    The Overcautious Retiree

    Being too conservative in retirement is not the same as being safe. It's a different kind of risk — and it's just as dangerous as overexposure. In Episode 15 of The Income Standard, Tod Long covers the retiree nobody talks about: the one who kept everything in cash and CDs, lived far below their means, deferred living for 20 years — and still ran short because inflation eroded the cash, healthcare costs escalated, and the overcautious strategy created risks nobody named. Topics covered: - Why overcaution in distribution is structurally different from overcaution in accumulation - The three-part mechanism: cash below inflation, low-yield drag, refusal to draw income - The opportunity cost — what a decade of overcaution costs in real dollar terms - The psychology behind it: 2008 experience, inherited scarcity mindset, the absence of a permission structure - Barbara's case study — $1.1M in low-yield instruments, living on less than half her means, still facing a $4,400/mo shortfall at 80 - The rebuilt architecture — a closed income floor that gives Barbara permission to spend - The architecture doesn't replace the caution. It focuses it. - The objections answered: I feel safer with cash, I saw 2008, I don't want to run out of money Use the Sequence of Returns Risk Calculator at theincomestandard.com (Resources, Calculator 2) to understand where portfolio risk actually lives — and where it doesn't. #RetirementPlanning #RetirementRisk #IncomeFloor #TheIncomeStandard #RetirementIncome

  3. Sep 28

    Inflation and the Floor

    A retirement income floor that covers your expenses at 65 may not cover them at 80. Inflation is the variable the guaranteed income conversation most often leaves out. In Episode 14 of The Income Standard, Tod Long explains what rising costs do to a fixed income floor over 20-30 years — and the specific architecture strategies that account for it. Topics covered: - The math of erosion — what 3% annual inflation does to purchasing power over 30 years - Which income sources adjust (Social Security) and which don't (fixed pensions, most annuity income riders) - The reframe: close the fixed expense core with guaranteed income; let the portfolio carry inflation-sensitive expenses - Why healthcare inflation at 5-7% annually matters more than CPI headline numbers - Linda vs. Margaret — same starting assets, same income gap, 15 years of inflation, dramatically different outcomes - Four strategies for building inflation awareness into your income architecture - The objections answered: I'll spend less as I age, my portfolio will cover it, inflation has been low recently Use the Longevity Risk Calculator at theincomestandard.com (Resources, Calculator 5) to see how long the surviving inflation-erosion scenario might last. #RetirementInflation #IncomeFloor #RetirementPlanning #TheIncomeStandard

  4. Sep 15

    What an Annuity Actually Is

    No sales pitch. No defense. Just the mechanism — clearly explained. In Episode 13 of The Income Standard, Tod Long demystifies the fixed indexed annuity as an income floor instrument: how the contract works, what the lifetime income rider does, the critical difference between account value and income account value, and how to evaluate an illustration. Topics covered: - The four annuity types and where each sits in the income architecture - Fixed indexed annuities — how index-linked growth works, what the cap and floor mean - The income rider — two separate values, the notional income account, what 'guaranteed for life' actually means - Where the bad reputation came from — the real history of abusive products in the 1980s and 90s - Why a modern FIA is structurally different from those products - Karen vs. Diane — same gap, same assets, one has a guaranteed floor and one doesn't - Five things to look at in any FIA illustration - The objections answered: I don't want to lock my money up, I could do better in the market, what if the company goes under, my advisor doesn't recommend annuities Use the Accumulation vs. Distribution Calculator at theincomestandard.com (Resources, Calculator 6) to see the income gap this instrument is designed to close. #FIA #Annuity #RetirementIncome #RetirementPlanning #TheIncomeStandard

