BEAM There, Done That

Plangora
  • 4.4 (5)
  • Technology
  • Updated Weekly

BEAM There, Done That is a podcast about building real systems with Elixir, Erlang, and the BEAM. We’ve built it before — distributed systems, fault‑tolerant services, event pipelines, real‑time apps, production nightmares, and the supervision trees that saved them. Each episode dives into practical lessons from shipping software on the BEAM: architecture decisions, scaling challenges, operational failures, and the patterns that actually work. No hype. No theory without scars. Just hard‑won experience from engineers who’ve been there.

  1. 12h ago

    Is Your Elixir Code Actually Fast? Tobias Pfeiffer on Benchmarking

    Everyone has an opinion about whether the BEAM is fast or slow. Almost nobody has actually measured it properly. Tobias Pfeiffer -PragTob on the internet, benchmarking nerd, real-time engineer at Supabase -came to Elixir from Ruby because Ruby couldn't handle WebSockets at scale. Then he learned the language the way he learns every language: by building a benchmarking library. Ten years later, Benchee is what most of the Erlang and Elixir world reaches for when it wants a number instead of an argument. Topics include: why Tobias writes a benchmarking library every time he learns a new language -and what that discipline actually teaches about how a runtime works the production scar: a benchmark that showed one query was faster, deployed it, and discovered the benchmark had been measuring the wrong input entirely the single most important insight about benchmarking: most people quietly fool themselves and walk away more confident and more wrong than when they started inputs as a first-class feature -the lesson José Valim taught Tobias within 17 minutes of an open GitHub issue why body-recursive map is faster than tail-recursive map for small lists on the BEAM -and what that tells you about the runtime what reductions are, why they're a more stable measurement than wall time, and when they diverge how Benchee measures memory: spawning a monitored process, watching GC events, reporting exact bytes -and why deterministic code gives deterministic memory the JSON benchmarking arms race -built-in OTP JSON, jason, Jiffy, and why comparison benchmarks usually miss the point why Benchee has no macros, no DSL, and deliberately only uses functions -and why that design decision made it composable in ways nobody predicted the hardest benchmarking mistake to stop making: confusing latency and throughput what Toby wishes more Elixir developers understood about BEAM performance before they opened a PR claiming something was faster Recorded August 21, 2026. Resources mentioned: Benchee on Hex: hex.pm/packages/benchee Benchee HTML formatter -self-contained HTML output with downloadable graphs Benchee markdown formatter PragTob on GitHub: github.com/bencheeorg

    Is Your Elixir Code Actually Fast? Tobias Pfeiffer on Benchmarking

  2. Sep 11

    Louis Pilfold on Building Gleam - Static Types on the BEAM

    What if the BEAM had a language that felt like talking to a friend instead of fighting a compiler? That's the problem Louis Pilfold set out to solve. He loved the BEAM. He missed static types. Every other option was a tradeoff he couldn't live with. So he built Gleam - and after years of quietly saying no to everything he wasn't sure about, it's gathered a community, found production users, and now runs on servers, browsers, and $2 microcontrollers. Topics include: why every successful language is born from a problem - and what specific frustration made Louis start building rather than just complaining the discipline of saying no: no if, no currying, no pretending two targets are one world the design decision Louis regrets most - the conditional compilation syntax he's now stuck with and desperately doesn't want more people to use why Gleam's concurrency model lives in a library rather than the language - and what that buys in terms of flexibility when smarter people eventually improve it how Gleam solved the problem everyone said was unsolvable: "you can't type message passing on the BEAM" what the JavaScript and BEAM targets share and where they genuinely can't be unified - and why pretending they can leads to terrible architecture why Gleam chose Erlang records as its data structure and what that costs at runtime Lustre, Gleam's web framework - beating mainstream JavaScript frameworks in benchmarks while written entirely in Gleam how Louis funds his work on Gleam: GitHub Sponsors, the Gleam community, and what sustainable open source actually looks like from the inside what Gleam will look like in 3–5 years - native records, better JavaScript interop, and why the language's approach to stability makes those changes possible Recorded August 20, 2026. Resources mentioned: gleam.run - docs, tour, community tour.gleam.run - interactive language tour running the Gleam compiler compiled to Wasm, takes an afternoon Exercism Gleam track Code Crafters - build Redis/SQLite/Git in Gleam GitHub Sponsors: lpil (Louis Pilfold) Lustre - Gleam's web framework

