Insured Success

Reed Smith LLP

Insured Success provides cutting-edge commentary on a range of insurance coverage issues affecting commercial policyholders. Reed Smith insurance recovery lawyers and guest speakers from around the world discuss emerging trends, legal developments and insurance best practices and provide timely insights to assist your organization.

  1. 08/13/2025

    Key insurance concepts and issues for data center construction projects

    In this episode focusing on data centers, real estate partner John Simonis and insurance recovery partner Chris Mosley join Paul Sovik-Siemens, senior VP and managing director for project risk at Lockton, to explore critical insurance considerations, challenges, and best practices for data center development and construction projects. The panel discusses the nuances of builder’s risk and liability insurance, the importance of wrap-up policies, and strategies for structuring insurance programs to protect large-scale data center investments. ----more---- Transcript: Intro: Hello and welcome to Insured Success, a podcast brought to you by Reed Smith's insurance recovery lawyers from around the globe. In this podcast series, we explore trends, issues, and topics of interest affecting commercial policyholders. If you have any questions about the topics discussed in this podcast, please contact our speakers at insuredsuccess@reedsmith.com. We'll be happy to assist.  John: Hello, everyone, and welcome to Insured Success, a segment of our Reed Smith Data Center series. Today, we will be discussing insurance-related considerations and best practices for data center construction projects. My name is John Simonis. I'm a real estate attorney and co-chair of Reed Smith's Global Data Center subgroup. I specialized in data center transactions development for many years, including a negotiation of numerous design and construction contracts. Today, I'm joined by my partner, Chris Mosley, and by Paul Sovic-Siemens, who is a senior vice president and manager of project risk at Lockton Companies. Lockton is one of the top insurance brokerage firms for substantial construction projects in the U.S. Both Chris and Paul have extensive experience structuring and negotiating insurance programs for data center and other substantial construction projects. Chris, can you share a bit more overview on your background?  Chris: Thanks, John. So I'm Chris Mosley. I'm a partner in Reed Smith Insurance Recovery Group. I have been representing businesses in insurance-related matters for more than 30 years. I have a particular specialty in representing owners and contractors in construction-related matters, and that work includes the assistance in negotiating insurance policies and the appropriate insurance provisions in general contracts and subcontracts on the front end, as well as handling claims that may arise after the fact, which most people see when we sue insurance companies. But the bottom line is that for the entirety of my career as well as my team, we've been helping businesses that are involved in the construction of large-scale projects from the beginning through the end of the project and then through claims that may occur thereafter as well.  Paul: My name is Paul Sovik-Siemens. I run our project risk department in the west for Lockton. My career has spanned over 20 years in construction-related insurance. I spent the first several years on the carrier side, most recently joined Lockton, and in the last five years, I've worked in our group that focuses primarily on setting up construction-related insurance for projects. A lot of our projects recently have been focused on data center clients, and so we've had a lot of experience lately structuring deals and negotiating with the contractors and figuring out the best way to cover these data center assets.  John: Thanks for the background, gentlemen. So data center construction projects are large, complex, expensive projects, often costing hundreds of millions of dollars or even billions of dollars. And the insurance costs can be several million dollars as well. So from an insurance coverage standpoint, they're obviously very complex. But maybe we can start with a little bit of an overview on the coverages that would typically be negotiated in an insurance program from a data center project. Chris, maybe you can start by giving a little overview on the differences between the builder's risk aspects of the project versus the liability insurance.  