Think Like a Librarian Podcast

Meredith Silberstein

Think Like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds aims to guide curious, ambitious people design humane systems for thinking, working, and creating — using librarian-grade frameworks.

Episodes

  1. Visibility Without Burnout - The Librarian's Weekly Review

    Apr 29

    Visibility Without Burnout - The Librarian's Weekly Review

    In this episode, you'll learn... Why weekly reviews are about visibility, not control—and how that changes everything How lack of regular calendar reviews can lead to preventable scheduling conflicts What weeding means in library science—and why your task list needs it too The MUSTIE framework for deciding what to let go of (Misleading, Superseded, Trivial, Irrelevant, Elsewhere) How to implement your own Weekly Review: a 4-step framework you can actually sustain How to tell urgency, importance, and noise apart—and why the Eisenhower Matrix only gets you partway there How preparation through mini-reviews transforms panic into confident response Why location is a design decision—and how to put your review where you actually go How to track energy instead of time when choosing commitments What to do when the system breaks down  Stories from the Library The Library Event Planning Surprise How I got blindsided by an email asking me to change the date of a major library event (the Jewish American Heritage Celebration) because I hadn't been checking the shared programming calendar regularly. If I'd been doing weekly reviews, I would have spotted the scheduling conflict weeks earlier—before telling community partners about the date. From panic to confidence: After receiving that stressful email, I spent the evening doing a mini-review—scanning calendars, checking reservations, gathering context. The next morning, I walked into the meeting prepared. It turned out fine. My daily page reflection captured it: "things have a way of working out better than I feared." The review helped me respond instead of react. Episode Takeaway Weekly reviews aren't about perfection. They're about presence. Knowing what's on your plate is a kindness you give yourself—so you can stop carrying it all in your head. And letting go of what no longer serves you? That's not failure. That's good collection management. Episode 006: Visibility Without Burnout - The Librarian's Weekly Review Featured Segment: Workflow Wisdom The Librarian's Weekly Review: Scan your inboxes (email, calendar, notes, tasks) — just to see what's there Triage — what's urgent vs. important vs. noise? Choose 3 commitments — what are you actually committing to this week? Weed 3 stale items — let go of three things that have been sitting untouched Design your system for your worst days. A system that only works when you're at full capacity isn't a system — it's a performance. The minimum viable version (one inbox scanned, one commitment written down) still counts. Consistency isn't a streak; it's a rhythm you can return to. On triage: Urgency is objective. Importance is subjective — and that's the part most advice skips. When you can't tell the difference, ask: Does this move me toward something I actually want? And watch for noise wearing urgency's costume. Finding Aids: What's Mentioned in this Episode Concepts & Frameworks: Weekly reviews, originally from David Allen's Getting Things Done book Weeding, a core part of library collection management (from the American Library Association's Policy Toolkit) The MUSTIE framework for weeding decisions from the Yavapai Library Network Tools: Notion (for weekly review pages, task databases, project databases, formula-based due date alerts) Notion AI (for extrapolating from sparse notes during low-energy days) Microsoft 365 Copilot (mentioned in the scheduling conflict story) Relay, Zapier, Make (mentioned as options for automating task capture with pre-filled properties) Let's Stay Connected Try it: This week, try The Librarian's Weekly Review. Scan your inboxes, choose 3 commitments, and weed 3 stale items. Notice what happens. Tell me: What was the friction point? Send me a message or leave a comment telling me what made this hard or what made it easy. I'll use your feedback to shape a future episode. Subscribe: Never miss an episode of Think Like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds. Share: Know someone who's drowning in their task list or keeps abandoning their weekly review practice? Share this episode with them. What's Coming Up Next on Think Like a Librarian AI can capture everything — but a warehouse isn't a library, and a transcript isn't knowledge. In Episode 007,  we'll talk about what actually happens after you hit record in your AI meeting notetaker, whether that's Zoom Companion, Spellar, Notion AI Meeting Notes, or something else: a three-stage pipeline for turning raw AI captures into something you can use, and where your judgment matters more than any algorithm. If you have a folder full of recordings you've never opened, that one's for you. Get Your Copy of The Hidden Stacks: Vol. 1 By Sharing