O, Word?

DeeSoul Carson

In this podcast, poet DeeSoul Carson speaks to writers about craft, processes, and the work that keeps them writing. deesoulpoetry.substack.com

Episodes

  1. Eponymous | "Resting B***h Face" by Dr. Taylor Byas

    10/13/2025 · BONUS

    Eponymous | "Resting B***h Face" by Dr. Taylor Byas

    Note: This transcription is edited to facilitate the reading experience. To see every word uttered in this recording, please click the “Transcript” button for captioning you can follow :) DeeSoul Carson: And it was just like, what a crazy thing to say! You know, you’re a professor of poetry at this big institution and you’re just like, people of color aren’t doing sonnets?!?! They aren’t doing sonnets?!?! Taylor Byas: Yeah, like just say, you don’t read. Just say that. DC: Right! Just say that. I would have respected that answer. I won’t like it, but I respect that. TB: Right. I might email you some recommendations after class, but okay! Yeah! DC: But you’re like, what am I going to do? I get it. I also have the things that I prefer. But she was just like, they don’t write them. TB: Like alright, well — DC: Wrong answer, fo’head, let’s try that one again! [The poets laugh and the intro music plays] DC: Hello, poets of the internet! I’m DeeSoul Carson, and this is Eponymous, an extension of the O, Word? podcast that is interested in poets, their collections, their title poems, and how they find their ways into our hands. Today’s episode is on Resting B***h Face by Dr. Taylor Byas. Dr. Taylor Byas, PhD, edits for The Rumpus, Jack Legg Press, Beloit Poetry Journal Editorial Board, and Texas Review Press. Her debut full-length, I Done Clicked My Heels Three Times from Soft Skull Press, won the 2023 Maya Angelou Book Award, among others. Her second full-length, Resting B***h Face (2025), which we’ll be discussing today, is a September pick for Roxane Gay’s Audacious Book Club. She is represented by Noah Grey Rosenzweig at Triangle House Literary. Taylor, hello! TB: Hello, hello. DC: How are we doing? TB: I’m wonderful. Happy to be here. How are you? DC: I’m doing great. I’m so happy that you’re here. I’m super appreciative. Your new book is in the world now. How do you feel? TB: It’s like, exactly a month now, maybe two days past a month, and it has been good. It’s interesting because the first book came out almost exactly two years ago. And, you know, I had no expectations for the first book. And somehow, interestingly, I’m, like, simultaneously more nervous about this one. But then I also have these moments where I feel kind of completely detached to it. And I think that’s a symptom more so of just the state of the world more than anything else. And maybe things just feeling not as important as maybe they would if we were in a better moment. DC: Yeah, I mean, I’m super excited about it. I finished reading it yesterday. I was trying to prepare for this interview. And I think it’s just so great. I understand what you’re saying, like the second book is kind of its own thing. Like there’s that energy around the first book, you’re like “the debut, now it’s out,” then it’s like, “oh, I have to do that… again.” Is that kind of the sensation you had while you were putting it together? TB: It is. You know, I think one thing that maybe people didn’t really tell me was… you know for a lot of people — unless you have just won like a ton of huge awards, and you’re someone who just has a lot of eyes on you — it’s very easy for people’s second and, you know, third, fourth books to kind of like not get the same attention as the debut as well. DC: Yeah. A lot of hype around a debut. TB: Yeah, yeah, a lot of hype around a debut and then it’s just, there’s just a difference with that second book, and I’m very fortunate that there was still some really great publicity around Resting B***h Face but, for example, we didn’t get any blurbs for the second book. Like, we sent out blurb requests we didn’t get any blurbs for Resting B***h Face, and they were like “this is actually something that’s pretty common with second books,” which I didn’t know. And so I just think it’s so interesting that there are things that happen the second go-round that no one really kinda tells you, that you aren’t really prepared for. And I know now it’s not personal, like I know those people that we asked were just busy and had 10,000 things to do but you know sometimes you do take a little personally and your feelings do get hurt and you do feel... DC: I mean, it’s your baby. How could you not? TB: You know, it’s my baby. Right. And of course, you know, no one cares about it likely more than I do, and that’s its own thing. But there is a way that I think you have to reshape your expectations for a book after the debut, for sure. DC: That’s fair. I never even thought about, like what that… ‘cause in my head, I keep tabs. I’m like, “okay, I want this person to talk in the second book, this person talking in the third book,” but that’s really actually, really eye opening. So given that this is Eponymous, I did want to start with the title. And I’m curious, was Resting B***h Face always, like, did you always know that’s what it was gonna be? Or were there like other titles that you were also kinda juggling? TB: So the first version of this book was my dissertation. And Resting B***h Face absolutely was not the title. DC: [Laughing] That’s not what you put to the — to the people at the PhD? TB: — That’s nottttt what I put on there. Don’t