Chris: Sure. So when insuring a project like a data center, there's really, as a general overview, two basic types of coverage. What we call in the insurance trade first-party coverage or third-party coverage, first-party coverage being things like builder's risk, third-party coverage being things like liability insurance. But what are those policies and what do they do? Well, the simplest way to understand it is to think about having two data centers next to one another. Say, John, you own one data center and Paul owns the other. And there's a tower on John's property, call it a cell tower or whatever the case may be, and it falls. If that tower falls on your own data center, say John's data center, then John's going to call his first-party property carrier and say, this tower fell upon my building. There was a significant amount of damage to my building. I need you, the insurance company, under your first-party policy to pay for that. And first-party policies can look like builder's risk during the course of construction or a commercial property policy after construction is complete. Now let's take the other situation where the tower on John's property falls onto Paul's data center and damages that data center. Now, Paul has sustained a significant amount of loss because of the damage to the data center and perhaps some other damages that flow from that, and Paul sues John. One thing to understand about a liability policy, and this is true with any liability policy, it is a lawsuit policy. So anytime you hear liability policy, it's a lawsuit policy designed to protect you against lawsuits filed by third parties. So when Paul sues John, John contacts John's liability carrier and says, I've been sued because my tower fell on Paul's data center. Please protect me and provide me the two benefits under the liability policy is, which are paying for my defense, that is giving me a lawyer and paying for it, and then paying for any judgment or settlement that may occur thereafter. Those are the two basic types of policies that are intended to cover a project like a data center, both before and after the project completes.  John: So with that background, Paul, maybe we can jump to the liability insurance and in particular, maybe one part of the liability insurance that I have often found to be misunderstood, the completed operations coverage.  Paul: Happy to hit on that. So if we were talking about liability related to a construction project or construction operations, think of it in two different buckets. The first bucket are the premises or operations of that construction site. An example of a scenario where that would be triggered is if I'm walking by Chris's job site and Chris drops a hammer and it hits me, that's a liability during their premises and operations. So I would turn around and sue Chris and his job site. As Chris mentioned, it's a legal policy to where we're going to recover damage through the premises operations. The second bucket of a construction policy is called the Products Completed Operations and Construction Defect Coverage. Now, that coverage starts after the project has been put to its intended use, is finished, certificate of occupancy. Any of those triggers can set it into the post-construction completed operations phase. Now, what does that give you? That gives you construction defect claims for problems that arise sometime between post-completion and generally the statute of repose. So an example like that would be that you build your building, you've got no problems, it's operating no problem the first two years, and then all of a sudden, year three, you're figuring out that there seems to be some water penetrating and perhaps creating some damage. Water damage is a huge component and a driving loss in the construction defect phase. And this general liability policy is there to cover resulting damage from that construction defect water loss.  Chris: And John, the only thing I would add, I think Paul described it perfectly. As an oversimplification, your premises and ongoing operations occurs until you get to the CO point, and thereafter, you're in the completed operations coverage, which hits the construction defect coverage Paul was talking about.  John: And I guess similarly, your builder's risk policy, which would be your property coverage during construction. At some point transitions to your traditional property insurance on an operating facility, correct?  Paul: That's correct. And that policy operates differently than the liability policy. As Chris mentioned, it's a first-party policy just during the course of construction. And when you're talking about building a construction project and when you want to get that coverage in place and the builder's risk, you really got to focus on the construction schedule. You want to start it when there's something there to insure, meaning if you've gone out and you've done some grading or you've brought materials on site. Anything that can sustain property damage, you'll want to have your builder's risk policy in place at that point. Fast forward towards the end of the project, builders risk carriers are not interested in covering your operations. So as you approach the completed phase of your construction project, you've got to make sure that you're coordinating with your permanent property carrier to transition that policy off so that there is no lapse in coverage on the builder’s risk.  John: Paul, you touched on one thing I think is worth some emphasis, and that is that supplies, materials, equipment that's delivered on site and stored before it is incorporated into the improvement itself. I think that's becoming a bigger issue. Recently did a podcast on tariffs in data center construction. And one of the things that was emphasized during that discussion was that to avoid tariff uncertainty and tariff increases, a lot of developers are focu

