Normalize therapy.

Caleb & Verlynda Simonyi-Gindele
  • 4,6 (360)
  • SANTÉ MENTALE
  • DEUX FOIS PAR SEMAINE

Formerly: The Marriage Podcast for Smart People. Co-hosted by Caleb and Verlynda Simonyi-Gindele. We are married to each other and are both counselors who have worked extensively with couples and individuals. We own Therapevo Counselling Inc., a counselling agency that delivers hope and healing to clients across North America and beyond via secure Zoom video call.

  1. -7 H

    Trickle Truth and Why Recovery Keeps Restarting

    If you've been wondering why your betrayal trauma recovery seems to restart every time your partner discloses something new, your nervous system isn't broken. It's reading new evidence of past deception as a current threat, exactly as it's built to. In this episode we walk through what's actually happening in your body, why more information doesn't bring the calm it seems like it should, and what complete honesty actually means in this season. https://therapevo.com/healing-for-the-betrayed/?utm_source=podcast

    28 min

  2. -4 J

    My Spouse Won't Go to Couples Therapy: What to Do When Only One of You Is Ready

    When one partner wants couples therapy and the other won't come, most advice says wait. Clinically, that's a mistake. Caleb and Verlynda walk through what individual work toward a marriage actually looks like when only one of you is ready, why it isn't a venting subscription about your spouse, and what happens when your spouse finally walks in. Learn more at https://therapevo.com/couples-counseling/?utm_source=podcast

    32 min

  3. 18 MAI

    Why Your Body Remembers the Betrayal (And 3 Polyvagal Resets That Actually Help)

    If you are a year or more past his disclosure and your body is still having reactions that don't feel like you, this episode is for you. Verlynda walks you through the three nervous system states polyvagal theory names, why talk alone plateaus, and three specific resets you can use the next time a trigger hits. Learn more at https://therapevo.com/healing-for-the-betrayed/?utm_source=podcast.

    38 min

  4. 14 MAI

    Is Covenant Eyes Enough for Porn Addiction Recovery?