  5. Sep 1

    Q&A Vol. 3 — "Enough Assets" Isn't the Same as Structured Correctly

    Every episode, questions come in. The best ones aren't the ones anticipated in the outline — they're the ones that arrive after, from a real person in a real situation who heard something that touched their actual life and got specific about it. Those questions deserve their own space. In Episode 12, Tod Long works through eight listener questions from Seasons 1 and 2 with the same directness he'd use in an actual planning conversation — including the pension election that blindsided a widow when it stopped without warning, why "you have enough assets" isn't the same claim as "your income is structured correctly," and whether it's too late to build a guaranteed income floor at 69. This episode covers: Taxable-first vs. IRA-first withdrawals — why two "correct" answers from two different advisors aren't actually in conflictFiling Social Security early out of distrust in the system — and why the decision isn't just about one spouse's incomeThe single-life pension that stopped at death with no warning, and how to prevent it from happening to your own spouseBuilding a guaranteed income floor for the first time at 69 — too late, or just later than ideal?"Enough assets" vs. a properly structured income — two different questions, often mistaken for oneFixed vs. variable annuities, and the narrow case where variable actually makes sensePaying off the mortgage before retirement — architecture vs. emotionWhat actually happens inside an Income Standard Review If one listener sent the question, forty more are sitting in the exact same situation without saying anything. Schedule The Income Standard Review at theincomestandard.com — no cost, no pitch, just measurement.

  6. Aug 18

    The Surviving Spouse Problem

    A couple retires. They've built a good plan. Two Social Security checks. A pension. A joint income of $9,000 a month — engineered to hold. The floor is closed. They sleep well. Then one spouse dies. The pension drops 50% — or stops entirely, depending on the election made at retirement. One Social Security check disappears. The survivor keeps the higher of the two, but only one. Income drops from $9,000 to $5,000 a month. Overnight. The expenses don't drop proportionally. The mortgage is the same. Healthcare is higher — one person now carrying costs that were shared across two. This is the surviving spouse income cliff. It is the most undermodeled event in retirement income planning. And it happens to virtually every married couple — eventually. In Episode 11, Tod Long covers the conversation most retirement plans skip — not out of carelessness, but because it's uncomfortable to model. What happens to the monthly floor when one of you is gone. This episode covers: The three income sources and what happens to each at first death — Social Security, pension, and annuity income all behave differently when one spouse dies. The specific mechanics of each, including the numbers a typical couple loses and the timeline over which they lose them. The pension election — why the choice between single-life and joint-and-survivor pension is one of the most permanent financial decisions a couple makes, why it's almost always made before the surviving spouse scenario has been explicitly quantified, and what it costs when the analysis is skipped. Why this gets missed — the emotional discomfort, the baseline scenario bias, and the structural gap between the multiple conversations where the survivor-relevant decisions get made — none of which is typically connected by a single advisor seeing the full picture. Robert and Margaret — retired at 68 with $79,000 in annual joint income. Robert elected a single-life pension for the higher monthly payment. At Robert's death at 79, Margaret's income dropped to $38,000 — a 52% reduction. Her shortfall: $17,000 per year. Potentially for fifteen more years. The pension election made in five minutes at an HR office determined a widow's income for the rest of her life. The rebuilt architecture — the same couple, different decisions. Social Security delayed to 70, joint pension elected, a fixed indexed annuity with joint lifetime income added. Joint income at retirement: $2,000 less per year. Margaret's income after Robert's death: $35,000 more per year. That's the surviving spouse trade. Most couples never see it modeled. Four places to look in your plan right now — the specific structural questions every married couple should be able to answer with a dollar number before any of the relevant decisions get locked in. Every retirement plan should be able to answer one question with a specific dollar number: if the higher-earning spouse dies tomorrow, what does the surviving spouse's monthly income look like? If you can't answer that — the plan isn't finished. Schedule The Income Standard Review at theincomestandard.com — no cost, no pitch, just measurement.

