NeLI Pod

NeLI Pod

The official podcast of the National eDiscovery Leadership Institute. Here, we bridge the gap between technology and the law, bringing you the forefront of electronic discovery.

  1. NeLI POD Season 2: Ep. 6 with Amy Ambroson

    6D AGO

    NeLI POD Season 2: Ep. 6 with Amy Ambroson

    Guest: Amy Abramson Director, Litigation Solutions & Go‑To‑Market, UnitedLex Episode Overview In this insightful conversation, Amy Abramson—a longtime leader at UnitedLex and a driving force behind some of the largest and most complex MDLs in the country—joins Daniel and Brandon to explore how e‑discovery strategy, culture, and technology are evolving together. With more than a decade at UnitedLex, Amy brings a rare blend of legal, operational, and business expertise to the discussion. The episode dives into how modern discovery has shifted from brute‑force review to evidence‑based strategy, why culture and partnership matter in high‑stakes litigation, and how organizations can modernize their legal operations without losing sight of risk, efficiency, or long‑term goals. Amy also shares candid insights on AI adoption, workflow design, data reuse, and why UnitedLex continues to invest in the NELI community. Key Takeaways Discovery has shifted from volume to strategy. Modern tools and AI allow teams to prioritize key documents early and build evidence‑driven workflows. (“We’re able to take multiple bites at the apple… really able to lead with evidence‑based strategy.”)Culture drives outcomes in high‑stakes matters. Trust, transparency, and shared values between service providers, law firms, and corporate clients are essential for meeting deadlines and managing risk.Modernization requires clarity and intentionality. Legal departments must understand their data landscape, retention policies, and business goals before investing in new technology. Action Items for Legal Teams Build a repeatable playbook. Standardize privilege, PII, and workflow decisions while leaving room for matter‑specific flexibility.Show early wins. Elevate hot documents quickly to build confidence in workflows and AI‑driven approaches.Align tech with purpose. Don’t buy AI tools for the sake of AI—define the problem first, then select the right solution.Plan modernization over 3–5 years. Evaluate data retention, internal expertise, and IT capacity before deciding what to insource or outsource. Chapters & Timecodes 00:00 – IntroductionDaniel and Brandon welcome listeners and introduce Amy Abramson. 00:01:52 – Amy’s Career at UnitedLexHow she joined the company right out of law school and grew into a leadership role. 00:02:32 – How the Purpose of e‑Discovery Has EvolvedFrom search‑term brute force to strategic, evidence‑driven workflows.(“It’s no longer a badge of honor to say you had 500 people working on a case.”) 00:04:20 – Culture, Values, and Client PartnershipsWhy shared values and long‑term relationships matter in complex litigation. 00:06:27 – Managing MDLs and High‑Pressure MattersHow trust, transparency, and tough conversations shape successful outcomes. 00:09:54 – Designing Workflows That Drive SuccessThe role of playbooks, early wins, and steering committees in building confidence. 00:12:12 – Getting Attorney Buy‑In for AI and CALHow to address concerns about time, cost, and changing review models. 00:15:22 – The Challenge of Reusing DataWhy consistency matters and how MD5 matching and sampling can help. 00:18:49 – Helping Clients Adopt AI SafelyUnderstanding goals, vetting tools, and balancing people‑process‑tech. 00:22:12 – Bringing Business Thinking Into Legal ConversationsHow Amy’s background in management and marketing shapes her approach. 00:24:41 – The Barriers to ModernizationData retention, security, BYOD, and the realities of corporate IT. 00:28:33 – Why UnitedLex Supports NELIA unique environment where judges, lawyers, and technologists learn together. Compelling Quote “It’s all still a people‑process‑tech equation… AI isn’t a magic button solution for everything.”

