Jen, Gabe & Chewy

4.5 (55)
BASKETBALL
UPDATED DAILY

ESPN reporter Jen Lada teams up with Packers Hall of Famer Mark Chmura and longtime ESPN Milwaukee host Gabe Neitzel as they provide unique and raw perspectives on local and national sports headlines.

18H AGO

Do the Packers Have Enough “A Players”? Jordan Love, Jacobs & O-Line Debate

What does it actually take to win a Super Bowl? In this hour of Jen, Gabe & Chewy, the conversation turns to the Packers’ offense and a simple but revealing question: 👉 Do the Packers have enough true “A players”? Using Chewy’s old-school formula for championship football — A players playing like A players, B players stepping up like A’s, and role players making key contributions — the crew breaks down whether Green Bay has enough top-end talent on offense to make a real run. 🧀 The Packers “A Player” Debate The discussion starts with the obvious names: Jordan Love Josh Jacobs Zach Tom And then the harder question: 👉 Is Jordan Love already an A player… or does he still have to prove it? The show digs into whether Love has actually reached that level yet, what Jacobs needs to be after last season, and how much the Packers are relying on players to grow into bigger roles. 👀 Which Pass Catchers Need to Emerge? The next layer of the debate focuses on Green Bay’s weapons: Christian Watson Jayden Reed Matthew Golden Tucker Kraft The takeaway: 👉 Not all of them need to become stars, but somebody has to elevate If the Packers are going to be dangerous, they need one or two of those skill guys to become clear difference-makers. 😬 The O-Line Concern Is Still There Even beyond the skill positions, one concern keeps coming back: 👉 Can this offensive line actually hold up? The group on paper has talent: Jordan Morgan Aaron Banks Sean Rhyan Anthony Belton Zach Tom But the issue is whether that talent turns into: consistency durability and a top-10 unit Because if it doesn’t: 👉 the whole season can get shaky fast 🧠 Projection vs Proven Production That’s really the bigger point of the whole hour: The Packers have a lot of players who could be really good. But when you’re talking about a championship team, “could be” only goes so far. This hour asks: Who’s actually proven? Who’s still projecting? And how many of those projections have to hit for Green Bay to be a serious contender? 😂 Bonus: Dude Wednesday Chaos The hour also opens with some classic JGC chaos, including: Chewy ranting about hotel prices and service Airbnb vs hotel complaints Josh’s upcoming Nashville + Kentucky Derby trip And the search for the perfect Derby hat So yes: 👉 it’s football analysis… but still very much Jen, Gabe & Chewy

52 min
18H AGO

March Madness Expansion Is Awful! Why 76 Teams Makes No Sense

March Madness may be getting bigger — but almost nobody seems to think that’s a good thing. In this hour of Jen, Gabe & Chewy, the crew reacts to reports that the NCAA is moving toward expanding both the men’s and women’s basketball tournaments to 76 teams, and the response is immediate: 👉 This is a terrible idea. 🚨 Why the 76-Team Plan Feels So Bad The biggest issue: More play-in games More clutter before the real bracket begins And a format that makes the tournament feel messier, not better Instead of the clean 64-team structure fans love, the NCAA is creating: 👉 12 games involving 24 teams before the bracket even really starts 🧠 The Bracket Problem One of the strongest points in the hour: 👉 Filling out a bracket is one of the best parts of March Madness But with this setup: It becomes harder More confusing And more rushed for fans trying to participate The feeling from the show is clear: 👉 Why would the NCAA make the most fun part of the tournament worse? 💰 It All Comes Back to Money The consensus: This is a money grab Not something fans are asking for Not something that improves the sport And even then: 👉 It’s not expected to be a massive financial windfall 🏈 The Bigger Pattern: College Football Expansion Too The conversation broadens to college football: 12 teams already feels like a lot 16 teams might be manageable 24 teams? That’s where it starts getting ridiculous The same problem applies: 👉 More teams does not mean more legitimate contenders 😬 Fan Frustration Feels Familiar The hour also pivots into a bigger discussion about: what it feels like when a team’s championship window is closing why fans struggle to admit it and how that tension shows up with teams like the 49ers… and even the Packers That gives the whole segment a bigger sports-wide theme: 👉 expansion, entitlement, and the reality of knowing when the magic might be slipping

