High Frequency Low Noise

Jarika Moon and Rachel Zelazny

🎙️ Welcome to High Frequency, Low Noise. We’re Jarika and Rachel—two unsupervised women exploring the places where science, “pseudoscience,” cultural influence, spirituality, and intuition intersect. We talk feminism, psychology, relationships, culture, wellness, belief, human behavior, and all the strange shit that comes with being a woman in the modern world. We’re spiritual, but we like evidence. We’re feminists, but we’re not here to tell you how to be one. We believe in intuition, but we’re not afraid to examine it. We’re not here to prove anyone wrong or pretend we have all the answers. We’re here to ask better questions, follow the evidence, challenge our assumptions, and explore the space between what feels true and what actually holds up. Expect deep dives, rabbit holes, research, real conversations, and probably a few moments of “Wait… but is that actually true?” High frequency. Low noise. No rulebook. ✨ Keep your frequency high, the noise low, and stay shamelessly unsupervised.

  1. Episode 1

    High Frequency, Low Noise, and "The Truth"

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode! Episode #1: High Frequency, Low Noise, and “The Truth” In our very first episode, we’re diving into the question that quietly shapes everything else we’ll explore on this show: why do we believe the things we believe, and how much of that is actually true? Ultimately, this episode isn’t about proving anyone wrong. It’s about noticing the moment we stop asking the question altogether. Confirmation bias, algorithms, echo chambers: none of that makes you broken, it just means you have a brain that’s trying to conserve energy. The real risk is mistaking “familiar” for “true,” or “fast” for “intuitive.” Intuition isn’t the enemy of critical thinking; assumption is, and that gap between the two is where we’re going to be spending a lot of time on this show. Subscribe now Sources, Organized by Section 1. Why We Believe Things That Aren’t True APA Psychologists are taking aim at misinformation with these powerful strategies APA Psychological science can help counter spread of misinformation APA Consensus Statement (PDF) — Using Psychological Science to Understand and Fight Health Misinformation APA What psychological factors make people susceptible to believe and act on misinformation? APA Why we fall for fake news: Hijacked thinking or laziness? APA How and why does misinformation spread? 1a. Your Truth, My Truth, and THE Truth Medium (Dialectic Reason) Is Truth Really Subjective? Relativism vs. Objectivity Catholic Answers Your Truth, My Truth: How to Understand and Refute Relativistic Thinking Substack What is truth? 1b. The Truth in Things We Don’t Understand Association for Psychological Science All About Awe Templeton The Science of Awe Psychology Today The Quiet Power of Awe 2. Confirmation Bias Simply Psychology Confirmation Bias In Psychology: Definition & Examples Britannica Confirmation bias Scribbr What Is Confirmation Bias? 3. Cognitive Bias & Rational Choice Theory Britannica Cognitive bias Wikipedia List of cognitive biases Wikipedia Choice-supportive bias 5. How Algorithms Reinforce Belief Reuters Institute (Oxford) Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review The Conversation Feedback loops and echo chambers: How algorithms amplify viewpoints NCBI/PMC Through the Newsfeed Glass: Rethinking Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers 5a. Echo Chamber: Treading the Line Ed Latimore What Is a Social Media Echo Chamber? (How Algorithms Trap You) arXiv A Systematic Review of Echo Chamber Research 6. Intuition vs. Assumption Mindtools Intuition and Decision-Making (Kahneman’s System 1/2, Gary Klein’s research) Springer (Business Research) When rational decision-making becomes irrational: intuition effectiveness Wiley Intuition in Decision Making: Insights From Drift Diffusion Modeling 7. Why Being “Open-Minded” Doesn’t Mean Believing Everything Psychology Today Open-Mindedness and Skepticism in Critical Thinking Bellevue College Critical Thinking note 33: Open-Mindedness FunBlocks The Power of Open-Mindedness: A Mental Model Fondation Jasmin Roy Open-Mindedness: A Key to Better Understanding the World 8. Origins of Intuition (Jung / MBTI) Simply Psychology Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Psychology Town Deciphering Personalities with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: An Extension of Jung’s Theories Medical News Today Myers-Briggs: 16 personality types and their accuracy 8a. Quantifying Intuition Wiley Intuition in Decision Making: Insights From Drift Diffusion Modeling Cambridge Core How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis

    High Frequency, Low Noise, and "The Truth"
  2. Episode 3

    Independence is great….Until you need someone.