    31 min
  2. NeLI POD Season 2: Ep. 5 with Steve Davis

    MAR 4

    NeLI POD Season 2: Ep. 5 with Steve Davis

    Guest: Steve Davis Vice President, Forensics & Investigations Practice, Purposely Legal(“Doing well and good to see you both… always enjoy crossing paths with you.”) Episode Overview Digital forensics is evolving faster than ever and returning guest Steve Davis brings a front‑line perspective on how investigators are adapting to a world defined by massive data growth, ephemeral messaging, encryption, and the rise of generative AI. In this episode, Steve breaks down the shifting landscape of evidence collection—from mobile devices and third‑party apps to structured databases and collaboration platforms—and explains why traditional assumptions about “where the data lives” no longer hold. The conversation also explores the practical realities of modern investigations: how to build a defensible collection plan, how to manage client expectations, and how AI is beginning to transform exfiltration and migration analysis. Steve closes with a candid look at why he keeps returning to NELI and what keeps him energized in such a rapidly changing field. Key Takeaways Data diversity now matters as much as data volume. Investigators must account for mobile apps, collaboration platforms, structured databases, and constantly shifting tool behaviors. (“Things can change literally a week or a month from what we did previously.”)Ephemeral messaging isn’t the end of evidence. While deletion is harder to overcome on modern devices, backups, syncs, and other participants’ devices often provide alternative paths to reconstruction. (“If the data is not there, the data is not there… but not necessarily.”)Gen AI is poised to reshape forensic analysis. Steve sees major potential in cross‑referencing artifacts, accelerating timeline reconstruction, and identifying patterns in exfiltration investigations. (“I think I’m dead wrong… there’s actually some super interesting things that are happening.”) Action Items for Legal Teams Start every investigation with a structured plan. Identify custodians, platforms, timeframes, and data types before collecting anything.Avoid “collect everything” instincts. Large, nonlinear data sources require targeted, defensible scoping to avoid unnecessary cost and noise.Prepare clients for the realities of modern forensics. Explain why thorough questioning, planning, and methodical workflows are essential—and why there is no “easy button.” Chapters & Timecodes 00:00 – IntroductionDaniel and Brandon welcome listeners and reintroduce Steve Davis. 00:02:09 – What’s Changed Since Last YearSteve explains why digital evidence collection evolves weekly, not yearly.(“You’ve got to be a student of the game… constantly listen and learn.”) 00:05:21 – The Explosion of Data TypesHow investigators help clients navigate diverse platforms, apps, and storage locations. 00:08:31 – Linear vs. Nonlinear Data ChallengesWhy collaboration platforms, JSON outputs, and structured databases complicate downstream review. 00:14:23 – Deletion, Encryption, and the Decline of RecoverabilityWhy SSDs and mobile architectures make deleted data harder to retrieve. 00:17:17 – The Future of Forensics in an Ephemeral WorldHow backups, syncs, and other participants’ devices can still preserve critical evidence. 00:20:50 – Gen AI’s Emerging Role in ForensicsSteve revises his earlier skepticism and highlights promising applications in migration and exfiltration analysis. 00:24:39 – Discoverability of AI PromptsA discussion of enterprise vs. consumer AI tools and how prompts, outputs, and source code can be collected. 00:26:57 – Managing Expectations: The Myth of the Easy ButtonWhy clients often underestimate the complexity of forensic workflows—and how Steve addresses that gap. Compelling Quote “You can’t arrive… you’ve got to keep your hand on the pulse and constantly listen and learn.”