    44 min
  2. 07/01/2025

    Insurance coverage for data centers: Navigating emerging challenges in a slowly adapting marketplace

    Reed Smith insurance attorneys Amy Koss, Stephen Raptis and Anthony Crawford survey the unique risk landscape facing data center owners and operators. Because no off-the-shelf “data center policy” yet exists, the trio explores how traditional coverages – property, cyber, technology E&O, and general liability – can be layered to safeguard both the bricks-and-mortar infrastructure and the critical information coursing through it. If you build, host, or rely on data centers, this episode is your blueprint for intelligent risk transfer. This is latest episode in our Data Center series. ----more---- Transcript:  Hello: Hello and welcome to Insured Success, a podcast brought to you by Reed Smith's Insurance Recovery Lawyers from around the globe. In this podcast series, we explore trends, issues, and topics of interest affecting commercial policyholders. If you have any questions about the topics discussed in this podcast, please contact our speakers at insuredsuccess@reedsmith.com. We'll be happy to assist.  Amy: Welcome to Insured Success and our Data Center series. My name is Amy Koss. I'm an Insurance Recovery associate attorney in Reed Smith's Philadelphia office, and I'm joined today by Steve Raptis, an Insurance Recovery partner in our D.C. Office, and Anthony Crawford, an Insurance Recovery partner in our New York office. As part of the Insurance Recovery Group, we represent policyholders in complex insurance disputes and counsel corporate policyholders on coverage issues. In today's episode, we're going to discuss the unique risks that data center owners and operators should consider when purchasing their insurance coverage. Data centers have been popping up all over the place, and they're really being integrated into our way of life. For example, very recently, OpenAI launched its Stargate project, and as part of that project, OpenAI intends to invest over $500 billion in building and supporting AI infrastructure over the next four years. And these infrastructure efforts are only going to continue to increase as technological advancements like AI and the Internet of Things become enmeshed with the way that we live our lives and the way that we do business. And much like anything else, with big investment comes big risk. So we're going to talk today about what owners and operators of data centers should consider as they look to ensure their risks, especially those risks that are unique to data centers. Stephen, Anthony, how are we doing today?  Stephen: Hi, Amy. Doing well. Thank you.  Amy: Great. So as I mentioned, data centers carry a unique set of risks. What should data center owners look for when shopping for insurance and reviewing different policy options?  Stephen: It's a great question, Amy, and I know from personal experience where I live in northern Virginia, data centers are everywhere, and every large piece of unused property seems to be in the process of being transformed into a data center. So it is just including what we hear in newspaper reports and trade press about this being an expanding industry. There's no doubt about it. Everywhere you look, there are more and more data centers coming up and AI is only going to increase that demand over time. And we know that the insurance industry is usually pretty good about coming up with specialized products once an industry hits a certain critical mass, they will start to produce specialized insurance products for that industry. And one might think that the data center industry is large enough now that it would have its own specialized insurance products. But in fact, we have not seen that. And we've talked to a number of insurance brokers to see if they might be aware of specialized products that are out in the marketplace. And they told us that they're not, at least not yet. So where that leaves data center owners and operators is that they need to take traditional off-the-shelf, for the most part, insurance policies and make those fit into their risk management portfolio in terms of how do we protect our assets, how do we protect our business. There aren't data center-specific policies. So they need to go out the marketplace and buy their traditional policies, but try to get those crafted as well as they can to their particular situation. And the good thing is that a lot of these policies that have traditionally been out there, including cyber policies, errors and omissions policies, those kind of policies are not written on a standard form, and so they tend to be more negotiable, whereas your property, general liability policies, those are written on standard industry forms and may be a little bit harder to negotiate, but even those can be changed in the endorsements.  Amy: Thanks, Steve. So, in terms of some of the risks that these data centers are facing that are particular to data centers, what do some of those include?  Stephen: The first kind of risk that may be the most prevalent risk is with respect to property, and that's the data center's physical operations. How does it protect its actual physical workings at a particular data center? And then there is sort of the more technical insurance, which would include errors and omissions coverage and cyber coverage, which is intended to protect largely against liability. But there is some first party coverage in the cyber as well that we'll talk about. And then finally, there's general liability coverage that covers property damage and bodily injury that might occur as a result of the data center's operations.  Amy: So in terms of protecting the actual physical assets of the data center, what kinds of coverage are we talking about? What can data center owners and operators look for?  Anthony: That's an excellent question. And, you know, the simple answer is starting out, the data center owners are going to look at their property policies. So, you know, these property insurance policies generally cover both the physical structure of the building as well as the assets inside of the building, which, you know, this is going to be something that is going to be significant and important to policyholders. Now, these policies traditionally cover loss due to physical damage from events such as, you know, it can be either sort of natural events such as earthquakes, some type of flooding, or it could be other man-made events such as fires. You know, also thinking about things such as water in truth. These property policies, as I said before, also look at sort of the assets inside, which is going to play into it hugely when we're talking about data centers, because you're talking about a lot of computer and electronic components that are going to be there. Data centers and the physical structure of the data center itself. We also, there is a component of property insurance that includes coverage for business interruption losses. And basically, this is where some type of physical loss has occurred at a business property, and there is an associated loss of business income because of that damage. So traditionally, you see where a fire burns down a factory or damages a factory, they're not able to produce the widgets that they do. They're able to get coverage for the lost income because they're not able to sell their widgets. They'll be looking at something similar here with data centers. Now, there are some unique components in terms of looking at property coverage for data centers because traditionally, these things, these policies cover sort of tangible assets. Well, one of the biggest components of a data center is that they have a lot of soft data that they're storing on the physical computer components within the structure. That data in and of itself, it may or may not be covered under the traditional policy. So policyholders may need to look to other policies or looking to look to get some type of endorsements added to their property policies in order to make sure that there are no gaps in the coverage because, you know, arguably one of the most important aspects of the data center is the data itself. There are some other considerations that we should look at, policyholders should look at when looking to insure their data centers. And that's concerns about a traditional extra coverage that's usually not sort of thought about or discussed heavily and negotiated in the underwriting process, and that's service interruption coverage. By their very nature, it's pretty clear that having uninterrupted access to electricity is pretty important to data centers. So policyholders need to look specifically at this coverage that's traditionally found in property policies and sort of work with the insurance company and the brokers to tailor that coverage so that it provides meaningful coverage for service interruption losses at the data center. And, you know, there can be different components of that. So, for example, some may provide coverage when there is a damage to the power supply or it may provide only coverage if there's sort of a power surge. But, you know, at the end of the day. This is something that policyholders will have to heavily scrutinize to make sure that they are not going to lose out on coverage if, for instance, there is some type of interruption with the service provided by the utility companies. Another thing that property holders need to take in consideration are sort of risk mitigation requirements that may be found in policies, specifically when talking about making sure that there's fire suppression systems and how that language is worded in the policies. Because traditionally, these policies require or may specify that there need to be sprinkler systems in place. But if you think about the nature of this risk with data centers. Having traditional water sprinkler systems in place may not necessarily be the best solution for data centers in that these fire suppression efforts may cause further damage using water. So policyholders should look to negotiate w

