Surviving the Silence Podcast

Penelope Wright

Because when the loss is complicated, you don't get the straightforward comfort. You're just standing in the debris. Holding all the things you aren't allowed to say out loud. The furious anger. The crushing guilt right in the middle of the night. And the relief. That’s the worst one. The absolute, terrifying relief when a long, exhausting emergency finally just stops. You can't tell anyone you felt that. I just want to dismantle that mental courtroom. I know there are other people staring at the ceiling at four in the morning, replaying old phone calls. Running an audit on past arguments. Treating a messy human tragedy like a crime scene they need to somehow solve. I can't do the therapy-speak anymore. No forced silver linings. No emotional performance. I just want to leave these short audio tracks—as Penelope Wright—about the actual, physical reality of getting through the day after the walls cave in. eulogywriter.substack.com

  1. Aug 13

    I haven’t even written the eulogy, but Facebook already did.

    I hadn’t even stood up from the chair yet. The phone call had ended maybe two hours ago. My coffee was still on the table, gone cold. And then my phone lit up again. Not someone checking on me. A notification. Someone had already posted a three-paragraph tribute on Facebook, with a photo of him I’d never even seen before. I watched the likes roll in while I was still trying to remember how to swallow. And underneath the grief, something uglier showed up fast. Why am I furious at people for saying something so nice about him? Why does it feel like they’re taking pieces of him before I’ve even had a chance to say goodbye myself? Am I a bad person for feeling robbed right now, in the middle of my own grief, by people who loved him too? Here’s what I actually want you to know. You’re not failing at this. You’re not broken, and you’re not petty for feeling that flash of anger at a Facebook post. You’re just standing on the fault line of something huge that shifted underneath all of us, and nobody warned you it had moved. Why Silence Might Be the Only Thing That Feels Right We’re taught that saying someone’s name out loud is the whole point. Say it enough times at a microphone, and you’ve supposedly done your job, proven you loved them, pushed back the silence. But what if all you actually want is quiet? Turns out that instinct isn’t a failure. On this exact continent, for sixty thousand years, a completely different understanding of grief has existed. In many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities during Sorry Business, speaking the name of someone who has died is considered deeply disrespectful, believed to disturb their journey and pull them back. Communities use mourning names instead, shared placeholder names that let people speak of someone without speaking them back into the world. Western tradition tells you silence is losing. The oldest continuous culture on earth has known the opposite for sixty thousand years, that trusting the silence to do its own work can be the deepest form of care there is. Why You Were Only Ever Handed the Tears If you’re a woman standing behind a lectern right now, gripping the wood so your hands stop shaking while you try to summarise an entire life, here’s something worth knowing. For most of history, you weren’t allowed to do that at all. The language, the public record, deciding what a life had meant, that belonged to men, by law, for centuries. Women were assigned something else entirely. Keening. Loud, wordless, raw grief with zero power to actually speak on the record. The men got the rhetoric. Women got the crying. So if you’re staring at a blank page right now feeling like an imposter, like you don’t know how to do this, please hear me. The version of you standing at that lectern, deciding out loud what this person’s life meant, is doing something women have only been allowed to do for a few decades. You’re not failing an old tradition. You’re barely old enough to have inherited it. Are you still with me? Because this next part is going to explain exactly why your phone keeps making you want to throw it across the room. We Don’t Throw These Parties for the People Who Are Actually Hurting We still like to pretend the eulogy happens on a Tuesday at 2pm, in a chapel, once, in front of everyone at the same time. It doesn’t anymore. It hasn’t for a while. The eulogy starts within hours now. A WhatsApp thread fills up overnight. Someone posts on Instagram before the funeral date’s even been set. By the time you’re standing at that lectern, the internet’s already been mourning for days, in fragments, without you. And here’s the part that actually needs saying. We don’t build these upbeat celebrations, the photo slideshows, the “he wouldn’t have wanted tears,” for the people who are drowning. We build them for the room. For the guests who need permission to laugh so the day feels bearable to attend. The person carrying the heaviest grief in that room is often the one who has the least room to actually fall apart in it. That’s not your fault. That’s not a flaw in how you’re grieving. That’s just what happens when an entire culture optimises mourning for comfort instead of for the people who need somewhere real to put their pain. Where the Grief Actually Lives His shoes are still by the door. You’ve opened your contacts to call him twice this week out of pure habit, before remembering, both times, right in the middle of pressing the button. Nobody’s writing tributes about that. Nobody’s liking a post about the shoes. But that’s where it actually lives. Not in the Facebook comments, not in the slideshow, not in the perfect five-minute speech everyone’s expecting you to deliver. It lives in the small, unbearable, completely unglamorous stuff nobody else will ever see. You do not owe the room a tidy ending. You do not owe fifty strangers online a story that makes sense. You are allowed to stand at that lectern and simply tell the truth, however incomplete it is, and let that be enough. FAQs Why does it make me so angry when people post about the death on Facebook immediately? There’s an actual term for this, parasocial mourning, the way communities now grieve collectively and publicly, in real time, before any formal service happens. What used to be private, whispered between family, is now a public broadcast. Your anger isn’t dysfunction. It’s a completely reasonable reaction to losing privacy over something this personal, at the exact moment you need it most. Is it normal that I don’t want to speak at the funeral? Completely normal. In ancient Greece, the formal funeral speech was exclusively a male performance, and Athenian law actually restricted how loudly women were allowed to mourn in public so they wouldn’t interrupt the men’s speeches. The pressure for everyone to speak is a modern invention, not some ancient rule you’re failing to live up to. Why does it feel wrong to keep saying their name? Because that instinct is older than the culture telling you otherwise. In many Indigenous Australian communities, avoiding a deceased person’s name is a deliberate act of care, meant to protect their journey. If saying their name feels like a violation, you might be responding to something far older than you realise. Did eulogies always used to be this personal? No. The modern, biographical eulogy is genuinely recent. When Pericles delivered what’s considered the first great eulogy in 430 BCE, he barely mentioned the individual men who died. He talked about the state. The pressure to perfectly capture one specific human being is a modern weight, not a timeless one. A few months back I wrote about the standard history of the eulogy, from ancient Rome to the modern civil celebrant. I realised afterward I’d left out the parts that actually matter most. If you missed that first piece, you can read it here.👇 This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit eulogywriter.substack.com

  2. Sep 20

    I am terrified I am going to ruin the eulogy.