    You installed Covenant Eyes because you wanted out. For a few weeks, maybe a few months, the screenshots and the reports made it feel like something was finally changing. The frequency dropped. The late-night slide into the phone got harder. And then something odd happened. The behavior slowed, but the pull didn’t. The fantasy kept running. The ogling kept happening. You started wondering, quietly at first, is Covenant Eyes enough for porn addiction, or is there something it was never going to touch? https://youtu.be/BRX1DdvO9xk If you’re asking that question, I want to say something up front. Covenant Eyes is not the problem. In my clinical work with men and women caught in pornography addiction, I’ve seen accountability software do real, legitimate work. It creates friction. It interrupts the automatic pattern. It gives you a moment of pause before the next click. And in the earliest, most volatile stage of trying to stop, that pause has protected marriages, jobs, and faith lives. But the question you’re sitting with is the right one. The software is a fence. A good fence. It is not, by itself, recovery. And if the fence has been up for a year or three and the addiction is still running on the inside of your head, you are not doing Covenant Eyes wrong. You are running into the one thing a fence cannot do. What Covenant Eyes Actually Does Well Before I name the limits, I want to honor what the tool is for. Covenant Eyes and similar products (Accountable2You, Ever Accountable, Canopy, Bark, and others) were built around a legitimate insight: the internet made pornography private, instant, and always available, which stripped away a lot of the old friction that used to slow people down. So the tool reintroduces friction. It puts eyes on the screen. It notifies someone you’ve asked to walk with you. When someone is not fully committed to stopping yet, the visibility alone can still change behavior. For people already in recovery, it removes the easy slip at 1 a.m. when willpower is always weakest. For parents, it does legitimate work keeping early exposure out of a ten-year-old’s phone. None of that is small. I routinely encourage clients to keep accountability software installed through the full length of their recovery work. I do not think of it as a temporary measure you graduate from. I think of it as a fence that stays on the property. The question is never whether to have the fence. The question is what to do about why you keep walking up to it. The Pattern I See in Session Many clients who sit down in my office with Covenant Eyes already running on their phone have some version of the same story. The software is working. The behavior has slowed. Real white-knuckle sobriety is happening, sometimes for months. And yet they are not better. They are often worse. This is where accountability software alone stops being enough for porn addiction, and where the real clinical work begins. If you recognize yourself in any of what follows, you are not failing at Covenant Eyes. You are running into its natural limits. The behavior stops but the fantasy doesn’t This is the most common one. The blocker catches the websites. It cannot stop the scenes already stored in your mind. Clients describe replaying pornography they watched years ago. They describe noticing someone at the grocery store and running a scene in their head on the drive home. The tool stopped the screen. The regulation strategy moved inside the skull, where no software will ever reach. You are finding workarounds, or thinking about them Many clients I sit with tell me they either find a way around the blocker or spend a lot of energy thinking about how to. A second device. An incognito window on a friend’s laptop. A business trip. A forgotten tablet in a drawer. This is not because the person is uniquely dishonest. It is because the underlying drive has not been addressed, so the nervous system keeps sending the signal, and the signal eventually finds a route. The accountability report has become routine The report still goes out. The partner or friend still sees it. The conversations, if they are happening, have become mechanical. Both people are going through the motions of accountability while the actual problem goes unaddressed. The fence is up. Nobody is talking about why the climber keeps coming back. The shame is worse than it used to be This one is counterintuitive. Over months and years, the shame can quietly intensify rather than relax. Because the behavior slowed but the interior state didn’t change, you now have proof, every week, that the thing inside you is still there. The report is no longer reassuring. It has become a scoreboard for a game you aren’t actually winning. Each of these is a sign, not of tool failure, but of something the tool was never designed to treat. What Porn Has Been Regulating All Along Here is the clinical truth almost no porn recovery product wants to say out loud: pornography use, for most people who come to me, is not fundamentally about sex. It