    Louis Pilfold on Building Gleam - Static Types on the BEAM

  3. Sep 4

    How WhatsApp Fixed Erlang's Tooling Problem | Roberto Aloi & Michał Muskała

    Part one established that Erlang scales. Part two is about what comes after - keeping a codebase that large healthy for years, when most engineers arrive having never written Erlang before. WhatsApp's answer was to invest in the language itself. The formatter, the language server, the type checker. And then to open source almost all of it back to the community - not as charity, but because diverse use cases and external bug reports make the tools better. Roberto Aloi and Michał Muskała are back for the half that doesn't appear on conference posters. Topics include: why the investment in tooling came from a developer survey rather than an engineering instinct - the data showed Erlang developer experience was the weak point what ELP (the Erlang Language Platform) actually is and how it superseded the Erlang LS that Roberto built before joining WhatsApp how eqWAlizer, WhatsApp's type checker, was rolled out without breaking other teams - the team owning the type checker also owned the task of fixing things up when new checks introduced errors why types and let it crash aren't in tension: you can never statically verify everything in a dynamic language, so the gap is where supervision and recovery fit the two biggest misconceptions about static analysis tools: that they're slow (modern tooling is fast) and that you have to commit to them all at once (you can do it incrementally) why WhatsApp open sources tools that took significant engineering investment - keeping them internal would make them worse, not better what's still unsolved: exhaustiveness checks at this scale remain an open problem how AI is changing the Erlang learning experience - build first, ask AI to review your patterns afterward the word that ties both episodes together: trust. Supervision earns it at runtime. Types earn it at compile time. Companion episode: Part 1 on scale and operations. Recorded June 25, 2026.

    How WhatsApp Fixed Erlang's Tooling Problem | Roberto Aloi & Michał Muskała

  4. Aug 28

    Inside WhatsApp with Roberto Aloi & Michał Muskała

    Everyone quotes WhatsApp when the topic of Erlang and scale comes up. Fewer people know what it actually looks like from the inside - what was hard, what was never hard, and what the team spent their time on once the concurrency stopped being the problem. Roberto Aloi and Michał Muskała work on the team keeping it running. This is the first of two episodes with them. Topics include: what Roberto's first Erlang moment was - implementing a GenServer for a robot at university and learning binary pattern matching felt like cheating why Michał came to Erlang backwards, from Elixir, and what the tooling gap actually felt like the column numbers OTP bug that caused cascading failures and taught Roberto what no documentation could the optimization that made the JSON Unicode parser slower - binary pattern matching was the wrong tool, and a custom state machine was faster what "let it crash" actually means at WhatsApp scale: letting it crash is the easy part, recovery is where the engineering lives why the 30th employee was the first person at WhatsApp with Erlang experience - and what that means for hiring the most misunderstood thing about Erlang at WhatsApp: scaling isn't the exotic part, keeping the codebase healthy is how WhatsApp does deployments: 1% of servers first, one region next, monitoring throughout, ready to roll back what types of failures become normal at this scale - and why disaster recovery drills are a regular practice overly dynamic code as the anti-pattern that creates the most sustained pain Part two covers ELP, Equalizer, and the tooling that keeps a codebase this large navigable. You want both. Recorded June 25, 2026.

