Indictable

drcatrinwilliams

Indictable is a true crime podcast hosted by Dr Catrin Williams, a forensic psychologist who works daily in the criminal justice field. This podcast won't just tell a story, it will explore the minds, motives and behaviors around crime and take a specific focus on the perpetrators. A forensic psychologist, like Catrin, will be expected to reflect with perpetrators of crime and learn to understand their perception of events to determine the steps that led to the final offence. Why did they do it? What led them to that point? What did it do for them? By using scientifically grounded explanations of real cases and patterns of offending, Catrin (and colleagues/guests) will delve into the mind of the perpetrator and instead of answering WHAT happened, will answer WHY it happened.  Episodes explore topics such as offender typologies, stalking and obsession, moral disengagement, trauma, memory, the psychology of deception and so much more related to crime. The main aim of the episodes is to give the listener insight into what it's like to be a forensic psychologist every day, with care, curiosity and a human-centered lens.  Behind every crime is a human mind, and understanding this takes us beyond the headlines. 

  1. Sep 4

    USA & UK as a Forensic Psychologist - Part 2

    What does a forensic psychologist actually do — and how different is the job in the UK compared with the United States? In the first interview episode of The Indictable Podcast, Dr Catrin Williams is joined by Dr Harrington, a forensic psychologist based in Atlanta, Georgia, to compare forensic psychology practice on both sides of the Atlantic. Dr Harrington explains how forensic psychological work in the US is often centred around court-ordered evaluations, with psychologists instructed to answer specific legal questions relating to issues such as competency to stand trial and not guilty by reason of insanity. They also explore how legislation varies significantly between individual states, including Georgia's particularly restrictive approach to insanity defences. Catrin contrasts this with forensic psychology practice in the UK, where psychologists working within secure hospitals and prisons are often much more involved in psychological treatment, rehabilitation, risk assessment and longer-term pathways of care.   Who was talking?   Dr Williams (Forensic Psychologist) AND Dr Aubree Harrington (Forensic Psychologist)     Content warnings and Disclaimer   The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the host and guests and do not represent the official positions of any organisation or professional body. This podcast is intended for educational and informational purposes only and should not be taken as psychological advice or a substitute for professional consultation. While efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of information shared, psychological concepts and case details are simplified for discussion. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or deceased, is purely coincidental unless explicitly stated. The hosts and guests will never discuss any details of individual cases or locations that they have personally worked with or within. Vague personal and professional experiences may be shared as part of discussions, but considerable details will have been changed to ensure that there is no identifiable information to ensure anonymity and confidentiality. There will be no discussion on any current or ongoing cases in the United Kingdom, not any cases from the United Kingdom unless they are historical and fully resolved. All discussions adhere to HCPC and BPS ethical guidelines regarding confidentiality, professional boundaries and responsible communication of psychological information. Listener discretion is advice, as some topics may contain descriptions of violence trauma and other sensitive content.   Get in touch at indictablepodcast@gmail.com   Where to find me! (Please follow x)   @indictablepodcast on Instagram, Tiktok and Facebook   www.indictablepodcast.com

  2. Aug 28

    USA & UK as a Forensic Psychologist

    What does a forensic psychologist actually do — and how different is the job in the UK compared with the United States? In the first interview episode of The Indictable Podcast, Dr Catrin Williams is joined by Dr Harrington, a forensic psychologist based in Atlanta, Georgia, to compare forensic psychology practice on both sides of the Atlantic. Dr Harrington explains how forensic psychological work in the US is often centred around court-ordered evaluations, with psychologists instructed to answer specific legal questions relating to issues such as competency to stand trial and not guilty by reason of insanity. They also explore how legislation varies significantly between individual states, including Georgia's particularly restrictive approach to insanity defences. Catrin contrasts this with forensic psychology practice in the UK, where psychologists working within secure hospitals and prisons are often much more involved in psychological treatment, rehabilitation, risk assessment and longer-term pathways of care.   Who was talking?   Dr Williams (Forensic Psychologist) AND Dr Aubree Harrington (Forensic Psychologist)     Content warnings and Disclaimer   The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the host and guests and do not represent the official positions of any organisation or professional body. This podcast is intended for educational and informational purposes only and should not be taken as psychological advice or a substitute for professional consultation. While efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of information shared, psychological concepts and case details are simplified for discussion. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or deceased, is purely coincidental unless explicitly stated. The hosts and guests will never discuss any details of individual cases or locations that they have personally worked with or within. Vague personal and professional experiences may be shared as part of discussions, but considerable details will have been changed to ensure that there is no identifiable information to ensure anonymity and confidentiality. There will be no discussion on any current or ongoing cases in the United Kingdom, not any cases from the United Kingdom unless they are historical and fully resolved. All discussions adhere to HCPC and BPS ethical guidelines regarding confidentiality, professional boundaries and responsible communication of psychological information. Listener discretion is advice, as some topics may contain descriptions of violence trauma and other sensitive content.   Get in touch at indictablepodcast@gmail.com   Where to find me! (Please follow x)   @indictablepodcast on Instagram, Tiktok and Facebook   www.indictablepodcast.com

