Disagreeing Well: The Podcast About Polarization

John Milloy
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Society & Culture

Disagreeing Well is a podcast about polarization - why it matters, what drives it, and what we should be doing about it. Can faith play a role? John Milloy, retired politician, commentator, and Director of the Centre for Public Ethics at Martin Luther University College speaks with authors, commentators and practitioners about one of the most pressing issues of our time. For more information about the podcast and the people involved, see our Substack https://centreforpublicethics.substack.com/?utm_campaign=profile_chips

  1. 1d ago

    Can Better Conversations Save Democracy?

    In this episode of Disagreeing Well: The Podcast About Polarization, I talk with Rob Danisch, Professor of Communication Arts at the University of Waterloo and co-author of Radically Civil: How to Save Democracy One Conversation at a Time. Drawing on his research in rhetoric, persuasion, and democratic dialogue, Danisch argues that democracy depends on our ability to listen, build trust, and engage constructively across differences – something that is becoming increasingly more difficult in our polarized times. We discuss why facts alone rarely change minds, how the way we approach political disagreements can cause them to harden into social divisions, and what happens when opponents dehumanize each other. From active listening and deep canvassing to civic engagement and community-building, Danisch offers insights into building bridges in our noisy polarized world. To Learn More about Rob Danisch To Learn More about Radically Civil: How to Save Democracy One Conversation at a Time

  2. Oct 8

    What is going on in Alberta?

    Alberta's upcoming referendum on separation has captured national attention, but what is really driving support for greater autonomy and separatism? In this episode of Disagreeing Well, I sit down with Jared Wesley, professor of political science at the University of Alberta. Jared leads the Common Ground Initiative which studies Alberta separatism, western alienation, populism and political attitudes within Alberta, while also trying to figure out how to foster dialogue across differences. Drawing upon extensive public opinion research and community engagement, Jared explains why many Albertans are not nearly as polarized as stereotypes suggest. We discuss the gap between what Albertans personally believe and what they think their neighbours believe, how misconceptions can fuel division, and why feelings of alienation can become politically powerful even when they don't reflect majority opinion. Our conversation also examines the rise of Alberta separatism, the importance of dialogue across differences, and innovative efforts to help people move beyond caricatures and engage one another with greater understanding and respect. Along the way, Jared offers practical insights into what citizens, politicians, and the rest of Canada can do to reduce polarization and strengthen democracy. I hope you enjoy this thoughtful and timely conversation with Jared Wesley. Want to learn more? Common Ground Initiative Common Ground’s Latest Report TownSquare game Peter Lougheed School of Politics and DemocracyJared’s latest book - "No I in Team: Party Loyalty in Canadian Politics"

  3. Jul 16 ·  Bonus

    Partisanship vs. Polarization

    Can politics be fiercely partisan without becoming deeply polarized? That's the question at the heart of this special bonus summer episode of Disagreeing Well: The Podcast About Polarization where I sit down with former B.C. Premier Christy Clark for a unique joint podcast that appears on both Disagreeing Well and The Christy Clark Show. Christy and I first met in politics in 1993, and our conversation draws on decades of experience in public life. We discuss the difference between healthy partisanship and destructive polarization, why political disagreements too often become personal attacks, and whether political parties can still make room for people with differing views. Along the way, we reflect on leadership, compromise, respect for those who choose to serve in public office and what both politicians and citizens can do to fight divisions in our society. I hope you enjoy this special conversation with Christy Clark and be sure to check out her weekly podcast featuring insightful dialogues on politics, leadership and societal change - The Christy Clark Show

  4. Jun 25

    Talking about religion in a divided world

    At the heart of polarization is an unwillingness to engage seriously with those who hold different perspectives from our own. Although we often think of polarization in political terms, it can extend to other areas including religion. In our secular society, people of faith are often dismissed as misguided, superstitious, or trying to impose their beliefs on the unwilling. Even between followers of different faith traditions, unfamiliar beliefs are often met with suspicion or mistrust.  This week I speak with three guests - Alice Chan, Hicham Tiflati, and Margie Patrick. They are all representatives of the Centre for Civic Religious Literacy (CCRL), an organization dedicated to breaking down barriers by helping Canadians better understand religious, spiritual, and non‑religious worldviews. Our discussion challenges the idea that religion is purely private, arguing instead that beliefs shape identity, values, and civic engagement for many Canadians.  All three of my guests make a strong case that increased religious literacy is crucial to promoting understanding and fighting polarization.