Your Review Screenshot your review of the Think Like a Librarian podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or any other platform and upload it to get a free copy of my curated "Hidden Stacks." Upload Your Review Transcript [00:00:00] Meredith: Have you ever ended a week and thought, what did I even do? Or maybe the opposite. You were so busy reacting to what came at you that you never got to the thing that actually mattered. Your email piled up until you just archived everything. Your calendar surprised you with an appointment you forgot about. Your task list grew so long, it stopped being useful. [00:00:22] This one took longer to get to you than I planned, which as you’ll hear is completely on brand for an episode about what happens when your systems don’t work. [00:00:30] I’m Meredith, and this is Think Like A Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds. [00:00:35] Weekly reviews are one of the most recommended productivity habits and also one of the most abandoned, not because they don’t work, but because most approaches are designed for people with predictable lives and empty calendars. Today I’m sharing the framework I actually use. One that borrows from a practice librarians know well: weeding. Let’s talk about visibility without burnout. Visibility is NOT Control [00:01:01] Most weekly review advice is built around control, getting on top of things, getting ahead, but that’s not the goal. Visibility is seeing what’s actually there. Think about a library circulation desk. The librarian doesn’t control what patrons bring to the desk. They triage, they route, they track. They’re building awareness of what’s happening, not creating a perfect plan for how things should go. [00:01:30] Your weekly review is the same. You’re not trying to predict every demand on your time. You’re just trying to avoid getting blindsided. And let me tell you about a time I did get blindsided. [00:01:42] It’s late January. I’m planning this big library event, the Jewish American Heritage Celebration for May, which is Jewish American Heritage Month, among many other great celebrations. [00:01:54] I’ve got community partners lined up. I’ve started promoting it in small circles, and I’m feeling good about the timeline. Then I get an email from my supervisor. “We need to change the date.” I wasn’t expecting it at all. Instant stress spiral. It turns out there was a conflict with another premier event, something I would’ve spotted if I’d been checking the shared programming calendar regularly and scrolled all the way over to the one column that indicated yes, this is a big deal event. [00:02:24] Instead, I’m scrambling to use Microsoft 365 Copilot to cross-reference the programming spreadsheet, the holiday schedule, venue reservations, just to find alternative dates. If I’d been doing regular weekly reviews of that shared calendar, I would have spotted the conflict weeks earlier before I’d already told the community partners about the original date, before I’d started promoting it. I would have double checked if having two Premier events on the same day was even a good idea, even if they’re targeted toward different audiences. And happening in different spaces. [00:03:05] Visibility is the first step. You can’t make good choices about what matters if you don’t know what’s on the table. A weekly review isn’t about being on top of everything. It’s about not being surprised by things you could have seen coming. The Library Practice No One Likes Talking About [00:03:20] Weeding. It’s one of those library practices that almost never makes it into productivity conversations, and it might be the most useful one for your task list. Weeding is the practice of removing materials from a library collection. Books that are outdated, damaged, no longer circulating or superseded by better resources. [00:03:39] It’s unglamorous, it’s essential, and it’s sometimes controversial, but here’s the truth. A collection that never weeds becomes unusable. Your task list, your inbox, your “Someday” projects? They’re a collection too. In library science, we use something called the MUSTIE framework to decide what to weed. Let me adapt it for personal tasks. [00:04:01] M is for misleading. This task no longer reflects what I actually want. [00:04:06] S: superseded. Something else has replaced this task. [00:04:11] T: Trivial. This task felt important when I wrote it, but it’s not. [00:04:17] I: Irrelevant. This task doesn’t serve who I am now. [00:04:21] E: Elsewhere. If I really need this task, I can recreate it. [00:04:26] Let me give you an example from my own life. Late January, my husband and I are going through our subscriptions, making some hard financial decisions. One of them is an amazing course platform. This platform with all of these features I thought I would someday use. When I wrote about it in my daily page later, I put the word sadly in parentheses like this, “including sadly, the course platform.” That sadly told me everything. [00:04:52] I wasn’t sad about losing the actual tool. I was sad about letting go of t