  7. Aug 3

    The Social Security Decision You Can't Undo

    At 62, you can file for Social Security. At 70, your benefit stops growing. Every month in between has a permanent, irreversible effect on your income for the rest of your life. If you're married, there are two windows. And the decisions compound — because the benefit you lock in isn't just your income. It's potentially your spouse's income for every year they outlive you. Social Security is not a benefit you receive. It is an income architecture decision you make. One time. With no take-backs. Most people make it without running the actual numbers. In Episode 10, Tod Long dismantles the break-even analysis — the most common framework for Social Security timing — and replaces it with the calculation that actually matters for married couples: the surviving spouse scenario. This episode covers: The permanent dollar impact — what different filing ages do to a $30,000 PIA, expressed as a lifetime annual number. The difference between filing at 62 versus 70: $16,200 per year, inflation-adjusted, for life — and for the surviving spouse. The break-even myth — why the standard break-even analysis is a single-person calculation with a structural flaw. What it measures, what it misses, and why the question it answers is the wrong question for anyone who is married. The survivor benefit — when the higher-earning spouse dies, the surviving spouse inherits the higher of the two Social Security benefits. What the higher earner files at 62 versus 70 doesn't just determine their income. It determines a widow's income for potentially fifteen or twenty years. David and Susan — both 62, combined assets of $1.4 million, combined retirement expenses of $108,000 per year. Two filing scenarios modeled side by side. At David's death at 80, the difference in Susan's survivor income over a ten-year period: $233,000. Based on a decision David made at 62 — without modeling what Susan would receive after he was gone. Why the industry defaults to early filing — the structural incentives, the political fear, and the bird-in-hand psychology that push people toward early filing, and why none of them hold up when the survivor scenario is modeled explicitly. Strategies for widowed and divorced individuals — Social Security flexibility that most people never know exists, including how to file one benefit first and switch later, and how to claim on a former spouse's record without affecting their benefit at all. The filing decision is permanent. The modeling isn't. If you haven't run the surviving spouse scenario for your household — that analysis needs to happen before you file. Schedule The Income Standard Review at theincomestandard.com — no cost, no pitch, just measurement.

  8. May 4

    The Order Matters: Decumulation Sequencing

    Most people spend thirty years learning how to put money in. Almost nobody teaches you how to take it out. Not how much to take out — that conversation gets plenty of airtime. The order. Which account first. Which source second. Which bucket you leave untouched until the last possible moment — and why the wrong answer to that question can cost you more than a bad market year. The sequence of your withdrawals is as important as the size of them. Maybe more. In Episode 9, Tod Long opens Season 2 with one of the least-discussed, highest-impact decisions in retirement income planning: decumulation sequencing. Not a rule to follow — a discipline to maintain, year by year, against your actual tax bracket, for the full length of your retirement. This episode covers: The conventional taxable-first framework — what the standard withdrawal sequence is, why the logic behind it is sound, and the specific scenario where applying it mechanically without bracket awareness can actually increase your lifetime tax bill. The pre-RMD conversion window — why the years between retirement and age 73 are often a retiree's lowest-income years, and why a traditional IRA left untouched in that window will eventually produce forced distributions at a higher bracket than the one you're sitting in right now. Bracket-filling as a retirement income strategy — what it means to manage your tax bracket every year in retirement rather than following a fixed sequence rule, and how that discipline changes which account you draw from each January. Richard and Carol — two people with nearly identical assets, the same income need, and the same twenty-year retirement horizon. The difference between their lifetime federal income tax bills: approximately $230,000. The difference between their strategies: sequence — and the discipline to manage it annually rather than by default. Why this never gets addressed — the structural and incentive reasons that year-by-year bracket management sits outside most standard planning relationships, and why the dashboard you receive each quarter shows you nothing about your tax sequencing picture. The four-step implementation — how to build a withdrawal sequence that's responsive rather than static, including when to involve a CPA and why the income architecture conversation and the tax compliance conversation need to happen together. If your savings are primarily in pre-tax accounts and no one has run a year-by-year bracket projection for the decade between your retirement and your first RMD — this is the most time-sensitive conversation in your financial plan. Schedule The Income Standard Review at theincomestandard.com — no cost, no pitch, just measurement.

See All (18)

About

The Income Standard is where retirement income is engineered. Not guessed. For decades, investors were told to accumulate assets, stay diversified, and trust the markets. But retirement isn’t about accumulation — it’s about distribution. And distribution requires engineering. This podcast is for pre-retirees and retirees who want a measurable, structured approach to retirement income. Each episode breaks down the frameworks, math, risks, and decision architecture behind sustainable income planning. No hype. No fear tactics. No product pushing. Just disciplined thinking about how income should be built, tested, and held to a standard. If you’ve built something over your lifetime, this show is about how to live on it — intelligently.

Information

  • Creator
    Tod Long
  • Years Active
    2026
  • Episodes
    18
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2026 Tod Long
  • Show Website
    The Income Standard