    The cursor’s been blinking on a blank screen for forty-five minutes. It’s past midnight. The house is completely quiet. There’s a notebook next to me full of crossed-out sentences, a cup of tea that went cold an hour ago, and my chest keeps getting tighter the longer I stare at this screen. I’ve googled “how to write a eulogy” more times than I want to admit, and every result says the same useless thing. Speak from the heart. Keep it under ten minutes. Tell a funny story. Remember to breathe. I read that advice and felt more alone than before I searched it. Here’s why. Underneath all of it, there’s a thought I haven’t said out loud yet. What if I get up there and completely mess this up? What if I say the wrong thing, and that becomes the thing everyone remembers instead of him? That's the real fear. It was never about finding the right words. It's the fear of getting up there and accidentally ruining how everyone remembers him. You think you’re failing because you can’t find the perfect words to sum up an entire human life in five minutes. I need you to hear this clearly. You were never supposed to be able to do that. Nobody can summarise a life. That was never actually the job. Why Your Brain Ignores the Nice Version Here’s something grief psychologists know that no generic funeral template will ever tell you. A brain doesn’t update a memory just because someone stands at a microphone and says something nice about a person. If the room already believes he was strict, unyielding, hard to love, you can stand up there and say “he was actually a really warm man,” and you know what those brains do with that information? Nothing. It bounces straight off. The brain already has its version, and it defends that version fiercely. The only thing that actually forces a brain to reconsider is a story it didn’t see coming. Psychologists call it a prediction error. It’s the strict, unyielding father who once pulled over on a motorway, in the pouring rain, just to move a dead bird off the road so it wouldn’t get hit again. It’s the woman everyone thought was cold, who turned out to have kept every single ugly, glittery macaroni card her kids ever made her, in a shoebox under her bed. That’s the exact moment a rigid memory softens. Not a list of nice things. One specific contradiction the room didn’t expect. Are you still with me? Take a breath, let your shoulders drop, because this next part explains exactly why you’re feeling so much pressure, and just naming it tends to take some of the weight off. We Don’t Build This Pressure for the People Actually Hurting Standard eulogy advice was written for a world that doesn’t exist anymore. We’re told to just talk to the room. But you’re not talking to a room anymore. In 2026, there’s a real chance a camera is quietly livestreaming you to relatives overseas, and that footage is going to sit somewhere permanently. A grandchild who hasn’t been born yet might press play in twenty years, trying to understand who this person actually was. Your body knows that. That’s why it’s terrified. You’re not just nervous, you’re speaking for the record, and something in you already understood that before your conscious brain caught up. That’s not meant to scare you. It’s meant to explain the fear you’re already carrying. Once you know you’re writing for the archive, not the room, you can stop obsessing over landing an inside joke only three people in the second row will get. You can just focus on telling one true, clear story a complete stranger could follow and still feel something from. The Room Changes the Words A formal speech written for a church sounds ridiculous read out in a forest. Funerals aren’t only chapels anymore. Surf clubs. Backyards. Pub function rooms with the bar tab already running. Deliver a sweeping, theatrical address in a pub, and the rhythm is instantly wrong. You’ll feel like you’re standing there in a costume that doesn’t fit the room you’re actually in. A green burial in a paddock wants shorter, quieter sentences. A surf club wants something conversational. Before you write another word, ask where your feet are actually going to be standing when you say this. Let that decide the language, not some template written for a building you’re not even standing in. The One Object That Will Carry You This last piece of advice is small. It’s also the thing that will actually get you through the first two minutes. Bring something that belonged to them. Something that still feels like theirs. A battered gardening trowel. The cap that never left their head. A paperback worn so soft the spine’s falling apart. Set it near the casket, where the room can see it, before you say a single word. The moment you stand up, every eye in that room locks onto your face, and your face is going to be trying very hard not to fall apart completely. That’s an unbearable amount of weight to carry alone. But if there’s something sitting there the room already recognises, they’ve got somewhere else to look. When your voice catches, and it will, you won’t need to force the words out. Just look at the object. Gesture toward it, however small the movement is. The room will fill in the rest themselves, because they already know exactly what that worn-out hat means. That object does the work your voice can’t do in that moment. That’s not you failing to deliver a speech. That’s you surviving the room. You don’t need a template. You don’t owe anyone a flawless performance. You just owe them one true story they didn’t already know. FAQs What if I start crying and can’t finish? Crying isn’t failure. It’s your body’s involuntary response to shock and grief. If your throat closes up, use the object you brought, point to it, take your time. As a backup, print two copies of your speech beforehand and give one to someone you trust, with clear instructions that if you nod at them, they come up, put a hand on your shoulder, and finish reading it for you. I don’t have any big, surprising stories. What do I do? A prediction error doesn’t need to be dramatic. Brains actually respond best to hyper-specific, small details, the exact terrible instant coffee they refused to give up, the way they held a steering wheel with two fingers instead of a full grip. Small, oddly specific details land harder than a sweeping life summary ever will. How long should a eulogy actually be? Measure it in attention, not minutes. A chapel can usually hold focus for five to seven minutes. Outdoors, or somewhere casual like a pub, aim for three to four. A short, vivid story will always beat a long, comprehensive timeline. About the Author Penelope Wright writes operational, unsentimental guides for the realities of senior dog care, drawing on extensive experience in structured assessment and caregiver logistics. She writes for grieving Australian families through her Substack@eulogywriter. Start here: the full masterclass A complete step-by-step course covering structure, memory-gathering, delivery, and family dynamics in one place. * How to Write a Eulogy When Grief Takes Your Words Away 👇👇👇A few months back, I wrote about the architecture behind eulogies that actually land. If you missed that piece, the one on structuring the emotional release properly, you can read it here. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit eulogywriter.substack.com