    Inside WhatsApp with Roberto Aloi & Michał Muskała

  5. Aug 21

    Erlang on a Microcontroller: Davide Bettio & Paul Guyot on AtomVM

    In 1952, Marvin Minsky and Claude Shannon built a box with a single switch. When you flip it, the only thing it does is reach out and switch itself back off. Seventy years later, 5,000 of those boxes are sitting on desks worldwide — and the thing making them tick is Erlang, running on a chip smaller than a fingernail. Davide Bettio built AtomVM, the virtual machine that makes this possible. Paul Guyot wrote the Erlang firmware, added SMP support as a weekend project, and shipped 5,000 units. Topics include: what AtomVM is — a from-scratch BEAM-compatible VM for microcontrollers with a few hundred kilobytes of RAM and no OS debugging a virtual machine with no stack traces: printf everywhere, blindfolded the first production batch with a 5–10% return rate that turned out to be a mechanical problem — after Paul rewrote half the software looking for a bug that wasn't there why the actor model, let it crash, and binary pattern matching are unusually well-suited to embedded devices what AtomVM actually supports: GenServer, maps, JSON, Erlang distribution, and via the Popcorn project — Phoenix LiveView on a microcontroller Paul's SMP implementation as a "mixed blessing" — added for purely selfish engineering reasons, then forced the whole team to rewrite their drivers where AtomVM differs from the BEAM: no dirty schedulers, no hot code unloading, a simpler scheduler model that mostly doesn't surface at the API level Recorded June 24, 2026. Resources mentioned: atomvm.net GitHub: atomvm/AtomVM Popcorn project — Phoenix LiveView on AtomVM Discord: AtomVM community

    Erlang on a Microcontroller: Davide Bettio & Paul Guyot on AtomVM

  6. Aug 14

    Mat Trudel on Building Bandit - the Web Server Running Your Phoenix App

    Bandit quietly became the default web server in Phoenix. Mat Trudel wrote it by hand, in pure Elixir, as a side project - and kept it that way even as AI changed how everyone else writes code. This episode goes two places at once: the engineering of a foundational piece of infrastructure most developers never think about, and an honest conversation about what it means to keep building something by hand when you don't have to. Topics include: how a six-month debugging session - Wireshark, a 30-page RFC, and a single misread line in the HPACK spec - explains why HTTP is genuinely hard to get right what "one process per connection" actually buys you at 3am when something's on fire: a stack trace that's entirely Elixir frames, all the way up why HTTP parsers have a million attack vectors that have nothing to do with which language you write them in the WebSock and WebSock Adapter split - and why a web server depending on another web server is ridiculous how José Valim looked at Mat's first WebSocket implementation and told him he was doing too much an AI-generated PR sitting open on the Bandit repo that implements the entire HTTP/3 stack - and why Mat hasn't merged it why Mat still writes Bandit entirely by hand while using agents for everything in his day job the cabinet maker's son analogy that explains the whole thing: if you want cabinets, go to IKEA; if you want to build them, the journey is the point what it means when "finding bugs got cheap but judging and fixing them didn't" Companion episode: Peter Ulrich and Jonathan Machin on CVEs and security - the same story from the reporting side. Recorded June 22, 2026. Bandit quietly became the default web server in Phoenix. Mat Trudel wrote it by hand, in pure Elixir, as a side project - and kept it that way even as AI changed how everyone else writes code. This episode goes two places at once: the engineering of a foundational piece of infrastructure most developers never think about, and an honest conversation about what it means to keep building something by hand when you don't have to. Topics include: how a six-month debugging session - Wireshark, a 30-page RFC, and a single misread line in the HPACK spec - explains why HTTP is genuinely hard to get right what "one process per connection" actually buys you at 3am when something's on fire: a stack trace that's entirely Elixir frames, all the way up why HTTP parsers have a million attack vectors that have nothing to do with which language you write them in the WebSock and WebSock Adapter split - and why a web server depending on another web server is ridiculous how José Valim looked at Mat's first WebSocket implementation and told him he was doing too much an AI-generated PR sitting open on the Bandit repo that implements the entire HTTP/3 stack - and why Mat hasn't merged it why Mat still writes Bandit entirely by hand while using agents for everything in his day job the cabinet maker's son analogy that explains the whole thing: if you want cabinets, go to IKEA; if you want to build them, the journey is the point what it means when "finding bugs got cheap but judging and fixing them didn't" Companion episode: Peter Ulrich and Jonathan Machin on CVEs and security - the same story from the reporting side. Recorded June 22, 2026.

