Science with Benefits

Rod Lamberts
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Science

In each episode of Science with Benefits, a different STEMM sector insider shares insights, perspectives and personal stories from their career and life experience.  In conversation with OG science communicator Dr Rod Lamberts*, guests aren't always "the usual  suspects" in STEMM, but they all share one thing: a unique perspective on the sector you haven't heard before. Whether you're en experienced insider or at the beginning of your STEMM career, there's always something interesting on Science with Benefits.  *Rod has been a science communication academic and practitioner for nearly 30 years. Check out his much more NSFW podcast "A Little Bit of Science" wherever you get your podcasts. And stay tuned for a new one coming in late 2026!

Episodes

  1. 4d ago

    David Waugh - Dean of Health Innovation, Precincts & Partnerships - Adelaide University

    Keywords health research, consumer engagement, university partnerships, impact measurement, science communication, trust in science, cancer research, health literacy, clinical trials, innovation   Summary In this conversation, David Waugh discusses his role in building health research ecosystems at Adelaide University, emphasizing the importance of partnerships, consumer engagement, and effective communication in health research. He reflects on the impact of consumer involvement in research, the challenges of communicating scientific concepts to the public, and the necessity of trust in science. Waugh also shares insights from his experience in cancer research and the importance of history in understanding current challenges in the field.   Takeaways Building partnerships is crucial for health research success. Consumer engagement enhances the impact of research. Effective communication is key to overcoming public skepticism. Trust in science must be earned through transparency. Health literacy is essential for informed public participation. Collaboration between academia and industry drives innovation. Measuring impact involves understanding patient outcomes. Navigating communication challenges requires honesty and clarity. History provides valuable lessons for current research practices. A connected ecosystem can elevate research participation.   Chapters 00:00 Introduction to David Waugh's Role 02:59 Building Health Research Ecosystems 05:49 Engaging Consumers in Health Research 09:01 Measuring Impact in Health Research 11:59 Navigating Communication Challenges 15:12 The Importance of Trust in Science 17:54 The Role of History and Personal Interests

  2. Sep 9

    James Harland - Director, STEMM Digital Innovation Hub (HuDINi) @ RMIT

    Rod Lamberts speaks with James Harland, professor of computational logic and director of the STEM hub for digital innovation (HuDIni) at RMIT, about how technologists are at their best when they’re thinking beyond just new-and-shiny tools and focusing on real-world problems. They cover practical uses of virtual reality, mixed reality, robotics, and AI, plus why collaboration with designers, educators, and other specialists matters more than tech evangelism. Key topics In this episode, James Harland explains his role at HuDIni: managing a technical team while also building partnerships across the university, industry, and student communities.He argues for a problem-first approach to innovation: start with a real need, then choose the technology that fits, rather than forcing technology to look for a use.James describes “low hanging fruit” projects such as using virtual tours to improve university orientation and make campus information available year-round.He contrasts that with “high hanging fruit” such as large-scale projects involving remote training, including support for people delivering care and services in places where travel is difficult.The conversation returns repeatedly to the danger of technology evangelism, where enthusiasm for a tool can outrun its usefulness.James says technologists have a responsibility to raise awareness of what is possible without trying to own the solution or dictate the agenda.They discuss how often clients or collaborators think they know the answer before they have fully diagnosed the problem, and how the discovery process usually changes the brief.James gives examples of immersive learning in STEM, including a virtual journey through digestion and interactive 3D teaching for engineering and chemistry concepts.The episode also explores the gap between innovation labs and everyday teaching, especially the cultural and institutional barriers that slow adoption.Later, they turn to trust, arguing that skepticism toward technology is healthy when it is evidence-based, not knee-jerk.James closes with a broader view of history and context, including how technologists need to understand society beyond their own specialty.Timestamps (00:00) Why Rod wanted to talk to James Harland (00:36) What the Houdini hub actually does (01:18) Bringing people together across university silos (02:16) Virtual tours as a simple, practical innovation (03:32) “High hanging fruit” and larger impact projects (05:23) Why technologists should not drive social change (06:23) Selling the possibilities without becoming an evangelist (07:47) The role and risk of tech evangelism (10:30) Why predictions about technology age badly (11:27) Concepts stay, interfaces change (12:51) AI and the pace of technological change (14:17) Why clients often need help naming the real problem (15:56) The same diagnosis problem in science communication (17:14) Digital natives still do not necessarily understand systems (17:43) Speech interaction and underused interfaces (19:05) Creativity as part of technological innovation (20:06) Why designers unlock new uses for tech (21:32) Technologists as collaborators, not lone experts (22:25) Virtual reality for teaching digestion and nutrition (23:51) Turning 2D concepts into 3D understanding (25:36) The challenge of moving from showcase to classroom scale (27:58) Trust in technology, and trust in technologists (30:28) Comfort, familiarity, and learning to use new systems (31:12) Healthy skepticism and the need for evidence (33:47) Old-school teaching, new tools, and what counts as learning (34:16) How quickly “normal” technology becomes invisible (36:30) Resistance to the internet in the classroom (37:17) Why people resist change when the present feels good enough (38:05) Music formats, disruption, and public adoption (39:40) Life outside tech: gardening and singing (40:50) What technologists should learn from history and society (43:14) Acknowledgement of country and long time horizons (44:40) Why technologists should step outside their own bubble

