Provider Power with Sara Sherman

Sara Sherman

Provider Power Moves is where developmental disability leaders stop surviving and start leading. If you’re tired of staffing chaos, compliance stress, burnout, and “why is this still a problem?” — you’re in the right place. Each episode delivers practical strategy, tough-love clarity, and real-world tools you can implement immediately to strengthen supervisors, empower DSPs, and build services that actually move the needle on independence. Less theory. More action. These are the moves that change everything.

  1. Mar 31

    Not the Best Supervision Philosophy

    Transcription It’s a very well-meaning philosophy. I totally understand where supervisors are coming from. Unfortunately, this philosophy is sabotaging your success as a supervisor and diminishing your impact as a team leader. Welcome to the Provider Power Moves Podcast. I’m your host, Sara Sherman. Here, I leverage my 35 years of experience in the field to give you practical steps that create big results in your agency and in your workday. It usually happens at the end of a frontline supervisor training. Someone pops into the chat or proudly strolls up to me and says, I don’t ask my staff to do anything I don’t do myself. As gently as I can, I have to say — mmm… that might not be the best approach. This is where I say, I’m sorry. If I didn’t say something here, I wouldn’t really be serving you. Here’s where this idea of not asking anyone to do anything you wouldn’t do yourself comes from. And there are many sources. See if any of these resonate with you. We’ve been abandoned. The people in our lives who were supposed to help us and support us simply didn’t. We were left alone to struggle and figure things out — at home, at work, or both. And we know what that feels like. It feels bad. Our response to this trauma is to make sure no one else feels that pain — at least not within our circle of control. And that is noble, kind, and loving. Not very effective — but noble, kind, and loving. We view being a good boss as pitching in, leading by being willing to get our hands dirty. We did that job. We earned internal promotion because we were good at it. The work is familiar. It feels comfortable. And sometimes we think it’s just faster or easier if we take care of things ourselves. This is our first management role. And we don’t want to be seen as above getting our hands dirty. The team we are managing — they were our coworkers. We know what they said about the boss. And we don’t want them saying those things about us. We’ve had crappy, hands-off bosses. And quite frankly, they sucked. We saw and felt the burden of having ineffective bosses — and we don’t want to behave like that. We’re disgusted by the idea that we could become like them. We don’t know what else to do. We want to be productive. We want to be a team player. But we didn’t get very good supervisor training. We want to be busy — or at least not look unbusy — so we default to what we know and what we see needs to be done. Hopefully, we’ll figure out what else we’re supposed to be doing. Our team demands that we help them do their jobs. They smile and complain that they have too much to do. They accuse us of being lazy — thinking we’re so fancy now. We feel pulled in to help because we feel bad for them, or we’re concerned they won’t follow our instructions. And that will hurt the individuals we support. And that will reflect badly on us. And we might even lose our position — along with the increased income. And we really need the money. We don’t know what else to do. The staff aren’t doing the work. There’s no support from above. And the work has to be done. So we jump in. We want to be a team player, and we don’t know any other way to show it. Staff are grateful for the help — and that feels great. Or maybe they’re just less mean — and that feels great too. I get all of this. I really do. I once held this philosophy myself — for all of these reasons. Then I hit a snag. I wasn’t getting my work done. Staff came to expect that I would pick up at least a portion of their tasks regularly. They began to treat me poorly — demanding I do more, following directions less, talking about me behind my back, rolling their eyes when I gave instruction. I was exhausted. Confused. And not really seen as a leader. Think about it. If something goes wrong on the computer soldering line, would you expect Bill Gates to run down to the line, put on a welding cap, and start melting parts together? If the Amazon website crashed, would you expect Jeff Bezos to log in and start coding? No. Of course not. Because it’s not their job to do these tasks. It’s their job to make sure the tasks are done. If these leaders leave their post and slide into a frontline role, our first thought is, Who’s manning the ship? And our second thought is, These are not good managers. Even if they could do the work well, they can only fill one role at a time. That’s great risk for small benefit. We don’t even expect frontline supervisors to jump in and do all the work. We expect them to coordinate the team so the work gets done. Why? Because if a supervisor drops down the table of organization into a frontline role, they can no longer see what the team is doing. They aren’t available to support others, prevent mistakes, or confirm work is being done correctly and on time. They’re locked into that position. I teach frontline supervisors to stay in their metaphorical fire tower — that big tower over the forest where rangers sit, scanning for danger. When the ranger comes down from the tower to deal with something on the ground, the entire forest is at risk. The ranger needs to spot trouble, come down briefly to deal with it, and then scramble back up the tower. Frontline supervision is exactly the same. A supervisor needs that 30,000-foot view. And when they come down from the tower unnecessarily — or for too long — the entire team and the individuals served are at risk. While a supervisor is absolutely part of the team, their role is different. They are the coach. And the coach does not run the ball. The coach prepares, observes, instructs, and encourages. And we all recognize that if the coach is on the field, nobody is coaching — even though coaching is critically important. There are two real-life exceptions. First, in an emergency, the supervisor jumps in. Absolutely. In true emergencies, it’s all hands on deck. Second, if a supervisor is filling a scheduled shift, then for that time, they are a frontline worker — and that’s appropriate. But if you supervise supervisors and your supervisor has dropped into a frontline role, they are no longer in the fire tower. Someone else must fill that oversight role — either you or another assigned leader. Expecting someone to be a tree and in the fire tower at the same time is a recipe for disaster. No one will be successful. Everyone will be frustrated. And no one is watching the forest during a period of great risk. Not asking people to do things you wouldn’t do yourself sounds noble. In reality, it undermines leadership and puts your entire team at risk. Instead, support your team so they can do the work. Advocate for their needs. Be clear and concrete about what you see and what needs to change. Dropping down to do the work is a band-aid at best. It is not a sustainable long-term solution. What do you think? Leave me a comment, or shoot me an email at Sara — (S-A-R-A) — sara@providerpowermoves.com . That’s in the show notes. Or ask me a question. I’d love to hear what’s on your mind and turn it into a podcast to give you the answers you’re seeking. Until next time — power on.