  3. Jul 31

    What to Say in a Eulogy When the Relationship Was Complicated

    Start-here line, near the top 👉 Start here: When the Eulogy Is the Hardest Part — the main guide to complicated deaths and difficult goodbyes. The microphone stand was cold under my palm. I could hear the low hum of the speakers in the chapel. Fifty faces looking back at me, aunts, cousins, neighbours, and my throat had completely closed up. I was standing in front of a room full of people who loved the same man I did, but one terrifying thought kept pounding through my head. Half this room is about to hear me describe a stranger. Because the version of him I knew wasn’t the version the front row knew. In about thirty seconds I had to open my mouth and decide whose truth got to live in that room. I was asking myself the exact question you’re probably asking yourself right now, in the middle of the night, staring at a blank page. Can I be honest without being cruel? How do I stand up there without betraying myself, or him? The standard advice tells you to celebrate their life. Speak from the heart. Find the silver lining. That advice was written for easy loves and simple losses. It wasn’t written for addiction, or abuse, or ten years of not speaking. When the relationship was complicated, it feels like you’ve only got two options. Lie to keep the peace, or blow the whole thing up in front of everyone. You don’t have to do either. You just have to stop trying to speak for everyone else in the room. Here’s what actually got me through that speech. The Broken “We,” and Why You Feel Like a Fraud Here’s the mistake I nearly made at that microphone. In a simple death, you stand up and say “we’ll all miss him so much,” and heads nod. Everyone in the room shares the same basic truth. But in a complicated one, that “we” is already broken. I realised if I stood up and said “we all knew how much he cared,” half the room would be sitting there thinking, no, I didn’t know that version of him. Or worse, that wasn’t my experience of him at all. Forcing everyone into one shared story doesn’t create peace. It breeds resentment. It makes people feel like they’re being told their own memory is wrong. And it makes you feel like a liar. Are you still with me? Take a breath, because this next part is the only rule you’ll actually need tomorrow. You Fix It by Switching From “We” to “I” I didn’t say, “we all knew how much he cared.” I said, “I’ll always hold onto the moments he showed me care.” Feel the difference? The first sentence asks everyone in the room, including the estranged cousin, including the person he hurt, to agree with a version of him they might not recognise. The second sentence is just true. It’s mine. Nobody has to sign off on it. Instead of “she was always there for us,” try “she was there for me, in ways I’m still grateful for.” Instead of “we will never forget,” try “I will never forget.” That shift isn’t selfish. It’s actually the kindest thing you can do for a room that’s already broken into pieces. You’re giving everyone permission to have their own complicated, private version of the truth. Nobody’s Owed a Lesson The hardest part of that day wasn’t the family. It was the world outside expecting a tragedy to come with a moral attached. When someone dies from an overdose, or suicide, or after years of estrangement, people start whispering things like “if this saves one life, it won’t be in vain,” or “maybe this will be a wake-up call for someone here.” I understand the impulse. The death feels so empty you want to fill it with meaning. But I realised I didn’t have to carry that weight, and putting it on him wasn’t fair either. His life doesn’t need to become a warning for other people to have mattered. His death doesn’t need to teach anyone anything for it to be real. Sometimes it’s just what it is. A tragedy. You don’t owe the room a happy ending. You’re allowed to stand at that microphone and say, “there’s no silver lining here, there’s just grief, and all of us sitting in it together.” You don’t have to perform meaning while you’re the one falling apart. The Exhaustion Nobody Sees The truth I was too scared to say out loud that day was that I was completely worn out. I’d been fighting a war none of those fifty faces had ever seen. The world expects your grief to start the day of the funeral. It doesn’t work like that. Sometimes the funeral isn’t where grief begins. It’s where it ends. I loved someone through addiction, so I’d already been losing him in stages, for years, watching the person I knew disappear a little more each time. I was grieving him while he was still breathing. Grief doesn’t wait politely for a death certificate. It starts the moment you realise the person you loved isn’t coming back, even while their body’s still right there in front of you. When you step up to speak, you’re allowed to say that. Not cruelly. Just honestly. You can say, “my mother’s mind left us years before her body did, today we’re just letting her rest.” Or, “addiction took him long before his heart actually stopped, this funeral is just catching up to what we’ve already been grieving.” Shake if you shake. Cry if you cry. Say “I” instead of “we.” The walk up to that microphone is the longest one you’ll ever take. Once you’re there, all you have to do is tell your own truth. That’s it. That’s genuinely enough. FAQs Is it normal that I feel relieved they died? Yes. Relief doesn’t mean you didn’t love them, and it doesn’t make you a bad person. It usually means you’ve been grieving them for years already. Their death is just the final full stop on a sentence that’s been exhausting you for a long time. Do I have to mention the addiction, the abuse, the estrangement? Only if it feels true to say. You don’t owe the room a full account of the worst parts of their life, but you don’t have to hide it either. Something like “he fought a battle with addiction he couldn’t win” tells the truth without turning the eulogy into something else. What if people get angry at my version of them? Some people in that room might not agree with what you say, and that’s okay. You’re not up there to represent everyone’s memory of him. You’re up there because you loved him, and you’re the only one who can say it exactly the way you actually lived it. Hold your version. Let them hold theirs. A few months back, I wrote the first half of this, “When the Eulogy Is the Hardest Part, Complicated Deaths and Difficult Goodbyes.” If you’re writing a speech for a relationship that was hard to survive, that piece is the foundation this one builds on, and you can read it here. Further Reading When the truth isn’t flattering Why I Refuse to Write Generic “Angel” EulogiesWhat gets lost when everyone is described as perfect. The Grief Nobody Gave You Permission to FeelWhen your loss isn’t one the world recognises. When the person caused harm Writing a Eulogy for the Parent Who Hurt YouWhat you owe the truth, and what you owe the people listening. Eulogy for a Narcissistic ParentFor the parent who took up all the air, and the room that knows it. Writing a Eulogy for Someone Who Was Convicted of a CrimeWhen the victims are still out there and the room knows. When you feel the wrong thing When Death Brings ReliefWriting a eulogy for someone you needed to let go. Writing a Eulogy for a Parent You Weren’t Close ToWhen there isn’t much to say and everyone is waiting anyway. All of it: Complicated deaths and difficult goodbyes This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit eulogywriter.substack.com