    24 min
  2. Your System Isn't Broken. It's Holding the Wrong Things

    Apr 17

    Your System Isn't Broken. It's Holding the Wrong Things

    In this episode, you'll learn... Why projects vs. areas in PARA is the single most important distinction to make, and why mixing them makes everything feel urgent all the timeExit criteria — what they are, why most projects don’t have them, and the one sentence that changes everythingWhy self-paced courses are a sneaky trap (and how to split them so they stop haunting you)Resources vs. archives: the difference between a waiting room and a graveyardThe reversed hanger method — borrowed from professional organizers — as a practical archiving triggerWhy “the archive” is not admitting defeat. It’s system hygiene. A Story from the LibraryLibraries have been running a version of PARA for a long time — they just don't call it that. Think about what a library actually holds. Projects are things with a clear endpoint: planning the summer reading program, coordinating an author visit, spending a grant before June. When the program ends, the project closes. Areas are ongoing responsibilities — the Makerspace, collection development, reader services. Nobody expects the Makerspace to get "done." It just continues. Resources are reference material: staff manuals, training docs, the policy handbook. Nobody's actively working on the staff manual right now, but when someone needs it, it has to be findable. And Archives hold what's finished — last year's summer reading files, the submitted grant report, the 2019 collection development plan. Not active. Not maintained. But preserved. Nobody at the library feels guilty that the summer reading files are archived. Nobody feels like they're falling behind because the Makerspace is an ongoing responsibility rather than a completed task. The categories make the expectations clear. That's what PARA can do for your own system — not add more structure, but make the right expectations visible. So you know what you're supposed to finish, what you're supposed to maintain, what you're just supposed to be able to find, and what you're allowed to let go of. Episode Takeaway The goal isn't a perfect system. It's a system that's good enough to actually use — one that makes you feel held instead of haunted. A finish line you can cross is infinitely more useful than a perfect one you never reach. So give yourself permission to define 'done' generously. Honestly. In a way that's actually reachable. Because a system that makes you feel behind doesn't mean you're broken. It just might be holding the wrong things. Episode 005: The System isn't Broken. It's Holding the Wrong Things. Featured Segment: Workflow Wisdom One sentence for your projects. One defined review for your system. That’s it. Your challenge: Open your task manager. Pick one item. Ask: “Does this end, or do I maintain it?” Write down one sentence — “I’ll know this is done when…” — before you do anything else with it. This is the fastest way to determine if something is a project vs. an area in the PARA framework. Finding Aids: What's Mentioned in this Episode Building a Second Brain by Tiago Forte (2022)The PARA Method by Tiago Forte (2023)Morgen — calendar + task manager with multi-app integrationSnipd — podcast and audiobook highlight and note capture appKeep It Shot — AI-powered screenshot renaming and search for MacSparkle — AI file organizer and cleaner for Mac Let's Stay Connected Try It: Pick one category in your digital life — a folder, a saved list, a collection of bookmarks — and define a time window: 30, 60, or 90 days. Anything in that category that hasn’t been touched in your window goes to Archive. Not deleted. Just moved out of active view. Notice how it feels to make that call ahead of time, before you’re in the emotional moment of deciding whether something is worth keepingSubscribe so you don’t miss future episodes where we’ll tackle how to do a weekly review without the dread, why the questions you ask matter more than the tools you use, and how to build a system that actually fits your real life — not the aspirational one.Share this episode with someone who opens their task manager hoping to feel organized and closes it feeling worse than before they started.  And if this episode made you think differently about your to-do list — send it to someone who needs to hear it. Because a list that never shrinks isn’t a reflection of your discipline. It’s a design problem. And design problems have solutions. What's Coming Up Next on Think Like a Librarian: Now that you know how to see what you’re actually holding, the next question is: how do you check in on it regularly — without the review itself becoming another thing you dread? That’s exactly what we’re covering in Episode 006: Visibility Without Burnout: The Librarian’s Weekly Review. Get Your Copy of The Hidden Stacks: Vol. 1 By Sharing Your ReviewScreenshot your review of the Think Like a Librarian podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or any other platform and upload it to get a free copy of my curated "Hidden Stacks." Upload Your Review Transcript [00:00:00] Meredith: Picture this. You open your task manager to figure out what to work on and instead of feeling clear, you feel heavy . There’s stuff on there from three weeks ago. Stuff you keep moving forward, stuff you added at 11:00 PM when you were convinced you would definitely do it tomorrow. And the worst part? You built this system, you* chose the app, set up the structure, added the tasks. It was supposed to help. So why does it feel like it’s following you around? [00:00:29] Today, we’re talking about why that happens and what to do instead. Welcome back to Think like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds. I’m Meredith. What I just described, that heaviness, isn’t a discipline problem, it’s a design problem. [00:00:46] Specifically, it’s what happens when your system doesn’t distinguish between the things you need to finish and the things you need to maintain; between stuff that’s actively useful and stuff that’s just taking up space. [00:01:00] Today we’re talking about a framework called PARA: projects, areas, resources and archives. It comes from Tiago Forte. He introduced the concept in his 2022 book, “Building a Second Brain” and then developed it fully in “The PARA Method” in 2023. At its core, it’s a way of organizing information and commitments based on actionability, not just topic, but I want to be upfront about something: I’m not here to sell you on PARA as a system. I’m here to use it as a clarifying lens, a way of seeing what you’re actually holding. Because once you can see it clearly, you can decide what actually deserves your attention and give yourself permission to put the rest down . Let’s get into it. Projects vs. Areas in PARA— [00:01:47] The single most important distinction in PARA is the difference between a project and an area. A project has a clear endpoint. It’s something you can finish. Plan kiddo’s birthday party, launch the podcast, finish that online course. These are projects. [00:02:04] An area, on the other hand, is an ongoing responsibility, something you maintain to a standard, but it never really ends. Health, finances, parenting, your home, your career. These are areas, and this is where most of us get into trouble. We mix them together. “Be healthier” ends up on the same list as “schedule dentist appointment.” ” Manage household” gets treated the same way as “fix the leaky faucet.” [00:02:32] When you do that, *everything* starts to feel urgent. Your list never shrinks because the areas don’t shrink. They’re not supposed to, but if you’re tracking them like projects, like things that should get done, you end up feeling like you’re failing at everything all the time. [00:02:49] I had a moment recently where this really clicked for me. I was journaling one morning, just a regular daily page in Notion, and I was frustrated. I’d been trying to get more organized digitally, and I still couldn’t find things when I needed them. I wrote, “I have to be regular about moving things out of my inbox folders and into the areas where they should be and be consistent about what is a project or an area and what is truthfully archived.” [00:03:20] And then I caught myself. [00:03:21] You’d think that, as a librarian, I would understand how things can and should be brought out of archives when needed. That was the insight, and honestly, it made me laugh a little. It’s not just about putting things in the right bucket, it’s about being consistent: having a standard for what counts , and giving yourself permission to move things around as your life changes. [00:03:47] So before you add anything to your system, try asking yourself one question: “Does this end, or do I maintain it?” If it ends, it’s a project. Give it a deadline. [00:03:58] If you maintain it, it’s an area. Stop expecting to get it “done.” [00:04:03] That one question changes a lot. Projects vs. Tasks: Your Vocabulary Choices— [00:04:21] One more distinction: what’s the difference between a project and a task? Well, a project is the container. A task is the action inside it. Launch the podcast is a project. Record episode five is a task that lives inside that project. [00:04:37] When those two things end up on the same list, side by side, same visual weight, everything feels equall