  3. Sep 2

    Elanor Huntington - Deputy Chief Exec, Commonwealth Industrial, Scientific and Research Organisation

    Keywords Elanor Huntington, quantum optics, STEM, leadership, impact, accountability, trust in science, research, engineering, CSIRO STEM, diversity, education, engineering, trust in science, imposter syndrome, cultural challenges, personal growth, safe spaces, community engagement Summary In this engaging conversation, Elanor Huntington discusses her journey from a PhD in experimental quantum optics to becoming a leader in STEM at CSIRO. She emphasizes the importance of practical applications of research, the significance of impact at scale, and the complexities surrounding trust in science. Elanor shares her insights on leadership, accountability, and the need for transparent communication in the scientific community. Rod and Elanor explore the importance of acknowledging mistakes in science and the barriers to diversity in STEM fields. They discuss the cultural challenges faced by students and professionals in engineering, the need for safe spaces, and the impact of imposter syndrome. Elanor shares her experiences in promoting diversity and creating welcoming environments in STEM education. The conversation also touches on personal interests outside of work and the critical issue of trust in science as a societal challenge.   Takeaways Elanor Huntington has a PhD in experimental quantum optics. She emphasizes the importance of practical benefits from scientific insights. Elanor identifies strongly as an engineer, valuing the E in STEM. Her leadership journey was in some ways accidental but driven by a desire for impact. She finds joy in creating opportunities for others to thrive. Elanor believes in aiming for impact at scale in research. She acknowledges the importance of small wins in daily work. Accountability and transparency are crucial for building trust in institutions. Elanor critiques the way universities measure success and impact. She advocates for a better understanding of the scientific method to restore trust.  Admitting mistakes fosters trust in science. Diversity in STEM is crucial for innovation. Cultural barriers impact students' confidence in STEM. Creating welcoming environments is essential for diversity. Imposter syndrome affects many professionals in STEM. Engagement in community activities enriches personal growth. Trust in science is built through personal connections. Problem-solving should drive STEM education. Cultural safety is vital for diverse engineers. Balancing professional and personal interests is important.   Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Elanor Huntington 00:54 Exploring Quantum Optics 03:07 The Journey to Leadership in STEM 06:11 Impact at Scale: A New Perspective 09:00 Measuring Success and Accountability 11:51 Trust in Science: A Complex Discussion 19:49 The Importance of Acknowledging Mistakes 21:36 Diversity in STEM: Breaking Barriers 23:59 Cultural Challenges in STEM Education 26:05 Creating Safe Spaces for Diverse Engineers 28:41 Imposter Syndrome and Personal Growth 30:28 Balancing Professional Life with Personal Interests 31:33 Trust in Science: A Societal Challenge