is about regulation. Pornography is one of the most efficient nervous-system regulators available. It provides a quick dopamine shift, a shutdown of anxious activation, a brief experience of control when life feels out of control, and a counterfeit sense of connection when attachment is scarce. The brain was not designed to find that cocktail in a phone. When it does, it learns that pathway quickly, and it returns to it under specific conditions: loneliness, stress, shame, conflict, rejection, boredom, unresolved pain. Our clinical experience backs this up. A 2024 study in Archives of Sexual Behavior of over 1,000 adults found that attachment insecurity, both anxious and avoidant, predicts compulsive sexual behavior and problematic pornography use, and that emotion regulation difficulties mediate that relationship. In plain English: if a person struggles to feel safely connected, and if they lack the internal tools to regulate hard emotions, pornography becomes an increasingly strong pull. The porn use is downstream. The attachment and regulation deficits are upstream. We see the same pattern in other data. A 2022 study in the Journal of Sexual Medicine identified difficulties in emotion regulation and loneliness as the strongest independent predictors of problematic pornography use. Not moral failure. Not a willpower defect. A specific, describable clinical pattern that treatment can actually address. Researcher Jay Stringer, studying nearly 4,000 people with unwanted sexual behavior, concluded that the behavior is never random. It is always pointing, like a signpost, toward something underneath: early attachment wounds, unmet needs for validation, unresolved trauma, sustained loneliness, chronic self-contempt. Now ask yourself what a blocker can do with any of that. It can stop the screen. It cannot repair an attachment rupture. It cannot metabolize a childhood wound. It cannot teach a nervous system to regulate something other than a dopamine hit. It was never supposed to. Why Accountability Without Interior Work Can Amplify the Shame Cycle I want to name one more dynamic carefully, because it is often misunderstood. Surveillance without clinical work can quietly turn up the shame dial over time. In a violent or coercive relationship, we would say something entirely different about monitoring. We are speaking here about a marriage or a friendship where safety is not the issue, and both people are trying, in good faith, to help. Here is the mechanism. Accountability software is built to make behavior visible. When the interior driver of that behavior is attachment rupture, trauma, or shame itself, making the behavior more visible without addressing the driver can create a feedback loop. The person sees, every week, a report of what their interior life just did. If the interior life has not changed, the report becomes proof that they are what they fear they are. A 2018 meta-analysis in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that moral incongruence, the distress of believing one thing and behaving another way, is one of the strongest predictors of self-perceived pornography addiction and the shame that attaches to it. More recent research links this shame spiral to worse outcomes, including depression, suicidal ideation, and increased likelihood of the relationship ending over the porn use itself. This does not mean Covenant Eyes is dangerous. It means visibility exposes whatever is underneath, and without care, that exposure can turn into shame. Shame is one of the most reliable fuels for the next relapse. You did not install Covenant Eyes to build a shame generator. If it has become one, the tool is not broken. The tool is missing its partner. How to Use the Fence the Way It Was Meant to Be Used Let me give you the frame I use with clients, because it changes how the tool works inside the therapy. Covenant Eyes is a fence. It is a good fence. Its job is not to make you holy. Its job is to slow you down long enough to ask a specific question when you feel the pull: why am I trying to climb over this right now? Not: why did I fail. Not: how do I hide better. Just: what am I actually reaching for, underneath the behavior, in this specific moment? If you are pulled toward the fence after a fight with your spouse, the answer might be about attachment threat. If it’s after a shame spike at work, it’s probably about self-worth and regulation. If it’s after a long stretch of loneliness, the driver is right there in the name. The fence doesn’t answer the question for you. It just buys you three seconds, a minute sometimes, to ask it. That pause is the tool’s real gift. Everything else follows from whether you use that gift. Almost every client I have seen move from managing the behavior to genuinely recovering does two things at once. They keep Covenant Eyes on. And they do the interior work that lets the pause become me

    27 min

  5. 11 MAI

    How to Be a Safe Man: 7 Markers, Seven Counterfeits, and Why Your Words Aren't Landing

