Independence by Design™

Ryan Tansom
  • 4.9 (38)
  • ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Independence by Design™ is a framework to help owner-operators get out of the weeds and lead from the boardroom. I built it because I lived this trap. In 2009, I joined my dad in our $21M family business. We turned it around and sold it for eight figures in 2014 — enough to pay off debt, cover taxes, let my dad retire, and leave me with a chunk of cash at 27. But the sale gutted our team, systems, and identity. It looked like a win, but it didn’t feel like freedom. I bawled in the driveway. After 450+ interviews, thousands of owners, and multiple ventures, I saw the real issue: we didn’t know the difference between being owners and operators. Our goals weren’t aligned. And we had no framework to guide us. That’s why I built iBD — to help owners avoid regret, reclaim their time, grow real equity value, and build a business that gives them freedom — whether they stay, scale, or sell. This show is the one I wish I had. ----- This is a co-hosted episode with Kim Clark, iBD's Chief Revenue Officer. Kim spent years at ITR Economics before joining iBD, and her background in economic forecasting and revenue operations runs all through this conversation. Ryan and Kim recorded this as both a standalone episode and an introduction to the Profit War Room workshop — and yes, the protein powder story that opens it came from a real text exchange with Ryan's buddy Michael the week before recording.

  1. 5D AGO

    #494: Ryan & Kim | How to Design an Annual Executive Compensation Plan

    Watch on YouTube You're paying highly paid people to take problems off your plate. Instead they're handing you back monkeys, drama, and a deal you end up pricing yourself. Sales and Operations are at war over what got sold and what can actually be delivered. Finance is caught in the middle. You're the referee. You're not bad at this. The comp plan is. Each leader gets paid on their own win, so winning at a peer's expense pays, and the monkeys land back on your desk by the end of the day.   In this episode I walk you through the annual executive comp plan I installed at my family's business and have put in with clients since. The move is to tie your top leaders to each other through the income statement and to your ownership goals at the same time. Half of their variable rides on their own seat. A quarter rides on each peer. Now winning at a peer's expense stops paying. Now the monkeys stay where they belong. Now you get to do the work only you can do, the strategic, the big, the broken things that are actually interesting to you. Kim and I get into the bonus pool sized top-down off normalized net operating income so it's always affordable, the multipliers that run both directions, and why one of our clients ran the math and decided not to hire the $500,000 CEO he was about to go find. He wanted the seat back. The seat got worth wanting again.   Top 10 Takeaways  You're paying highly paid people to take problems off your plate. They're handing you back monkeys.  The drama isn't your team. It's the comp plan paying each of them only on their own win.  Tie your top leaders to each other through the income statement. Three buckets, three seats: revenue, margins, SG&A and cash.  The 50/25/25 model ropes them together. Half their variable on their own seat, a quarter on each peer's.  Now winning at a peer's expense stops paying. The monkeys stay where they belong.  Comp each executive on numbers they actually control. Not on a peer's leadership growth.  Size the bonus pool top-down. A fixed slice of normalized net operating income. Bottom-up reconciles to it.  Run multipliers on every seat. 1.1x to 1.2x up, 0.8x to 0.7x down, with a floor where the piece stops paying.  The company's cash flow and your ownership goals set what comp is affordable. Title doesn't. Wish doesn't.  Get the comp right and you get the work back: the strategic, the big, the broken things only you can do.  Chapters:     (00:00) Ryan and Kim on designing the annual executive comp plan  (02:33) The drama isn't your team — it's the comp plan paying on their own win  (03:21) The 50/25/25 model: tying top leaders to each other through the income statement  (10:30) Size the bonus pool top-down off normalized net operating income  (12:20) Cash flow and ownership goals set what comp is affordable — title doesn't  (18:00) Comp each executive on numbers they actually control, not a peer's growth  (20:43) Total inversion: monkeys stay where they belong, you get the work back  (21:06) Run multipliers on every seat: 1.1x up, 0.8x down, with a floor  (53:46) Fractional leaders: can they actually own the outcome of the seat  (1:05:20) You've got to do the work — comp grounded in data, goals, and financials  This episode was produced by Castos Productions.    Resources:    Executive Comp Workshop June 25 – 9 AM - 11am CST – Virtual, Live, Interactive: https://ryantansom.com/the-compen...