  4. Aug 26

    Fabien Medvecky - President, Public Communication of Science & Technology Network (PCST)

    Rod Lamberts speaks with Fabien Medvecky, Associate Professor at the Australian National University and president of the PCST network, about the real work of science communication. They dig into why policy influence is often less about formal submissions and more about relationships, why “trust in science” is a slippery phrase, and how impact can show up in unexpected places. They discuss the difference between science as a field and science as a public debate, the policy “mating ritual” that often surrounds decision-making, and how international context changes everything from engagement styles to terminology. Key topics Fabien Medvecky explains what the PCST network is: an international representative body for science communication that serves both researchers and practitioners.The conversation covers PCST’s advocacy role, including support for academic programs under threat and engagement with institutions when science communication itself is challenged.Fabian traces his path into science communication from philosophy of economics, especially through work on intergenerational justice, climate policy, and the social discount rate.He argues that climate debates are often framed as science disputes when the deeper issues are actually ethics, economics, and distribution.Rod and Fabian discuss why policy submissions often matter less for direct persuasion and more as part of a broader process that legitimizes and enables conversations.Fabian describes policy engagement as a kind of “mating ritual” - awkward, indirect, but sometimes necessary to create the conditions for influence.The discussion turns to impact, with Fabian distinguishing between citation-based academic impact, personal influence, and changes in real-world practice.A New Zealand lake-health project becomes a concrete example of impact: shifting community engagement away from tense town halls toward more effective informal consultation.Fabian warns against assuming science communication methods travel neatly across borders, noting that context, safety, and political conditions shape what works.He challenges the phrase “trust in science,” arguing that trust attaches to people and institutions, not science as a single thing.The episode closes with Fabian reflecting on the need for a broader community across science-related and knowledge-related fields, not just within science communication alone.Chapters  ·      Introducing Fabien Medvecky and the PCST network  ·      What the PCST network does and who it serves  ·      From philosophy of economics to science communication  ·      Climate change as an economics and justice problem  ·      Why public debate often misses the real issue  ·      Policy submissions versus real policy influence  ·      The “policy mating ritual” idea  ·      How Fabien thinks about impact  ·      The New Zealand lake-health engagement example ·      Why town halls can fail and barbecues can work ·      Why context matters in science communication  ·      Is trust in science actually declining?  ·      Why “trust in science” is a category mistake  ·      What PCST does day to day  ·      International differences in science communication  ·      PCST as a truly global network  ·      Food, books, and life outside work  ·      A broader community across science-related fields

  5. Aug 19

    Carissa Bonner - Deputy Director of the Sydney Health Literacy Lab

    Keywords health literacy, risk communication, heuristics, COVID-19, trust in science, implementation science, public health, nudges, shared decision making, health awareness  Summary In this conversation, Rod Lamberts speaks with A/Prof Carissa Bonner about the complexities of health literacy and risk communication, particularly in the context of COVID-19. They explore the role of heuristics and biases in decision-making, the importance of building trust in health communication, and the application of implementation science in public health. Carissa shares insights on innovative communication strategies, the impact of nudges in health behaviour, and the significance of shared decision-making in health interventions. The discussion concludes with personal reflections and future directions in health literacy.   Takeaways Health literacy is crucial for effective risk communication. Heuristics help people process complex health information. COVID-19 highlighted the need for clear risk communication. Trust in health professionals is essential for public health. Implementation science focuses on applying research in real-world settings. Collaborative approaches enhance health research outcomes. Humor can be an effective tool in health communication. Nudges can influence health behavior positively. Shared decision-making respects patient values in health care. Engaging the public is key to improving health awareness.   Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Health Literacy and Risk Communication 02:56 Understanding Heuristics and Biases in Health Decisions 06:04 The Role of Risk Communication in COVID-19 08:57 Building Trust in Health Communication 12:01 Implementation Science in Public Health 15:02 Collaborative Approaches in Health Research 18:01 Innovative Communication Strategies During Crises 20:56 The Impact of Nudges in Health Behaviour 23:53 Shared Decision Making in Health Interventions 27:03 Engaging the Public in Health Awareness 30:00 Personal Insights and Future Directions