    28 min
  3. What You Call Things Matters More Than Where You Put Them

    Apr 10

    What You Call Things Matters More Than Where You Put Them

    Show Notes Every time you name a file, a folder, or a note, you're making a bet that future-you will search for the same word you're using right now. This week's episode is about why that bet so often fails — and what librarians figured out centuries ago that can help. We're talking naming conventions, controlled vocabularies, and five practical principles for naming things in ways that actually hold up over time. In this episode, you'll learn... Why naming is a design decision — not administrative busywork — with real consequences for findability What the "vocabulary gap" is and why past-you and future-you don't always speak the same language How librarians solved the findability problem centuries ago using controlled vocabularies Five practical principles for naming files, notes, and folders so future-you can actually find them Why good systems are forgiving of imperfect names — and how to start building one Featured Segment: Metadata Minute The Search Test Before you name your next file, pause for ten seconds and ask: "If I needed to find this in six months, what would I type into the search bar?" Write down those two or three words. Then check: does your file name contain them? If not, either rename it or add tags that include them. Do this regularly and you'll start to notice patterns — the words your brain actually reaches for. That's data about how your mind works. Use it. A Story from the Library Findability is a 2,000-year-old problem. Around 250 BCE, a scholar named Callimachus created the Pinakes — the first library catalog in the Western world — because the Library of Alexandria held hundreds of thousands of scrolls and no one could find anything. Fast forward to 1815: Thomas Jefferson's personal library became the foundation of the Library of Congress after the British burned the Capitol. Having books still wasn't the same as finding them. So in 1876, Melvil Dewey published the Dewey Decimal Classification, and Charles Cutter published his Rules for a Dictionary Catalog — the first formal systems for organizing by subject and retrieving by author, title, or topic. Then in 1898, the Library of Congress established standardized subject headings (LCSH), now the most widely used controlled vocabulary in the world. The thread connecting all of it to your downloads folder: findability requires consistency. Pick a term. Stick with it. That's the whole lesson. Episode Takeaway "Every time you name something, you're making a bet about what future-you will search for. Naming isn't administrative busywork — it's a design decision with consequences. The best systems assume you'll forget. They're designed for graceful retrieval, not perfect naming." Episode 004: What You Call Things Matters More Than Where You Put Them Finding Aids: What's Mentioned in this Episode Library History & Controlled Vocabularies The Library of Alexandria & Callimachus Kallimachos: The Alexandrian Library and the Origins of Bibliography by Rudolf Blum (University of Wisconsin Press, 1991) — The definitive scholarly work on Callimachus and the Pinakes The Genius Innovation That Made the Great Library of Alexandria Work - TIME article on the first card catalog Pinakes (Wikipedia) - Details on Callimachus's catalog system Thomas Jefferson's Library • Thomas Jefferson's Library (Library of Congress) — Official LC exhibition • About the Collection (KC Research Guide — How the 1815 Purchase Happened • Jefferson's Books by Douglas Wilson (Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation, 1996) Dewey Decimal Classification Dewey Decimal Classification (OCLC) — Official home of the DDC History of the Dewey Decimal Classification — Wikipedia Overview Dewey Decimal Classification: Principles and Application by Lois Mai Chan (Libraries Unlimited) Library of Congress Subject Headings Library of Congress Subject Headings "Still Robust at 100" (Library of Congress) — History of LCSH Charles Ammi Cutter • Rules for a Dictionary Catalog (Project Gutenberg) — Free full text of Cutter's 1876 rules • Charles Ammi Cutter (Forbes Library Biography) — Excellent bibliographical overview General Reading on Information Organization Books Organizing Knowledge by Jennifer Rowley & Richard Hartley — Comprehensive introduction to information organization The Organization of Information by Arlene G. Taylor & Daniel N. Joudrey — Standard LIS textbook Everything Is Miscellaneous by David Weinberger — How digital changes organization How to Make Sense of Any Mess by Abby Covert — Information architecture for everyone Online Resources History of Information — Database of key moments in information history ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization — Scholarly encyclopedia on KO concepts AI-Powered File Renaming Tools These tools can help you batch rename files intelligently — useful for cleaning up messy downloads folders, screenshot libraries, or any collection of poorly-named files. Keep It Shot — Fast, AI-powered screenshot and file renaming app Sparkle (Every) — AI tool for organizing and renaming files Claude with Cowork — Use Claude's computer use capabilities to help rename and organize files in batches What’s coming up next on Think Like a Librarian Next episode, we take these ideas further. We've talked about what to call things — now let's talk about where things go. I'll introduce you to a framework called PARA that's changed how I think about structure entirely. It's librarian-approved, and it just might change your digital life. Let’s stay connected: Try it: Open your downloads folder — or any folder that's become a dumping ground. Pick five files. For each one, pause and ask: "If I searched for this in six months, what would I type?" Notice whether those words are actually in the file name. You don't have to rename anything yet. Just notice the gap. Subscribe so you don't miss future episodes where we'll tackle where things go (not just what to call them), why retrieval breaks down even in well-organized systems, and how to ask better questions before reaching for a new tool. Share this episode with someone who saves things carefully and still can never find them — or whose downloads folder is a graveyard of good intentions. If this episode made you think differently about your file names — send it to someone who needs to hear it. You're not bad at organizing. You just haven't been taught to name things for future-you. Transcript [00:00:00] Meredith: I have a question for you: Have you ever saved something important, filed it somewhere logical, named it something sensible, and then never found it again? You know it exists. You remember saving it. You can almost picture the moment you clicked save as and typed in a name that made perfect sense at the time, but when you go looking for it, it’s like it vanished into a black hole labeled miscellaneous. [00:00:26] Maybe you’ve clicked through folder after folder thinking, “it has to be here somewhere.” Maybe you’ve eventually given up and just recreated the thing from scratch– if that was even an option, all while knowing the original is sitting right there, mocking you from some corner of your hard drive. [00:00:45] If this sounds familiar, I have good news and bad news. The bad news, this is going to keep happening. The good news, it’s not because you’re bad at organizing, it’s because naming things is genuinely hard. And almost no one teaches us how to do it. Welcome to Think Like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds. [00:01:08] I’m Meredith, and today we’re talking about why the name you give to things is more important than where you put them and how to get better at naming. Last episode, we talked about how systems make hidden assumptions about our energy and capacity. Today, I want to name another assumption systems make about us: that we’ll remember what we call things. That past-us and future-us speak the same language. [00:01:37] Spoiler alert: we don’t always. By the end of this episode, you’ll see naming as a skill you can develop, not a chore you’re bad at, and you’ll have practical principles to make your names work harder for future-you. Let’s get into it. Naming for Future-You [00:01:53] Here’s something I want you to notice. Every time you name something, a file, a folder, a note, a project, a page or a database property in Notion, you are making a bet. You’re betting that when future-you comes looking for this thing, you’ll use the same words you’re using today. Think about that for a second. You save a document as Q3 marketing plan. Totally reasonable name, but three months later, when you need it, you search for fall campaign strategy because that’s how you’re thinking about it now and nothing comes up. [00:02:28] Or you create a folder called Admin. Makes sense in the moment, but six months later, you can’t remember. Do receipts go in Admin or Finance? Or Paperwork? You made a decision once and now you can’t remember what it was or, and this one happens to me constantly, you name a Notion database property “category,” but then later you realize you think of it as “type.” Now your filters

