Tearsheet Podcast: Exploring Financial Services Together

Tearsheet Studios

Tearsheet is news, opinion, and analysis on the business of finance. Candid conversations with senior executives, fintech entrepreneurs, investors, industry experts -- all weigh in on the trends impacting the industry and the disruptive impact technology is having on the business. Where social media, technology and finance intersect.

  1. Aug 24

    “Amy has the what. I help with the how”: Inside Bank of America's data and AI partnership

    Amy Avery, Managing Director, Analytics, Modeling and Insights, took her job at Bank of America because of a number. When she interviewed at Bank of America, she was told that the bank interfaced with, at the time, 67 million clients. "Gosh, that's so much information," she remembers thinking. "Think about what you could do with that.” She started in January 2020. Two months later, the pandemic made that abstraction very literal: the bank suddenly needed to know, in real time, how its customers were doing, thinking, and coping. Avery's job was to figure out how to answer that. Michelle Boston, Head of Data Management Technology & Enterprise Architecture, arrived by a different route entirely. She built her career in enterprise technology, rose to CIO of a startup that was eventually built and sold, and came to Bank of America first as a contractor to lead an information architecture practice. “Data has always kind of been in my blood,” she said. At Bank of America, she works at a scale few other organizations have and builds the platforms that serve as the enabling force for Avery's work. Despite a very different set of starting points, the two describe a partnership that has essentially erased the line between their jobs. "We probably know each other's jobs better now than before generative AI showed up”, Avery said, because the pace of the last two years has forced her strategy team and Boston's engineering team to make decisions in near lockstep. Listen to the full episode to hear how Avery and Boston have built a shared language across the two functions, and how they're stress-testing it against a technology cycle that seems to wait for no one.

    “Amy has the what. I help with the how”: Inside Bank of America's data and AI partnership
  2. Aug 19

    How enterprise AI is moving up the stack in 3 layers

    Welcome to The Editors’ Room, a new Tearsheet Podcast series where Editor-in-Chief Zack Miller and Managing Editor Sara Khairi take the conversations that usually happen behind the scenes about our biggest stories and put them on the record. There isn’t a rehearsed interview or carefully choreographed panel answers. It’s just two editors comparing notes, challenging each other’s takes and trying to make sense of what is actually happening in financial services. Think of it as pulling up a chair after the meeting ends. It's the stuff we usually debate after the calls end: what a new product actually means, which industry trends have legs, and where the hype gets ahead of reality. Raw, conversational, and occasionally accompanied by a blooper. For our inaugural conversation, the topic was AI and, more specifically, what would you happily delegate to AI and what would you never hand over? From there, we got into the bigger question of how enterprise AI is taking shape. On that first question, Zack’s line is creativity. AI can handle planning and logistics, and he uses it as a kind of editorial sparring partner, asking questions, challenging ideas, and pushing him to dig deeper. But the creative judgment stays human. Sara draws the line at decision-making. Take an expensive laptop: she'll happily let AI compare the options, but she wants to be the person who clicks buy. It turns out that tiny distinction – AI can help make the decision, but shouldn't necessarily make it – is becoming a much bigger question in financial services.

    How enterprise AI is moving up the stack in 3 layers
  3. Jul 1

    Trust, stablecoins, and the AI margin squeeze:What McKinsey and QED's fintech report means for banks

    Welcome to the Tearsheet Podcast, where we explore financial services together with an eye on technology, innovation, emerging models, and changing expectations. I'm Tearsheet's editor in chief, Zack Miller. Fintech just lived through four distinct ages — pioneers, growth-at-all-costs, the 2021-22 hype cycle, and the brutal reset that followed. Now we're in a fifth: bigger, more profitable, and more disciplined than any version that came before it. Stripe's reportedly eyeing a six-figure-billion IPO. Fintech listings tripled investor appetite this year. And yet talk to anyone who lived through 2021 and they'll tell you this doesn't feel anything like that boom. To make sense of that contradiction, I sat down with the authors of a new joint report from McKinsey and QED Investors — two firms that sit on opposite sides of the table from the fintechs they study. Max Flötotto is a senior partner at McKinsey, where he leads the firm's global retail banking practice and coordinates its fintech work across Europe. Mike Packer is a partner at QED, leading growth-stage investing globally for a firm that's been backing fintech since its earliest days, nearly two decades now. We dig into the report's biggest findings: why the simplest version of banking — collecting deposits, making loans — is structurally at risk if customers start letting their own AI agents shop for the best rate; why fintechs have, for the first time, actually overtaken incumbents on trust in Europe, even as banks have closed much of the product gap; and the massive spread in how seriously banks are actually taking AI, from "talking about thinking about it" to rebuilding their entire operating model around it. We close with each of them picking the one trend, out of six in the report, they think matters most for the next decade. Max, Mike, welcome to the show.

    Trust, stablecoins, and the AI margin squeeze:What McKinsey and QED's fintech report means for banks
  4. Jun 24

    How Figure and Method closed the loop on debt consolidation and cut delinquency in half

    Debt consolidation has always rested on a promise lenders couldn't verify. A borrower takes out a HELOC, says they'll pay off their credit cards, and the lender hands over the cash and hopes for the best. Credit bureau data lags by 30 days. There's no mechanism to confirm the debt actually got retired. And a significant share of consolidation borrowers end up re-accumulating balances — leaving lenders with paper that performed worse than expected and borrowers worse off than before. Figure and Method set out to close that loop. Figure is the largest non-bank HELOC originator in America, a public company on the Nasdaq running a two-sided capital marketplace on blockchain rails. Method is a financial connectivity API that gives lenders real-time access to a borrower's full liability picture — and the ability to pay those liabilities off directly at the moment of funding. Together, they've built what they're calling verified debt consolidation: a closed-loop system where the lender doesn't hope the debt will be paid — they know it will be. Today I'm joined by Mit Shah, co-founder and COO of Method, and Rod Albuyeh, who leads AI at Figure and is something of a boomerang — he was at Figure from 2020 to 2022, left, and returned in January to a company that had transformed around him. We talk about what the data actually shows, what happens when this capability travels across Figure's 380 white-label partners, and whether verified debt consolidation is a premium feature or the future of the category.

    How Figure and Method closed the loop on debt consolidation and cut delinquency in half
4.9
out of 5
30 Ratings

About

Tearsheet is news, opinion, and analysis on the business of finance. Candid conversations with senior executives, fintech entrepreneurs, investors, industry experts -- all weigh in on the trends impacting the industry and the disruptive impact technology is having on the business. Where social media, technology and finance intersect.

You Might Also Like