    You can learn every phrase. “I hear you.” “That makes sense.” “I’m not going to get defensive right now.” And your partner’s body can still be on guard when you walk into the room. https://youtu.be/s_NhBOl_QWE That gap, between the words you’ve practiced and what her nervous system reads off of you, is the whole problem. A viral Instagram carousel from @threepercent.co named this recently with seven markers of a safe man, and it circulated widely because women recognized the pattern in their own relationships. We want to take those markers seriously, put some clinical weight behind them, and be honest about what they actually ask of a man who wants to be genuinely safe rather than just convincingly safe. We’ve watched guys take the language home from session and deliver it almost perfectly. It doesn’t land the same. Their partners come back the next week still not breathing easier, and they don’t know why. It’s because safety is not something you say. It’s something she feels in her body. Safety Lives in the Body, Not in the Script Here’s what most men miss: safety isn’t a decision your partner makes with her thinking mind. It’s an assessment her nervous system runs continuously, below her conscious awareness. Stephen Porges, the neuroscientist who developed polyvagal theory, calls this neuroception. Porges describes safety as a state that emerges when the nervous system detects cues of genuine connection rather than threat, and those cues are largely physiological before they’re verbal. In practical terms: her body is scanning for congruence. Your tone, your breathing, the micro-expressions you don’t know you’re making, the quality of your attention, the tension in your jaw. Those signals land before your words do. If the signals say “I am here, I am with you, I can handle this moment” and your words say the same thing, her system can start to settle. If the signals and the words disagree, her body believes the signals. Every time. This is why rehearsed responses fail. A man who has memorized “I’m going to listen without getting defensive” while holding a jaw like a closed fist and a voice pitched two notes too high is telling his partner two different things at once. Her nervous system picks the more honest message. The partners we sit with are rarely confused about whether their husband is saying nice things. They’re trying to make sense of why they still don’t feel calm in the same room with him. Safe Is Not the Same as Nice A lot of men conflate being a safe man with being a nice man. They are not the same thing, and the difference matters. Nice is a surface posture. A nice man is easy to be around. He doesn’t start fights. He smooths things over. He’s well liked. He might also be conflict-avoidant, image-managing, quietly resentful, and deeply invested in being seen as one of the good ones. None of that is necessarily wrong. But none of it is safety. Safe is structural. A safe man holds a steady internal state under pressure. He stays present in hard conversations without collapsing or escalating. He tells the truth even when the truth is awkward. He can be disagreed with without retaliating in a hundred small ways over the next three days. You can lean your weight on a safe man and the floor doesn’t give. Nice men often can’t hold that. Nice men often fold or freeze, then make the relationship pay for it later. Partners of nice men describe a particular kind of loneliness: “He never does anything wrong, but I still can’t exhale.” The guys we sit with who are furthest from safe are often the ones most convinced they’re the good ones. Being nice was their whole strategy for avoiding becoming their fathers. It’s not enough. The 7 Markers of a Safe Man (and Their Counterfeits) Every marker below has a counterfeit version that looks similar from the outside and reads completely different inside her body. If you’re wondering whether you’re the real version or the convincing imitation, there’s a good chance her body has been picking up the difference for a long time. 1. He Regulates Himself Before He Engages The real version: he notices he’s activated, slows down, breathes, and comes back to the conversation from a steadier place. He can tolerate his own discomfort long enough to stay available to her. The counterfeit: he’s “calm,” which means he’s detached, withdrawn, or smug. He uses his composure as a weapon. The message is “I’m fine. You’re the emotional one.” Her body reads that as abandonment, not regulation. Regulation is not the absence of feeling. It’s the capacity to feel it and stay connected at the same time. 2. He Doesn’t Weaponize What She’s Told Him The real version: when she’s trusted him with something vulnerable, he treats it as sacred. He doesn’t bring it up in the middle of an argument to win. The counterfeit: ammunition collection disguised as good listening. He seems to be taking it all in. Three weeks later, her words are coming back at her in a fight. Her nervous system files that away: what she shares with him may not actually be safe. If she’s ever said to you “I can’t believe you just used that against me,” take it seriously. That moment costs more trust than most men realize. 3. He’s Genuinely Curious About Her Inner World The real version: he asks, and he actually wants to know. He doesn’t interrupt the answer. He doesn’t correct her interpretation of her own experience. He treats her inner life as its own country that he’s visiting, not a disorder he’s diagnosing. The counterfeit: explaining her to herself. “You’re not really angry. You’re tired.” “You’re overthinking this.” Esther Perel has written about the pull, in every couple, toward one partner defining reality for the other. In the safe version, both people keep the right to name their own experience. 4. He Tells the Truth, Especially About Himself The real version: he says the hard thing when it needs to be said, including about his own mistakes, his own patterns, and his own fears. His partner doesn’t have to be a detective to know what’s going on with him. The counterfeit: strategic disclosure. He tells her what’s useful for her to know. He shades the truth to protect his image. He says “I’m fine” about things he is demonstrably not fine about. She can feel the curation. Living with it is exhausting. 5. He Owns Impact Before He Defends Intent The real version: when she tells him something he did hurt, his first move is to understand the impact. He lets it land before he explains himself. The counterfeit: “I didn’t mean to” as a conversation closer. His intent becomes the whole subject. He makes her manage his guilt about the thing that hurt her. She ends up comforting him about her own wound, which is disorienting and, over time, crazy-making. John Gottman’s research has shown for decades that defensiveness is one of the most reliable predictors of relational breakdown. Owning impact is the antidote. 6. He Stays Connected Through Disagreement The real version: he can disagree with her and still feel close to her. He doesn’t need her to be wrong in order to be with him. The counterfeit: stonewalling dressed up as “keeping the peace.” He goes quiet. He walks away. He comes back hours later as if nothing happened. Her body knows something did happen. Repeated over years, this is one of the most corrosive patterns in a marriage. 7. He Does His Own Work The real version: he’s in therapy, in a men’s group, reading the books, doing the journaling, talking to a mentor, actually changing. His growth is his responsibility, not her project. The counterfeit: he outsources his healing to her patience. She becomes the therapist, the accountability partner, the explainer. She carries the cognitive and emotional labor of his change. Murray Bowen’s work on differentiation of self gives us a clear frame for why this pattern is so costly: when an adult fuses his wellbeing with his partner’s responses, satisfaction tends to drop for both people, not just for her. A man who does his own work creates the space for his partner to exist as a person rather than a resource. Why Defensiveness Is the Quiet Killer If we had to name the single pattern that undoes the most relationships we sit with, it would not be an explosive one. It would be defensiveness. And defensiveness is almost always self-protection. That’s the reframe that cracks things open for a lot of men. Defensiveness feels, from the inside, like a reasonable response to unfair attack. From the outside, from inside her body, it lands as “he’s protecting himself from me.” Self-protection does not make your partner calmer. It activates her more. The shift is from protecting yourself to protecting the bond. Early in our marriage, if Caleb was stressed about something, he wouldn’t bring it to Verlynda. He told himself he didn’t want to burden her. He thought that was care. What he was actually doing was protecting his own feelings of inadequacy, or shame about a mistake, or the discomfort of not knowing how to solve something. The version of Caleb she got in those moments was a wall. She knew she was being blocked, and the wall felt far less safe to her than whatever mess he was hiding. That’s the paradox. Self-protection in a marriage almost always reduces safety for your partner, because what she registers is not your fine language about “giving you space to handle it.” She registers the closed door. There’s a harder layer underneath this for some men. If you grew up inside patriarchal or misogynistic messaging, some of your baseline scripts about masculinity, emotional expression, authority in a relationship, or what women “really want” are running in the background. You don’t need to be ashamed of having inherited them. You do need to actually exa