  3. Jul 17

    Incel Communities & Violence

    Episode Summary   Incel Communities & when this becomes violent   Who was talking?   Dr Catrin Williams (Forensic Psychologist)   Show notes   In this episode of The Indictable Podcast, forensic psychologist Dr Catrin Williams examines the psychology of the incel movement—not simply to condemn or ridicule its members, but to understand how loneliness, rejection, identity and online communities can combine to create a deeply harmful ideology. The episode traces the term’s origins in an inclusive support community before exploring the modern incel worldview, including appearance-based hierarchies, “Chads” and “Stacys,” sexual entitlement, misogyny, the red pill and the fatalistic black pill. Catrin considers the roles of dating-app experiences, rejection sensitivity, poor mental health, low self-esteem and profound social isolation, alongside the sense of belonging that incel forums can provide. She also examines echo chambers, the mythologising of violent attackers, sexual frustration theory and the psychological processes through which grievance may escalate into radicalisation or violence—while emphasising that identifying as an incel does not automatically make someone violent.   References and Reading   Andersen, J. C. (2024). To alleviate stigma: How incels negotiate masculinity online. Men and Masculinities, 27(5), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X241285447 Brooks, R. C., Russo-Batterham, D., & Blake, K. R. (2022). Incel activity on social media linked to local mating ecology. Psychological Science, 33(2), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211036065 Dunn, M. J., & Hill, A. (2014). Manipulated luxury-apartment ownership enhances opposite-sex attraction in females but not males. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.1 Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154 Lankford, A. (2021). A sexual frustration theory of aggression, violence, and crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 77, Article 101865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101865 Lindsay, A. (2022). Swallowing the black pill: Involuntary celibates’ (incels) anti-feminism within digital society. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 11(1), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.2138 Matter, D., Schirmer, M., Grinberg, N., & Pfeffer, J. (2024). Investigating the increase of violent speech in incel communities with human-guided GPT-4 prompt iteration. Frontiers in Social Psychology, 2, Article 1383152. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsps.2024.1383152 Moskalenko, S., Fernández-Garayzábal González, J., Kates, N., & Morton, J. (2022). Incel ideology, radicalization and mental health: A survey study. The Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare, 4(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.21810/jicw.v4i3.3817 Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208 Sparks, B., Zidenberg, A. M., & Olver, M. E. (2022). Involuntary celibacy: A review of incel ideology and experiences with dating, rejection, and associated mental health and emotional sequelae. Current Psychiatry Reports, 24(12), 731–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-022-01382-9 Sparks, B., Zidenberg, A. M., & Olver, M. E. (2024a). An exploratory study of incels’ dating app experiences, mental health, and relational well-being. The Journal of Sex Research, 61(7), 1001–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2249775 Sparks, B., Zidenberg, A. M., & Olver, M. E. (2024b). One is the loneliest number: Involuntary celibacy (incel), mental health, and loneliness. Current Psychology, 43(1), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z Speckhard, A., Ellenberg, M., Morton, J., & Ash, A. (2021). Involuntary celibates’ experiences of and grievance over sexual exclusion and the potential threat of violence among those active in an online incel forum. Journal of Strategic Security, 14(2), 89–121. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.14.2.1910 Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). 2018 Toronto van attack. In Wikipedia. Retrieved July 16, 2026, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Toronto_van_attack   Content warnings and Disclaimer   The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the host and guests and do not represent the official positions of any organisation or professional body. This podcast is intended for educational and informational purposes only and should not be taken as psychological advice or a substitute for professional consultation. While efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of information shared, psychological concepts and case details are simplified for discussion. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or deceased, is purely coincidental unless explicitly stated. The hosts and guests will never discuss any details of individual cases or locations that they have personally worked with or within. Vague personal and professional experiences may be shared as part of discussions, but considerable details will have been changed to ensure that there is no identifiable information to ensure anonymity and confidentiality. There will be no discussion on any current or ongoing cases in the United Kingdom, not any cases from the United Kingdom unless they are historical and fully resolved. All discussions adhere to HCPC and BPS ethical guidelines regarding confidentiality, professional boundaries and responsible communication of psychological information. Listener discretion is advice, as some topics may contain descriptions of violence trauma and other sensitive content.   Get in touch at indictablepodcast@gmail.com   Where to find me! (Please follow x)   @indictablepodcast on Instagram, Tiktok and Facebook   www.indictablepodcast.com