    19 min
  4. Planning for Energy, not Time

    Apr 2

    Planning for Energy, not Time

    What if the reason your perfectly planned day keeps falling apart isn’t that you need better time management — but that you’ve been measuring the wrong thing entirely? We interact with systems every day without recognizing them as systems — calendars, chore charts, project trackers, workplace policies, fitness apps. And nearly all of them make the same flawed assumptions about human capacity: that our attention is consistent, our availability is predictable, our progress is linear, and our energy is equal from day to day. In this episode, we examine these hidden assumptions and explore why time-based planning fails so many capable people. Drawing on librarian thinking — where systems are designed for patrons with variable needs, not idealized “users” — we discover energy-based planning instead of time-based. Because if a system only works on high-energy days, it’s fragile. Robust systems are designed to hold us on the hard days too. In this episode, you'll learn... Why everyday systems (calendars, project tools, fitness apps) are designed with flawed assumptions about human capacity The four hidden assumptions most systems make — and why they set us up to fail Why these assumptions hit some people harder (ADHD, chronic illness, caregivers, variable mental health) What librarians know about designing for real humans with variable needs The difference between time (neutral) and energy (variable) as planning units A practical framework for matching tasks to your actual capacity Stories from the Library The invisible systems around us: How calendars treat every hour as equal, project tools assume linear progress, and fitness apps expect consistent output The Timing app discovery: How tracking time by category revealed that matching task type to energy mattered more than matching tasks to time slots Illness and pushing through: Why trying to stick to the schedule during a stretch of illness made recovery slower, not faster The library as model: How libraries build systems for peaks, lulls, and re-entry — and what that looks like applied to personal productivity Featured Segment: Workflow Wisdom The Three-Tier Task ListInstead of one monolithic to-do list, try keeping three: High-Energy Tasks — creative work, complex problems, deep thinkingMedium-Energy Tasks — meetings, collaborative work, tasks that need presenceLow-Energy Tasks — admin, email, organizing, autopilot tasksEach day, check your energy first — then pull from the appropriate tier. No guilt for which tier you’re working from. This isn’t about doing less. It’s about doing the right things for the capacity you have. Episode Takeaway "Time doesn't care if you're exhausted. But your systems can. And when your systems honor your energy — not just your hours — that's when real, sustainable productivity becomes possible. Not productivity that burns you out. Productivity that actually fits your life." Episode 003: Planning for Energy, not Time Finding Aids: What's Mentioned in This Episode Think Like a Librarian Ep. 002: Why Systems Fail Smart People Timing app The Four Hidden Assumptions: Consistent attention, predictable availability, linear progress, equal capacity day to day Next time on Think Like a Librarian: Next episode: you didn’t “lose” it — you just can’t remember what you called it. We’re talking why naming is the invisible make-or-break step in any system, and how to name things so future-you can actually find them. Let's stay connected: Try it: Before your next planning session, ask yourself: “What kind of energy do I have today?” Notice how that changes what feels possible. Subscribe so you don’t miss future episodes where we’ll go deeper into designing systems that help you orient and make progress — even when your energy is unpredictable. Share this episode with someone who’s been beating themselves up for not “sticking to the schedule.” Sometimes the most powerful thing we can offer is a different question to ask. Think Like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds is a podcast for curious, ambitious humans who want systems that actually work in real life — with all its variability, interruptions, and beautiful complexity. Transcript [00:00:00] Meredith: You planned for that important project, that necessary task. You blocked the time. You sat down. And then — nothing. The time was real. You were physically present. But mentally? You were running on empty. [00:00:11] Maybe you stared at a blank document. Maybe you scrolled your phone for “just a minute” that turned into forty. Maybe you tried to push through anyway and produced something you later deleted. [00:00:21] “Why can’t I just focus?” [00:00:23] “I had the time. What’s wrong with me?” [00:00:25] “Other people seem to do this. Why is it so hard for me?” [00:00:28] The story you tell yourself — without even meaning to — is that you’re the problem. What if I told you the problem wasn’t your discipline — it was your unit of measurement? [00:00:38] Welcome to Think Like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds. I’m Meredith, and today we’re talking about a question that changed how I think about productivity: What if we planned for energy instead of time? [00:00:51] In the last episode, I talked about why learning systems fail smart people — how courses and memberships are often designed for an ideal learner who doesn’t exist. Someone with unlimited time, perfect focus, and no competing demands. [00:01:05] Today, I want to go broader. [00:01:07] Because it’s not just learning systems. It’s the everyday systems we might not even see as systems — but they are. Calendars. Chore charts. Project trackers. Workplace policies. Fitness apps. [00:01:19] They’re all making assumptions about you. About your capacity. About how you work. [00:01:24] And most of those assumptions? They’re wrong. [00:01:26] By the end of this episode, you’ll see the hidden assumptions in the systems you use every day — and understand why planning for energy instead of time changes how we design systems for ourselves and others. [00:01:38] Let’s dig in. Systems Are Everywhere [00:01:39] Meredith: Here’s something I want you to notice: we interact with systems constantly without recognizing them as systems. [00:01:45] When you hear the word “system,” you might think of something formal — a software platform, a government process, a corporate workflow. But systems are everywhere. And most of them are invisible until they fail us. [00:02:00] Think about your calendar. [00:02:01] Every hour gets equal weight, right? 9AM looks the same as 3PM. Tuesday looks the same as Friday. The calendar doesn’t know — and doesn’t care — whether you slept well, whether your kid was up sick, whether you’re anxious about something, or whether you’re riding a wave of creative momentum. [00:02:18] It just shows you blocks of time and expects you to fill them. [00:02:21] Or think about project management tools. Gantt charts. Timelines. They assume Task A leads to Task B leads to Task C. Linear progress. Predictable flow. But if you’ve ever done creative work — or honestly, any complex work — you know it rarely moves in straight lines. Sometimes, you need to circle back. Sometimes, you leap ahead. Sometimes, you sit with something for a while before you know what it needs. [00:02:47] Workplace “core hours” assume everyone has the same peak productivity window. But some of us do our best thinking at 6am. Some of us come alive at 9pm. Some of us have energy that shifts depending on the day, the week, the season. [00:03:02] Household chore charts assume you’ll have the same capacity to do laundry on Tuesday that you had last Tuesday. But what if this Tuesday, you’re recovering from a migraine? What if this Tuesday, your toddler refused to nap and you’re running on fumes? [00:03:16] Even fitness apps do this. Step goals assume every day your body can deliver the same output. Ten thousand steps. Every day. No exceptions. No grace for the days your body is saying “not today.” [00:03:30] None of these systems are broken. They’re just built on assumptions that don’t match how humans actually work. [00:03:36] And here’s what happens: when we struggle with these systems, we blame ourselves. We think we’re the problem. We think we need more discipline, more willpower, more consistency. [00:03:46] But what if the problem isn’t us? What if the problem is the design? [00:03:50] Most systems — whether we designed them ourselves or inherited them from productivity culture — assume four things about human capacity. [00:03:59] Assumption number one: Consistent attention. [00:04:02] The system assumes you can focus the same way at 9AM and 3PM. On Monday and Friday. In January and July. It doesn’t account for the fact that attention fluctuates — sometimes wildly — based on factors you can’t always control. [00:04:18] Assumption number two: Predictable availability. [00:04:21] The system assumes you’ll show up when scheduled, with the capacity you planned for. But life doesn’t work that way. Kids get sick. Meetings run long. Emergencie