    30 min

  6. 7 MAI

    The 72-Hour Porn Addiction Relapse Protocol: What Both Partners Need to Do Right Now

    He told you. Or you found out. Either way, you’re standing in the same room and it feels like the ground just opened up underneath you. https://youtu.be/EZTw3clH99g If you’re dealing with a porn addiction relapse right now, whether you’re the one who slipped or the partner who just learned about it, the next 72 hours matter more than you think. Not because this moment defines your entire recovery, but because what you both do right now will determine whether this setback becomes useful data or the beginning of the end. This article is a protocol. Not a lecture, not a pep talk. A step-by-step guide for couples who want to survive a relapse without burning down everything they’ve been building. We’ll walk through what both of you need to do, what to avoid, and why this moment, handled well, can actually make your recovery stronger than it was before. But before any of that, we need to answer a question most people skip entirely. Wait: Is This Actually a Relapse? The word “relapse” gets used loosely, and that’s a problem. Because what you call this moment changes everything about how you respond to it. In Alcoholics Anonymous, there’s a concept called the “dry drunk.” A dry drunk is someone who has stopped drinking but hasn’t actually engaged in recovery. They’re white-knuckling it. No meetings, no sponsor, no internal work. They’re sober in the narrowest technical sense, but the patterns of thinking and relating that fueled the addiction are completely intact. When a dry drunk picks up a drink again, that’s not a relapse. That’s a continuation of the same addiction with a gap in the middle. The Dry Drunk Pattern in Porn Addiction The same pattern shows up in porn addiction recovery, and it’s more common than most people realize. Some men stop viewing pornography for weeks or months, and their partners believe recovery is working. But nothing has actually changed underneath. There’s no therapeutic work, no accountability structure, no honest self-examination. The person has simply extended the period between acting out sessions. When they use pornography again, the spouse experiences it as a devastating relapse. But clinically, this isn’t a relapse in recovery. This is an active addiction running at a lower frequency. That distinction matters. It matters for the person using pornography, because it tells them the truth about where they actually are. And it matters for the partner, because the response to a relapse in genuine recovery looks very different from the response to discovering that recovery was never happening in the first place. The Three-Circle Framework: Naming What Happened In CSAT (Certified Sex Addiction Therapist) treatment, we use the three-circle worksheet to help individuals define their own boundaries with precision. The inner circle (red) contains the behaviors that constitute a full relapse: the specific sexual behaviors the person has committed to abstaining from. The middle circle (yellow) contains the warning signs and boundary behaviors, the slippery slope: lingering on social media, searching for triggering content, isolating. These are slips. The outer circle (green) contains healthy recovery behaviors. A slip is a yellow-circle moment. It’s a warning sign that something in the recovery plan needs attention. A relapse is a red inner-circle event. Both require a response, but the severity, the clinical meaning, and the conversation with your partner are different. If you and your therapist haven’t built a three-circle plan yet, that’s the first conversation to have after you finish reading this. Why You Can Only Relapse If You’re Actually in Recovery This is the reframe most couples miss, and it’s the one that changes the emotional temperature of the room. You cannot relapse from something you were never recovering from. The word “relapse” only applies when a person has been actively engaged in recovery: working with a therapist or group, building accountability, doing the internal work of understanding their triggers and patterns. When someone in that process stumbles, it’s a setback within a genuine effort. It is not a return to square one. Relapses are to be expected in recovery. That is not an excuse to have them. But it is a clinical reality that reshapes how both partners can think about what just happened. If he relapsed, it means he was actually in recovery. If she slipped, it means she had built something real enough to slip from. The addiction didn’t win. The recovery hit a complication. The Neural Reset Fallacy One of the most damaging beliefs couples carry into a relapse is the idea that one slip erases months of brain healing. It doesn’t. Neuroscience research on addiction recovery consistently shows that the neural pathways built during sustained recovery, the strengthened prefrontal cortex, the reduced reactivity in the reward system, do not vanish after a single episode. A 2019 review published in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews found that recovery-related brain changes are cumulative, and while a relapse can temporarily reactivate old pathways, it does not eliminate the structural gains made during abstinence. Your brain keeps the progress. The work you put in is still there. What a relapse reveals is not that recovery failed, but that there’s a specific vulnerability in the recovery plan that needs to be addressed. The 72-Hour Relapse Protocol The first three days after a relapse are the highest-risk window for both the person in recovery and the relationship. Emotions are raw. Fear is running the show. This is when couples make the decisions they regret most: ultimatums, moving out, ending therapy, or on the other side, minimizing, lying about the scope, or retreating into silence. What follows is a protocol. It won’t make the pain disappear, but it will keep both of you from making this moment worse than it already is. For the Person in Recovery: Disclose, Don’t Hide If you have a disclosure agreement with your partner, honor it. That means telling them within 24 hours. Not waiting for them to find out. Not testing whether they’ll notice. Not telling yourself you’ll mention it at the next therapy session. The problem we see most often in clinical practice is not the relapse itself. It’s the delay. When a person waits days or weeks to disclose, or when the partner discovers it on their own, the betrayal of the concealment often causes more damage than the relapse. The partner’s internal narrative shifts from “he slipped” to “he’s been lying to me again.” Here is the reframe worth sitting with: proactive disclosure is one of the only moments in early recovery where you can actively earn trust. When you come to your partner before being caught, you are demonstrating that honoring the relationship matters more to you than protecting yourself from shame. That doesn’t obligate your partner to feel better about it right away. But it changes what kind of moment this is. It shifts the story from “I was caught again” to “he came to me.” That distinction is not small. It’s one of the most concrete, visible acts of vulnerability available in recovery, and over time, these moments are what rebuild trust. After disclosure, do two things immediately. First, run a HALT-B audit. HALT-B stands for Hungry, Angry, Lonely, Tired, Bored. These five states are the most common entry points for a slip. Before you do anything else, identify which one (or which combination) was present in the hours leading up to the relapse. This isn’t about making excuses. It’s about identifying the gap in your recovery plan. For example, if the HALT-B audit shows “Bored” every time a slip happens, the data tells you something important: the recovery plan isn’t missing willpower. It’s missing meaningful engagement, connection, or structure in the hours where idle time becomes dangerous. That’s a solvable problem. And you would never have identified it without treating the relapse as information. Second, journal the emotional lead-up. Write down what you were feeling in the hours before the relapse. Not what happened, but what you were feeling. Were you anxious? Resentful? Disconnected from your partner? Overwhelmed at work? This becomes clinical data. Bring it to your next session and let your therapist help you trace the thread. Every relapse that gets worked through this way makes the recovery more watertight, because it reveals the areas that haven’t been addressed deeply enough yet. For the Partner: Feel Everything, Decide Nothing Your pain is real and it deserves to be felt. But the first 24 to 48 hours after learning about a relapse are not the time to make permanent decisions. This is the Power of the Pause. When the nervous system is in fight, flight, or freeze mode, the prefrontal cortex, the part of your brain responsible for rational decision-making, is significantly impaired. The urge to act immediately, to move out, to end the marriage, to call his mother, to check his phone, is not wisdom. It’s survival response. Those urges make sense. They are your body trying to protect you. But acting on them in this window often creates consequences that outlast the crisis. The rule: no big decisions for 24 to 48 hours. If you’ve already built a boundaries plan with your therapist, now is the time to refer back to it. A prepared list of options is far more reliable than a plan made from panic. If you haven’t built one yet, that becomes the next priority after this crisis stabilizes. When you’re ready to talk (not in the first hour, not when you’re still shaking), use the Softened Startup. This is a technique drawn from the Gottman method, and it follows a simple structure: Observation, then Feeling, then Need. It might sound robotic at first, and you might have to say it through tears or gritted teeth, but try to move from “You lied again”