  5. Jun 17

    Reclaiming the Digital Public Square

    In this episode of Disagreeing Well, I sit down with Shlomit Broder, CEO of the Canadian organization Digital Public Square, to explore how technology is reshaping the way we engage with each other. Although the “digital public square” can be a place for meaningful dialogue, digital spaces can also fuel polarization. Shlomitt and I discuss the nature of polarization in Canada today and the challenges posed by new technologies – from misinformation to amplified outrage to the way it often drowns out nuanced voices. Shlomit shares how her organization is building digital tools and creating spaces that foster curiosity, empathy, and meaningful dialogue—even on the most polarizing issues, including Israel-Gaza. The conversation offers both a clear-eyed assessment of the risks of online discourse and a hopeful vision for how we can rebuild trust, embrace nuance, and learn to disagree well. Learn more about Digital Public Square

  6. Jun 11

    The Media and Polarization: Feeding it or Fixing it?

    Is the media fueling polarization or is it helping to defend truth and hold our battered and bruised society together? In this episode of Disagreeing Well: The Podcast About Polarization, I sit down with Bill Killorn, Executive Director of Journalists for Human Rights, to explore the relationship of the media and polarization from both a Canadian and global perspective. Drawing upon his experience in government and international journalism development, Bill discusses the way in which the media can both deepen divisions as well as serve as a source of accountability and informed public debate. We talk about everything from misinformation to the pressures shaping modern newsrooms and the need for balanced journalism that prioritizes understanding over outrage. We also highlight the work of Journalists for Human Rights, supporting journalists in Canada and around the world to produce fair, accurate, and inclusive reporting—often in challenging environments. Join us as we take a thoughtful look at why a strong, independent press—and public support for it—is essential to a healthy democracy. Learn more about Journalists for Human Rights.

  7. Jun 4

    Minding the Myth Gap

    In this episode of Disagreeing Well, I sit down with Alex Evans, author of The Myth Gap: What Happens When Evidence and Arguments Aren’t Enough and founder of Larger Us, a UK organization focused on reducing division. Together, we explore why polarization remains so difficult to overcome—and what we may be missing in our efforts to address it. Drawing on his experience in the British government and politics along with his work at the United Nations, Evans makes the important point that while facts and evidence are essential, they are rarely enough to change minds. Instead, the stories we tell about what matters, who we should trust and what the future holds plays a decisive role in addressing division. Unfortunately, our world has a shortage of these stories to help us deal with our current set of challenges – what Evans calls the “myth gap”. In that gap, more divisive stories often take hold, reinforcing an “us versus them” dynamic. Drawing upon his work of Larger US, Evans offers a more hopeful path forward. Citing practical examples—from climate conversations to grassroots bridge-building—he highlights how listening, curiosity, and shared stories can help expand our sense of a “larger us.” To learn more about Larger Us. To learn more about Alex’s book.

  8. May 28

    What Is Truth?

    In this episode of Disagreeing Well: The Podcast About Polarization, I explore one of the basic challenges of combatting polarization – truth itself. In a world where competing viewpoints all claim that the facts are on their side, understanding the nature of truth is crucial to the discussion. To help us explore “truth”, I am joined by Jeffrey Dudiak, a Christian philosopher and Professor at The King’s University in Edmonton, and author of Post-Truth? Facts and Faithfulness. In our discussion we consider a different way of thinking about truth. Instead of something we simply have, Jeff suggests truth is something we live out— something that we are faithful to – in our lives.  Along the way, we explore the nature of polarization, why people can look at the same evidence and come to different conclusions and the importance of humility in making space for others in our divided world. Learn more about Jeff’s book.

    What Is Truth?
See All (13)

About

Disagreeing Well is a podcast about polarization - why it matters, what drives it, and what we should be doing about it. Can faith play a role? John Milloy, retired politician, commentator, and Director of the Centre for Public Ethics at Martin Luther University College speaks with authors, commentators and practitioners about one of the most pressing issues of our time. For more information about the podcast and the people involved, see our Substack https://centreforpublicethics.substack.com/?utm_campaign=profile_chips

Information

You Might Also Like