38 min
1D AGO

Packers’ Biggest Problem After the Draft? O-Line Concerns Still Linger

The NFL Draft is over — but for the Packers, the biggest conversation might be about what still wasn’t solved. In this hour of Jen, Gabe & Chewy, the focus turns to Green Bay’s biggest remaining weakness after the 2026 NFL Draft, with one position group taking center stage: 👉 The offensive line 🧀 What’s the Packers’ Biggest Remaining Concern? The hour opens with a simple question: After the draft, what unit still worries you most? The answers include: Offensive line Running back depth Linebacker Cornerback Defensive line But Chewy makes his stance clear immediately: 👉 “O-line, O-line, O-line.” 😬 Why the Offensive Line Still Feels Risky The concern isn’t just the starters — it’s the depth behind them. The discussion centers on: Whether the Packers truly have enough reliable bodies How quickly injuries can derail a season Why counting on a fifth-round rookie to stabilize the unit feels unrealistic There’s also skepticism about whether Jagger Burton can realistically push for a major role right away, even with the strong scouting feedback from Kentucky. 🧠 Jason Wilde Agrees When Jason Wilde joins the show, he backs up the concern: 👉 He says he’d vote yes that the offensive line is still the Packers’ biggest issue. The logic: questions remain about depth the front office says it feels good about the group but there are still real unknowns if injuries hit 👀 Other Concerns: RB, Kicker & Depth The conversation doesn’t stop with the line. The hour also gets into: Running back Josh Jacobs will carry the load But behind him, the Packers are relying heavily on Marshawn Lloyd If Lloyd can’t stay healthy, that room gets thin in a hurry Kicker Jason Wilde says the new kicker competition is fascinating Green Bay traded up to draft a kicker, which suggests the job is his to lose But if Lucas Havrisik wins the job, the Packers may have burned a draft pick for nothing Jaden Reed Wilde was surprised not by the extension itself, but by how low the money was The discussion frames Reed’s new deal as potential bargain territory if he produces 🎙️ Schefter Draft-Week Fun from Pittsburgh The hour also includes some Adam Schefter setup from Pittsburgh, including: buying a draft-night outfit the morning of the draft running into Ty Simpson doing the same thing and setting the stage for a conversation about the Rams’ surprising QB pick and its Packers/Jordan Love parallels

46 min
1D AGO

Brewers Surviving April + Packers Ranked 16?! Debate Erupts

The Brewers are hovering around .500… and somehow, that might be a good thing. In this hour of Jen, Gabe & Chewy, the show opens with a reality check on Milwaukee’s start to the season before shifting into a hilarious — and heated — NFL power rankings debate following the draft. ⚾ Brewers: Surviving the First Month At 14–13 and just one game over .500: The Brewers are hanging around despite injuries The offense has been inconsistent The bullpen hasn’t always locked things down But the perspective from Jeff Levering: 👉 This is actually a solid place to be Especially considering: Missing bats like Vaughn, Trujillo, and Yelich Limited experience in the starting rotation 🧠 Why There’s No Panic (Yet) The key takeaway: Last year’s team was in a similar spot The Brewers didn’t really take off until later The division won’t stay this tight forever 👉 Translation: it’s way too early to panic 🏈 NFL Draft Fallout → Power Rankings Chaos Then things take a turn… The crew reacts to post-draft NFL power rankings, and: 👉 The Packers come in at #16 Which immediately sparks: Confusion Disagreement And a full breakdown of the list 😳 The Rankings That Made No Sense Some of the biggest reactions: Teams like the Rams and Seahawks near the top The Packers sitting in the middle Questions about how much the draft should even change rankings 👉 The conclusion: Nobody really agrees with the list 👀 The Bigger Packers Question It turns into a deeper debate: Are the Packers actually underrated? Or is this a fair reflection of where they stand? And one key point: 👉 Draft picks alone shouldn’t define a team’s ranking

45 min
2D AGO

LIVE REACT: Did Packers REALLY Get Better?! | Gutey Draft Grades & Big Questions

The Packers addressed needs… but did they actually get better? 👀🧀 Join us LIVE as we break down the Green Bay Packers 2026 NFL Draft, where reactions are ALL over the place — from A grades to D grades. 🧀 Packers Draft Reaction Six picks: CB, DL, EDGE, OL, Kicker Did Gutey fill the biggest needs? Why fans are so divided on this class Was trading up the right move? 📊 Draft Grades Are SPLIT 👉 The big debate: Some say this is Gutey’s BEST draft Others say it didn’t move the needle Why the gap? 👉 Because: No 1st-round pick Limited impact players expected right away Focus on depth vs stars 💥 Biggest Questions After the Draft Is this team actually closer to a Super Bowl? Did the Packers improve their depth enough? Why no RB or QB additions? Was drafting a kicker the right call? 🧠 Reality Check: What Matters Most From the show: Draft alone won’t decide the season Injuries + depth will define success Jordan Love’s performance is EVERYTHING Coaching and execution still under the microscope 🔥 We’ll cover: 🏈 Full Packers draft breakdown 💥 Biggest wins and biggest concerns 📉 Depth issues still on the roster 🧠 Coaching + roster debate 💬 Live fan reactions and takes 💬 JOIN THE CONVERSATION ➡️ What grade do YOU give the Packers draft? ➡️ Did they get better or stay the same? ➡️ What’s still missing from this roster? ➡️ Are they truly Super Bowl contenders? Drop your takes in the chat — we react LIVE. #Packers #GreenBayPackers #NFLDraft #BrianGutekunst #NFL #PackersNation #WisconsinSports #SportsTalk #LiveReaction

52 min
2D AGO

LIVE REACT: Are Packers REALLY Super Bowl Ready?! | Is Matt LaFleur Holding Them Back?