    27 min

  7. 4 MAI

    Porn Addiction in Women: Breaking the Silence on the Invisible Struggle

    You’ve probably never told anyone. https://youtu.be/jOWTi9qscTo Not your best friend. Not your partner. Definitely not your therapist. Because every article you’ve found about pornography addiction was written for someone else. Every recovery group is 90% men. Every cautionary story starts with “he.” And somewhere along the way, you quietly concluded that whatever is happening to you must make you some kind of anomaly. A freak. A woman who broke the rules of what women are supposed to struggle with. You’re not a freak. And you are not alone. Porn addiction in women is real, it is increasing, and the silence around it has far less to do with how many women struggle and far more to do with a culture that never built a category for your experience. If you’ve been searching for something that finally names what you’re going through, this article is for you. You’re Not Alone. You’ve Just Been Invisible. If you’ve listened to Normalize therapy. for a while, you may have noticed that most of our pornography content has been written for and about men. That’s a gap worth naming, because that silence is part of what compounds the shame for women who struggle. Here’s what the numbers actually show. A 2024 Barna study found that 44% of women view pornography at least occasionally, up from 39% just eight years earlier. By the end of 2024, nearly 4 in 10 users on the largest pornography platform in the world were female. A 2019 German research study found that approximately 3% of women in their sample experienced what researchers classified as problematic pornography use, with emotional avoidance as a primary predictor. These aren’t small, fringe numbers. And they’ve been climbing for over a decade. When we ran an informal poll of our audience fifteen years ago, roughly 10% of women said they’d viewed pornography in the previous month. Five years later, that number was 30%. The research has been catching up to what many women already knew in private: this isn’t a “male problem.” It’s a human one. And the longer we pretend otherwise, the longer women suffer without support. Why Women Use Pornography (And What the Research Actually Says) There’s a common assumption that men use pornography for the visual stimulation and women use it for emotional reasons. The truth is more complicated, and more important to understand. A large-scale 2020 study published in Psychology of Addictive Behaviors examined pornography use motivations across multiple samples totaling over 2,600 participants. The researchers found that men scored higher than women on nearly every motivation, including stress relief, emotional distraction, and boredom avoidance. The assumption that women use pornography for emotional reasons while men use it for the visual experience is not what the data shows. Both groups use it to regulate how they feel, and men do so at higher rates by self-report. What tends to differ, in our clinical experience, is the self-awareness women bring when they seek help: they have often already named the loneliness or the anxiety that drives the pattern. Many men arrive at that understanding later in recovery. For women, knowing exactly why you’re doing something and still being unable to stop creates its own particular kind of anguish. The Erotica Gateway It’s also worth naming that for many women, the entry point isn’t a video. It’s a story. Explicit novels, fan fiction, audio erotica, series like Fifty Shades of Grey. These feel safer, more socially acceptable, and easier to dismiss as “just reading.” But the neurological pathway is the same. The dopamine cycle doesn’t distinguish between a screen and a page. And because narrative pornography carries less cultural stigma, many women are further along in a compulsive pattern before they recognize it as one. Not Escape. Survival. A 2024 narrative review in Current Addiction Reports confirmed what clinicians have observed for years: pornography is frequently used to regulate unpleasant emotional states or to cope with stressful life events. While it may provide temporary relief, the researchers found that difficulties in emotion regulation and dysfunctional coping strategies are significant risk factors for pornography use becoming problematic. For some women, this coping function runs even deeper. When pornography use is rooted in past sexual trauma, it can serve as a dissociative survival mechanism: a way to experience something adjacent to intimacy without the vulnerability or the risk of being hurt again. This is the fawn response at work. The part of you that learned to manage threat by accommodating found a way to experience connection that felt controllable. That’s not a moral failure. That’s a nervous system doing what it was designed to do in the face of unbearable circumstances. The Double Shame: Why This Hits Women Differently Every person who struggles with compulsive pornography use carries shame. But women carry a second layer that most men never encounter. To understand why, it helps to hear it in the words of women who have lived it. Throughout this article, we’ve drawn on the voices of women who’ve shared their experiences in public online support communities. Their words describe something clinical language rarely captures. One woman described it this way: “I feel ruined, dirty. I can’t help but think I’m a bad person. It feels like whatever good acts I do in real life don’t matter because of the things I’ve sought pleasure in.” That shame isn’t proportional to the behavior. It’s totalizing. It attaches to her entire identity, not just the pattern she wants to change. You can read more about why the shame and relapse cycle feeds itself — and what breaks it. This compound shame has specific roots, and naming them is part of loosening their grip. The “Visual Myth” We are culturally conditioned to believe women are relational and men are visual. When a woman finds herself compulsively drawn to visual sexual content, she doesn’t just feel guilty about the behavior. She feels like she’s failed a fundamental standard of what it means to be female. The research doesn’t support this binary, but the cultural messaging is powerful enough to make a woman feel like something is neurologically wrong with her before she ever considers that she might simply be human. The Madonna-Whore Dichotomy, Internalized In many cultural and religious contexts, a woman is either the virtuous wife and mother or the promiscuous outsider. There is rarely a category for “the virtuous woman who struggles with compulsion.” Without that middle ground, a woman’s brain is left to sort her into one of two boxes. And the one it chooses is almost always the cruel one. The Absence of Mirrors Because the vast majority of recovery resources, support groups, and clinical language around pornography addiction have been written by men for men, women don’t see themselves in the solution. One woman wrote: “I feel like a total freak because every space for this is 90% men.” That absence of reflection reinforces the lie that she is an anomaly. It’s not that women don’t exist in this struggle. It’s that no one built a room with their name on the door. Trauma as a Silent Driver For women whose pornography use is connected to past sexual abuse, sexual violence, or the damaging effects of growing up in environments shaped by patriarchal control, the shame becomes recursive. She’s using a “shameful” tool to manage unbearable pain, and each use confirms the internal narrative that she is beyond help. A 2024 systematic review on the intersection of interpersonal trauma, shame, and substance use found robust associations across varied populations: increased shame is consistently linked to greater compulsive behavior among survivors of interpersonal violence. The cycle feeds itself until someone intervenes with compassion rather than judgment. What Porn Addiction Actually Looks Like in Women One reason women struggle longer in silence is that the most commonly discussed warning sign of pornography addiction, erectile dysfunction, simply doesn’t apply to them. As one woman observed in a public online support community: “It’s very easy for women to ignore these things since the signs of overstimulation and sexual dysfunction are only obvious in men.” Without that visible “canary in the coal mine,” the pattern can entrench itself for years before a woman recognizes what’s happening. Here are the signs that matter, and the clinical reasons behind each one. You keep going back despite wanting to stop This is the core marker. Not frequency. Not content type. The defining feature of compulsive pornography use is repeated failure to stop despite consistent effort and genuine desire to quit. A 2023 qualitative study of women with self-identified problematic pornography use found that every participant reported wanting to stop but being unable to, despite repeated and sustained attempts. You use pornography to manage emotions, not just for pleasure If you notice a pattern where you reach for pornography when you’re lonely, anxious, bored, or emotionally overwhelmed rather than when you’re simply aroused, the behavior has shifted from recreational to regulatory. This is one of the strongest predictors of problematic use across all genders. You feel worse afterward, not better The temporary relief gives way to shame, self-disgust, or emotional numbness. Over time, the gap between the relief and the crash gets shorter. You need more to feel less. It’s changing how you see yourself Self-objectification is a particular risk for women. If consuming pornography is distorting how you view your own body, your worth, or your desirability, or if you find yourself performing sexuality in ways that feel disconnected from your own desire, the pattern is doing more than occupying your