    Mat Trudel on Building Bandit - the Web Server Running Your Phoenix App

  7. Aug 7

    Erlang Without an OS: Maxim Kharchenko on Building LING

    Booting OTP without a Linux kernel underneath it. Running Erlang directly on a Xen hypervisor. Implementing a VM where every single out-of-memory condition is explicitly handled — not a single allocation without a recovery path. Maxim Kharchenko spent five to eight years building Ling, a from-scratch Erlang runtime that runs without an operating system. Not a fork of the BEAM. Not a modification. A clean implementation, built to answer one question: can you run a system that never stops? Francesco Cesarini joins Alan Wyma for this episode — he was there when it was built, running the Erlang Solutions team that worked on the other half of the project. Topics include: how Maxim came to Erlang backwards — building his own isolation-based runtime first, then discovering Erlang had already solved the same problems what a Xen hypervisor actually is and why it's the right host for a no-OS Erlang VM how Ling's dynamic instruction set works: analyzing real OTP source code to figure out the optimal instruction set for that specific workload, then generating specialized opcodes — including one that loads the number 17 specifically because 17 appeared frequently enough to warrant it why every single memory allocation in Ling has an explicit out-of-memory handler — and how hard that discipline was to maintain the garbage collector design for bare-metal network applications and why it matters differently there than in regular BEAM workloads running the entire network as an Erlang application: not just a piece of it, but switch firmware, controller, and the full stack why the industry was not ready for this ten years ago — and why the problems Ling was solving have come back under different names where unikernels and Linux eBPF fit in the same space today Recorded June 3, 2026.

    Erlang Without an OS: Maxim Kharchenko on Building LING

  8. Jul 31

    Mike Williams & Björn Gustavsson on Building the JAM

    Before the BEAM, there was the JAM - Joe's Abstract Machine. It was the first virtual machine that made Erlang fast enough to run in production, and it was built by a handful of people at Ericsson's computer science lab who had a mandate to do whatever they wanted. Mike Williams wrote large parts of the emulator. Björn Gustavsson inherited it in 1996 and built what came after. In this episode - the most historically significant we've recorded - Alan Wyma and Francesco Cesarini bring them both together to tell the story of where the BEAM actually came from. Topics include: why Mike looked at Joe Armstrong's first 20 lines of C and said "this is awful, I'll do something about it" - and how he got message passing down to six instructions the three numbers that decide whether a concurrent language lives or dies: process creation time, context switch time, and message copy time - and why 70% of VM time was spent on them, not application code why keeping concurrency inside the language rather than the OS was "perfectly obvious" to Mike, and why it was a minority view even then - Java removed green threads, early Rust removed lightweight processes the two-version rule for module hot loading that's still in the BEAM today, 30 years on - and why Björn never wanted to remove it memory as the binding constraint, not speed: phone switches handling whole cities ran on 16–64 MB of RAM how distribution was added to the JAM by Claes Wikström - the person whose name is always forgotten in this story, who also invented ETS tables and created the first prototype of Erlang's binary syntax what Björn saw when he first read Mike's code in 1996, why he liked the JAM more than the BEAM at first, and what finally made the JAM obsolete the computer science lab culture that made Erlang possible: no publish-or-perish pressure, just a mandate to solve a real problem Recorded June 4, 2026. Resources mentioned: "History of Programming Languages" paper, Joe Armstrong (HOPL III) Bjarne Däcker's licentiate thesis Early Erlang CS lab technical reports (ERN series)

    Mike Williams & Björn Gustavsson on Building the JAM
See All (29)

Ratings & Reviews

4.4
out of 5
5 Ratings

About

BEAM There, Done That is a podcast about building real systems with Elixir, Erlang, and the BEAM. We’ve built it before — distributed systems, fault‑tolerant services, event pipelines, real‑time apps, production nightmares, and the supervision trees that saved them. Each episode dives into practical lessons from shipping software on the BEAM: architecture decisions, scaling challenges, operational failures, and the patterns that actually work. No hype. No theory without scars. Just hard‑won experience from engineers who’ve been there.

Information

  • Creator
    Plangora
  • Years Active
    2026
  • Episodes
    29
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © Plangora
  • Show Website
    BEAM There, Done That