From the Principal's Chair with Principal Jay

Jonathan Snead

Practical leadership conversations about the work behind the work — people, systems, decisions, AI, culture, and what it really takes to lead a school.

Episodes

  1. 5d ago

    The Weight of the Chair

    Principal Jay, Jonathan Snead, reflects on the unseen burden of school leadership and argues that a leader’s impact is measured not by how much they personally carry, but by the people, systems, and trust they build. He also introduces his book, The Weight of the Chair, and shares how he is expanding the Principal Jay community. -- Jonathan Snead distinguishes the visible authority of a principal’s title from the unseen pressure and responsibility of the role. He traces his path in education from teaching to academy coach, assistant principal, and principal, describing how final accountability changes the work. Leadership decisions continue to affect students, teachers, families, staff, and communities after the decision is made; follow-through and sustainable systems matter. Taking on every problem can create dependency and make an organization vulnerable when its leader is unavailable. A leader’s responsibility includes developing people and systems so the organization can function effectively without them in the room. Leadership changes the leader: it calls for humility, evolving communication and decision-making, admitting mistakes, and remaining willing to learn. Snead frames leadership as both weight and privilege, with opportunities to grow teachers, support student success, and build trusting teams. He introduces his first book, *The Weight of the Chair*, and describes it as a reflection on real leadership challenges and growth, not a claim to have mastered leadership. Snead outlines the Principal J community, including its podcast, newsletter, leadership reflections, and website. Takeaways The title principal is visible. The weight is not.You can love what you do and still acknowledge that it's hard.Being responsible for everything doesn't mean you have to personally do everything.The goal should be to build something that continues functioning even when we're not in the room.Activity is not the same thing as progress.The chair doesn't make us immune to mistakes. It makes us responsible for how we respond when we make them.We have to hold these two realities together: the weight and the privilege.Measure it by what you're building.The greatest accomplishment of a leader isn't simply reaching the position, but it's what becomes possible because you were there.Leadership is not about proving how much pressure you can withstand. Chapters 00:00 Leadership’s greatest accomplishment: what becomes possible 00:50 The visible title and the unseen weight of the principal’s chair 02:48 From teacher to principal: when final responsibility becomes yours 05:39 The decisions and follow-through that affect whole communities 08:42 Why strong leaders must stop carrying everything alone 11:27 How leadership changes the leader 13:32 Building with intention: activity is not progress 16:15 The Weight of the Chair: the realities leadership programs may miss 18:07 Holding leadership’s burden and privilege together 19:18 Principal J, the book preorder, and the newsletter 21:27 Measure leadership by what you build, not what you carry 22:59 A challenge: decide what to carry, share, or approach differently

  2. Oct 30

    The Conversations You’re Avoiding - Why They Matter More Than You Think

    Principal Jay (Jonathan Snead) reflects on the difficult conversations school leaders postpone, and how avoidance can harm students, staff trust, and the people who need clear feedback. He offers a practical approach for addressing concerns directly, respectfully, and with meaningful follow-through. In this episode, Principal Jay distinguishes thoughtful timing from avoiding a conversation because it feels uncomfortable.General reminders in staff meetings or emails can’t replace addressing a specific concern with the person involved.He shares how feedback that he was afraid of confrontation pushed him to examine his own leadership.Unaddressed concerns can affect students’ learning, frustrate colleagues who meet expectations, and leave the person at the center of the concern without a fair chance to improve.Leaders can be both supportive and accountable: describe the evidence, clarify what needs to change, listen to the other person’s perspective, and agree on next steps.A difficult conversation is only the beginning. Coaching, a second meeting, reviewing student work, or other follow-up can help turn expectations into improvement.Principal Jay challenges leaders to examine whether they communicate clearly, follow through consistently, and avoid conversations to protect relationships or avoid discomfort.He closes with three questions to help listeners prepare for one conversation they’ve been putting off.What specifically needs to be addressed?What am I hoping will happen if I keep waiting?What would a respectful, clear, and productive conversation look like? Timestamps 00:23 - Why leaders put off difficult conversations02:24 - When “being patient” becomes avoidance05:16 - The feedback that made Principal Jay reflect on confrontation08:04 - Who pays the price when concerns go unaddressed10:48 - Holding people accountable without disrespect13:55 - A four-step process: clarify, understand, communicate, follow through17:11 - The difficult conversation leaders need to have with themselves19:37 - Three questions to prepare for a conversation this week21:16 - Closing thoughts on the courage to address what matters

  3. Oct 23

    Are We Leading Instruction... or Just Looking Like We Are?