    16 min
  5. Why Systems Fail Smart People

    Mar 27

    Why Systems Fail Smart People

    In this episode, you'll learn... Why the “ideal learner” most courses are designed for doesn’t actually existWhat librarians know about designing for real humans (hint: we design for patrons, not “users”)Smart questions to ask before you buy your next courseHow to build (or choose) learning systems that expect real life and design around itWhy completion isn’t the only metric — and better ways to measure successMetadata Minute: The “Re-Entry Ramp” technique for returning to abandoned projects without shame Featured Segment: Metadata Minute The Re-Entry Ramp When you abandon a course or project, the hardest part isn’t leaving — it’s coming back. This episode’s Metadata Minute introduces a tiny labeling practice: before you close a course tab, jot down one sentence about what you learned and what you’d do next. Future-you will thank past-you for the breadcrumb. A Story from the Library Meredith’s course graveyard: The honest reality of being an ADHD mom, part-time librarian, and business owner with a pile of unfinished programsCricut Crafternoons: How library programs build in time for failure, multiple entry points, and low-stakes experimentation — everything most online courses don’tBuilding a workshop for real humans: What Meredith is designing into her own workshop to support real humans with real interruptionsJenna Kutcher’s hidden library philosophy: Building content that works for you while you sleep — and why that applies to learning, too. Episode Takeaway "Systems that work for smart people are systems designed for whole people — people with limits, distractions, competing priorities, and real lives. That's not a bug. That's just being human." Meredith Silberstein, Think Like a Librarian EP. 002 - Why Systems Fail Smart People Finding Aids: Mentioned in This Episode The Membership Experience (course)The Podcast Lab by Jenna KutcherCricut crafting machines & “Cricut Crafternoons” library workshopsUnderworld by Don DeLilloMy upcoming workshop on how course creators can utilize tools like Notion to increase student retention and completion Let's stay connected: Subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts so you don’t miss the next episodeShare this episode with someone who needs to hear it — maybe that friend who’s been beating themselves up about an unfinished programReflect: Pick one abandoned course or project. Try the Re-Entry Ramp and write one sentence about where you left off and what you’d do next. See if it changes how you feel about going back. Transcript [00:00:00] Here’s what almost nobody says out loud: the way learning gets designed — by almost everyone, on almost every platform — assumes a learner who doesn’t exist. [00:00:10] Maybe it was the membership you were sure would change everything. You were excited, you carved out time, you showed up. [00:00:18] And then… life happened. Or you got confused. Or you just… stopped. [00:00:24] And the story you tell yourself — without even meaning to — is that you’re the problem. [00:00:29] ” I just need more discipline.” [00:00:32] “I always do this.” [00:00:34] “What’s wrong with me?” [00:00:35] Welcome to Think Like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds. I’m Meredith, and today we’re talking about why smart, motivated people struggle to complete courses and memberships and why that failure often says more about the system design than the learner. [00:00:54] This is a deeply personal topic for me. I’ve been on both sides : the learner who didn’t finish and the educator trying to build something people will finish. [00:01:05] By the end of this episode, you’ll have a new framework for evaluating learning systems, whether you’re buying them or building them, and hopefully you’ll walk away with a little less shame and a lot more clarity. [00:01:20] Let’s dig in. THE UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH— [00:01:21] Here’s the uncomfortable truth most course creators don’t want to talk about. Most online learning platforms are designed for an ideal learner. Someone with unlimited time, laser focus, and no competing demands, but that person doesn’t exist. [00:01:40] I know this because I am a highly motivated learner. I love learning. I’ve invested in course after course, The Membership Experience, the Podcast Lab, business programs, creative workshops. I show up excited. I take notes. I genuinely want to finish, and yet my completion rate… Let’s just say it’s not what I’d put on a resume. For a long time, I thought that was my fault. [00:02:07] I have ADHD, I’m parenting a 4-year-old. I work part-time as a librarian. I’m running a business. Life is full. But here’s what I’ve realized. Those aren’t excuses; they’re context. And if the system requires ideal conditions to succeed, if it only works when you have perfect focus, uninterrupted time, and zero life chaos? [00:02:32] Then it’s not designed for real humans, it’s designed for marketing. The promise of a course is transformation, but the delivery often assumes you’re already transformed, that you already have the bandwidth, the structure, the support system to show up perfectly every single time. That’s not realistic, and it’s not your fault when you can’t meet an unrealistic standard. SYSTEMS DESIGNED FOR REAL PEOPLE— [00:03:13] Okay, so here’s where my librarian brain kicks in. Librarians don’t design systems for “users.” We design for patrons. I’ve had some bosses call them customers, but that term never vibed with me, because it implies a more transactional relationship than I enjoy having with people who come into my library. [00:03:34] The distinction matters, because when you think about patrons, you’re thinking about real people with varied literacy levels, different time constraints, diverse access needs, and a whole range of emotional states. A patron might be a kid doing homework after a long school day, a parent juggling a baby on their hip, a job seeker who hasn’t touched a computer in years, someone grieving, someone celebrating. Libraries build systems that account for all of that. [00:04:07] When I’ve run Cricut crafting machine workshops at my library, I have to build in time for failure. I expect people to make mistakes, to try something and have it not work out the way they planned. I have learned to design the crafting experiences, so that messing up isn’t embarrassing, it’s just part of the process. With my Cricut Crafternoons, as I’ve come to call them, there are multiple entry points. You could come to one workshop without ever having been to the library before. You didn’t always need to pre-register, and you didn’t need to have all the tools at home. You could make as much progress as you felt comfortable with. And come back to the library’s makerspace the next day to finish up, start over or do more, and you could just as easily come to another workshop and do something totally different. No one tracked your progress bar or sent you guilt inducing emails about your incomplete modules. [00:05:09] Now, compare that to most online courses. They’re often linear. You have to finish module one before you can access module two. There’s often no easy way to jump around. And if you leave for a week, or a month, coming back feels like starting over. Libraries build in multiple entry points, self-paced exploration, and low stakes experimentation. [00:05:36] Good learning design assumes interruption, welcomes reentry, and separates completion from value received. Just because you didn’t finish doesn’t mean you didn’t learn. Just because you stopped doesn’t mean you failed. Whether you’re a course creator or a course buyer, or both like me, you can [00:06:00] apply this librarian thinking to evaluate and improve learning systems. BUILD IN CHECKPOINTS, CELEBRATE PARTIAL PROGRESS — [00:06:19] Let me share what I’ve been doing on the creator side. I’m building a workshop right now, and as I design it, I keep asking myself what happens when my student gets interrupted? Because they will. Life will happen. That’s not a bug. That’s just being human. So I’m building in checkpoints. I’m celebrating partial progress. [00:06:41] I’m creating resources people can return to without feeling lost or behind. I’m not designing for a perfect learner. I’m designing for me on a hard day with the kid yelling in the background and a brain that wanders. If it works for me, it will probably work for [00:07:00] my students too. Now, on the buyer side, if you’re someone who enrolls in programs and wants to actually get value from them, here are some questions to ask before you buy. [00:07:12] Does this course have a realistic time estimate, or does it assume I have 10 free hours every week? Are there multiple formats, video, audio, text, so I can engage in different ways? Can I jump around or am I locked into a linear path? What happens if I need to pause? Is there lifetime access? Will I lose my progress? [00:07:37] Is there a community or support system, or am I on my own? These aren’t picky questions. They’re smart questions. You’re not asking for perfection, you’re asking for respect. The best systems don’t demand perfection. They expect real life and design around it. [00:07:57] We’ve been taught that finishing equals success, but what if the real value is in the parts you used? What if 30% completion with lasting behavior change is better than 100% completion with no retention? I think about Jenna Kutcher’s advice about podcasting. She talks about building a library of co