    39 min
  3. NeLI POD Season 2: Ep. 4 with Judge Rodriguez

    FEB 18

    NeLI POD Season 2: Ep. 4 with Judge Rodriguez

    NELIPod Episode Summary Guest: The Honorable Xavier Rodriguez United States District Court Judge, Western District of Texas Episode Overview In this wide‑ranging and deeply practical conversation, Judge Xavier Rodriguez—national authority on e‑discovery, AI, and modern civil procedure—joins Daniel Gold and Brandon Mack to examine how technology continues to reshape litigation. Drawing on his judicial experience, academic work, and decades of practice, Judge Rodriguez offers a candid look at the gaps between the Federal Rules and today’s data landscape, the realities of AI adoption, and the persistent challenges of proportionality. Key Takeaways The Rules haven’t kept pace with modern data. Collaborative platforms, mobile devices, and ephemeral messaging have outgrown the assumptions of the 2015 amendments, creating new complexity in preservation and proportionality. (“The goal has not been able to keep up with collaborative devices… it’s all just increased in complexity.” )AI is here to stay—and must be used responsibly. Judge Rodriguez emphasizes validation, human oversight, and transparency, while rejecting blanket bans or unworkable disclosure mandates. (“We’re going to have to adopt a responsible use mentality.” )Discovery fights will intensify around AI‑assisted review. Expect disputes over prompts, validation rates, privilege, and sampling—echoes of the TAR wars, but more complex. (“I think it’s going to be even more difficult than the TAR wars.” ) Action Items for Legal Teams Document your process. Whether using keywords, TAR, or AI‑driven workflows, maintain clear records of methodology, validation, and decision‑making.Be transparent with clients. Inform clients when AI tools are used and obtain consent before uploading sensitive materials. (“I would just be transparent with the client from the get go.” )Focus proportionality arguments on marginal utility. Tie requests directly to elements of claims or defenses and articulate why additional data advances the case. Chapters & Timecodes 00:00 – Welcome & IntroductionsDaniel and Brandon open the episode and introduce Judge Rodriguez. 00:01:54 – Why the 2015 Rules Are Struggling TodayJudge Rodriguez discusses the explosion of data sources and the limits of proportionality.(“The goal has not been able to keep up with collaborative devices… mobile phones, ephemeral messaging.” ) 00:03:41 – The Evolution of AI in Legal PracticeHow generative AI differs from earlier predictive coding and what responsible use looks like. 00:06:54 – Validating AI‑Assisted ReviewThe need for human oversight, validation metrics, and realistic expectations. 00:10:34 – Hallucinations, Databases, and OverreactionWhy focusing only on AI failures distorts the conversation. 00:12:32 – Should Courts Require AI Disclosures?Judge Rodriguez explains why mandatory disclosures are unworkable and what his district is considering. 00:16:00 – Client Communication & EthicsWhen and how lawyers should disclose AI use to clients. 00:18:12 – Transparency, TAR Wars, and the Future of E‑Discovery ProtocolsA candid look at pre‑production fights, privilege issues, and validation battles. 00:29:52 – Proportionality Done RightHow to argue proportionality effectively—and what wastes judicial time. 00:36:46 – Are Law Schools Preparing Students?Judge Rodriguez on the gap between legal education and modern practice. 00:41:51 – Why Judge Rodriguez Keeps Returning to NELIA reflection on community, learning, and the value of the conference. Compelling Quote “I’m taking the attitude in my work, hey, there’s some positives here… How can we responsibly adopt some of these AI tools to get to a quicker resolution for our clients with greater accuracy?"

    44 min
  4. NeLI POD Season 2: Ep. 3 with John Benson

    FEB 4

    NeLI POD Season 2: Ep. 3 with John Benson

    Guest Details John Benson, E‑Discovery and Digital Forensics Expert; Founder of SecKC; Formerly with Stinson Morrison Hecker (Kansas City) Episode Overview This episode of The NeLI Pod brings together hosts Daniel Gold and Brandon Mack with Kansas City–based e‑discovery and digital forensics expert John Benson for a deep, practical conversation about AI, confidentiality, and trustworthiness in legal practice. With more than 17 years of experience and a career spanning law firms, cybersecurity communities, and hands‑on technical work, Benson offers a grounded, real‑world perspective on how attorneys can responsibly evaluate and adopt AI tools. Key Takeaways Confidentiality and trustworthiness remain the core tests for legal AI adoption. Benson emphasizes that evaluating AI tools begins with defining the specific risks—especially around cloud storage, training data, and vendor controls.Practical validation matters more than technical theory. Lawyers can safely experiment by testing AI tools on familiar material, checking outputs against known cases or documents, and treating AI as a junior associate whose work must be reviewed.AI drafting becomes dramatically more effective when lawyers use voice, not typing. Dictation allows models to capture a lawyer’s natural cadence and reasoning, producing outputs that align more closely with their authentic writing style. Action Items Define the risk before choosing the tool. Identify whether the concern is confidentiality, cloud storage location, vendor trust, or model behavior—and evaluate tools accordingly.Use enterprise‑grade, first‑party providers for any client data. Avoid consumer apps or third‑party resellers when handling sensitive information.Experiment with your own documents. Validate reliability by testing AI on material you already know well.Adopt dictation for drafting workflows. Speak through your reasoning and let the model learn your voice, then refine the output through iterative prompting. Chapters with Timecodes 00:00 – IntroductionOverview of the episode and introduction of guest John Benson. 00:01:14 – Philosophy of Experimentation in Legal AIBenson discusses balancing healthy experimentation with professional responsibility. 00:03:34 – Security Foundations: Defining the RiskHow to begin evaluating AI tools through a security and confidentiality lens. 00:05:24 – Cloud Storage, Training Data, and Vendor ControlsUnderstanding where data goes—and why cloud fundamentals still matter. 00:09:46 – Trustworthiness, Compliance, and Practical Due DiligenceHow lawyers can assess vendor claims and avoid misleading “checkbox compliance.” 00:12:30 – The DeepSeek Case StudyA real‑world example of why model provenance and hosting location matter. 00:16:23 – Evaluating AI Outputs: Reliability and BiasBenson explains his practical benchmarking approach and the role of task‑specific models. 00:22:36 – Overwhelm in the Legal Market: Where Lawyers Should StartGuidance for attorneys who feel lost in the AI landscape. 00:24:40 – “Get Your Hands Wet”: Safe, Practical ExperimentationWhy lawyers should test AI tools directly using their own materials. 00:25:53 – Dictation as the Future of Legal DraftingHow voice input transforms accuracy, tone, and efficiency. 00:29:56 – When Products Get in the Way of the ModelWhy lawyers should focus on the underlying model rather than the interface. Compelling Quote “Don’t be afraid to get your hands wet. If you get a bad summary, what’s the worst that happens? You learn something—and you go back to reading it the old‑fashioned way.”