  4. Jul 17

    Do Children Inherit Debt in Australia?

    What This Is It starts the same place those other pieces do. A man. A note. One word left behind before he stepped in front of a train. Adolf Merckle chose that over facing the debt he’d been hiding. But I’m not going to leave you there. Because eventually, someone has to open the filing cabinet. And once you’re standing there, staring at it, you need more than a gut-punch. You need to know what to actually do next. What’s Inside The real legal answer, in Australia, do you inherit someone’s debt when they die, and why it’s almost always no. A proper day-by-day plan for your first 30 days if you’ve ended up as executor, so you’re not making panicked, permanent decisions on no sleep. What happens if there simply isn’t enough money to cover what’s owed. And at the end, the part nobody prepares you for, how you write a eulogy for someone once you’ve learned things about them you didn’t know, without lying about who they were, and without turning their funeral into a confession. So there’s this guy, Adolf Merckle. German billionaire. And back in January 2009, he’s sitting at dinner with his family, completely ordinary night. Then dinner’s done, and he gets up, walks out into the freezing cold, all the way down to the train tracks near his house. And he steps in front of a train. They found his car parked nearby. One note on the seat. One word. Entschuldigung. Sorry. That’s it. That’s all he left. Seventy-four years old. Built an empire. And underneath all of it, there’s five billion euros of debt he’d been hiding, and he couldn’t even bring himself to explain it. Just sorry. I don’t think Adolf Merckle was a man who stopped thinking clearly. A man who built and lost billions doesn’t get there without running numbers constantly, instinctively, even at the worst moment of his life. . Somewhere in there, I imagine a version of him doing the one calculation nobody wants to say out loud: that his death might do something his life no longer could. Whether that’s true, legally or otherwise, we don’t actually know. What we do know is that a mind capable of building an empire is also capable of convincing itself that disappearing is a solution, not just an ending. And then there’s Ludwig. Forty-three years old, I think about what someone in that position might actually feel at 2am, once the banks have gone home and the meetings are over. I’d guess it isn’t gratitude. I’d guess it isn’t simple grief either. Because he wasn’t given the choice to help carry it. It was simply left for him to find. I can’t tell you that’s what Ludwig felt. I don’t know him, and I’m not going to put words in a real person’s mouth. But I think it’s the honest question underneath this whole story, what does it actually cost someone to inherit a silence that big, and still have to build something out of it. The Drawer I Wish I Hadn't Opened Look, most of us aren’t Ludwigs. No global banks, no billion-dollar empire. But you don’t need to be a billionaire to leave behind a mess. The size of the number doesn’t change how heavy it feels when it lands on you. You walk into the spare room of a completely normal house, pull open a filing cabinet, three drawers, all neatly labelled in their handwriting. You’re expecting bank statements. Boring paperwork. The kind that makes the next few months tedious, not terrifying. Instead you find a whole other financial life. Credit card debt going back years. Loans you never knew about. A second mortgage. Money owed to actual people, not banks. And you end up sitting on the floor of that spare room because your legs just stop working for a minute. In that moment, you switch off the grief and start doing maths instead, and somehow you assume all of it is yours to fix now, just because you’re the one standing there. But grieving the person comes first. Then there’s the second loss, grieving the version of them you thought you knew. And honestly, that one’s harder to carry. Here’s the thing though. The shame was theirs. The secrecy was theirs. Choosing not to tell you was theirs. None of it says anything about what you meant to them, or what they meant to you. The debt is just a problem to manage. The grief is the actual thing you need to feel. You don’t have to do both in the same week. The Panic Answer: Do You Inherit Their Debt? Take a breath. In the vast majority of cases in Australia, you do not personally inherit another person’s unsecured debt. Credit cards, personal loans, store accounts, and utility bills belong strictly to the deceased person’s estate—not to their children, not to their relatives, and not to you. Here is exactly how to handle the aftermath without letting their secrets become your financial ruin. The 30-Day Financial First Response: A Framework for the Executor Okay, close the filing cabinet drawer, wipe your eyes, and let’s get tactical. You are way too exhausted to figure this out from scratch, so I built the timeline for you. Put your brain on standby and just do what this list says. This framework applies to the executor, or to the person who has taken on a de facto administrative role while the estate is being sorted. Days 1–3: Do Not Pay Anything From Your Own Pocket The rule: pause before paying. Not one bill. Not one debt collector call returned with a payment. Not one credit card statement settled from your own funds. Before you have a full picture of the estate and legal advice on your obligations, every payment you make could create a liability or complicate the administration. Pause everything. If debt collectors call, keep it brief: “The person has died and the estate is being assessed. Please put all correspondence in writing to the executor or solicitor.” Days 4–7: Secure the Financial Picture Before Any Decisions The rule: gather before acting. You need a full financial inventory before anyone can make sensible decisions. Partial information is dangerous because it makes one debt look urgent when there may be a bigger legal picture behind it. Keep everything in one folder. Ugly organisation is still organisation. Days 8–14: Appoint a Specialist Solicitor The rule: this is not the moment for guesswork. Estate law is state-specific in Australia. Look for a solicitor with Accredited Specialist status in Wills and Estates. Tell them: “I am the executor, and we have discovered significant debts after the death. I need advice before any payments are made.” Days 15–21: Understand Your Personal Exposure The rule: not every debt is your debt. Unsecured debts belong to the estate. Secured debts attach to the asset they secure (like a house). The only debts that expose you personally are those you co-signed, guaranteed, or jointly borrowed. Everything else is the estate’s problem. Your solicitor will map this clearly. Days 22–30: Separate the Administration From the Grief The rule: the debt is one problem. The grief is another. Give the administration a container. A set time of day. A checklist. Give the grief a different container. A counsellor. A sibling conversation. You are allowed to deal with the paperwork in one part of the day and fall apart in another. Okay, take one more breath. You know the plan. Now let's handle the specific fears. Before you close this screen and go back to staring at the filing cabinet, let's put out the last few fires in your brain regarding how this actually works. Frequently Asked Questions About Inheriting Debt * What happens if an estate is insolvent? An estate is insolvent when the debts are greater than the assets. Beneficiaries may receive nothing, and creditors may need to be dealt with in a legally required order. You do not personally have to pay the shortfall. * Are superannuation death benefits used to pay debts? Not always. Superannuation does not automatically form part of the estate. It may be paid directly to a nominated beneficiary. Get legal advice before assuming superannuation can be used… This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit eulogywriter.substack.com