    Principal Jonathan Snead, known as Principal Jay, examines the difference between completing instructional leadership tasks and improving what happens for students. He shares practical ways to turn walkthroughs, PLCs, and data meetings into better instructional decisions, and explains how to build a culture that keeps improving even when the principal isn’t in the room.In this episode: Why activity and documentation can look like progress without changing instruction.How walkthrough feedback can move beyond identifying a concern to coaching, support, and follow-up.What makes a PLC a professional learning community: teachers study student work, identify misconceptions, choose a response, and return to check whether it worked.How a seventh-grade reading team can use student work to pinpoint where students struggle to connect textual details to a larger idea.Why data should lead to specific instructional decisions, not simply another report or a default reteach.The difference between an efficient system and an effective one, and why faster paperwork isn’t the goal.How shared expectations, trust, and teacher leadership can make improvement less dependent on the principal.Three questions for school leaders: Does this activity improve teaching and learning? What changes after we identify a problem? Would the process continue without my personal management? Timestamps: 00:03 - The question: Are we leading instruction or just looking like it?02:28 - Managing leadership activities versus improving instruction05:21 - Why a completed form or meeting isn’t the improvement05:50 - Turning classroom walkthroughs into meaningful follow-through10:14 - Having a PLC versus functioning as a professional learning community12:12 - Using student work to choose and test an instructional response15:35 - Moving from data review to better instructional decisions18:06 - Why “reteach it” isn’t enough without understanding the problem20:33 - Examining whether leadership systems produce intended results22:09 - Efficiency and effectiveness are not the same24:04 - Building instructional practices that work beyond the principal’s presence28:26 - Three questions to assess the purpose, response, and sustainability of the work31:50 - Measuring instructional leadership by what continues when the principal leaves33:18 - A one-activity challenge for school leaders Action item: Choose one instructional leadership activity that takes significant time and ask what has actually changed because of it. If the answer isn’t clear, rethink its purpose, strengthen follow-through, or reconnect it to student learning.

  4. Oct 9

    The Week Was Hard. That Doesn’t Mean It Was Bad.

    Principal Jay, Jonathan Snead, reflects on why a difficult week isn’t automatically a bad one. This short leadership episode offers a practical way to distinguish growth and meaningful work from mistakes, overload, and systems that need attention. In this episode: Separate a hard week from a bad week. A difficult conversation, an unexpected change, or a decision others disagree with may be evidence that you led, not that you failed.Snead shares examples of challenging but necessary leadership: giving honest feedback, holding someone accountable, protecting standards, and building others’ capacity instead of rescuing them.Hard weeks can also point to problems worth addressing, such as weak systems, too much work, or responsibilities that should be delegated, changed, or stopped.Replace self-criticism with reflection: What did the week require from you - courage, patience, clarity, humility, or a boundary?Notice small signs of growth, like pausing before sending an irritated email, asking instead of assuming, or admitting you don’t have the answer yet.Before the weekend, name what was hard, identify what it required from you, and consider what you handled well and what you can learn from. Timestamps: 00:00 - Was it a bad week, or was it just hard?02:28 - When difficulty is evidence that something important happened03:44 - Telling growth apart from exhaustion and broken systems05:12 - Spotting the quiet moments of leadership growth06:10 - A three-step reflection for closing out the week07:46 - Give yourself credit without ignoring what you can learn

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
3 Ratings

About

Practical leadership conversations about the work behind the work — people, systems, decisions, AI, culture, and what it really takes to lead a school.