  4. Jul 3

    Cult leaders and Narcissism

    In this episode of The Indictable Podcast, forensic psychologist Dr. Catrin Williams explores the rise and fall of Keith Raniere, founder of the self-development organisation NXIVM.   Once promoted as a pioneering personal growth programme attracting entrepreneurs, celebrities, and wealthy professionals, NXIVM was later exposed as an organisation built on manipulation, coercion, and abuse. In 2019, Raniere was convicted of racketeering offences including sex trafficking, forced labour conspiracy, and other crimes connected to his activities between 1998 and 2018.   Who was talking?   Dr Catrin Williams (Forensic Psychologist)   List of Topics Covered   Keith Raniere's background and early career The creation and growth of NXIVM The hierarchy, rituals, and culture within the organisation DOS ("The Vow"), the secret society operating within NXIVM The use of collateral, coercion, and psychological control Branding, extreme dieting, and exploitation The psychological characteristics commonly seen in cult leaders Grandiosity and narcissistic traits   References and Reading   Gauglitz, I.K., Schyns, B., Fehn, T. et al. The Dark Side of Leader Narcissism: The Relationship Between Leaders’ Narcissistic Rivalry and Abusive Supervision. J Bus Ethics185, 169–184 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05146-6   Rosenthal, S. A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.005   Content warnings and Disclaimer   This episode also explores the psychology of influence, power, and manipulation.   views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the host and guests and do not represent the official positions of any organisation or professional body. This podcast is intended for educational and informational purposes only and should not be taken as psychological advice or a substitute for professional consultation. While efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of information shared, psychological concepts and case details are simplified for discussion. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or deceased, is purely coincidental unless explicitly stated. The hosts and guests will never discuss any details of individual cases or locations that they have personally worked with or within. Vague personal and professional experiences may be shared as part of discussions, but considerable details will have been changed to ensure that there is no identifiable information to ensure anonymity and confidentiality. There will be no discussion on any current or ongoing cases in the United Kingdom, not any cases from the United Kingdom unless they are historical and fully resolved. All discussions adhere to HCPC and BPS ethical guidelines regarding confidentiality, professional boundaries and responsible communication of psychological information. Listener discretion is advice, as some topics may contain descriptions of violence trauma and other sensitive content.   Get in touch at indictablepodcast@gmail.com   Where to find me! (Please follow x)   @indictablepodcast on Instagram, Tiktok and Facebook   www.indictablepodcast.com