    1h 6m

  2. MAY 14

    #493: Ryan & Kim | How to Tie Everyone's Compensation to Your Ownership Goals

    Watch on YouTube This is the kickoff of a multi-episode arc on Module 8 (Executive Compensation) of the iBD Ownership OS. Kim Clark, iBD's CRO and business partner, runs the interview; she spent years designing sales and revenue comp at ITR Economics before joining iBD. Module 8 is Ryan's territory, so the format flips: Kim asks, Ryan teaches the system. The next two episodes go deeper on short-term incentive design (annual exec bonuses, cascade math, KPI architecture) and long-term phantom stock mechanics (vesting, valuation triggers, the M9 transition bridge). The companion workshop where you actually build your own plan is June 25, 2026. You have a $40,000 executive comp plan sitting on your desk and you don't know if it's the right one. Your insurance broker pitched it. Your attorney drafted it. Your HR person was distracted. And it's tied to absolutely nothing that matters. The first call I had with that client, he asked me, "Should I sign this?" I asked back: What's your five-year valuation target? Cash flow goals? Do you have a financial model? Three nos in a row. That's where most owners are. Comp gets treated as an HR motivation problem when it's actually a capital allocation decision that has to trickle down from the owner's goals. Kim and I open Module 8 with the reframe and the cascade: why this module only works after Modules 1 through 7 are installed, why normalized net operating income beats gross profit and net income for the bonus pool, what 10% of NOI looks like split across the executive team and the company, and why phantom stock does most of what real equity does without putting anyone on your cap table. When the goals are clear and the rules are clear, the executive team runs the field. When subjectivity rules, everyone is just guessing. Top 10 Takeaways Your comp plan keeps failing because you're paying people on outcomes they can't control. Comp tied to gut feel breeds resentment, not productivity. The exact opposite of what you wanted. Comp design starts with the owner. Not HR. Not your attorney. Not the insurance broker pitching annuities. You can't build a comp plan without a five-year valuation target and a financial model in front of you. Hiring a CFO before your model exists? Tie their first bonus to building the model. Comp is a capital allocation decision, not a motivation problem. You're sharing future cash flow. Normalized net operating income beats gross profit because a CRO can crush GP and crater operations by overhiring. Your bonus pool is 10% of normalized NOI. Everything else is just how you split it. Phantom stock is a legal contract and a real liability on the balance sheet. No cap table, no K-1. When the goals are clear and the rules are clear, the executive team runs the field. Subjectivity is exhausting. Chapters: (00:00) Introduction to Module 8: executive compensation and why it exists (01:46) Your comp plan keeps failing because you're paying on outcomes they can't control (04:15) Comp tied to gut feel breeds resentment, not productivity (07:21) Comp design starts with the owner, not HR, your attorney, or the insurance broker (10:38) Why this module only works after Modules 1 through 7 are installed (16:24) Comp is a capital allocation decision, not a motivation problem (19:25) Normalized NOI beats gross profit and net income for the bonus pool (26:20) Your bonus pool is 10% of normalized NOI — here's how you split it (32...

    46 min

  3. MAY 7

    #492: Ryan | How to Analyze Your Margins and Gross Profit

    Watch on YouTube Most owners stare at the same gross profit number every month and feel good about it, and the chart underneath it is telling a completely different story. Revenue is up. Gross profit dollars are up. You feel good for about ten seconds. Then you notice the gross margin percentage is creeping the wrong way and you don't know if it matters. Your CPA does taxes. Your banker manages the line. Nobody is sitting at the chart with you asking the next question. That next question is what this episode is for. We get into how to read the gross margin chart by product line, where to set the floor that triggers the boardroom conversation, what the rate of change is actually telling you before the trend shows up in cash, and how the same chart asks one question if you're wearing the COO hat and a completely different one if you're wearing the owner hat. The owner question is where most operators get stuck, because almost nobody runs the seats separately. Real example from my old copier business, real numbers from the case study, and the honest version of how messy it is to get your data clean enough to actually believe. Top 10 Takeaways Your three financial statements are a closed loop, and every operating decision ripples through all three. Without a five-year plan, every margin decision is made in a vacuum. Gross profit can grow every year while gross margins quietly shrink. The blended company gross margin hides the line that's bleeding by averaging it with the line that's healthy. Rates of change are your early warning system, before the trend shows up in cash. If costs and revenue don't land in the same month, your gross margin is fiction. Every product line needs a target margin and a floor, and the floor triggers the boardroom conversation. Gross profit grew because you sold more, or because your margins expanded, and the split tells you whether the year was real. The gross margin chart you're looking at this month is the input to your distribution next December. The COO seat asks how to operate around the margin, and the owner seat asks what to do with the cash it produces. Chapters: (00:00) Three financial statements are a closed loop; every decision ripples through all three (03:00) Without a five-year plan, every margin decision is made in a vacuum (07:30) Gross profit can grow every year while gross margins quietly shrink (11:00) Rates of change are your early warning system before the trend shows up in cash (12:30) If costs and revenue don't land in the same month, your gross margin is fiction (19:30) The blended gross margin hides the line that's bleeding (26:30) Every product line needs a target, a floor, and the floor triggers the boardroom conversation (35:00) The split tells you whether the year was real: revenue growth or margin expansion (43:00) The gross margin chart this month is the input to your distribution next December (49:00) The COO seat asks how to operate; the owner seat asks what to do with the cash This episode was produced by Castos Productions. Resources: Boardroom Blueprint — The 90-day program where Ryan walks owners through installing the financial model, business valuation, and iBD Ownership OS™. — ryantansom.com/coaching Ep. 487 — Casey Brown: Th...