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode! We’re taught that independence is the goal. Be self-sufficient. Handle your own shit. Don’t be a burden. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps. Need less. Do more. Figure it out yourself. And there’s nothing wrong with being capable of standing on your own. But what happens when “I can do it myself” quietly becomes “I have to do it myself”? In Episode 3 of High Frequency, Low Noise, we’re talking about the complicated relationship between independence, vulnerability, and connection—and what happens when self-sufficiency stops being a strength and starts becoming a defense mechanism. We’re getting into: 🧠 Hyper-independence — why some of us become so determined not to need anyone that asking for help starts to feel almost impossible. 🫂 Vulnerability — why letting people show up for us can feel more uncomfortable than doing everything ourselves. 🤝 Codependence, intradependence & interdependence — and why these concepts aren't interchangeable. 🏠 Community & connection — how we've gone from intensely interconnected local communities to a world where we can be connected to thousands of people and still feel completely alone. 💭 Asking for help — why needing other people isn't necessarily weakness, and why receiving support can be just as difficult as offering it. And we’re asking a bigger question: What if independence isn't the opposite of dependence? Maybe the goal isn't to need nobody. Maybe it's to become independent enough to stand on our own, intradependent enough to understand ourselves, and interdependent enough to know when we don't have to. Because there's a strange contradiction in modern life: we're more connected than ever, but we're increasingly expected to solve our problems individually. Maybe sometimes we're trying to solve collective problems individually. And maybe rebuilding community doesn't mean giving up our autonomy. Maybe it means figuring out how to belong without disappearing—and how to rely on other people without losing ourselves. 🎙️ High Frequency, Low Noise Two unsupervised women. Big questions. Low noise. No rulebook. ✨ Keep your frequency high, the noise low, and stay shamelessly unsupervised.

    Independence is great….Until you need someone.
  3. Episode 6

    The Attachment-Style Industrial Complex

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode! Anxious. Avoidant. Secure. Disorganized. Congratulations! You've spent seven minutes on TikTok, and now you've diagnosed yourself, your ex, and that person who left you on read three weeks ago. Attachment theory has become one of the internet's favorite ways to explain relationships. And while there's real psychology behind it, somewhere along the way, we started treating attachment styles like personality types, relationship horoscopes, and convenient explanations for why people behave like assholes. In Episode 6 of High Frequency, Low Noise, we're digging into the actual science behind attachment theory, how our early relationships can influence the way we connect with others, and what happens when useful psychological frameworks become limiting labels. We're talking childhood experiences, relationship patterns, emotional availability, and the difference between understanding someone's behavior and excusing it. Because attachment theory can help us recognize patterns, but it can't tell us everything about a person. And knowing someone's attachment style doesn't mean we know their intentions, their capacity for growth, or whether they're right for us. So, are we using psychology to better understand ourselves and each other? Or are we just getting really good at diagnosing people we haven't actually taken the time to understand? Maybe the goal isn't to figure out which attachment style everyone has. Maybe it's to get a little better at actually attaching.

    The Attachment-Style Industrial Complex
  4. Episode 7

    Are We Becoming Better People, Or Just Better at Explaining Ourselves?

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode! We've spent six episodes questioning everything from intuition and attachment styles to hyper-independence, emotional avoidance, and whether the internet has collectively lost its damn mind. But here's a question we haven't spent nearly enough time asking: Are we actually taking our own advice? In Episode 7 of High Frequency, Low Noise, we're turning the microphones—and the uncomfortable questions—back on ourselves. We're revisiting the conversations we've had, the perspectives we've challenged, and the things we've learned about ourselves along the way. We're getting a little more personal, a little less structured, and pulling back the curtain on what happens behind the microphones. We're talking about the moments that made us reconsider our own beliefs, the conversations that stuck with us long after we stopped recording, and the ways this podcast has challenged us to practice what we preach. Because it's one thing to talk about boundaries, self-awareness, critical thinking, and personal growth. It's another thing entirely to realize you're still doing the exact shit you just spent an hour discussing. And maybe that's the uncomfortable truth about growth: Knowing better doesn't automatically mean we're doing better. So, are we becoming better people? Or are we just getting really, really good at explaining ourselves? We're not entirely sure. But we're willing to ask the question, admit where we're still figuring things out, and maybe laugh at ourselves a little along the way. Because personal growth isn't a finish line. And self-awareness isn't worth much if we're not willing to do something with it.

    Are We Becoming Better People, Or Just Better at Explaining Ourselves?

About

🎙️ Welcome to High Frequency, Low Noise. We’re Jarika and Rachel—two unsupervised women exploring the places where science, “pseudoscience,” cultural influence, spirituality, and intuition intersect. We talk feminism, psychology, relationships, culture, wellness, belief, human behavior, and all the strange shit that comes with being a woman in the modern world. We’re spiritual, but we like evidence. We’re feminists, but we’re not here to tell you how to be one. We believe in intuition, but we’re not afraid to examine it. We’re not here to prove anyone wrong or pretend we have all the answers. We’re here to ask better questions, follow the evidence, challenge our assumptions, and explore the space between what feels true and what actually holds up. Expect deep dives, rabbit holes, research, real conversations, and probably a few moments of “Wait… but is that actually true?” High frequency. Low noise. No rulebook. ✨ Keep your frequency high, the noise low, and stay shamelessly unsupervised.