  5. Jun 26

    'I can fix him' - the Psychology behind attraction to Crime

    Why do some people become romantically or sexually attracted to offenders? In this episode of The Indictable Podcast, forensic psychologist Dr. Catrin Williams explores the psychology of hybristophilia—the attraction to individuals who have committed serious crimes. Using notorious serial killer Ted Bundy and the social media phenomenon surrounding Cameron Herrin as case studies, Dr. Williams examines why some offenders receive fan mail, romantic proposals, online admiration, and devoted followings despite the harm they have caused. Dr. Williams also discusses the ethical concerns surrounding offender fandoms, including the potential to minimise criminal behaviour, overlook victims, and inadvertently glamorise violence. This episode contains discussion of serious violent offending and homicide.   References and further reading  Pettigrew, M. (2019). Aggressive hybristophilia in men and the affect of a female serial killer. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 30(3), 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2019.1588911 Pasquarelli, D., & Mastronardi, V. M. (2021). Hybristophilia: "Cause mama I'm in love with a criminal". Rivista di Psicopatologia Forense, Medicina Legale, Criminologia, 26(1–3). https://doi.org/10.4081/psyco.2021.616 Williams, T. J. V., Slater, H., & Gomez, C. (2024). Unpacking the construction of online identities of hybristophilia communities on TikTok. Deviant Behavior. Advance online publication. indictablepodcast@gmail.com Where to find me! (Please follow x) @indictablepodcast on Instagram, Tiktok and Facebook www.indictablepodcast.com

  6. Jun 19

    Crime and remorse: TJ Lane

    Episode Summary   The Psychology of REMORSE – case study of T.J Lane   Who was talking?   Dr Catrin Williams (Forensic Psychologist)   List of Topics Covered   Topics discussed in this episode: What moral disengagement is and why it matters in understanding offending How individuals separate their morals from their behaviour The 2012 Chardon High School shooting as a case study Courtroom behaviour and perceived lack of remorse (TJ Lane) What remorse actually means psychologically Why remorse is important in sentencing and parole decisions The difficulty of accurately measuring remorse Factors that can affect how remorse is expressed (e.g. learning disabilities, psychosis, brain injury) The difference between feeling remorse vs showing it Key distinctions between: Remorse Guilt Shame Regret Victim empathy Core mechanisms of moral disengagement: Moral justification Euphemistic language Advantageous comparison Displacement of responsibility Diffusion of responsibility Minimising consequences Dehumanisation   References and Reading   Spice, A., Viljoen, J. L., Douglas, K. S., & Hart, S. D. (2015). Remorse, psychopathology, and psychopathy. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. https://summit.sfu.ca/_flysystem/fedora/sfu_migrate/16977/OA%20SUMMIT%20Spice%20et%20al%202015,%20Remorse,%20Psychopathology%20and%20Psychopathy.pdf   Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.011   Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Martinez, A. G. (2014). Two faces of shame: The roles of shame and guilt in predicting recidivism. Psychological Science, 25(3), 799–805. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9848224/pdf/TPPL_30_2112101.pdf   Proeve M. (2023). Addressing the challenges of remorse in the criminal justice system. Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 30(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2022.2112101   Wright, K., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2007). The development of a scale for measuring offence-related feelings of shame and guilt. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology , 18(3), 307 - 316.   Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Hafez, L. (2011). Shame, Guilt and Remorse: Implications for Offender Populations. The journal of forensic psychiatry & psychology, 22(5), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2011.617541   https://socialchangenyu.com/review/judging-remorse/?utm_     Content warnings and Disclaimer   The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the host and guests and do not represent the official positions of any organisation or professional body. This podcast is intended for educational and informational purposes only and should not be taken as psychological advice or a substitute for professional consultation. While efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of information shared, psychological concepts and case details are simplified for discussion. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or deceased, is purely coincidental unless explicitly stated. The hosts and guests will never discuss any details of individual cases or locations that they have personally worked with or within. Vague personal and professional experiences may be shared as part of discussions, but considerable details will have been changed to ensure that there is no identifiable information to ensure anonymity and confidentiality. There will be no discussion on any current or ongoing cases in the United Kingdom, not any cases from the United Kingdom unless they are historical and fully resolved. All discussions adhere to HCPC and BPS ethical guidelines regarding confidentiality, professional boundaries and responsible communication of psychological information. Listener discretion is advice, as some topics may contain descriptions of violence trauma and other sensitive content.   Get in touch at indictablepodcast@gmail.com   Where to find me! (Please follow x)   @indictablepodcast on Instagram, Tiktok and Facebook   www.indictablepodcast.com