  6. Aug 12

    Susannah Eliott - CEO Australian Science Media Centre

    Keywords science communication, misinformation, disinformation, media relations, public understanding, uncertainty, science media centres, symposium, evidence-based reporting, public health health misinformation, science communication, trust in science, misinformation solutions, AI in science, public understanding of science, media literacy, combating disinformation, evidence-based research, science literacy   Summary In this conversation, Rod Lamberts speaks with Susannah Eliott, CEO of the Australian Science Media Centre, about the challenges and responsibilities of science communication in the face of misinformation. They discuss the role of science media centres in bridging the gap between scientists and journalists, the importance of conveying uncertainty in scientific findings, and the impact of misinformation on public perception. The conversation also touches on the recent Science Misinformation Symposium, highlighting the collaborative efforts needed to address the multifaceted issue of misinformation in today's digital landscape. In this conversation, Susannah discusses the pervasive issue of health misinformation and its implications for science. She emphasizes the role of various stakeholders in combating misinformation, including scientists, journalists, and the tech sector. The discussion also highlights innovative solutions being implemented to educate the public, particularly children, about misinformation. Additionally, the conversation touches on the importance of building trust in science, the complexities of health misinformation, and the need for a nuanced approach to science communication.    Takeaways The Australian Science Media Centre has been operational for 21 years, focusing on improving science reporting. Science media centres train both scientists and journalists to enhance communication. Misinformation is a significant concern, especially during crises when public confusion is high. Scientists often hesitate to engage with the media due to uncertainty in their findings. Public communication of science needs to include the concept of uncertainty. Communicating nuance in science is challenging but essential for accurate reporting. Misinformation can have serious consequences for public health and trust in science. Collaboration across sectors is necessary to combat misinformation effectively. Understanding the scale of misinformation is crucial for developing effective strategies.  Health misinformation is a significant and growing concern. Algorithms amplify health misinformation, making it more pervasive. The scientific literature is increasingly being polluted by fake papers. We all have a role in combating misinformation. Innovative educational programs can help children identify misinformation. Building trust in science requires transparency and skepticism. Health misinformation often serves as a gateway to broader misinformation. Success in science communication can sometimes mean less coverage of certain issues. Engaging the public in science requires creativity and nuance. Passion projects can help balance work and personal interests in science.   Chapters 00:00 Introduction and Context of the Australian Science Media Centre 02:55 The Role of Science Media Centres in Misinformation 06:00 Navigating Uncertainty in Science Communication 08:59 Public Perception of Uncertainty in Science 12:05 The Challenge of Communicating Nuance 15:02 The Impact of Misinformation and Disinformation 18:06 Insights from the Science Misinformation Symposium 21:50 The Impact of Health Misinformation 24:14 The Role of Science in Misinformation 26:39 Innovative Solutions to Combat Misinformation 28:51 Building Trust in Science 31:28 Understanding Health Misinformation 34:55 Navigating Trust and Skepticism in Science 39:20 Measuring Success in Science Communication 41:39 Balancing Work and Passion in Science Communication

  7. Aug 5

    Frank Bongiorno - Director of the Vice-Chancellor's Centre of Public Ideas at the University of Canberra