    19 min

  8. 30 AVR.

    Is Watching Porn Cheating? What the Research Says About Betrayal, Fidelity, and Harm

    If you’ve asked this question, you’ve probably already lived the argument. You brought it up, and it got dismissed. “It’s just porn.” “You’re being unrealistic.” “Every guy does this.” And somewhere in the middle of that conversation, the focus shifted from what happened to you, to whether you even had the right to call it what it felt like. https://youtu.be/y7cws2if73k Is watching porn cheating? The honest answer is that it depends on how you define fidelity, and that the definitional debate is often exactly where the conversation gets weaponized against the person who was hurt. This article won’t tell you what to call it. What it will do is give you the research, the clinical picture, and a clear framework for understanding what pornography use actually does to a relationship. You can decide what you want to call it after that. The Debate Gets Used Against You There is a particular kind of conversation that happens when a partner brings up pornography use. The person who was hurt asks a legitimate question. The person who used it offers a technical defense. And the conversation moves from “what happened and how do we address it” to “can you even prove this is a real problem.” The Language of Minimizing In our practice, we hear the same phrases repeatedly from partners who use pornography. “It’s not like I slept with anyone.” “You’re the only one I’m with in real life.” “It doesn’t mean anything.” “Every guy does this.” Each of those statements may be technically true. Each of them also redirects attention away from the actual question, which is: what has this done to us? This is what we call minimizing language. It isn’t always calculated or deliberate. Sometimes the person saying it genuinely believes it. But the effect is the same. The focus moves from the harm to the definition, and the partner who was hurt is left carrying the burden of proof. What You Are Actually Asking Most partners who bring this question into our office aren’t asking for a verdict. They’re asking whether their own pain makes sense. They’ve been told, explicitly or implicitly, that their response is excessive. They want to know if there’s a legitimate basis for what they’re feeling. There is. And the research is clear about why. What the Research Actually Shows The evidence on pornography’s impact on relationships has grown substantially over the past two decades. What it consistently shows is that regular pornography use is not neutral for the people in a committed relationship, or for the relationship itself. How It Changes the Way Partners See Each Other A 2016 study by Rasmussen documented something researchers call contrast effects, meaning the brain begins comparing a real partner unfavorably to the people in pornography, which progressively erodes satisfaction with the actual relationship. The person using pornography may not be making these comparisons consciously. But the neural pattern is being built regardless, and it shows up in reduced desire and increasing dissatisfaction with the actual relationship. This isn’t a moral claim. It’s a neurological one. The brain responds to repeated visual stimulation by recalibrating its expectations. A real partner, with a real body and a real life, tends to lose that comparison. What It Does to Her A 2012 study by Stewart and Szymanski found that a partner’s pornography use predicted lower relationship quality and lower self-esteem in female partners. Critically, the research showed that self-esteem was mediated, meaning it was the pathway through which pornography use damaged the relationship, not just a side effect. Her sense of herself as desirable, valuable, and enough was being eroded, and that erosion was the mechanism through which the relationship deteriorated. Crawford and colleagues, in a 2023 grounded theory study (a qualitative research method where patterns emerge directly from participants’ own words rather than from a predetermined hypothesis), interviewed women whose partners had used pornography. What they found was that these women described the experience using language nearly identical to how people describe discovering a physical affair: betrayal, rupture of trust, and a fundamental questioning of the entire relationship. The Attachment Injury Underneath Research by Zitzman and Butler (2009) tracked what happened to relationships over time when pornography use was present. What they found was a progression they described as an attachment fault line. A fault line is a fracture in the relational foundation. Left unaddressed, it develops into a rift (a significant break in the emotional bond) and eventually estrangement (full emotional withdrawal from the relationship). These aren’t just evocative terms. They describe measurable stages in a relational process. Why This Feels Like Betrayal Even Without a Physical Act Intimate partnership is built on emotional availability, responsiveness, and the sense that your partner is orienting toward you. What pornography use often does, even when kept entirely secret, is create a competing source of sexual arousal that bypasses the actual partner. The betrayed partner often senses this before they have language for it. A feeling that something is off. A distance they