Santa Reads to You about Medicine

Mario

You better not pout you better not cry you better keep up to date with the latest from the Journal of American Family Practice Pediatrics in Review Annals of Internal Medicine Journal of the American Geriatric Society and various medical podcasts I like

  1. 1d ago

    Thurs 2026/10/08 Approach: Menopause, Part One: HRT / Systemic Therapy

    Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note. Part one of a two-part series on menopause, covering systemic hormone therapy for vasomotor symptoms, drawing on documents plus three April 2026 ACP Internal Medicine Meeting sessions (Monica Christmas, Lisa Larkin, and a UCLA speaker). It opens with the regulatory story — the November twenty twenty-five FDA announcement removing the boxed warnings for cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, and dementia, the first revised labels approved in February twenty twenty-six, the fact that implementation is still product by product, and the criticism of both the process and the benefit claims. It then goes back to what the Women's Health Initiative actually showed in absolute numbers and by age, and why the regimen it tested differs from what most clinicians prescribe now. It covers the new American College of Physicians guideline published October sixth, with its recommendation grades, its clinical considerations, and the accompanying Mayo Clinic editorial, including where the guideline departs from the Menopause Society and from the ACP meeting speakers on route of administration, family history of breast cancer, age cutoffs, and duration. Then the practical prescribing: candidacy and contraindications, transdermal versus oral and the venous thromboembolism data, doses, progestogen choice and endometrial protection, bleeding, duration and the end of the arbitrary stop date, perimenopause, and premature ovarian insufficiency. It closes with the nonhormonal ladder, including fezolinetant's liver monitoring and the newly approved elinzanetant, and a note on compounded hormones.

  2. 4d ago

    Mon 2026/10/05 Monday Sweep: VESALIUS-CV and Repatha, Triglycerides, Diaper Psoriasis and Retinoblastoma

    Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note. This week's sweep is organized around the comparator — what a treatment was actually tested against, and whether that's the comparison you face in clinic. It leads with VESALIUS-CV, the evolocumab trial in high-risk patients without a prior heart attack or stroke, covering what the twenty-five percent figure means in absolute terms, why "without prior MI or stroke" is not the same as primary prevention, the fact that only one in five patients was on ezetimibe and the 2026 guideline's decision to no longer require ezetimibe before a PCSK9 antibody, the diabetes subgroup published in JAMA, and the FDA label expansion that came before the trial. It pairs that with the VA/DoD lipid guideline synopsis in Annals, which lays out the stepwise path the trial skipped. Then a Core IM episode on triglycerides under the 2026 guideline — when to check non-HDL or apoB, a three-day carbohydrate trial, icosapent ethyl, fibrates for pancreatitis, and the new apoC-III drugs, with both open triglyceride thresholds now settled from the guideline text (apoB testing at one hundred fifty after a June correction; risk enhancer at one hundred seventy-five nonfasting or one hundred fifty fasting); the SUPER trial of supervised exercise after ACL reconstruction; the KDIGO 2026 anemia in CKD guideline in brief; and two Pediatrics in Review In Brief pieces, on diaper psoriasis and on retinoblastoma and the red reflex.

  3. Sep 30

    Thurs 2026/10/01 Approach: Dementia, Part One: Diagnosis

    Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note. Part one of a two-part approach series on dementia, covering diagnosis. Built on Curbsiders episode 511 with Halima Amjad, the Alzheimer's Association's first clinical practice guideline on blood-based biomarkers, and a JAGS review on detecting Alzheimer neuropathology in chronic kidney disease. The organizing question is whether a primary care clinician should be ordering the new blood tests, and three credible sources disagree: the podcast says recent FDA clearances make primary care an appropriate setting, the Alzheimer's Association guideline explicitly declines to address primary care and restricts its recommendations to specialized settings, and the geriatrics literature says the tests should not be implemented anywhere without validation in kidney disease. It covers functional impairment as the line between mild cognitive impairment and dementia, cognitive testing and collateral history, alternative screeners for patients with little schooling or tested in a second language (education-adjusted MoCA cutoffs, MoCA-Basic, the RUDAS and its 2026 meta-analysis, the SLUMS and the limits of its education adjustment, the Mini-Cog as a first-step screen at Medicare Annual Wellness Visits and why a negative result is less reassuring than a negative PHQ-2, the AD8 informant questionnaire, and the Spanish-developed Fototest and Prueba Cognitiva de Leganés), what the MRI is for, the biomarkers themselves and the performance thresholds the guideline sets, why kidney disease produces false positives, the sarcopenia trap that hides kidney disease behind a normal creatinine, and why a positive amyloid result in an eighty-year-old means less than it sounds.

About

You better not pout you better not cry you better keep up to date with the latest from the Journal of American Family Practice Pediatrics in Review Annals of Internal Medicine Journal of the American Geriatric Society and various medical podcasts I like

You Might Also Like