    15 min
  6. Welcome to "Think Like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds"

    Mar 26

    Welcome to "Think Like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds"

    What if the key to feeling more organized, more creative, and less overwhelmed wasn’t another app… but a different way of thinking? Welcome to Think Like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds — a podcast for curious, ambitious humans who want systems that actually work in real life. In this launch episode, I’m sharing what it truly means to think like a librarian — and why librarian-style thinking goes far beyond libraries. We’re talking about organization, metadata, productivity, technology, ethics, privacy, creativity, and curiosity — all through a humane, flexible lens that honors real life, including motherhood, ADHD, and ambition. If you’ve ever felt like traditional productivity advice wasn’t built for your brain or your season of life, this episode is your invitation to approach systems differently. In this episode, you'll learn: What “librarian thinking” really is — and why it’s so useful outside of librariesHow organization and creativity can work together, not against each otherWhy the way you label and organize things (metadata!) shapes how you think and find informationA real-life story about creativity, technology, and learning through mistakesHow to build systems that support real humans — not idealized versions of ourselves Featured Segment: Metadata Minute In this episode’s Metadata Minute, we explore how the way you name, label, and categorize things directly affects how usable — and trustworthy — your systems are. Small shifts in language can make a big difference in clarity and confidence. A Story from the Library I also share a recent workshop experience that was supposed to be tech-focused — but turned into a powerful reminder that creativity thrives in experimentation, not perfection. When a Cricut project didn’t go as planned, the real learning came from troubleshooting, play, and curiosity — not getting it “right.” Who this podcast is for: Curious minds who love systems and creativityEntrepreneurs, parents, and knowledge workers navigating complexityPeople with ADHD (or ADHD-adjacent brains) who want flexible structureAnyone tired of productivity advice that ignores ethics, context, and humanity What's coming up next on Think Like a Librarian: You can expect solo episodes, short practical segments, thoughtful conversations, and librarian-approved frameworks you can apply to your work, your tech, and your everyday life — all without hustle culture or rigid rules. Let's stay connected: If this episode resonated with you: Subscribe so you don’t miss future episodesShare this show with a fellow curious humanAnd start noticing the systems you interact with every day — who were they designed for?  Because the world could use a little more librarian thinking. Transcript [00:00:00] Meredith: Welcome to Think like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds. If you’ve ever felt overwhelmed by your to-do list, confused by your digital files, or frustrated that productivity advice never seems to work the way it’s supposed to, this podcast is for you. [00:00:18] Because what if the answer isn’t another app, another planner, or another perfect system? What if the real shift is learning how to think differently about information, organization, creativity, and technology? [00:00:34] I’m your host, Meredith. I’m a librarian by training, a systems thinker by nature, an ambitious entrepreneur by choice, a mom to a 4-year-old, and an ADHDer who has spent years figuring out how to make systems work with real life, instead of against it. And this show exists because librarians don’t just organize books. We organize knowledge, we design systems for real humans. We think deeply about ethics, access, privacy, creativity, and curiosity. And those skills, they are wildly useful, far beyond libraries. [00:01:14] On Think Like a Librarian, we’re going to explore how librarian- style thinking can help you feel more capable, more creative, and less overwhelmed. Whether you’re running a business, managing a household, navigating tech, or just trying to keep track of your life, you’ll hear practical strategies, honest stories and recurring segments like metadata Minute, where we’re going to unpack how the way you organize things directly impacts how you find use and trust information. [00:01:45] This is not about perfection, it’s about clarity and curiosity and building systems that actually support you. [00:01:56] So let’s get into it. When people hear the word librarian, they often picture quiet rooms, neat shelves, and strict rules, but that’s not really what librarianship is about. At its core, librarian thinking is about making sense of complexity. [00:02:15] It’s about asking questions like, “how will someone discover this? What assumptions are we making who might be excluded by this system? How do we balance structure with flexibility?” Librarians don’t build systems for ideal users. We build them for real people with different needs, different brains and different contexts. [00:02:38] That’s why librarian thinking lives at the intersection of organization and creativity structure and experimentation technology. And ethics, and it’s also why this way of thinking translates so beautifully into entrepreneurship, parenting, productivity, and everyday life. [00:02:59] This podcast isn’t about turning you into a librarian. It’s about giving you the mental models librarians use, so you can apply them wherever you need clarity. [00:03:10] Let’s talk about metadata. Metadata is simply information about information. Titles, labels, categories, tags, descriptions. Metadata is how we decide where something belongs and how we’ll find it later. [00:03:28] And here’s the thing, metadata isn’t neutral. The way you label something changes how you think about it. For example, if you name a folder, miscellaneous, you’ve already decided future-you