Land & Line

Emme Hayes

Hosted by Emme Hayes, founder of Articles In Common, the series features unscripted phone conversations that begin with everyday encounters and open into deeper reflections on outdoor identity, animals, and the cultural stories shaping how we relate to the natural world. landandline.substack.com

Episodes

  1. Mar 14

    Afterthoughts: The Pigeon Racer

    After I hung up with Dennis, one thing he said stayed with me. Dennis is 88 years old and has been racing pigeons since he was fourteen. During our conversation I asked him what he had learned after doing this for so long. His answer was simple. He said that over time he realized pigeons aren’t machines. Later in the conversation he also said something else that kept echoing in my mind:“If they did good for me, I kept them until they died.” Those two ideas sitting next to each other made me start thinking about how often our care for animals is tied to usefulness. Working animals. Hunting. Factory farming. Zoos. Animals in entertainment. Racing pigeons. Even something like animal shelters overflowing with dogs can trace back to the same pattern — when animals stop fitting into the role we’ve created for them, they’re often discarded. Maybe I’m noticing it more lately because of where I’ve been and the conversations happening around me. I was recently at the Wild and Scenic Film Festival watching the documentary Trade Secret, and there were a lot of discussions around wolf conservation and reintroduction. Back in Los Angeles, there are protests outside the zoo most weekends. Different stories. Different contexts. But when you start paying attention, you begin to see how this inherited relationship with animals shows up everywhere. This short reflection is me thinking through that tension — between recognizing that animals aren’t machines, and the many systems we’ve built that still treat them like they are. Sometimes a random conversation in a parking lot reveals more than you expect. Get full access to Land and Line at landandline.substack.com/subscribe

    6 min
  2. Wearing the Answer

    Feb 8

    Wearing the Answer

    This episode is where patterns start to come into focus. Not through theory, but through repetition. Moving through industry spaces, conversations, programs, and events that claimed to be climate-adjacent, but consistently redirected away from climate action and toward growth of the outdoor economy instead. In this session, I talk about what it felt like to keep running into the same friction. The belief that the outdoor industry shouldn’t be talking about climate directly. That its role is to grow participation, grow brands, and grow the outdoor economy, while climate is treated as someone else’s responsibility. I don’t agree with that separation. This episode sits at the line between brands and outdoor culture. Between marketing and meaning. Between an industry built on growth and an outdoors that is being fundamentally altered by climate collapse. I also trace how, when those conversations start to feel uncomfortable, familiar brands often get pulled in as reassurance. Not as an argument, but as a way to steady the moment and move past it. There are no solutions offered here. Just the moment when noticing becomes unavoidable, and when the idea of the outdoors as something separate from climate no longer makes sense. This episode is about realizing that the outdoors can’t be siloed. It has to be holistic, or it isn’t honest. Listen in one go. In motion, if you can. This one is about seeing the whole picture instead of jumping to the comfortable parts. Get full access to Land and Line at landandline.substack.com/subscribe

    14 min
  3. Conditional Inclusion

    Feb 1

    Conditional Inclusion

    This started as an Instagram story. I’m reading it out loud because it felt wrong to keep it fragmented. It’s coming from years of noticing how much of what we buy, wear, believe, and repeat is shaped by systems we’re rarely invited to question. The clothes. The food. The stories we’re told are educational or authoritative. Even what we’re allowed to hear often shows up already approved by the same structures that benefit from it staying that way. I talk about why I’m done waiting for permission. Why I don’t want to speak on stages funded by corporations that were never built for me in the first place. Why the outdoor industry doesn’t represent me, doesn’t speak for me, and doesn’t share my values. I name something I keep running into, which is how inclusion almost always comes with conditions. How difference is welcomed only when it’s softened or translated or reshaped to fit a dominant framework. How assimilation gets mistaken for progress. How surviving inside someone else’s culture gets confused with belonging. This isn’t about asking for more space within the same industry. It’s about questioning why the industry looks the way it does, who it actually makes room for, and who it keeps asking to leave parts of themselves at the door. Nothing here is edited for comfort. I’m just reading the words as they were written and letting them stand. Get full access to Land and Line at landandline.substack.com/subscribe

    1 min

About

Hosted by Emme Hayes, founder of Articles In Common, the series features unscripted phone conversations that begin with everyday encounters and open into deeper reflections on outdoor identity, animals, and the cultural stories shaping how we relate to the natural world. landandline.substack.com