  7. Jun 13

    Stalking Series: Ep6 - Cyberstalking

    In the final episode of this stalking miniseries, forensic psychologist Dr. Catrin Williams explores cyberstalking and the ways digital technologies can be used to harass, monitor, intimidate, and psychologically destabilise victims. The episode discusses why cyberstalking is often far more invasive and persistent than people assume, and why solutions such as blocking accounts or deleting social media are rarely enough to stop determined offenders. The episode focuses on the case of James Florence, who carried out prolonged and escalating campaigns against multiple victims over several years. Using IT expertise, encrypted services, VPNs, hacked accounts, impersonation, and automated monitoring tools, Florence targeted at least seven victims — including minors — through online harassment, image manipulation, doxxing, humiliation campaigns, and sexualised abuse. Dr. Williams discusses the psychological impact of cyberstalking, including the loss of safety, hypervigilance, fear, and the feeling that there is no clear escape when the abuse follows victims across platforms and into everyday life. The episode also explores how anonymity, moral disengagement, and blurred boundaries online can contribute to offending behaviour, particularly among younger perpetrators who may not fully grasp the seriousness or long-term consequences of their actions. The discussion examines the overlap between online and offline stalking, the challenges law enforcement face in investigating technologically sophisticated offenders, and the broader question of how digital spaces can amplify coercive and obsessive behaviour.     Who was talking?   Dr Catrin Williams (Forensic Psychologist)   List of Topics Covered   What cyberstalking is and how it differs from offline stalking The James Florence case and technology-facilitated abuse Psychological impacts of cyberstalking on victims Online anonymity, escalation, and challenges for law enforcement   References and Reading   Please see all references on episode 0 of this miniseries     Ayerza, J. M., Lee, J. R., & Holt, T. J. (2026). Cyberstalking and online dating: Examining cyberstalking victimization among dating app users. Asian Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-025-09480-2 Bussu, A., Pulina, M., Ashton, S.-A., Mangiarulo, M., & Molloy, E. (2025). Cyberbullying and cyberstalking victimisation among university students: A narrative systematic review. International Review of Victimology. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580241257217 Dreßing, H., Bailer, J., Anders, A., Wagner, H., & Gallas, C. (2014). Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: Prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0231   Kim, B., Lee, J. R., & Reyns, B. W. (2023). A multilevel meta-analysis of cyberstalking: Domains and subdomains of contributing factors. Journal of Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102127 Lee, S. S., Park, J., & Lee, J. (2025). Gender differences in cyberstalking: The roles of risk, control, and opportunity factors in social media. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5), Article 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050566 Maran, D. A., & Begotti, T. (2019). Prevalence of cyberstalking and previous offline victimization in a sample of Italian university students. Social Sciences, 8(1), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8010030 Weekes, C. J., Worsley, J. D., Wheatcroft, J. M., & Short, E. (2025). Cyberstalking perpetrators and their methods: A systematic literature review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251333411   Content warnings and Disclaimer   This podcast is intended for educational and informational purposes only. This episode contains discussions of stalking, harassment, sexual abuse material, coercive behaviour, and online exploitation that some listeners may find distressing. Listener discretion is advised.   The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the host and guests and do not represent the official positions of any organisation or professional body. This podcast is intended for educational and informational purposes only and should not be taken as psychological advice or a substitute for professional consultation. While efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of information shared, psychological concepts and case details are simplified for discussion. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or deceased, is purely coincidental unless explicitly stated. The hosts and guests will never discuss any details of individual cases or locations that they have personally worked with or within. Vague personal and professional experiences may be shared as part of discussions, but considerable details will have been changed to ensure that there is no identifiable information to ensure anonymity and confidentiality. There will be no discussion on any current or ongoing cases in the United Kingdom, not any cases from the United Kingdom unless they are historical and fully resolved. All discussions adhere to HCPC and BPS ethical guidelines regarding confidentiality, professional boundaries and responsible communication of psychological information. Listener discretion is advice, as some topics may contain descriptions of violence trauma and other sensitive content.   Get in touch at indictablepodcast@gmail.com   Where to find me! (Please follow x)   @indictablepodcast on Instagram, Tiktok and Facebook   www.indictablepodcast.com