    Keywords Public Ideas, Applied History, STEM communication, audience engagement, Historical Context, Humanities, Social Sciences, Uncertainty, Policy, Historical Knowledge, Humanism, Quantitative History persuasion, influence, academia, public engagement, humanities, social sciences, audience, storytelling, success measurement, political agenda   Summary In this conversation, Rod Lamberts speaks with Frank Bongiorno about the establishment of the Vice Chancellor's Centre of Public Ideas at the University of Canberra. They discuss the role of applied history in contextualizing present issues, the subjective nature of historical narratives, and the importance of uncertainty in historical knowledge. Bongiorno emphasizes the human element in history and the balance between quantitative and qualitative approaches, highlighting the persuasive power of historical narratives. In this conversation, Rod Lamberts and Frank Bongiorno explore the themes of persuasion and influence in academia, particularly within the humanities and social sciences. They discuss the challenges of engaging diverse audiences, the importance of understanding who the public is, and the need for effective storytelling in public engagement. The conversation also touches on measuring success in public engagement efforts and the personal reflections of Bongiorno on his experiences and interests outside of academia.   Takeaways The Centre of Public Ideas aims to bridge humanities and public discourse. Applied history involves using historical expertise to address contemporary issues. Contextualizing the present is crucial for understanding current problems. History is not just a series of facts; it is constructed and subjective. Uncertainty in historical knowledge reflects its human and cultural aspects. Historians must convey the value of uncertain knowledge to policymakers. Good history is persuasive and connects with evidence. Quantitative and qualitative histories both have their place in understanding the past. The art of persuasion is essential in historical narratives. Historians should train to use language that accurately reflects evidence. Persuasion is a fundamental aspect of communicating expert knowledge. The humanities often face suspicion regarding political agendas. Engaging with diverse audiences requires understanding their backgrounds. Younger audiences are often underrepresented in public discussions. The rise of social media complicates public engagement efforts. Storytelling can bridge gaps between academia and the public. Success in public engagement is measured by audience interaction. Collective learning experiences are more impactful than lectures. The humanities have an image problem that needs addressing. Personal experiences can enrich professional insights.     Chapters 00:00 Introduction to the Centre of Public Ideas 02:46 The Role of Applied History 05:51 Understanding Historical Contexts 09:06 The Nature of Historical Knowledge 11:58 Uncertainty in History and Policy 15:01 The Human Element in Historical Narratives 17:59 Quantitative vs Qualitative History 20:39 The Role of Persuasion in Academia 25:27 Understanding the Public: Who Are They? 29:43 Engaging with Diverse Audiences 31:25 Measuring Success in Public Engagement 35:21 Personal Insights and Reflections

  8. Jul 29

    Ben Newell - Director of the UNSW Institute for Climate Risk & Response

    Keywords climate risk, interdisciplinary research, climate science, behavioral science, policy impact, communication, economic analysis, environmental policy, decision-making, climate response climate change, trust in science, communication, uncertainty, public perception, research advice, interdisciplinary, personal balance   Summary In this conversation, Ben Newell discusses his role as the director of the New South Wales Institute for Climate Risk and Response, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in addressing climate risk. He highlights the challenges of integrating diverse fields such as psychology, law, and business to create effective climate policies. The discussion also covers the significance of clear communication in climate science, the need for economic analysis in understanding climate impacts, and the importance of engaging with policymakers to drive meaningful change. Newell reflects on the evaluation of success in climate research and the ongoing efforts to influence climate risk disclosure practices. In this conversation, Ben Newell discusses the importance of transformative change in climate action, the complexities of trust in climate science, and the challenges of communicating uncertainty. He emphasizes the need for public trust in science, particularly in controversial areas, and shares insights on navigating interdisciplinary research. Additionally, he highlights the significance of maintaining a work-life balance as a researcher.   Takeaways The Institute focuses on climate risk and response. Interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial for addressing climate issues. Different disciplines have varying perspectives on risk. Effective communication is key to conveying climate science. Economic analysis can bridge gaps in climate understanding. Engaging with policymakers is essential for impact. Success is measured by academic output and public engagement. Building a trusted voice in climate discourse is important. Behavioral insights can enhance policy effectiveness. Continuous learning is necessary for improving climate risk practices. Transformative change is essential for climate action. Trust in climate science is influenced by political leanings. Communicating uncertainty is crucial in climate discussions. Public trust in science varies across different fields. The COVID experience highlighted trust breakdowns in science. Interdisciplinary research requires balancing expertise and collaboration. Maintaining a work-life balance is important for researchers. Understanding different perspectives enhances research effectiveness. The worst case scenario in climate predictions is evolving. Scientists are still trusted sources of information by the public. Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Climate Risk and Response 03:08 Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Climate Science 05:57 Challenges of Interdisciplinary Research 09:04 Communicating Climate Science Effectively 12:03 Bridging Economics and Climate Science 14:57 Policy Engagement and Impact 18:01 Evaluating Success in Climate Research 26:21 Transformative Change in Climate Action 27:24 Trust and Climate Science 28:46 Communicating Uncertainty in Climate Events 32:47 Public Trust in Science 37:04 Advice for Aspiring Researchers 40:15 Balancing Work and Personal Life