    27 min
  3. 04/02/2025

    Where there’s fire, there’s smoke: The evolving LA wildfire claims landscape

    While the devastating Los Angeles wildfires earlier this year were extinguished, the risks associated with those fires – and wildfires more broadly – continue to affect policyholders. In this episode, Nick Insua, Matt Weaver and Kya Coletta discuss important topics related to wildfires, including recent insurance updates, smoke damage remediation, the threat of mudslides, the California FAIR Plan and the process of rebuilding after a loss. ----more---- Transcript: Intro: Hello, and welcome to Insured Success, a podcast brought to you by Reed Smith's Insurance Recovery lawyers from around the globe. In this podcast series, we explore trends, issues, and topics of interest affecting commercial policyholders. If you have any questions about the topics discussed in this podcast, please contact our speakers at insuredsuccess@reedsmith.com. We'll be happy to assist.  Nick: Welcome everyone to the Reed Smith podcast Insured Success. My name is Nick Insua. I’m a partner in the New York and New Jersey offices of Reed Smith and I’m in our insurance recovery group. I primarily work on first party property and business interruption insurance claims although my practice is varied on liability coverage disputes as well. I'm joined for today's podcast by my partner, Matt Weaver. Matt is a partner in our Miami and Dallas offices, and a significant part of his practice involves dealing with the aftermath of natural disasters. And finally, we are joined by Kya Coletta. Kya is an associate in our Los Angeles office, and she primarily focuses her practice on representing corporate policyholders in insurance coverage disputes and does have a particular focus currently on losses relating to aviation clubs. And today we're going to be talking about some of the current legal and different coverage developments related to the terrible wildfires that struck the Los Angeles and greater Los Angeles area early in this year of 2025. We did want to acknowledge the devastating losses that many families and the communities there are facing due to these recent wildfires. Our hearts continue to go out to everyone affected. And we hope to provide some useful insights today and resources to assist those affected in recovering. Our firm, along with many, not only in the West Coast, but around the country, work very closely with an organization called United Policyholders. They're a nonprofit organization that provides invaluable information and support for policyholders navigating insurance claims and recovery efforts. Homeowners should visit their website for guidance on filing claims, negotiating with insurers, and accessing disaster recovery resources. United Policyholders is based in California and has a lot of experience dealing with natural disasters and their aftermath from an insurance perspective, and in particular on wildfire claims. Our podcast today is going to hit on a few key topics. The key areas of focus will be smoke damage remediation, mudslides, the fair plan, rebuilding after a loss, and some recent insurance policy updates. The reason why these topics matter is because there is and we've seen an increased risk of wildfires. Not only these in California, but others in California. We've now seen some subsequently in southwest of the United States. This is a risk that's growing in frequency and severity. Insurance policies, terms and conditions are evolving, and there's a lot of change in policy terms and how those might apply to losses. And we've also seen some recent court rulings from California, and there will be others, undoubtedly, that all policyholders and lawyers working with them should be aware of. So with that, we're going to step into some substantive segments of our podcast. Our first segment is going to be key initiatives by Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara since our last podcast. And the first topic in that segment is going to be provisional approval of State Farm's rate increase request. And I'm going to ask Kya if you would chime in on what's behind the 22% emergency rate increase approval?  Kya: Thanks, Nick. As of last week, the Insurance Journal reported that insurance companies have so far paid out more than $12 billion for losses from the Los Angeles area wildfires. This figure nearly doubles the $6.9 billion in claims reportedly paid out last month. State Farm General, the company's California-only subsidiary, has cited increasing payouts and rising reinsurance expenses as justification for the rate hike to pay out future policyholder claims. This request by State Farm would raise rates by 22% for homeowners and 15% for renters. The commissioner's approval is provisional, meaning State Farm must not only pause policy cancellations in the interim, but also present supporting data during an April 8th public hearing before full approval is granted. If State Farm is unable to substantiate the validity of these rates at the hearing next month, the commissioner has stated that State Farm will have to issue full refunds with interest to the impacted policyholders. This emergency rate increase approval reflects broader concerns about the financial stability of insurance companies in California's high-risk wildfire zones and seems to be an attempt to keep State Farm from withdrawing from the state. We should know more after the April 8th hearing, which is held before an administrative law judge and Commissioner Lara, so stay tuned.  