can’t explain. A sense that their partner is physically present but somewhere else entirely. When they eventually discover the pornography use, they frequently describe it as confirmation of what they already knew, not as new information. That felt sense of absence is real. And it precedes the discovery. For more on how this kind of betrayal registers neurologically and physiologically, how betrayal trauma impacts the brain and body goes deeper on the physical experience of discovering a partner’s hidden behavior. The Secrecy Factor One of the clearest indicators that a behavior has crossed a relational boundary is that it requires concealment to continue. If pornography use were genuinely neutral for a relationship, it wouldn’t need to be hidden from a partner. Most pornography use in committed relationships involves exactly that: deleted browser history, use during times when a partner won’t notice, active denial if asked directly. The secrecy isn’t incidental. It reflects an awareness, however suppressed, that the partner would not consent to the behavior if they knew about it. That awareness matters, because it means one person has been making unilateral decisions about the terms of the relationship. What Fidelity Actually Requires This is where the definitional question is worth engaging directly. Fidelity, in its classical sense, doesn’t mean physical exclusivity alone. It means loyalty, trustworthiness, and the consistent prioritization of the relationship. The Ogling Question There is a meaningful distinction between noticing that someone is attractive and choosing to pursue that attraction. A committed person can find other people attractive. That’s not a failure of fidelity. What changes the relational calculus is intentionality: seeking out content for the purpose of sexual arousal, returning to it repeatedly, and keeping that behavior hidden from a partner. The question we sometimes put to couples in our office is this: Is your sexual attention something your partner would recognize as theirs? Or has a significant portion of it moved somewhere else? That question tends to cut through the definitional debate fairly quickly. What Partners Consistently Name as the Loss When we sit with betrayed partners, what they grieve isn’t usually an abstract principle. They grieve specific things: the feeling that they were enough. The assumption that their partner’s desire was oriented toward them. The belief that what they had was exclusive, even if the specific terms were never formally negotiated. These are legitimate relational expectations in a committed partnership. Their loss is a genuine injury, regardless of what we decide to call the cause. For the Man Who Is Watching If you’ve read this far and you’re the one who has been using pornography, this section isn’t written to condemn you. We work with men in this situation regularly, and what we see is that this behavior rarely started as an act of disregard for a partner. It usually started much earlier, often in adolescence, as a way to manage stress or loneliness or boredom, before any partner existed to be hurt by it. But you’re not in adolescence now. Seeing the Full Picture The research above describes, with some precision, what your use is doing to your partner. The contrast effects quietly reshaping how you perceive her. The self-esteem pathway through which she is being harmed. The attachment fault line opening underneath your relationship, whether you can see it or not. Most men who come into our office didn’t think it was doing that. They had operated on the assumption that what happened on a screen had nothing to do with what happened in the relationship. That assumption, the research is clear, is wrong. And now that you can see it more clearly, the question worth sitting with is this: knowing the pain this is causing her, what would you do to actually protect her? Not just to stop a behavior, but to become someone she can feel safe with again? What Protection Actually Looks Like Stopping the behavior is necessary. It isn’t sufficient. Genuine recovery means developing the capacity to be with the internal states that pornography was previously managing: stress, loneliness, boredom, emotional discomfort. That capacity can be built. It’s the actual work of recovery, and it changes not just the behavior but the person behind it. Pornography use tends to narrow emotional range over time. Recovery tends to expand it. The expanded capacity for presence, attunement, and genuine connection is what healthy intimacy actually requires. And it’s available to

    28 min
Tout afficher (338)

4,6
sur 5
360 notes

À propos

Formerly: The Marriage Podcast for Smart People. Co-hosted by Caleb and Verlynda Simonyi-Gindele. We are married to each other and are both counselors who have worked extensively with couples and individuals. We own Therapevo Counselling Inc., a counselling agency that delivers hope and healing to clients across North America and beyond via secure Zoom video call.

Informations

  • Création
    Caleb & Verlynda Simonyi-Gindele
  • Années d’activité
    2014 - 2026
  • Épisodes
    338
  • Classification
    Contenu explicite
  • Copyright
    © 2026 by Caleb & Verlynda Simonyi-Gindele. For personal self-help use only.
  • Site web de l’émission
    Normalize therapy.

Vous aimeriez peut‑être aussi