won’t wanna look there. If you tag a task as someday. You told your brain it’s not safe to focus on now if you organize everything the way someone else recommends, instead of how you think your system will eventually fall apart. [00:03:57] Librarians spend a lot of time asking what language makes sense to the user. And you can do that too, because good metadata doesn’t just help you find things. It helps you trust your system and throughout this podcast, we’ll keep coming back to that idea because better organization starts with better thinking, not more tools. [00:04:19] I wanna share a quick story. Recently I ran a library workshop that was supposed to be about using Cricut Design Space. Very tech focused, very instructional. The project was designing gift tags, but I didn’t actually plan for people to leave with finished tags. The goal was learning the software. Then people asked if we could run the cutting machine, so I did, and immediately things went wrong. I chose a cut setting meant for intricate designs, but the card stock was thinner than I expected. [00:04:51] The snowflake cutouts were too small to count as intricate, and a lot of the tags tore. They were unusable. But here’s what surprised me. No one was frustrated. We talked through what happened. We tried troubleshooting. We laughed. People stayed engaged, and it became this beautiful reminder that creativity thrives in experimentation, not correctness. [00:05:17] Technology often makes us believe that there’s a right way and a wrong way, but librarian thinking treats technology as a process. Try, observe, adjust, try again. Mistakes aren’t failures. They’re metadata. They tell you what to change next time. And that mindset, especially when paired with creativity, is something I wanna keep bringing into this show. [00:05:43] One of the reasons I care so deeply about systems is because I live in a very real, very imperfect context. I have ADHD, and I’m raising a small child. I am ambitious and creative and curious, and sometimes exhausted. And librarian thinking has taught me that good systems adapt to humans, not the other way around. [00:06:07] That means planning around energy instead of time designing workflows that expect interruptions. Building systems that forgive inconsistency. Libraries don’t collapse because someone checks out a book or returns it late. They flex. And that’s the kind of thinking I wanna share here. Systems that hold you, support you, and leave room for curiosity and growth. [00:06:33] So what can you expect from Think Like a Librarian? You’ll hear solo episodes like this one. Short, practical Segments that you can apply immediately. Deeper conversations about tech, ethics, creativity, and productivity. Stories that remind you that learning is messy, and that’s okay. This show is for curious minds who want structure without rigidity and ambition without burnout. [00:06:58] If this episode resonated with you, I’d love for you to subscribe so that you don’t miss what’s coming next. And if you know someone who’s drowning in information, overwhelmed by systems or craving a more thoughtful way to approach productivity, share this episode with them because the world could use a little more librarian thinking. [00:07:17] Thanks for listening, and I’ll see you next time. Stay in the Stacks Get the weekly field notes Episode previews, reading lists, and one small organizational experiment to try each week. No spam — just signal.

    7 min
  7. Trailer

    Season 1 Trailer

    Trailer

    Play in new window Download File Show Notes Welcome to Think Like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds What if the key to feeling more organized, more creative, and less overwhelmed wasn't another app… but a different way of thinking? Welcome to Think Like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds — a podcast for curious, ambitious humans who want systems that actually work in real life. I'm Meredith — librarian, systems thinker, multi-passionate entrepreneur, mom, and ADHDer who has spent years turning chaos into clarity. In this trailer, I share what the show is all about, who it's for, and why I started it. This podcast blends librarian-grade thinking with humane productivity, creative living, and applied tech — because the real secret to getting organized isn't a better app. It's a better way of thinking. What this show is about: Organization and creativity working together, not against each other Metadata, systems, and frameworks you can actually use in everyday life Information literacy — how to evaluate, trust, and use what you find Ethical, accessible technology — tools by capability, not hype Real-life stories from librarianship, parenting, crafting, and entrepreneurship Who this podcast is for: Curious minds who love systems and creativity Entrepreneurs, parents, and knowledge workers navigating complexity People with ADHD (or ADHD-adjacent brains) who want flexible structure Anyone tired of productivity advice that ignores ethics, context, and humanity What's coming up on Think Like a Librarian: You can expect solo episodes, short practical segments like Metadata Minute and Workflow Wisdom, thoughtful stories, and librarian-approved frameworks you can apply to your work, your tech, and your everyday life — all without hustle culture or rigid rules. New episodes drop weekly. Let's stay connected: If this sounds like your kind of show: Subscribe so you don't miss the first episode Share this trailer with a fellow curious human And start noticing the systems you interact with every day — who were they designed for? Because the world could use a little more librarian thinking. Stay in the Stacks Get the weekly field notes Episode previews, reading lists, and one small organizational experiment to try each week. No spam — just signal.

    1 min

Trailer

About

Think Like a Librarian: Systems for Curious Minds aims to guide curious, ambitious people design humane systems for thinking, working, and creating — using librarian-grade frameworks.