The Aperture Field Notes

Kari LaMotte

Field notes on clarity, leadership, and systems in transition. About learning to see clearly, think structurally, and navigate complexity with coherence. notes.theaperturefield.com

  1. Aug 12

    Conversations with Mica: Strong Spine, Open Heart

    How do we build a more regenerative, sustainable future when the hardest challenge is not the technology, but how we talk, listen, and decide together? In this conversation, we explore the posture needed for difficult conversations about collective change. From infrastructure and co-design to power, truth, empathy, and belonging, we consider how communities can move beyond polarized camps without erasing real differences. We discuss: * Why innovation adoption is a relational challenge, not only a technical one * “Strong spine, open heart” as a posture for holding conviction and curiosity together * What meaningful co-design requires beyond a stakeholder checklist * How power imbalances can shape who gets heard—and how facilitation can create more equitable space * The difference between facts, interpretations, and feelings in a challenging conversation * Why belonging to the shared work may matter as much as belonging to a particular side The guiding idea is simple but demanding: each of us may hold an essential piece of truth, but none of us holds the whole. What would change if we entered difficult conversations not to win, but to create a space where something better can emerge? This is a space where ideas are explored in real time. Subscribe at notes.theaperturefield.com to follow the threads as they begin to connect, and follow on your favourite podcast platform. Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe

    Conversations with Mica: Strong Spine, Open Heart
  2. Jul 30

    Perpetual Visitors

    In this piece, I begin with what initially seemed like an obvious principle: recognizing the Indigenous nation whose territory it is as the host nation and genuine co-founder of any new community. But an uncomfortable question emerged: If one people remains the host forever, does everyone else remain a guest forever? This reflection explores whether historical repair can protect the depth of Indigenous belonging without making future belonging impossible. It considers belonging as something that can be inherited, and also something that must be cultivated through responsibility, participation and care for the land. Ideas explored - The difference between ceremonial recognition and genuine co-founding - Consent, co-founding and shared inheritance - Whether people can become true stewards while remaining perpetual visitors - The difference between Indigenous identity and an authentic relationship with place - The danger of romanticizing Indigenous peoples as humanity’s designated land stewards - Learning across knowledge systems without extracting or erasing them - Land as an enduring participant rather than property changing owners - Whether historical repair needs a destination beyond permanent creditor-and-debtor roles - Creating a shared future without using equality to erase history Questions to carry forward - At what point does a guest become part of a place? - Can belonging be cultivated without appropriating another people’s identity? - How do we protect what must remain distinct while allowing something genuinely shared to emerge? - What would our communities look like if stewardship were part of belonging? - Can we remember that our beginnings were unequal without making inequality of belonging permanent? This is an incomplete thought offered in the hope that it generates conversations needed for a more promising tomorrow. I welcome your perspective through your own lens as we collectively navigate this tricky terrain.Visit Substack for the original article and others at notes.theaperturefield.com Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe

  3. Jul 10

    When the Work Doesn't Fit Inside Your Head

    In this episode, I reflect on artificial intelligence as part of a much larger pattern of technological change. New technologies have always arrived with a mixture of possibility and fear. Railways, electric light, telephones, automobiles, television, computers, and the internet all disrupted the world people knew. Many of the concerns they raised were valid. But the deepest changes were rarely limited to what the technology itself could do. The automobile didn't simply replace the horse, it reorganized cities, work, infrastructure, commerce, and everyday life. I believe AI may represent a similar threshold. Most current conversations focus on first-order questions: - Will AI replace jobs? - Will people stop thinking? - Will truth become harder to find? - Will AI become dangerous? These questions matter. But they may not be the whole story. The deeper question I explore here is: What happens when human thinking gains a new environment in which to unfold? Many leaders, founders, researchers, advisors, and changemakers are not short of intelligence or ideas. They are short of cognitive room. They are trying to hold complexity, relationships, competing needs, history, uncertainty, and possibility all at once. Used carefully, AI can become a place to externalize that complexity. It can help us hold multiple threads, identify patterns, test assumptions, translate across disciplines, and see the structure of what we are carrying. The purpose isn't to hand our thinking over to a machine, it is to create more room for human judgment, discernment, connection, and action. This is the thinking behind AI as a Thinking Partner, my six-week small-group course for people working with real complexity. The course is not primarily about prompts, software, or productivity. It is a practice for learning how to use AI to: - externalize difficult or unfinished thinking; - find patterns within complex material; - explore questions without rushing toward answers; - pressure-test decisions and assumptions; - translate ideas into useful structures; and develop a personal way of working with AI that strengthens human agency. I am currently gathering interest for upcoming cohorts. Learn more through the link in the episode description, or reply and tell me about the complexity, change, or possibility you are trying to hold. Perhaps the future will not be shaped only by those who learn how to make AI produce more. Perhaps it will also be shaped by those who learn how to create more room.Learn more here: https://notes.theaperturefield.com/s/ai-as-a-thinking-partner Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe

  4. Jun 16

    Learning that other people are real..

    I recently found myself reflecting on one of my earliest attempts at empathy. As a child, I once gave my younger sister a birthday gift that consisted of the contents of my bedside drawer: a worn charm necklace, a collection of charms, and some fake money. I was thrilled with my own thoughtfulness. She was… less impressed. Looking back, I’ve come to realize that the lesson wasn’t about gift-giving. It was about perspective. At that age, I was trying to care for someone else using the only map I had available: my own. Over time, I learned to understand other people’s worlds more deeply. I became fascinated with empathy, relationships, and the ways people make sense of their experiences. Later, Carl Jung’s work introduced another layer: the idea that our strongest reactions often contain information about ourselves. But eventually I discovered that understanding myself wasn’t enough either. In this episode, I explore the relationship between empathy, projection, shadow work, trauma, and boundaries. I share why I think many discussions of projection have become overly simplified, and why true integration may require holding three things at once: 1) My reaction contains information about me. 2) Their behaviour contains information about them. 3) The interaction contains information about the relationship. We often talk about healing as learning to understand ourselves. We sometimes talk about compassion as learning to understand others. But perhaps maturity asks something more difficult: learning to hold both simultaneously. Topics explored: - Childhood lessons in empathy- Carl Jung and projection- Shadow work beyond simple projection- Trauma and emotional triggers- Restoring dimensionality in relationships- Compassion without self-abandonment- Boundaries rooted in understanding rather than condemnation A reflection on what happens when we stop asking only, “What’s wrong with them?” or “What’s wrong with me?” and begin asking what the relationship itself might be trying to show us. Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe

About

Field notes on clarity, leadership, and systems in transition. About learning to see clearly, think structurally, and navigate complexity with coherence. notes.theaperturefield.com