  5. Jul 10

    The Front Row Politics: Who Actually Decides Where the Ex-Wife Sits?

    What This Is I’m walking you through the whole mess, blended families, funeral seating, all of it. Who actually decides where the ex-wife sits when it comes down to it. Why that person almost never matches whoever’s got the strongest emotional claim. And the actual words to send so it’s sorted before standing in the chapel arguing about it. What's Inside This one’s for the current wife who’s paying for the funeral, the ex-wife who raised his kids for ten years, and the adult kids stuck in the middle watching it all play out. It gets into who Australian law actually says decides where the ex-wife sits, and it’s rarely who you’d guess, what to do when legal control and moral claim belong to two totally different people, and the actual scripts to text so it gets sorted quietly, days before, instead of blowing up in the aisle with the kids standing right there. 🔖 Series [X]: What actually happens after death — inside families, workplaces, cultures and rooms full of people pretending not to know. 👉 ↳ Start here My phone buzzed just as I reached for a coffee that had gone cold an hour ago. I was standing in the kitchen, glaring at that mug like it might warm itself back up out of sheer spite, when the screen lit up with a text from my sister-in-law. She wanted to know if Uncle Marcus’s ex-wife was planning to come to the funeral. Not whether she’d be welcome. She didn’t ask that. Just whether she was planning to come, like that one detail would somehow settle everything else. My first thought wasn’t a nice one. Here we go. The man’s been gone two days and we’re already treating the seating chart like a UN peace summit. I dropped the sarcasm pretty quick though, because honestly, I get it. The ex-wife had eleven years with him. She’s the mother of his kids. She sat through the worst of the hospital waiting rooms years before the current wife was even in the picture. But the current wife’s the one paying for the funeral. So there I am, standing there with the phone in my hand, wondering if we’re seriously doing this right now. The current wife already feels like she’s sharing her marriage with a ghost. The ex-wife’s carrying a grief nobody’s ever given her permission to feel out loud. And then there’s the kids. God, the kids. Right in the middle of it, already wrecked, watching the adults lose their minds over who sits in row one. This is the front row problem. I’ve seen it happen more times than I want to count. Leave it to sort itself out at the door of the crematorium, and it always goes badly. The flowers die and get forgotten in a week. Nobody forgets the argument in the aisle. That one sticks around for twenty years. You can’t undo decades of messy family history in a chapel foyer. You just can’t. But you can get ahead of it before anyone’s even put a black suit on. I got so sick of watching families do this to each other over something so avoidable that I finally sat down and wrote the whole thing out. Who actually has the legal right to decide the seating. How to keep the kids out of the crossfire. And the bit that actually matters most, the exact words to send the ex-wife, or the current wife, so it gets sorted quietly instead of turning into a war. Nobody puts it on the order of service. But everybody in the room knows exactly what the seating means. The phone call came the day before. Not from the funeral home. From his sister, who wanted to know whether she was planning to come. Not whether she was welcome — she had not asked that. Whether she was planning to come. She was the mother of his children. She had been married to him for eleven years. She had sat beside him in hospital waiting rooms, at school concerts, and at appointments where his diagnosis was explained in language that was careful and devastating. She had been his emergency contact when the second wife was overseas. And now someone was calling to ask whether she was planning to come to his funeral. This is the front row problem. It does not resolve cleanly. But it can be managed if the right conversation happens before the day. Okay, wait a second. Don’t jump straight into it just yet. If you are reading this and your jaw is currently clenched tight enough to crack a tooth, just pause. You’re probably looking for someone to tell you who is “right” and who is “wrong.” But the law doesn’t care about our feelings. If we’re going to survive this day without starting a family war, we need to know the actual rules of the room. The Quick Answer: Who Controls Funeral Seating in Australia? In Australia, the person arranging the funeral usually has practical control over the service, including the format, order of service, instructions to the funeral director, and seating arrangements. This person is often the executor named in the will, or the senior next of kin if there is no executor available or no will. For seating, the funeral director will usually follow the instructions of the person who arranged the funeral. An ex-wife, ex-husband, former partner, current partner, adult child, sibling, or parent may have a strong emotional claim to be present, but emotional closeness does not automatically give a person legal control over the service. That is the painful part. The law may recognise one person’s authority. The room may recognise a much more complicated truth. Who Has the Legal Right to Decide Seating at a Funeral in Australia? The short answer is: usually the person arranging the funeral. In many Australian funeral disputes, the person with the strongest legal position is the executor named in the will. If there is no executor, no will, or the executor is not available, the practical responsibility often falls to the senior next of kin or the person who has taken responsibility for arranging the funeral. That person is the one the funeral director takes instructions from. They are usually the person signing the paperwork, choosing the service format, approving the order of service, liaising with the venue, and communicating with the funeral home. In practice, this means the arranger can usually decide which rows are reserved and who is expected to sit where. Not who loved him most. Not who was there at the end. Not who had the longest history. Not who raised the children. Not who has the most morally persuasive claim. Whoever has carriage of the funeral usually controls the seating plan. That does not mean they should use that control carelessly. Legal authority is not the same thing as emotional wisdom. A funeral seating plan is not only a logistics decision. In a blended family, it is a public statement about who counts. If there is no executor and no will, the law doesn’t care who loved him most. The legal priority for the ‘senior next of kin’ follows a strict, unromantic hierarchy: the current spouse, then adult children, then parents, and finally adult siblings. Can an Ex-Wife Attend the Funeral? Usually, an ex-wife can attend a funeral unless there is a legal reason she cannot, such as an intervention order, restraining order, private venue restriction, or specific safety issue. But there is a difference between attending and being formally included. She may be able to walk into the service. That does not mean she controls the order of service. It does not mean she chooses the front row. It does not mean she speaks. It does not mean the funeral director will take instructions from her. This distinction is where a lot of conflict begins. One person thinks, “I have every right to be there.” Another person thinks, “You do not have the right to take a family place.” Both may be speaking from different kinds of truth. The ex-wife may have been part of his life for decades. She may be the mother of his children. She may have known him before the second marriage, before the illness, before the public version of the family became tidy. She may have cared for him in ways nobody at the servi… This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit eulogywriter.substack.com

  6. Jul 3

    The 24-Hour Turnaround: Writing a Hindu Tribute When the Body Must Be Cremated Tomorrow