  9. Jul 22

    Sarah Keenihan - Legendary science communicator, writer and editor

    Keywords science communication, freelancing, environmental crisis, academia, qualitative research, writing, editing, academic publishing, communication strategies, public engagement trust in science, imposter syndrome, science communication, advice for writers, navigating disagreement Summary In this conversation, Sarah Keenihan discusses her journey back to academia as a postgraduate student in science communication, triggered by an environmental crisis in South Australia. She reflects on her previous experience in science, the challenges of freelancing, and the importance of effective science communication. The discussion also touches on the balance between meeting client expectations and maintaining ethical standards in writing and communication. In this conversation, Sarah K and Rod Lamberts explore the complexities of trust in science, the challenges of imposter syndrome, and the importance of mentorship for aspiring science writers. They discuss the nuances of engaging with differing opinions and the need for transparency in scientific communication. Sarah shares her personal experiences with imposter syndrome and offers advice for those starting their careers in science writing, emphasizing the value of seeking guidance and finding balance in life beyond work. Takeaways Sarah is returning to university to pursue a PhD in science communication. Her interest in science communication was sparked by an environmental crisis. She has a PhD in a traditional science field, which she refers to as 'legit'. Freelancing in science writing involves juggling multiple clients and deadlines. Networking is essential for success in freelancing. Effective science communication requires understanding the audience's needs. Academics often forget how much they know and need to simplify their messages. The importance of structuring stories to hook readers early is crucial. Trust is built through transparency and accuracy in communication. Ethical considerations can lead to turning down work that doesn't align with personal values. We need to engage with people we disagree with. Trust in science varies among different groups. People want to see real individuals involved in science. Imposter syndrome is a common experience for many. Using fear can be a motivator for success. It's important to find a mentor for guidance. Physical activities can provide mental relief. Knowing when to take a break is crucial. Being human in your work fosters connection. Asking for advice can lead to valuable insights.   Chapters 00:00 Revisiting Academic Roots 02:58 Navigating Environmental Crises 06:00 The Freelance Journey 08:58 The Role of Science Communication 12:00 Balancing Pragmatism and Ethics 17:21 Navigating Disagreement and Trust in Science 18:25 The Challenge of Trust in Science 24:29 Imposter Syndrome: A Common Struggle 28:38 Advice for Aspiring Science Writers 30:57 Finding Balance Beyond Science