    54 min

  4. APR 30

    #491: Bud Martin | The Lower Middle Market M&A Gap Nobody Talks About

    Watch on YouTube "I want the seller to level with me. I don't want to be his priest or pastor, but I want honesty, and I don't want any surprises down the road." - Bud Martin,     Bud Martin once watched a son kill his parents' deal by telling every buyer tour the company would never make it without him. I told Bud I was 27 when we sold our family business — and I knew I could have done the same thing. I almost did. That story is the human core under every M&A advisory conversation we don't talk about enough. Bud Martin runs controlled auctions for businesses in the $1M-$3M EBITDA range — a no man's land for owners. Too complex for brokers. Too small for the big banks. We get into what a real sell-side process actually looks like at this level, why most lower middle market deals are cash-at-closing strategic bolt-ons (not earnouts), the family dynamic that kills more deals than bad numbers ever will, and the philosophical question I keep coming back to: build a cash-flow business that gives you choices, or chase a third-party strategic deal that maximizes cash at closing. Both work. They're just not the same.  Top 10 Takeaways  The $1M-$3M EBITDA range is no man's land — too complex for brokers, too small for the big banks, and most owners get the worst sell-side representation right when they need the best.  A controlled auction is non-negotiable — multiple bidders keep buyers honest, drive pace, and protect your leverage; day 92 close is the goal, day 180 is a red flag.  Most lower middle market deals are cash at closing because strategic buyers write checks from the balance sheet — no banks involved, faster closes, cleaner deal structures.  Earnouts in this segment are shifting from financial metrics to integration milestones — one of Bud's current deals is 95% cash, 5% tied to a six-month CRM integration.  The family dynamic kills more deals than bad numbers — if your partners aren't on the same page before you call a banker, the deal is already dead.  Build a cash-flow business and you have choices — ESOP, internal transfer, third-party, PE — but if you go straight to a strategic buyer, cash at closing goes through the roof and the cultural trade-offs come with it.  The buyer who already knows your industry isn't the best buyer — the aligned-industry buyer who wants to be in your space is, because that's where 2+2 = 5 or 6.  A $3M revenue fire safety business landed a $5 billion publicly-traded buyer because the industry was consolidating and Bud reached out to everyone — including the companies that looked too big.  Bud gives sellers a conservative valuation so they're surprised on the upside — if the seller isn't in the same area code on number, he walks away from the engagement.  Geopolitical risk lands on the deal table — a strategic buyer pulled out of one of Bud's deals in February because the Iran situation spooked their backlog and changed the math.  Bud Martin is the founder of M&A Connect, a lower middle market M&A advisory firm based in the Chicago area. William (Bud) Martin has over 20 years of M&A experience. Prior to founding M&A Connect, he was with a highly regarded Midwestern M&A firm and was the leading broker by revenue and transactions closed during his seven years there. Bud has been the lead advisor on dozens of middle market transactions and is a current board member of Dynamic Rubber Inc. near Chicago. Before M&A, Bud owned a contract manufacturer of precision-machined components serving OEMs in aerospace, automotive, and business machine industries. He started his career as a runner on the Chicago Board of Trade and traded options on the...