  8. Jun 12

    Stalking Series: Ep5 - The Predatory Stalker

    In this episode, Dr. Catrin Williams looks at predatory stalking — a form of stalking that is often less about emotional attachment and more about control, planning, and access to a victim. Unlike other stalking typologies, predatory stalking can involve surveillance, rehearsing behaviours, gathering information about routines, and carefully creating opportunities to offend. Catrin discusses the case of Mark Twitchell, the filmmaker convicted in 2011 of murdering John Altinger after luring him to a rented garage using a fake Plenty of Fish profile. The episode explores the level of planning involved in the offence, the attempts to conceal the crime afterwards, and the discovery of the document “SK Confessions,” which outlined fantasies and attempts to lure victims. The episode also explores a British Psychological Society vignette involving “Lucas,” whose behaviour escalated from collecting details about victims’ routines and movements into sexual assaults, highlighting how stalking behaviours can gradually develop into more serious offending. Throughout the episode, Catrin discusses how predatory stalking differs from other forms of stalking, warning signs professionals may look for, and the psychological processes that can sit behind this type of behaviour.   Who was talking?   Dr Catrin Williams (Forensic Psychologist)   List of Topics Covered   What predatory stalking is and how it differs from other stalking typologies Surveillance, planning, and escalation in stalking behaviour The Mark Twitchell case When stalking behaviour progresses into violent or sexual offending   References and Reading   Please see all references on episode 0 of this miniseries   Parkhill, A. J., Nixon, M., & McEwan, T. E. (2022). A critical analysis of stalking theory and implications for research and practice. Behavioral sciences & the law, 40(5), 562–583. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2598   https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mark-twitchell-the-dexter-killer-letters-48-hours/   Turner, Z. (2020). Stalking and attachment theory: Causes and management (Master’s thesis, City University of New York Graduate Center). CUNY Academic Works. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5118&context=gc_etds&utm_   Content warnings and Disclaimer   This podcast is intended for educational and informational purposes only. The episode includes discussions of stalking, violence, sexual offending, and homicide, which some listeners may find upsetting. Listener discretion is advised.   The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the host and guests and do not represent the official positions of any organisation or professional body. This podcast is intended for educational and informational purposes only and should not be taken as psychological advice or a substitute for professional consultation. While efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of information shared, psychological concepts and case details are simplified for discussion. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or deceased, is purely coincidental unless explicitly stated. The hosts and guests will never discuss any details of individual cases or locations that they have personally worked with or within. Vague personal and professional experiences may be shared as part of discussions, but considerable details will have been changed to ensure that there is no identifiable information to ensure anonymity and confidentiality. There will be no discussion on any current or ongoing cases in the United Kingdom, not any cases from the United Kingdom unless they are historical and fully resolved. All discussions adhere to HCPC and BPS ethical guidelines regarding confidentiality, professional boundaries and responsible communication of psychological information. Listener discretion is advice, as some topics may contain descriptions of violence trauma and other sensitive content.   Get in touch at indictablepodcast@gmail.com   Where to find me! (Please follow x)   @indictablepodcast on Instagram, Tiktok and Facebook   www.indictablepodcast.com

See All (14)

About

Indictable is a true crime podcast hosted by Dr Catrin Williams, a forensic psychologist who works daily in the criminal justice field. This podcast won't just tell a story, it will explore the minds, motives and behaviors around crime and take a specific focus on the perpetrators. A forensic psychologist, like Catrin, will be expected to reflect with perpetrators of crime and learn to understand their perception of events to determine the steps that led to the final offence. Why did they do it? What led them to that point? What did it do for them? By using scientifically grounded explanations of real cases and patterns of offending, Catrin (and colleagues/guests) will delve into the mind of the perpetrator and instead of answering WHAT happened, will answer WHY it happened.  Episodes explore topics such as offender typologies, stalking and obsession, moral disengagement, trauma, memory, the psychology of deception and so much more related to crime. The main aim of the episodes is to give the listener insight into what it's like to be a forensic psychologist every day, with care, curiosity and a human-centered lens.  Behind every crime is a human mind, and understanding this takes us beyond the headlines. 

Information

  • Creator
    drcatrinwilliams
  • Years Active
    2026
  • Episodes
    14
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © Copyright 2025 All rights reserved.
  • Show Website
    Indictable