    1h 1m
  5. NeLI POD Season 2: Ep. #2 with Judge Kim

    JAN 21

    NeLI POD Season 2: Ep. #2 with Judge Kim

    Guest Details Judge Young KimNorthern District of Illinois, U.S. Federal Court Episode Overview In this episode of The NeLI Pod, hosts Daniel Gold and Brandon Mack sit down with Judge Young Kim to explore how judicial philosophy intersects with the rapidly evolving world of electronic discovery. Judge Kim, the first Asian American appointed to the federal bench in the Seventh Circuit, brings a wealth of experience from his career as a public defender, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and EEOC Administrative Law Judge. The conversation dives into pressing questions about proportionality, reliability, and the role of courts in shaping discovery practices amid technological disruption. From TAR workflows to Gen AI review, Judge Kim offers candid insights into how judges balance fairness, efficiency, and the rule of law when technology outpaces procedure. Key Takeaways Rules as Anchor: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure remain the guiding framework, even as technology advances beyond their original scope.Reliability Over Transparency: Courts defer to producing parties’ review methods, provided they can explain and defend their processes in plain English.Proportionality in Practice: Requests must be supported with specific, concrete examples of burden or benefit; conclusory arguments about metadata or cost are insufficient. Action Items Attorneys should document and explain review processes clearly, using expert testimony when necessary.When raising proportionality objections, provide detailed evidence of burden (e.g., declarations, time studies).Leverage Rule 502(d) protections to streamline privilege review and reduce unnecessary costs. Chapters with Timecodes 00:00 – Introduction and Welcome01:12 – Judge Kim’s Career Path to the Federal Bench02:35 – Courts’ Role in Shaping Discovery Amid Technology Shifts05:09 – Balancing Review Methods and Transparency09:03 – Discovery on Discovery: When Is It Warranted?11:00 – Disputes Over Form of Production and Metadata16:14 – Proportionality and Burden Analysis in Practice19:36 – Rule 502(d) Orders and Privilege Review23:06 – Validating TAR Workflows and Expert Testimony25:39 – Career Lessons Shaping Judicial Philosophy29:29 – Challenges of Authenticating Evidence in the Age of Gen AI32:43 – Looking Ahead: Prompts, AI, and the Future of Discovery Compelling Quote "At the end of the day, this whole litigation process is a truth-seeking process. Sometimes we forget that." –Judge Young Kim