The Packers might have a Super Bowl roster… but is something still missing? 👀🧀 Join us LIVE as we break down the biggest debate coming out of the NFL Draft and offseason: 👉 Are the Packers actually ready to win a Super Bowl? 👉 Or is something — or someone — holding them back? 🧀 Super Bowl Contender or Not? How close is this roster REALLY? Why this draft didn’t make or break the team The role of depth vs star power What needs to go right for a deep run 🧠 The Matt LaFleur Debate 👉 The biggest question: Is coaching the problem? Is LaFleur holding the team back? Game management concerns Locker room dynamics and player roles Can he take this team to the next level? 💥 What REALLY Decides the Season From the show: Injuries and luck play a HUGE role Jordan Love’s performance could define everything Key “A players” must step up Young roster vs veteran leadership 🔥 We’ll cover: 🏈 Packers roster evaluation post-draft 💥 Coaching vs talent debate 📊 What it takes to win a Super Bowl 🧠 Biggest risks heading into 2026 💬 Live fan reactions and takes 💬 JOIN THE CONVERSATION ➡️ Are the Packers truly Super Bowl ready? ➡️ Is Matt LaFleur the problem? ➡️ What’s the biggest weakness? ➡️ Who needs to step up the most? Drop your takes in the chat — we react LIVE. #Packers #GreenBayPackers #NFL #JordanLove #MattLaFleur #NFLDraft #NFL2026 #PackersNation #WisconsinSports #SportsTalk #LiveReaction

38 min
5D AGO

Packers at Pick 52 | Trade Back or Stay Put? Draft Strategy Debate Heats Up

The Packers didn’t make a splash in Round 1 — now everything comes down to what happens at Pick 52. In this hour of Jen, Gabe & Chewy, the conversation shifts fully into Green Bay’s draft strategy, with Jason Wilde joining to break down why the Packers stayed put and what comes next. 👀 The Big Question: Stay or Trade Back? As the Packers prepare to pick: 👉 What’s more likely — stay at 52 or trade back? Gutekunst historically wants more picks But the roster needs players who can contribute now And fans are split on what matters more 🧠 Jason Wilde’s Key Insight Wilde explains: The Packers never seriously considered trading into Round 1 They believed the cost was too high And they feel good about the players who could still be available 👉 Confidence in the board is driving the strategy 📊 The Positions That Matter From the discussion, three areas stand out: Cornerback Defensive line (DT/Edge) Offensive line 👉 Addressing two of those would be a strong night ⚖️ Picks vs Immediate Impact This is where the debate gets real: Trading back = more shots at players Staying put = better chance at a difference-maker And Chewy’s concern: 👉 The Packers need guys who can contribute right now, not just develop 🧩 Bigger Philosophy Question The segment raises a deeper issue: 👉 Are the Packers going “all-in”… or just treading water? Limited free agent moves Heavy reliance on draft picks Massive draft capital next year 👉 Is this a setup for a bigger push later?

50 min
5D AGO

Packers Didn’t Trade Up | Jason Wilde Explains Gutey’s Draft Strategy

The Packers had chances to move — but they didn’t. In this segment of Jen, Gabe & Chewy, Jason Wilde breaks down Green Bay’s decision to stay out of the first round entirely, revealing that Brian Gutekunst and the front office never even seriously considered trading up. 🚨 The Big Reveal Jason Wilde shares: 👉 The Packers didn’t even pick up the phone to move into Round 1 They knew it would be too expensive They stayed disciplined And stuck to their board 🧠 Why Gutey Stayed Put Despite a chaotic, trade-heavy first round: Green Bay felt confident in their position The board didn’t force their hand And they believe value will still be there at Pick 52 👉 The message: trust the process 👀 Why This Draft Feels Different No first-round pick creates a different energy Less immediate impact, more patience required But internally: 👉 The Packers feel GOOD about who could fall to them 📊 Positions That Matter Most Wilde outlines three key areas: Cornerback Offensive line Defensive line 👉 Addressing two of those would be a win 🔄 Trade Possibilities Still Alive Even without a first-round move: Packers could trade up or down tonight Gutey still likely to maneuver Could add picks later in the draft 🧩 Backup QB Conversation The segment also touches on: Why trading for guys like Richardson or Levis is unlikely The belief that Desmond Ritter may already be the plan Packers trusting internal development again

42 min

See All (62)

4.5

out of 5

55 Ratings

Love this show!!!

08/31/2021

popcorn gav

I listen to it every single day and can’t get enough of how funny it is!
Decent once they get down to business

02/13/2024

Murderrow 2002

I like how they interact with each other and have their own opinions when they discuss sports. But they take so long to get to the actual sports talk. The best thing about this podcast is that you can skip through all nonsense. It should be about sports, not their personal lives, opinions on nonsports things, etc
Not Bad

01/26/2024

neatweeds

I could do without the giggling.
Chewy is my hero

10/09/2023

stormin gorman fan

Thank you for informative AND enjoyable show. Lifelong 50 year old Packers fan living in NYC now for half my life. Younger Packers fans need some perspective on QB … I remember Lynn Dickey and David Whitehurst days :/ Listen to you every day !