  10. Jul 15

    Ryan Winn - CEO, Science & Technology Australia

    Summary In this conversation, Ryan Winn discusses his role in connecting the science sector with public servants and politicians, emphasizing the importance of communication and collaboration. He shares insights on the challenges of advocacy, the need for science literacy, and the significance of building trusted relationships in policymaking. The discussion highlights the value of celebrating small wins in science communication and the ongoing efforts to bridge the gap between science and society. In this conversation, Ryan discusses the complexities of political decision-making, the challenges and excitement of Senate estimates, and the importance of restoring trust in science. He emphasizes the need for effective communication in the science sector and shares insights on leadership, imposter syndrome, and the value of open conversations in fostering a collaborative environment in STEM. Takeaways Ryan Winn believes he has the best job in science, connecting people. Celebrating and connecting the science sector is vital for progress. Everyone in the science and policy realm is trying to do the right thing. Building relationships is key to effective science communication. Researchers need to be involved in policy-making processes. Science communication roles require translating complex ideas. Success in science communication is often about visibility in media. The importance of diverse representation in science is crucial. Advocacy can feel like shouting into the wind at times. Small wins in science communication can lead to significant changes. Senate estimates can be a tedious but necessary part of political engagement. Restoring trust in science is crucial and requires nuanced communication. The science sector has not kept pace with societal changes in communication. Effective communication must cater to the audience's needs and preferences. Leadership in science advocacy requires authenticity and relationship-building skills. Celebrating hidden voices in the sector can enrich the conversation. Understanding the complexity of the world requires diverse perspectives and knowledge. Chapters 00:00 Connecting Science and Society 03:01 The Role of Science in Policy 05:57 Navigating Complex Relationships 09:00 Measuring Success in Science Communication 11:50 The Challenges of Advocacy 15:06 Celebrating Small Wins in Science 17:25 Awakening to Complexity in Political Decision-Making 18:18 The Drudgery and Excitement of Senate Estimates 20:35 Restoring Trust in Science 25:54 Becoming a Leader in Science Advocacy 27:54 Navigating Imposter Syndrome 29:41 The Importance of Open Conversations in Science

  11. Jul 15

    Dan Angus - Director of Queensland University Technology’s Digital Media Research Centre

    Keywords Computational Social Science, Data Donation, Ethics, Self-Reporting, Digital Media, Research Methods, Advertising, Social Science, Algorithms, Data Privacy advertising, data donors, participant bias, subjective experience, research challenges, academic success, aspiring researchers, work-life balance Summary In this conversation, Rod Lamberts and Dan Angus delve into the emerging field of computational social science, discussing its significance, methodologies, and ethical considerations. They explore the concept of data donation, the challenges of self-reporting in research, and the role of computational methods in enhancing social science research. The discussion also touches on the insights gained from digital platforms and the complexities of researching contested spaces such as pornography and advertising. In this conversation, Dan discusses the nuances of advertising, the importance of understanding participant bias in research, and the subjective experiences that shape data collection. He emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaboration in academia and shares insights on measuring success in research. Dan also offers advice for aspiring researchers and reflects on the balance between professional and personal life, highlighting the importance of curiosity and community engagement. Takeaways Computational social science is a new interdisciplinary field. Data donation allows for more accurate data collection. Ethics and consent are crucial in data donation processes. Self-reporting can lead to inaccuracies in research. Computational methods can enhance traditional social science research. Digital platforms provide valuable data insights. Research in contested spaces faces unique challenges. Positive impacts of digital content are often overlooked. Advertising research can benefit from data donation methods. The importance of transparency in data collection is paramount. Political advertising garners more attention than other forms. There is a bias in who participates in research studies. Subjective experiences of participants are valuable in research. Resistance in research can lead to refinement of ideas. Success in research is indicated by raising more questions. Building relationships is key to impactful research. Patience is essential in navigating a career path. Curiosity drives meaningful contributions to various fields. Balancing work and personal life is crucial for well-being. Creating conditions for others to succeed is a priority. Chapters 00:00 Introduction and Context 02:10 Exploring Computational Social Science 04:36 Data Donation and Ethics 09:43 Challenges of Self-Reporting 12:21 The Role of Computational Methods 14:08 Data Insights from Digital Platforms 17:53 Research in Contested Spaces 18:49 The Focus of Attention in Advertising 20:04 Understanding Data Donors and Participant Bias 22:25 The Importance of Subjective Experience in Research 23:50 Navigating Challenges in Research and Academia 29:05 Indicators of Success in Research 31:41 Advice for Aspiring Researchers 35:18 Balancing Work and Personal Life