    10 min
  2. Mar 24

    Lazy Doesn't Matter

    Transcription Do you have lazy staff? I know it’s pretty common to think that you do. I hear about “lazy” staff every time I do a frontline supervisor training. Lazy. Here for the wrong reasons. Don’t care. Basically broken humans beyond repair. But they just keep showing up to the job. Supervisors and managers feel frustrated, angry, and stuck. In the meantime, work is not getting done. Compliance isn’t happening. And most importantly, the precious minutes of the lives of the individuals you serve are slipping by. Those individuals are not getting the services they’re supposed to be getting, and they aren’t living the lives they want to be living. Welcome to the Provider Power Moves Podcast. I am your host, Sara Sherman. Here, I leverage my 35 years of experience in the field to give you practical steps that create big results in your agency and in your workday. This episode is brought to you by TrueLink. TrueLink partners with hundreds of IDD organizations nationwide to streamline how clients receive and use their funds. Many programs still rely on paper checks, cash, and manual receipts — which creates risk and makes audits difficult. The TrueLink platform replaces that entire process with reloadable Visa debit cards, built-in spend controls, and audit-ready reporting. TrueLink keeps clients safer, gives staff back valuable time, and provides clear visibility into every transaction. If your organization is interested in learning more, check the show notes for contact information. What if I told you that you wouldn’t recognize lazy if you were looking at it — and that it didn’t matter anyway? Would you believe me? Let me ask you this. How do you un-lazy someone? You can’t, can you? And that’s the beauty of judging someone’s character and giving them a negative assessment. There’s nothing more to do. The verdict is in. The staff are lazy, and you’re stuck with them. It’s kind of like saying, I just washed my hair and I can’t do a thing with it. You’ve judged them, and now you’re absolved of any further obligation to address the situation. I mean, what could you possibly do about someone who has decided to be lazy? Sure — these are people who have managed to find housing, drive and maintain a car, shower, have clothing, feed themselves, and often raise children, maintain relationships, and even attend college or have another job. But once they get to work, it all falls apart. It’s very frustrating when staff are not completing their work — or aren’t completing their work without a lot of nagging, reminding, and accommodating. Because supervisors tend to be diligent employees, they don’t understand this behavior. They can’t figure it out. So they’ve decided the problem must be a character flaw — and that character flaw is being lazy. The truth is, we don’t know if they’re lazy or not. What we do know is that they aren’t doing their work. When I hear staff say people are lazy, I ask this question: What is it that you see that is leading you to conclude that the staff are lazy? Let me ask it again. What is it that you see that is leading you to conclude that the staff are lazy? Here’s what I hear when I ask that question. They don’t take people on outings. They’re on their phones. They don’t interact with individuals. They’re visiting with each other. They don’t document. They don’t clean. They don’t cook. Wonderful. Why wonderful? Because we can work with this list. You’re not going to un-lazy someone, but you can address the fact that they’re on their cell phone. You can help someone figure out how to interact more with the individuals they serve. And because this list is specific, you can coach and correct on these topics. You can track performance expectations. You can move through corrective action procedures if staff decide they’re not going to be receptive to coaching. All of a sudden, lazy doesn’t matter. The truth is, these staff could be the most ambitious people on the planet. Unfortunately, they are not executing their tasks. Once you define the behaviors that need to change, you can have a specific conversation about expectations. You can complete skills-based training. You can create performance measures. You can track to those measures and have performance-based feedback conversations. You can identify barriers to success and seek to eliminate those barriers. And you can evaluate progression toward working independently — or toward working somewhere else. Now everything has shifted to the supervisor. It’s all about the supervisor’s actions and the staff person’s response to those actions. Instead of feeling helpless, the supervisor is now actively driving performance correction — and is completely responsible for doing so. That’s right. Monitoring performance and taking the necessary steps to move performance in the correct direction is the supervisor’s responsibility. No more feeling stuck and powerless. The key here is to define and address behavior, with the goal that staff do their work correctly, on time, and independently. So, what do you think? Did I convince you that lazy doesn’t matter? And do you now understand that in order to resolve performance issues, we have to focus on the concrete behavior patterns of our staff? What do you think? Leave me a comment, or shoot me an email at Sara — (S-A-R-A) — sara@providerpowermoves.com . That’s in the show notes. Or ask me a question. I’d love to hear what’s on your mind and turn it into a podcast to give you the answers you’re seeking. Until next time — power on.

    7 min

About

Provider Power Moves is where developmental disability leaders stop surviving and start leading. If you’re tired of staffing chaos, compliance stress, burnout, and “why is this still a problem?” — you’re in the right place. Each episode delivers practical strategy, tough-love clarity, and real-world tools you can implement immediately to strengthen supervisors, empower DSPs, and build services that actually move the needle on independence. Less theory. More action. These are the moves that change everything.