    36 min
  6. NeLI Pod Season 2: Ep. #1 with Robert Keeling

    JAN 7

    NeLI Pod Season 2: Ep. #1 with Robert Keeling

    🎙 Nelly Pod – Episode Show Notes Guest Details Robert Keeling – Partner, Redgrave LLPRobert is a nationally recognized authority on e-discovery, validation, and defensibility. He has led large-scale discovery matters for DOJ and FTC second requests, contributed to the Sedona Conference, and authored influential articles such as Humans Against the Machines and Document Review: You’re Doing It Wrong. Episode Overview In this episode of Nelly Pod, hosts Daniel Gold and Brandon Mack sit down with Robert Keeling to explore one of the most pressing issues in modern legal practice: the intersection of AI, ethics, and discovery. Keeling reflects on his earlier arguments about the enduring value of human judgment and examines how generative AI is reshaping validation, privilege logging, and responsiveness review. The conversation dives into practical frameworks for defensibility, the challenges of authenticating evidence in the age of deepfakes, and the evolving role of specialized discovery counsel. For attorneys, judges, and legal professionals navigating this rapidly changing landscape, Keeling offers both caution and optimism about the future of AI in discovery. Key Takeaways Validation remains essential: Generative AI requires the same statistical validation protocols as TAR, particularly for outward facing uses like responsiveness review.Privilege logging is ready for AI: Keeling argues that generative AI has matured enough to safely generate privilege log entries, though edge cases still require human oversight.Authenticity challenges loom large: Deepfakes and synthetic media pose unprecedented hurdles for evidence authentication, with family law and employment disputes likely to see early impacts. Action Items Differentiate outward-facing vs. internal-facing uses of AI in discovery, applying rigorous validation only where defensibility is required.Document processes proactively and consider sharing protocols with opposing counsel to reduce disputes.Begin testing AI-driven privilege logging workflows, while maintaining human “sanity checks” for complex compilations. Chapters with Timecodes 00:00 – Introduction & Welcome01:13 – Guest Background: Robert Keeling’s Career and Scholarship02:44 – Humans Against the Machines: Revisiting Human Judgment in the Gen AI Era05:27 – Validation & Defensibility: Outward vs. Internal AI Uses10:12 – Prompt Discoverability and Work Product Protection13:12 – Privilege Logging: AI’s Promise and Pitfalls17:34 – Gen AI in Second Requests and Merger Reviews20:10 – TAR 1.0 vs. Continuous Active Learning vs. Gen AI21:37 – Discovery on Discovery: Documenting Processes for Courts and Opposing Counsel23:38 – Evidence Authenticity in the Age of Deepfakes29:11 – Boutique vs. Big Law: The Future of Specialized Discovery Counsel32:36 – The Increasing Complexity of Modern Discovery Compelling Quote “The prompt is clearly work product, and it’s not even a close question. It reflects the thoughts and mental impressions of counsel about the case. To me, it’s classic opinion work product.” – Robert Keeling

    41 min
  7. NeLI Pod #14 with The Honorable William Matthewman

    05/06/2025

    NeLI Pod #14 with The Honorable William Matthewman

    Podcast Show Summary Guest Details The Honorable William Matthewman - United States Magistrate Judge, Southern District of Florida Key Takeaways Evolving Technological Competence: Judge Matthewman emphasized that lawyers must go beyond basic technology knowledge; true ethical practice today requires understanding platforms like Slack, Teams, and the implications of emerging technologies like Generative AI and ephemeral messaging. The Role of the Judiciary in Technology: Judges have an essential responsibility not only to stay updated on e-discovery and ESI (Electronically Stored Information) but also to actively manage cases to ensure fair, efficient, and proportional discovery processes using technology. Generative AI’s Opportunities and Risks: While Gen AI offers exciting new efficiencies, Judge Matthewman warned that it must be properly supervised. Lawyers (and pro se litigants) cannot blindly rely on AI outputs without rigorous verification, as hallucinations and misinformation still pose risks. Action Items Lawyers: Stay updated through CLEs, seminars, and self-study; if technical knowledge is lacking, partner with IT experts or vendors. Judges: Actively educate themselves and help guide lawyers in properly managing e-discovery and technological issues. Organizations: Encourage young lawyers to focus on core legal skills (communication, evaluation, strategy, litigation) while responsibly using AI as an assistant—not a replacement. Pro Se Litigants: Must be cautioned to verify AI-generated legal materials to avoid filing hallucinated or incorrect submissions. Chapters with Timecodes 00:10:11 🎙️ Opening & Guest Introduction: Introduction of Judge Matthewman and his background. 00:11:06 📚 Key Tenets of E-Discovery: Discussing the 10 Tenets from Judge’s Law Review article and their relevance today. 00:13:04📈 Are We Closer to Better E-Discovery?: Status update on the legal community's adherence to better e-discovery practices. 00:14:15 ⚖️ Judges’ Role in Encouraging Tech Adoption: How the judiciary should lead in promoting technological competence. 00:17:59🔥 The Expanding Definition of Competence: Why basic knowledge isn't enough for lawyers anymore. 00:23:03📚 Continuing Legal Education & Lifelong Learning: How lawyers must keep evolving their technology knowledge. 00:24:20🤖 Gen AI's Impact on Law and E-Discovery: Challenges and opportunities Gen AI presents. 00:27:47🕵️ Supervising Gen AI in Legal Work: Why oversight is critical when using Gen AI for document review. 00:30:42👩‍🎓 Young Lawyers and AI: Risks and realities of new lawyers growing up with Gen AI tools. 00:37:17 ⚖️ Equal Access and Pro Se Litigants: Gen AI's double-edged impact on pro se litigants. 00:40:01💡 Building Good Lawyers in a High-Tech Era: Essential skills every young lawyer must develop. 00:44:09 🏛 Judge Matthewman's Legacy Vision: Final thoughts on building a fairer justice system. 00:47:22🎤 Closing: Thanking Judge Matthewman and wrapping up. 🔔 Don’t forget to subscribe to the NeLI Podcast for more expert insights on legal technology, AI, and e-discovery! 🎙 Follow Us: ⁠⁠⁠ LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ X (Twitter)⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Facebook