  12. Jul 15

    Kylie Walker - STEMM sector peak body CEO extraordinaire

    Keywords STEM, diversity, leadership, policy, research funding, innovation, education, technology, engineering, Australia geopolitical shifts, research opportunities, philanthropy, investment, R&D, imposter syndrome, trust in science, indigenous knowledge systems, future perspectives, Australia   Summary In this conversation, Kylie Walker, CEO of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, discusses her role in promoting STEM across diverse sectors, the importance of inclusivity in education, and the challenges faced in policy and research funding. She emphasizes the need for a shift in how research is valued and funded in Australia, advocating for a culture that encourages risk-taking and innovation. The discussion also highlights the Elevate program aimed at supporting diverse individuals entering STEM fields and the potential for Australia to seize global opportunities in research and technology. In this conversation, Kylie discusses the impact of geopolitical shifts on research funding, particularly in Australia, and the opportunities that arise from these changes. She emphasizes the importance of philanthropy and investment in R&D, while also addressing the challenges of navigating imposter syndrome in professional settings. The discussion touches on the need to restore trust in science and the potential of integrating Indigenous knowledge systems into future research methodologies.   Takeaways Kylie Walker is the CEO of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering. STEM workforce is diverse and extends beyond traditional research roles. The Elevate program supports individuals from various backgrounds to enter STEM fields. Passion and drive are key criteria for the Elevate program. Mature age students often have a clearer purpose in their studies. Kylie measures her success by the satisfaction of her members and the impact on systemic issues. There is a need for a cultural shift in how research funding is perceived in Australia. The current funding system often favours established researchers over innovative ideas. Australia has the potential to lead in global research and technology. Kylie sees exciting opportunities for Australia in the evolving global landscape. Geopolitical shifts are creating uncertainty in research funding. Australia's stability presents an opportunity for global research. Philanthropy in Australia lacks established pathways for investment. Navigating imposter syndrome is a common challenge for professionals. Owning one's space is crucial in leadership roles. Imposter syndrome can serve as a motivating fuel. Trust in science is often a reflection of communication issues. Indigenous knowledge systems offer valuable perspectives for research. Weaving different knowledge systems can enhance understanding. The future of knowledge transmission is still in its infancy.   Chapters 00:00 Introduction and Background of Kylie Walker 02:58 The Role of STEM in Diverse Sectors 05:59 Elevate Program and Diversity in STEM 08:58 Measuring Success in Leadership Roles 11:50 Challenges in Policy and Research Funding 14:59 The Need for Risk-Taking in Research 18:05 Opportunities for Australia in Global Context 18:28 Geopolitical Shifts and Research Opportunities 21:22 Philanthropy and Investment in R&D 23:50 Navigating Imposter Syndrome 28:49 Restoring Trust in Science 33:23 Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Future Perspectives

  • 12 Episodes

About

In each episode of Science with Benefits, a different STEMM sector insider shares insights, perspectives and personal stories from their career and life experience.  In conversation with OG science communicator Dr Rod Lamberts*, guests aren't always "the usual  suspects" in STEMM, but they all share one thing: a unique perspective on the sector you haven't heard before. Whether you're en experienced insider or at the beginning of your STEMM career, there's always something interesting on Science with Benefits.  *Rod has been a science communication academic and practitioner for nearly 30 years. Check out his much more NSFW podcast "A Little Bit of Science" wherever you get your podcasts. And stay tuned for a new one coming in late 2026!

Information

  • Creator
    Rod Lamberts
  • Years Active
    2026
  • Episodes
    12
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © 2026 Science with Benefits
  • Show Website
    Science with Benefits