Weltgeist

Weltgeist

Philosophy, video essays. New videos every week.

  1. 2h ago

    Why Nietzsche Loved the Odyssey

    Try Brilliant's tutor for free: https://brilliant.org/Weltgeist/ . You’ll also get 20% off an annual Premium subscription.Support us on Patreon, get access to exclusive videos:▶ https://www.patreon.com/WeltgeistYT▶ Follow us on X for updates: https://x.com/WeltgeistYTTIMESTAMPS:00:00 Introduction02:19 The Underworld17:11 The Surface34:15 The HeightsOUR ANALYSES: ▶ Beyond Good and Evil: https://youtu.be/WIHXZUltfqk▶ The Antichrist: https://youtu.be/qej1Z8Qzq_c▶ Genealogy of Morals: https://youtu.be/6PUx4cOfFcI▶ Twilight of the Idols: https://youtu.be/YpVr_NEvWYA▶ The Will to Power: https://youtu.be/He6ZC7ZFBt8▶ Daybreak: https://youtu.be/cOL2z7nuXdA▶ The Joyful Science: https://youtu.be/U0fTBOJ-C_INietzsche was a professor of Greek and intimately familiar with both Homer’s Odyssey and the Iliad. He admired the Greeks for their way of life, their culture, and specifically how they justified life as an aesthetic phenomenon, through art.In particular he was fond of using Odysseus as an exemplar of this Greek ideal. Wily, cunning Odysseus, throughout the Odyssey, brushes with darkness but is never consumed by it. He escapes from the cave of the Cyclops, he visits the Underworld but never quite enters it (he takes what needs from Tiresias, converses with Achilles, and leaves), he manages to hear the Siren’s Song without being bewitched by it, he enjoys his time with Circe and Calypso but never loses sight of his ultimate goal: Ithaca. Odysseus sticks bravely to the surface, he doesn’t fall into the trap of the “introspective present”; he always pushes onwards.For Nietzsche, Odysseus represented the best of mankind. A joyful affirmation of life in spite of its sufferings, which are many. In particular Nietzsche singles out his conversation with Achilles in Hades, where Achilles says he’d rather live as a poor farmer than “reign over the endless dead.” For Nietzsche, this was not Achilles showing regret, nor Odysseus flattering his audience of pacifists (the Phaeacians) but rather a Homeric song of praise for life. The Greeks were such staunch affirmers of life that even the lowest life possible is preferable to being dead. The Greeks, in this way, loved life in a way that is alien to us: they took the totality of existence, and in dreaming up their world of gods and myths, managed to say yes to it so much that even a miserable existence would make them happy.This video was sponsored by Brilliant. Thank you!

    Why Nietzsche Loved the Odyssey
  2. 5h ago

    How to Become Evil | Nietzsche

    Try Brilliant's tutor for free: https://brilliant.org/Weltgeist/ . You’ll also get 20% off an annual Premium subscription.Support us on Patreon, get access to exclusive videos:▶ https://www.patreon.com/WeltgeistYT▶ Follow us on X for updates: https://x.com/WeltgeistYTTIMESTAMPS:00:00 Introduction02:25 Zarathustra’s Context06:38 The Tropical Monster18:07 The Hammer and the Sculptor25:07 The Sipo Matador34:54 ConclusionMENTIONED IN THE VIDEO:▶ Nietzsche's Warning to Scientists: https://youtu.be/Qy8Xof92OYQ▶ Nietzsche on Cesare Borgia: https://youtu.be/V8PtXOEbnQoOUR ANALYSES: ▶ Beyond Good and Evil: https://youtu.be/WIHXZUltfqk▶ The Antichrist: https://youtu.be/qej1Z8Qzq_c▶ Genealogy of Morals: https://youtu.be/6PUx4cOfFcI▶ Twilight of the Idols: https://youtu.be/YpVr_NEvWYA▶ The Will to Power: https://youtu.be/He6ZC7ZFBt8▶ Daybreak: https://youtu.be/cOL2z7nuXdA▶ The Joyful Science: https://youtu.be/U0fTBOJ-C_IA puzzling passage in Nietzsche's Thus Spoke Zarathustra speaks of the need for mankind to "become more evil." Did Nietzsche write this purely for shock value, or is there more to it? And how do we square this strange demand with Nietzsche's broader philosophical project of going BEYOND good and evil? We go through three aphorisms from Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil in order to answer these questions. Each illuminates a different aspect of what Nietzsche meant by the word "evil."First, The Tropical Monster. Nietzsche argues that nature, morality and mankind are fundamentally misunderstood so long as we seek a defectiveness or morbidness in the "tropical growths", in the constitution and lives of so-called great men of action. He singles out Cesare Borgia as the prime example of what in his day was regarded as an evil man, possibly alluding to Jacob Burckhardt and his influential Civilization of Renaissance Italy, where the historian highlights the cruelty of Cesare's methods, cruelty that far exceeded the degree necessary for the achievement of his aims. Rather than viewing good/evil in a simple dichotomy, where the presence of one necessitates the absence of another, Nietzsche argues for a view where good and evil go together, as in the final analysis they are both about capability and power. Cesare Borgia is a "tropical growth", a force of nature. Those historians and contemporaries who call Cesare a monster, Nietzsche argues, are in favor of the "temperate zones" - in favor of mediocrity. Morals as timidity. Second, the Hammer and Sculptor. The human being, for Nietzsche, is a conglomeration of different instincts and drives, always seeking their own expression. Becoming more evil (cruel) also implies being cruel towards your own lesser instincts, like how a sculptor fashions a statue from marble. Only in mankind's case, we are both marble and sculptor. We must sculpt away at our lesser instincts and seek to overcome them.Third, tying both visions together, is the metaphor of the Sipo Matador, a strangler fig. A plant that grows by wrapping around a tree, climbing upwards, and using its host for support. Nietzsche urges his reader to confront the "hard truth" about the origin of so-called noble societies, saying that any aristocratic class has depended for its own sake upon the labor and existence of lower classes. Rather than talking about economics he analyses these societies psychologically; where the emergence of an aristocratic class necessitated a psychological mindset of those would-be nobles, the so-called pathos of distance, the ability and self-confidence to issue commands and wield power. Cultivating this type of power, from the outside looking in, will inevitable look cruel or evil, but if human society is to flourish, like the blooming flower of the Sipo Matador, such a mindset will be necessary.Finally, all of this ties into Nietzsche's broader project of confronting ex