    37 min
  8. NeLI Pod #13 with Kelly Twigger

    04/29/2025

    NeLI Pod #13 with Kelly Twigger

    Guest Details Kelly Twigger - CEO of Minerva26 Kelly Twigger is the creator of the ESI Practical Guides, host of Case of the Week series, frequent panelist and webinar contributor on eDiscovery topics. She is also a practicing attorney and Adjunct Professor teaching eDiscovery at the University of Colorado at Boulder Law School. Key Takeaways Hyperlinked Documents Pose New Challenges: Courts are inconsistent on whether hyperlinked documents should be treated like attachments. Organizations must proactively manage hyperlink data, and counsel must adapt to technical realities. The Role of Legal and IT Collaboration: Organizations that effectively align legal and IT through strong information governance and proactive policy-setting can better control discovery costs and reduce litigation risk. Generative AI Brings Both Promise and Risk: While Gen AI offers potential efficiencies, it also introduces ethical risks—such as hallucinated case law—that lawyers must diligently supervise and verify. Action Items Develop robust ESI protocols that cover hyperlinks from all storage sources, not just platforms like Google Drive.Educate legal teams on managing hyperlinked documents and ephemeral data properly.Implement better communication between Legal, IT, and Records departments to anticipate discovery needs.Train legal professionals and students to balance AI tool usage with maintaining strong traditional legal research skills.Update and enforce policies around data retention, ephemeral messaging, and possession/custody/control of devices. Chapters with Timecodes 00:00:00 🎙 Guest Introduction: Kelly Twigger's background in eDiscovery and education. 00:05:00📎 Challenges with Hyperlinked Documents: Legal and technical issues, and how courts are grappling with them. 00:15:00 🏛 Organizational Technology Choices: Holding companies accountable for ESI management decisions. 00:22:00🔗 Hyperlinks in ESI Protocols: Lessons from recent cases on improperly scoped ESI protocols. 00:30:00 🛠 Information Governance and IT Collaboration: Building bridges between legal and IT for better discovery outcomes. 00:38:00🚀 Generative AI Risks and Ethics: The promise of AI and the ethical pitfalls lawyers must avoid. 00:47:00 🎓 The Role of AI in Legal Education: How law schools and students must adapt to the new tech-driven reality. 00:55:00🔥 Ephemeral Data Challenges: Why disappearing messaging apps create major risks in litigation. 01:05:00🧩 Future Legal Trends: Predicting how AI and data practices will reshape the legal landscape by 2026. Most Compelling and Thought-Provoking Quote "The tools will change, but our obligation to preserve the integrity of the legal process never will." ✅ This perfectly captures the heart of the episode: technology may shift rapidly, but the ethical responsibilities of lawyers remain constant. 🔔 Don’t forget to subscribe to the NeLI Podcast for more expert insights on legal technology, AI, and e-discovery! 🎙 Follow Us: ⁠⁠⁠ LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ X (Twitter)⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Facebook

    52 min
See All (20)

About

The official podcast of the National eDiscovery Leadership Institute. Here, we bridge the gap between technology and the law, bringing you the forefront of electronic discovery.

Information

  • Creator
    NeLI Pod
  • Years Active
    2024 - 2026
  • Episodes
    20
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © NeLI Pod
  • Show Website
    NeLI Pod