My Pharma Reviews

Salil Kallianpur

All things pharma and transformation mypharmareviews.substack.com

  1. The Last Prescription

    14h ago

    The Last Prescription

    The entire commercial logic this series has examined from the MR-driven detailing model in Episode 8, the chronic refill economics implicit in the GLP-1 story in Episode 5 , assumes a patient who keeps coming back. Cell and gene therapy breaks that assumption completely. CGT is often a single infusion, priced once, intended to either cure the patient or durably control the disease, eliminating the recurring revenue stream entirely. NexCAR19’s journey from a ₹42 lakh launch price to a ₹30 lakh price, alongside its first full year of real profitability, shows India is not just a low-cost copier of this model but an active participant proving a harder economic problem can be solved, making a curative, one-time therapy commercially sustainable at a fraction of Western pricing. • The actual chronic-care cost stack for relapsed/refractory blood cancers in India — BMT, multi-line chemotherapy, targeted therapy — set directly against NexCAR19’s single ₹30 lakh dose • ImmunoACT’s real financial trajectory: ₹42 lakh to ₹30 lakh pricing, ₹62 crore revenue and ₹12 crore profit in FY25, 350+ patients treated across 70 hospitals • Why a one-time cure is a harder business model to sustain profitably than a chronic therapy, and what ImmunoACT’s manufacturing scale-up reveals about solving that problem • What this means for Indian pharma companies whose commercial and financial architecture, examined in Episodes 7 and 8, is built entirely around recurring revenue Listen in to Episode 8 of the Bio-Health Supercycle. “My Pharma Reviews - The Podcast” is now available for you to listen on your favourite podcasting apps like Spotify and Apple. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit mypharmareviews.substack.com

    14 min
  2. Episode 8: The Gatekeeper Who Is Leaving the Building

    2d ago

    Episode 8: The Gatekeeper Who Is Leaving the Building

    The traditional Indian pharma commercial model was built around one assumption: that the physician is the primary, often the only, gatekeeper between a molecule and a patient, and that an army of medical representatives visiting doctors’ clinics is the most effective way to influence that gatekeeper. That assumption is now wrong for a rapidly growing share of the market, across all three income tiers of the country simultaneously, for three different and unrelated reasons. The three-India framework from earlier analytical work is the right lens for seeing this clearly because the disintermediation is happening differently, and at different speeds, in each of the three Indias. • The three-India commercial reality, updated with new 2025-2026 data showing which segment is being disintermediated by what, and how fast • Government digital health infrastructure at unprecedented scale - 780 million ABHA digital health IDs, 372 million eSanjeevani teleconsultations, numbers most pharma commercial strategy decks have not internalised • The quick-commerce entry into pharmacy (Zepto Pharmacy’s 10-minute delivery) as a genuinely new disruptive vector • Tata 1mg and PharmEasy’s combined 55% share of online pharmacy sales, non-pharma-company platforms now sitting at the centre of the distribution chain • What this means concretely for how Indian pharma should restructure commercial spend, threading back to the Episode 7 capital allocation lens Listen in to Episode 8 of the Bio-Health Supercycle. “My Pharma Reviews - The Podcast” is now available for you to listen on your favourite podcasting apps like Spotify and Apple. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit mypharmareviews.substack.com

    16 min
  3. Episode 7: The Capital Allocation Crisis

    3d ago

    Episode 7: The Capital Allocation Crisis

    Indian pharma’s R&D intensity has been structurally stagnant for years, sitting at roughly half of global large pharma’s spend as a share of revenue and less than a third of China’s. This is not simply a function of India being a generics-focused industry, it is a capital allocation choice, made repeatedly, by boards that have other options. Sun Pharma’s $355-416 million acquisition of Checkpoint Therapeutics shows what disciplined innovation capital allocation looks like. A single, sizeable, strategically coherent bet on a commercial-stage specialty asset, rather than either no investment at all or a scattering of small, low-conviction bets that read well in an annual report but change nothing structurally. • Hard benchmark numbers: Alphabet’s $61 billion annual R&D spend vs. the combined R&D spend of India’s top 10 listed pharma companies • R&D intensity comparison: global large pharma at ~23.5% of sales, China at ~17.5%, India at ~4.4-7.5%, essentially flat for years • The Sun Pharma-Checkpoint Therapeutics deal as a worked case study in disciplined, sizeable, strategically coherent innovation capital allocation • What boards should be asking and typically are not, connecting back to the Ternus Test introduced in Episode 2 Listen in to Episode 7 of the Bio-Health Supercycle. “My Pharma Reviews - The Podcast” is now available for you to listen on your favourite podcasting apps like Spotify and Apple. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit mypharmareviews.substack.com

    18 min
  4. Episode 6: The Talent That Got Away

    4d ago

    Episode 6: The Talent That Got Away

    The Coefficient Bio acquisition reveals the true price of computational biology talent at the frontier. Roughly $44 million per person, paid not for revenue or product but for scarce expertise that would otherwise take years to build internally. This is not anything Indian pharma payrolls can compete with, and trying to compete on that basis is a strategic error. The realistic Indian pharma AI strategy is not to out-bid Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI for individual computational biologists but to behave more like Eli Lilly did with Insilico Medicine - pay for access to an AI-native platform’s output, rather than trying to own the scarce talent that built the platform. • The Coefficient Bio deal anatomy: 8 months old, fewer than 10 people, $400 million, all-stock, and why that price was rational for the buyer • Where this talent actually comes from: Genentech’s 2025 layoffs as Roche pivoted toward embedded AI, releasing exactly the computational biology talent pool that Coefficient Bio’s founders came from • The acqui-hire versus platform-partnership distinction, using Eli Lilly’s contrasting $2.75 billion Insilico Medicine deal as the comparison case • What this means concretely for Indian pharma: the talent-acquisition path is largely foreclosed; the platform-partnership path remains genuinely open • The regulatory vacuum around AI-generated claims in pharma promotion and prescribing support, and the specific compliance exposure this creates for any Indian company moving fast on AI-assisted commercial tools Listen in to Episode 6 covering Wave 5 of the Bio-Health Supercycle. “My Pharma Reviews - The Podcast” is now available for you to listen on your favourite podcasting apps like Spotify and Apple. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit mypharmareviews.substack.com

    19 min

About

All things pharma and transformation mypharmareviews.substack.com