    This piece is written for anyone preparing words for a Hindu funeral service or memorial with very little time. It addresses the diaspora Hindu experience in Australia and does not represent all regional or family traditions. Please adapt for your specific community’s practice. 🔖 Series [X]: What actually happens after death — inside families, workplaces, cultures and rooms full of people pretending not to know. 👉 ↳ Start here: How a Great Eulogy Is Built Part One: The Writing Guide The call came at 11pm. By midnight, the family had been notified. By the time the sun rose, arrangements were already underway — the pundit, the crematorium, the calls to relatives in three cities and two countries. Someone was booking a flight. Someone else was booking another. And somewhere in the middle of all of this, someone needed to find words. In many Hindu communities, particularly in the diaspora, a spoken tribute — in English, in Hindi, sometimes in both — has become part of the service alongside the traditional rites. Not all families include one. But when they do, the person who is asked to speak is often the person who is most devastated by the loss, given the least preparation time, and the most unsure of what the tradition expects. This post is for that person. Still with me? Because I know right now your instinct is to frantically Google “perfect Hindu eulogy templates” and try to memorize something that doesn’t even sound like you. Put that idea in the bin. Before we get into the actual writing guide, I need you to hear something very clearly. The Reality Check You are reading this on your phone, hiding in a bathroom stall, trying to escape the noise. You are running on three hours of sleep and cold, sugary chai. Outside that door, the house smells like burning ghee and anxiety. The priest is rushing through the Sanskrit because the crematorium is double-booked at 2:00 PM. Your cousin is arguing with the caterer in the driveway. You are terrified of dropping the pinda on the living room rug. And in the middle of this exact chaos, someone expects you to stand up and speak. The Rules of Engagement Before you type a single word, drop the performance. Give yourself radical permission to be imperfect. Do not try to write a profound tribute to honor the divine soul. Funerals are not the time to pretend you are a poet. Do not force flowery metaphors about the tapestry of life. Real grief doesn’t sound like a Hallmark card. It sounds like stiff sweaters, cold tea, and the literal weight of the pinda in your hands. Do not try to deliver a TED Talk on the Bhagavad Gita if you have never actually read it. Five minutes of honest, messy truth is infinitely better than a forced, scholarly act. The 2 AM Emergency Script If you are staring at a blank screen, the house is loud, and your brain is fried, stop trying to reinvent the wheel. Highlight the text below, copy it, and paste it directly into your Notes app. This structure bridges the gap. It hands the elders the traditional respect they are waiting for, but it leaves room for you to just be a sad, exhausted human being. “We are gathered today to honor the life of [Name/Relation]. Our tradition teaches us that the atman (soul) is eternal, and that today is just a transition. But while we find peace in that truth, today we are still allowed to grieve the specific, daily presence of the person we loved. I will always remember [Name] for [insert one specific, slightly funny, or deeply true everyday detail—e.g., how they always argued about the best way to make chai, or how they never forgot a birthday]. That is the version of them I will carry forward. To our family, friends, and community who have gathered here today—thank you for holding us up when we are too exhausted to stand. We offer these words, and our deepest love, alongside the prayers today. Om Shanti. How to Write a Eulogy for a Hindu Funeral in 24 Hours The first thing to understand is that the words you are looking for do not need to be perfect. They need to be true. A tribute that is specific, honest, and spoken from love will always outperform a tribute that is formally polished but generic. This is true of all eulogies. It is especially true when there was no time to write. The second thing to understand is what a Hindu tribute in the diaspora context is actually for. It is not a biography. It is not a performance review. It is a spoken acknowledgment of a life — and in the theological context of a Hindu service, it is offered alongside the rites as part of the community’s collective marking of a soul’s transition. The Bhagavad Gita teaches that the soul — the atman — is eternal and cannot be destroyed. Death is understood not as an ending but as a transition: the soul moving from one form to another, continuing its journey. A tribute offered in this context is not a farewell to a person who is gone. It is an acknowledgment of a life that was lived, offered to a soul that is continuing. This theology does not need to dominate the tribute. But understanding it shapes the tone: grief is appropriate, and it is also understood within a larger frame. Does a Hindu Funeral Require a Western-Style Eulogy? Not traditionally — and this matters. The formal structure of a Hindu funeral (antim sanskar — the last rites) is a complete ritual in itself, performed by the pundit with the family’s participation. The spoken tribute in English is a diaspora addition, incorporated into many Australian Hindu funerals because the community includes people who don’t understand the Sanskrit rites and because the values of the adopted country have influenced how grief is expressed publicly. This means: if your family has not asked for a spoken tribute and you are not sure whether one is expected, ask. The pundit or the family organising the service will know what is planned. If a tribute is expected, the questions are: how long, by whom, in which language, and in what part of the service does it fall? Get these answers before you write. A five-minute English tribute that arrives in the wrong place in a tightly structured ritual can disrupt more than it adds. For the Australian diaspora context, Funeral Culture in Australia addresses how migrant communities navigate the intersection of traditional practice and the Australian context — the crematorium instead of the pyre, the timetable instead of the natural rhythm of the rites. Understanding the context helps, but it doesn't write the speech for you. Let’s get into exactly what needs to go into this document What a Hindu Tribute Actually Needs to Contain A Hindu tribute—particularly in the diaspora context, where the room will hold people of multiple generations and varying familiarity with the tradition—works best when it holds four things, in roughly this order. 1. The Specific Person Not a list of achievements. A specific true detail—something the person said, something they did, the specific way they occupied a room. This anchors the tribute in reality and makes the person present in the room one more time. 2. The Relationship Who is speaking and what the person meant to them. The more specific, the better. Not “a wonderful father” but the thing the father actually did that was his specific quality. 3. The Community An acknowledgment of the people gathered—the extended family, the community members, the people who travelled to be there. In many Hindu families, the community’s presence at a funeral is itself a significant act of love and support that deserves explicit acknowledgment. 4. The Release A closing that acknowledges the transition in a way that is consistent with the theological frame—without being preachy, without lecturing, and without making non-Hindu people in the room feel excluded. This can be as simple as: “We offer these words alongside our prayers for the journey ahead.” Are you looking at the time on yo… This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit eulogywriter.substack.com

  7. 5d ago

    Why Was He So Happy Right Before He Did It?