    48 min

  5. APR 23

    #490: Alex Chausovsky | Supply Chains, Inflation, and Your Profit Battle Plan

    This interview is about why the old playbook of waiting for certainty is dead, and what owners need to do instead. Alex Chausovsky walks through how supply chain shocks, inflation, and a broken global system are hitting real P&Ls right now — input costs moving, margins under pressure, and customers who may or may not have the money to keep buying. Kim Clark and I then turn it into the owner's next move: three decision vectors (pricing, inventory, supply chain), pricing as an ownership decision — not a sales problem, segment your customers so a 12% increase doesn't blow up your tier-one relationships, and communicate the move in a way that builds trust instead of burning it. Build the battle plan before you need it — because by the time you need it, it's too late to build.  Watch on YouTube   Top 10 Takeaways  Stop waiting for clarity and start building scenarios — pricing, inventory, and supply chain are the three decision vectors you stress-test now, not when the crisis hits.  Every CEO should have a filing cabinet of pre-built scenarios. When the Strait closes, you open the folder. You don't start planning.  A 2% global disruption is not a 2% hit — Qatar LNG, aluminum, diesel trucking, and fertilizer all chain off the same chokepoint, and the tail kills the whole machine.  Availability is becoming a bigger moat than price — "I can get it to you when you need it" is worth more than being ten cents cheaper.  Pricing is an ownership decision, not a sales problem — the math runs through your valuation, distributions, and cash flow, which makes it a boardroom conversation.  A 12% increase dropped in a week without a "why" reads like collusion; the same 12% broken into transportation, material, and wages lands.  Don't push uniform pricing across every customer — your Tier 1 relationships can absorb what Tier 2 and below cannot, and segmentation is where the margin gets protected.  The top 20% drives 60% of US consumption — be honest about whether your customer actually has the money to keep buying what you sell.  You're not in business to grow revenue — you're in business to make a profit, and that means running your P&L by customer and product line.  The five-year forecast is the destination — scenario planning is how you course-correct to actually get there when the world gets loud.  Alex Chausovsky is the President of 3DM Consulting. He is a highly experienced market researcher and analyst with more than two decades of expertise across subjects including economics, manufacturing, automation, advanced technology trends, and business cycle analysis. He has consulted and advised companies throughout the US and Canada, Europe, South America, and Asia. Alex has delivered over a thousand presentations, webinars, and workshops to small businesses, trade associations, and Fortune 500 companies across a spectrum of industries, and is the go-to source of industry data and insights for business owners and leaders. Alex's analysis has been featured in the Wall Street Journal, on the BBC, and on NPR, and he is a Top Voice on LinkedIn.    Chapters:   (00:00) Introduction of Alex Chausovsky, President of 3DM Consulting, economist and geopolitical analyst  (03:30) Alex's lens: geopolitics as geography plus leadership personalities driving global policy  (16:00) A 2% disruption is not a 2% hit — Qatar LNG, aluminum, diesel, and fertilizer all chain off the same chokepoint  (24:16) Availability is becoming a bigger moat than price — "I can get it when you need it" beats ten cents cheaper  (28:48) Stop waiting for clarity: every CEO needs a filing cabinet of pre-built...

    1h 15m

  6. APR 16

    #489: Ryan & Kim | The Profit War Room. Inflation Is Coming. Do You Have a Battle Plan?