    How to Become Evil | Nietzsche
  3. 8h ago

    Nietzsche's Problem With Socrates

    To try everything Brilliant has to offer—free—for a full 30 days, visit https://brilliant.org/Weltgeist/ . You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.Support us on Patreon, get access to exclusive videos:▶ https://www.patreon.com/WeltgeistYTOUR ANALYSES: ▶ Beyond Good and Evil: https://youtu.be/WIHXZUltfqk▶ The Antichrist: https://youtu.be/qej1Z8Qzq_c▶ Genealogy of Morals: https://youtu.be/6PUx4cOfFcI▶ Twilight of the Idols: https://youtu.be/YpVr_NEvWYA▶ The Will to Power: https://youtu.be/He6ZC7ZFBt8▶ Daybreak: https://youtu.be/cOL2z7nuXdA▶ The Joyful Science: https://youtu.be/U0fTBOJ-C_IIn Twilight of the Idols, Nietzsche opens up the chapter "The Problem of Socrates" with a bold statement: he calls him ugly. By itself that's not really a controversial statement: Socrates's unsightly physique is well-attested in ancient sources, and Socrates himself (with a dint of his trademark irony) even agrees with detractors who insult his looks. (His bulging crab-like eyes, for example, allow him to take a broader view of the world than those with normal, forward-facing eyes can... he says to his friend Crito.) What's so provocative about Nietzsche's statement is not the statement itself but rather that he uses it as an argument against Socrates. Isn't that the classic example of an ad hominem attack? You're ugly therefore you're wrong? But Nietzsche goes deeper into it and uses the ugliness of Socrates as a springboard to critique ancient Greek culture - how Socrates and the Socrates Revolution was a symptom of decadence, of the ancient pre-Socratic Greeks losing their noble tastes, allowing themselves to be seduced by reason, allowing Socrates to convince them that from now on, they needed good reasons, solid arguments, for their way of life. The happy instinct of the powerful, that needs no justification beyond itself, now stood in need of a justification: good reasons were required for your beliefs.And the Greeks had Socrates to thank for that.For Nietzsche, this is not a sign of philosophical enlightenment, but a sign of decay, of decadence, of a loss of strength; of weakness.Moreover, with Socrates, the way was paved for Plato, and his world-changing distinction between appearance and reality. The Greeks used to judge books by their covers, and Plato changed that. Now, there is this rotten, fallen, imperfect material world juxtaposed with a perfect World of Forms. For the pre-Socratic Greeks, this idea was not as forceful as it is today: appearance WAS reality. And only ugly Socrates, who could not compete with the strong, healthy, noble Greeks on physical terms, had to invent a kind of mental challenge: the tyranny of reason, and the prelude to the World of Forms where reason would reign supreme over all the rest. Mind over body, reason over instinct, idea over reality.This video was sponsored by Brilliant.

    Nietzsche's Problem With Socrates

About

Philosophy, video essays. New videos every week.