    I’ve lived this twice, with two men I loved in different ways, and for years the not-knowing was the heaviest part. I would have given anything to know what happened inside that final half hour. Not out of morbid curiosity, but “I mean, I just needed to know what was going on in there. Were they scared? Were they still themselves? Was there some alternate version of that night where I stepped in and changed the whole ending? I never fully got that answer, and it used to drive me crazy. But what I got instead... was something I could survive on. Something I could actually live with. And I figure, if you’re going through this right now, then going back into the dark to hand you this answer... yeah. It’s completely worth it.” Because that’s really why this exists. If you’ve been through the darkest thing that can happen to a person, and you can turn back around inside it and reach a hand out to someone still standing in there, that’s about as close to a good use of pain as I think there is. It takes a strength I didn’t know I had until I needed it. What follows isn’t a way to finally understand why. It’s the closest thing to an answer I could actually stand on, and the words it eventually let me say out loud. If any part of this stirs something in you that feels too heavy to carry today, support is there any time, no judgment, no explanation needed. In Australia, Lifeline is 13 11 14 and Beyond Blue is 1300 22 4636. In the US, the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is 988. In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans is 116 123. Wherever you are, findahelpline.com can point you to a local line. Part 1: The Empty Chair in the Lounge Room It was a Wednesday. We called it happy hump day, that midweek dinner where everyone gets together and complains about who’s had the worst week. Nobody drinks much on a Wednesday. One, maybe two. Wednesday is too hard for more than that. My flatmate and I were at the dining table first. Then Josh tagged along. We were planning a friend’s birthday party, nothing more complicated than that. Five chairs around the table. Bright lights through the glass doors, the kind you only get in a high-rise on the Gold Coast at night, the whole coastline lit up like it doesn’t know anything is wrong. Josh owned a bar. That night he offered to put my bottle of wine there for the party, so I wouldn’t have to buy it separately, one less thing to organise. Small, practical, generous. That was just him. At the table he was the one getting the ice out of the bag, serving everyone, five guys and two girls, and when someone said something about him doing all the work, he just said, no worries, I do this every day. Easy. Familiar. The most normal version of himself. If you’d asked me to score my own happiness that particular Wednesday, I’d have said five percent, honestly, that’s just what Wednesdays are. Josh, next to that, seemed high. Genuinely high. Eighty, maybe more. Nobody went to Surfers that night. Surfers Paradise is the main nightlife strip on the Gold Coast, think bars, clubs, the kind of place you go out clubbing. Josh asked a few times if anyone wanted to come with him. We all brushed it off, it was a work week, and one or two casual invitations out on a Wednesday didn't register as anything. That was the offhand question earlier in the night, does anyone want to come to Surfers with me, and it landed the way a hundred other offhand questions had landed before it. One of the guys dropped him at the train station in Helensvale, where he always parked his car for work. Nothing unusual about that part. It was where he parked every single day. What was in the car was unusual. A hose. He must have known it was there the whole night. Through the ice, through the birthday planning, through offering up his own bar for free. A few hours later, the phone rang. I came back the next morning to five chairs still around the table. Four of them I could look at. His, I couldn’t. I don’t know how else to explain it except that my brain simply refused to process it as a chair anymore. My flatmate felt the same thing, neither of us could bring ourselves to move it, so we left it exactly where it was for three days, until it started to feel wrong for a different reason, and we finally had to. We asked each other the only question there was to ask. Should we have gone to Surfers. Could we have stopped it. I said no, I don’t think we could have. But then why the ice. Why the