    My protein powder went from $62 to $122. The company's response was a mass email that started with "we understand your frustration." That is exactly how most businesses handle price increases. No plan. No segmentation. Just a surprise and an apology nobody asked for.   Watch on YouTube Kim Clark and I sat down to talk about pricing. Not theory. The real conversation that happens when your input costs are moving and you have to decide what to do about it. We started with a protein powder subscription that went from $62 to $122 in a single month with no warning, no communication plan, and a mass apology email nobody asked for. From there we got into why pricing is an ownership decision that runs through valuation, cash flow, and distributions. I walked through the income statement to balance sheet to ownership decision chain the way I do it in a quarterly board meeting.  Kim broke down rates of change analysis on your input costs as the early warning system, the customer segmentation framework for who gets a phone call, who gets a personal email, and who gets the mass communication, and how to give your sales team the "why" and the training to hold the line. We also talked about what is happening right now with the Strait of Hormuz, what that means for supply chains, and why this is different from every other inflationary cycle most of us have lived through.    Top 10 Takeaways  Pricing is an ownership decision. The math runs through valuation, distributions, and cash flow. That conversation belongs in the boardroom, not with your VP of Sales.  The Strait of Hormuz is closed right now. Twenty percent of the world's oil and fifty percent of its helium are not flowing. Pull up IMF PortWatch and see for yourself.  You cannot print molecules. Money printing is one problem. Physical supply chain disruption is a different problem. Both are happening at the same time.  The boiling frog kills more businesses than the crisis. A container going from $2,500 to $20,000 gets an emergency call. Margins sliding from 43% to 37% over seven months gets ignored.  Rates of change on your input costs are the early warning system. The 3-month rate leads the 12-month rate. When those diverge, your tire pressure light just came on.  Build tiered battle plans before you need them. If input costs hit 8%, here is Plan A. If they hit 12%, here is Plan B. Do the math now so you are not doing it in a panic.  Your salesperson is caught between company pressure, customer pressure, and the fear of losing the deal that pays their mortgage. Without the "why" and the tools, you are sending them into an impossible position.  Segment your customers before you communicate a price increase. Tier 1 gets a personal visit. Tier 2 gets a personalized email from leadership. Tier 3 gets the mass communication.  State what is NOT changing before you discuss what IS changing. Casey Brown calls these power statements. Anchor the customer on the value that continues, then explain the adjustment.  Run at least one full pricing analysis per year and rotate which customer segments get increases. Pricing discipline is a cadence, not a crisis response.    Kim Clark- This is a co-hosted episode with Kim Clark, iBD's Chief Revenue Officer. Kim spent years at ITR Economics before joining iBD, and her background in economic forecasting and revenue operations is all over this conversation. Ryan and Kim recorded this as both a standalone episode and an introduction to the Profit War Room workshop (April 27, 2026). The protein powder story that opens the episode came from a real text exchange with Ryan's buddy Michael the week be...

    1h 9m

  7. APR 9

    #488: Dr. Sabrina Starling | $10,000/Hour Work and the 4-Week Vacation Test

    Dr. Sabrina Starling is the founder of Tap the Potential and the author of The Four Week Vacation. This is her second time on the show. We got into what $10,000/hour work actually means for the owner and for every person on their team. Watch on YouTube We talked about how AI is accelerating the opportunity to delegate. How A-players are 900 to 1,200% more productive than average performers. Why delegation always goes down the org chart, never up. And the 4-week vacation test as the single best forcing function for figuring out what you are still holding onto that someone else should be doing. Sabrina works 10 hours a week now. Her team of 7 part-time A-players produces what people assume takes 20 full-time staff. Two years ago her husband passed away suddenly and she was out for six weeks. Her team never missed a beat. We also got into something most owners do not talk about: the friendships, the hobbies, the life outside the business that disappears when work becomes the only identity you have. Top 10 Takeaways $10,000/hour work is not about billing rate. It is any activity where you are working from your strengths and making everything else easier for yourself or others. If it does not meet that test, it should not be on your calendar. 41% of a knowledge worker's week goes to discretionary tasks that could be delegated or automated. In a 50-hour week, that is 20 hours you are giving away for free. The 4-week vacation test is not a perk. It is a diagnostic. Take four weeks completely unplugged. Whatever breaks is what you have not actually delegated yet. Once you delegate something and it works, do not take it back. The moment you pull it back, you just told your best person their growth has a ceiling. A-players try three things before they ask for help. When they do ask, they show you what they already tried. If your team leads with "what should I do?" you have a hiring problem, not a training problem. You cannot afford not to hire the more expensive person. Sabrina's framing: treat the hire as a loan to yourself. The right person frees hours immediately that are worth more than their salary. Five direct reports. That is the cap. More than that and your weekly one-on-ones become status updates instead of actual development conversations. A-players are 900 to 1,200% more productive than average performers. Before AI. Sabrina's team of 7 part-time people produces what outsiders assume requires 20 full-time employees. Boredom is the prerequisite for creativity. Every time you pick up your phone when you have nothing to do, you kill the process before it starts. Cal Newport calls scrolling "Doritos for your brain." The owner who cannot sit still for 10 minutes without checking email is the same owner who says they never have any good ideas. Q-Storming: instead of brainstorming answers, brainstorm questions. The right question reframes the entire problem. Most rooms full of smart people are solving the wrong thing. Dr. Sabrina Starling is the founder of Tap the Potential, a business coaching firm that helps entrepreneurs build businesses that run without them. She is the author of the How to Hire the Best series and The Four Week Vacation, and co-hosts the Profit by Design podcast. Sabrina's work centers on building A-player teams, delegating effectively, and helping owners identify and protect their $10,000/hour work. She was previously on this podcast in Episode 335. Chapters: ...