Nick: Great, thank you. And there's also a directive for comprehensive investigations of smoke damage claims. Can you tell us a little bit about that new directive?  Kya: Sure. Many policyholders were fortunate that their homes remained standing during the L.A. wildfires. However, many of these homes are uninhabitable due to unclean air, unsafe drinking water, and lingering harmful substances. Despite this, insurers have pushed back on smoke damage claims, arguing that smoke damage does not constitute, quote, physical loss or damage to, unquote, property. Earlier this month in response, on March 7, 2025, Commissioner Lara issued Bulletin 2025-7, which provides guidance on the handling of smoke damage claims for properties affected by the LA wildfires. It clarified the Department's position on insurance coverage for smoke damage and outlined the expectations for insurance companies in processing these claims in three major ways. First, the Bulletin advised that it expects insurers to handle smoke damage claims in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and best practices. This includes adherence to California Insurance Code Section 790.03(h), which requires insurers to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of processing claims, as well as adherence to Section 2695.7(d) of the Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations, which essentially mandates insurers to conduct and diligently pursue a thorough, fair, and objective investigation of claims. It is also unreasonable under this section for insurers to require policyholders to incur substantial costs to investigate their own claims. If professional testing is warranted, insurers are expected to contract and pay for these services. Second, the department encourages insurers to consider the distribution of low-cost, commercially available at-home test kits for things like asbestos and other smoke-damaged contaminants as a reasonable first step in responding to and investigating certain smoke-damaged claims. Then, depending on the results of these at-home test kits, further investigation and processing may be warranted. And third, the bulletin addresses the implications of recent court cases on smoke damage claims to stress that whether a particular claim is covered depends on the specific policy language and unique facts of each claim. My colleague Matt will go into these wildfire cases more in depth later, but to close the loop on the commissioner's directive, the cases noted are the California Supreme Court's decision in Another Planet, a COVID-19 case that sets the standard for direct physical loss, and the California Court of Appeals decision in Gharibian v. Wawanesa General Insurance Company, which notably involved ash and soot damage rather than smoke damage. Importantly, the Bulletin 2025-7 emphasized that the Gharibian decision should not be interpreted and applied as a blanket rejection for coverage of smoke damage. Rather, where a particular claim is covered depends on the specific policy language and the unique facts of each claim. This directive can be seen to ensure that claims are not dismissed based on superficial inspections, and insurers must now provide detailed documentation and consider the full extent of smoke damage before denying coverage. Any policyholders with questions or concerns about their smoke damage claims are encouraged to contact their insurance company or the department directly.  Nick: Thank you. And our fourth point is approval of the $1 billion assessment to support the fair plan. And my question is, how is California supporting high-risk policyholders?  Kya: Sure. So the California fair plan was established to meet the needs of California homeowners who were unable to find insurance in the traditional marketplace. It is a syndicated fire insurance pool comprised of insurers licensed to conduct property and casualty business in California. Last month, the Fair Plan Association reported that it had paid more than $914 million to policyholders to cover claims related to the Palisades and Eaton fires. The Fair Plan's accounting subcommittee and governing committee each recommended an assessment of $1 billion to enable the Fair Plan to access additional available layers of reinsurance and maintain operators. To address this, the Commissioner approved the $1 billion assessment on member insurance companies to stabilize the program. This step by the Commissioner is meant to ensure that homeowners in fire-prone areas can still access insuranc

    35 min

About

Insured Success provides cutting-edge commentary on a range of insurance coverage issues affecting commercial policyholders. Reed Smith insurance recovery lawyers and guest speakers from around the world discuss emerging trends, legal developments and insurance best practices and provide timely insights to assist your organization.

You Might Also Like