bar. Why be the most helpful, most easy version of himself, hours before. Here’s the part that’s taken me the longest to admit. I’ve gone back over that night more times than I can count, and I don’t actually think it was eighty percent anymore. Not really. I think there was a thinness to it, a tone underneath the ease that I didn’t have the language for at the time. Not sadness you could point to. Just a kind of edge to the calm. I didn’t see it that night. I think I can see it now, looking backward, knowing what I know. That’s the sentence every family in this position ends up holding, in one form or another. I should have known. I should have gone to Surfers. I should have seen it. And underneath all of it, the harder one: what if I did see it, just not clearly enough to call it by its name? I know this is a lot to carry, and if you need to close the screen and walk away for a minute, do it. But if you are still with me, take a breath, because this next part is where we actually start dismantling the guilt. Part 2: The Sober Tap-Out Leafy was a family man. That’s not a phrase I’m reaching for, it’s just what he was. He and Chris had been together for years, a two-year-old daughter, a good job each, a house on my street. I’d drive past most weekends and there he’d be, doing what he always did, mowing, tinkering, cleaning the garage, the same unremarkable rhythm every family on that street kept. The day it happened, Chris was at work. Their daughter was with her grandmother. I drove past and he waved out the window, same as always. He was cleaning the garage. Nothing about it looked different from any other Saturday I’d seen him do exactly that. Then he got in the car. Not the four-wheel drive he and Chris usually took out bush, the one built for it, the one they went out in together often. The sedan. He drove out to the bush alone and he ended his life there. No note. Nothing left behind that explained anything. Chris didn’t speak, not really, for two years. That’s the story people can almost bear to hear, because at least it looks like something. A man alone with something building in him for a long time, however invisible. Josh’s is the one nobody knows what to do with. Because Josh wasn’t alone in the days before. Josh was in a room full of people, being generous, being useful, being exactly himself. There was no bush, no long drive out somewhere private and unwitnessed. There was a train station he parked at every single day, a hose he must have already had, and a night beforehand spent handing out ice and offering up his own bar for a party he wouldn’t be at. That’s the difference that breaks people. A chaotic death, even a devastating one, gives the living something to hold onto. Alcohol. Isolation. A slow, visible unravelling you can point to afterward and say, there, that’s when it started. It doesn’t take away the grief, but it gives grief a shape. A sober tap-out gives you nothing to hold. No slow decline to trace backward. No note. No warning anyone can honestly say they missed, because there was nothing to miss. Just a man sweeping a garage on a Saturday, and a man getting ice out of a bag on a Wednesday, both of them entirely, convincingly themselves, right up until they weren’t anywhere at all. The question every person left behind eventually has to sit with is the one that has no comfortable answer: how do you write a eulogy, how do you stand up and speak about someone, when … This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit eulogywriter.substack.com

About

Because when the loss is complicated, you don't get the straightforward comfort. You're just standing in the debris. Holding all the things you aren't allowed to say out loud. The furious anger. The crushing guilt right in the middle of the night. And the relief. That’s the worst one. The absolute, terrifying relief when a long, exhausting emergency finally just stops. You can't tell anyone you felt that. I just want to dismantle that mental courtroom. I know there are other people staring at the ceiling at four in the morning, replaying old phone calls. Running an audit on past arguments. Treating a messy human tragedy like a crime scene they need to somehow solve. I can't do the therapy-speak anymore. No forced silver linings. No emotional performance. I just want to leave these short audio tracks—as Penelope Wright—about the actual, physical reality of getting through the day after the walls cave in. eulogywriter.substack.com