    1h 7m

  8. APR 2

    #487: Casey Brown | The Fear That's Eating Your Margins

    Most owners plan their transition around money. Pete Walker thinks that's why so many of them end up with regret. Watch on YouTube Episode Summary: Your pricing strategy is probably a B+. Your team's ability to hold the line is a C-. That gap is where the real money lives. I brought Casey Brown back for a third time because one of my clients just went through her program and watched his entire sales team transform how they handle pricing conversations. Casey is the founder of Boost Pricing, author of Fearless Pricing, and has a TEDx talk with over 4 million views. She has spent 25 years helping over 1,000 companies generate more than $1 billion in incremental profits. In this episode, we got into why fixing execution captures 80% of the benefit at a fraction of the cost of fixing strategy. Why fear, not skill, is the real reason your team discounts. How your personal "money story" from childhood quietly sabotages every pricing conversation. And why quarterly strategic pricing reviews are the discipline most companies have never heard of, let alone implemented. Top 10 Takeaways Turning your pricing strategy from a B to an A is expensive and slow. Turning your team's execution from a C- to a B+ is fast, cheap, and captures 80% of the upside. Every company Casey has worked with, over 1,000 of them, has been underpriced somewhere. Not one has ever been charging the maximum the market would bear. Fear, not skill, is the dominant emotion in pricing decisions. Salespeople know what to say. They just panic when the customer pushes back and discount anyway. Everyone has a "money story" from childhood that affects how they sell. Casey grew up in a family of seven on $32,000 a year. The first time she quoted $35,000 for a project, her stomach went tight because that number meant something personal. Asymmetrical feedback destroys pricing confidence. Nobody ever says "Wow, that's a deal!" but you hear "that's too expensive" ten times a day. Even when you are not too expensive. The real framework is not "say this when they say that." It is: illuminate the blind spot, create a path for practice, then reinforce with accountability. Beliefs precede behaviors precede results. If you make pricing weird, it gets weird. Dogs and prospects can smell fear. Desperation breath eliminates your pricing power faster than anything. Stop selling features. A valve with seven pressure settings means nothing. $180,000 per quarter in savings that lets them hire four people? Now you are speaking their language. Quarterly strategic pricing reviews should be the default. Lock your senior leadership in a room, assign one person to argue prices are too low and another to argue they are too high. Debate it. Profitable decisions will come out of it. If you anchor your pricing to your costs, you are telling the customer that the only reason they should pay you is for your inputs. You are admitting zero value added. Price from value, not from cost. A company with 85% gross margins still has pricing upside because 100% of every price increase flows straight to profit. Sound Bites "100% of the companies on the planet that I've ever met are underpriced. Meaning in some corner of the business, there's something you could charge more for." — Casey Brown [00:19:44]. After being asked how she knows if a company is underpriced. She has never been proven wrong across 1,000+ engagements. "Fear is the dominant emotion present for pricing decisions and negotiations. Not anything else. Fear." — Casey Brown [00:38:34]. Explaining why traditional skill-based sales training fails....

    1h 18m
See All (95)

Trailer

4.9
out of 5
38 Ratings

About

Independence by Design™ is a framework to help owner-operators get out of the weeds and lead from the boardroom. I built it because I lived this trap. In 2009, I joined my dad in our $21M family business. We turned it around and sold it for eight figures in 2014 — enough to pay off debt, cover taxes, let my dad retire, and leave me with a chunk of cash at 27. But the sale gutted our team, systems, and identity. It looked like a win, but it didn’t feel like freedom. I bawled in the driveway. After 450+ interviews, thousands of owners, and multiple ventures, I saw the real issue: we didn’t know the difference between being owners and operators. Our goals weren’t aligned. And we had no framework to guide us. That’s why I built iBD — to help owners avoid regret, reclaim their time, grow real equity value, and build a business that gives them freedom — whether they stay, scale, or sell. This show is the one I wish I had. ----- This is a co-hosted episode with Kim Clark, iBD's Chief Revenue Officer. Kim spent years at ITR Economics before joining iBD, and her background in economic forecasting and revenue operations runs all through this conversation. Ryan and Kim recorded this as both a standalone episode and an introduction to the Profit War Room workshop — and yes, the protein powder story that opens it came from a real text exchange with Ryan's buddy Michael the week before recording.

Information

You Might Also Like