go look it up y’all. It’s a different title on the dissertation. The title for the dissertation, if I remember correctly, was Corrupt[i]on and then the “I” was in parentheses because I do think that there is something in the collection about the I, that it kind of emerges or kind of breaks out of this mold and moves towards a more autonomous being. And so that was actually the title. Then we sold it to Soft Skull. And that’s actually when we changed the title. And I was so happy that they were like “Resting B***h Face is it” because I was kind of like, “oh, I don’t know how the press would feel about, you know, having this curse word in the title. If they’re kind of like, oh, that’s too much.” They were like “Resting B***h Face is the title.” So it actually didn’t change until we had gotten to the Soft Skull and talked about it with them, yeah. DC: Speaking of that I that you’re talking about, your eponymous poem “Resting B***h Face,” kind of speaks a bit to this phenomena of both being observed and the observer. And I’m wondering if you could speak to more of how you feel this poem represents the collection as a whole. TB: So, that poem came into being because of the height of the pandemic when masks were like, heavily mandated everywhere, I like, it occurred to me that men had stopped telling me to smile because I couldn’t police my face because I couldn’t see it. And so then I got to thinking about this way women are not only observed, not only constantly under surveillance, but all of the different ways that we are expected to appear a certain way, expected to behave a certain way, how even as we’re going about our days, minding our business — as we’re deep in our thoughts, as we’re stressed, as we’re worried — we’re expected to kind of be approachable and welcoming and warm and inviting. And interestingly enough, the phrase, “resting b***h face” is this thing that gets weaponized and thrown at you if you don’t appear that way. It’s like, you know, this insult. So I, the poem, kind of confronts that gaze, which is something that I wanted this book to do. I wanted this book to be the stare down, like, that stares back at the, sort of, watcher until they back down ,sort of thing. I wanted “resting b***h face” to go from this insult to this kind of act of resistance, like yes you’ve called out my resting b***h face and now I’m going to look even meaner in your face until you leave me the hell alone, type of thing. And I think the book is very much engaged in a similar sort of movement. It definitely goes from being watched, poems in which there is a lot of watching happening — the speaker is being watched, the speaker finds themselves in these scenes where they also find themselves being watched. And then, as the book progresses, the speaker emerges more and more, “Resting B***h Face” is kind of, like, right at the center of the book. It’s kind of like a hinge point. After that poem, you see the speaker kind of getting more ballsy, and getting more empowered to speak in similar ways. [Transitional music plays] DC: There’s definitely this emphasis in the book on performance and presentation that I felt throughout, that I think you’re speaking to here. And, you know, this assumes this sort of interpretation of the woman’s expression by some external party. You know, a lot of what we’re talking about is like the presence of the male gaze. And I’m thinking a lot in this book of just how much the speaker is moving through that, right? It’s a book that is ostensibly dealing with a lot of art, you know, art pieces, art styles, art techniques. But it’s really kind of the subtext that is tracking this woman’s movement through these things. There’s this double consciousness happening. Speaking more about the art part, though, for people who haven’t read the book yet, the sections of the book are named after different kinds of art making techniques. And so much of the book itself is inspired by various kinds of art. So I’m wondering if you can — this is more of a craft question — can you speak about your relationship to ekphrasis? TB: Yes. That’s my girl. Yeah, I was a fiction writer in undergrad and, you know, I had it in my mind that I was gonna graduate and go on to write the great novel and that’s hilarious and — DC: — you still can, you still can! It is poets’ time for fiction, it really is. TB: I know, I say that as I’ve actually started a novel, so just like, just bear with me. But at the end of undergrad, I actually took an ekphrastic poetry class. The entire semeste

    24 min
  2. O, Summer Slump!

    09/29/2025

    O, Summer Slump!

    Hellooooooo poets of the internet. Have you ever had that thing happen to you where you passed the imaginary deadline you made for a thing you were trying to do, and after you missed that deadline, it felt more and more impossible to return to said thing? No? Just me? Well, this is me trying to get back into this project of a newsletter I set out for myself. Cozy up, cause in this post I’m reflecting on the summer, my journey doing the Sealey challenge (along with a breakdown of the whole '“archetype” thing some of you asked me about), and some things I’m looking forward to regarding this Pubstack in the future (yes, I’m still trying to make Pubstack ™ a thing). And hey! Thanks for being here :) Where in the World Have I Been? No one is asking that question, but I’m going to answer it for you anyway, cause that’s how I am. In short: everywhere! In long: nowhere at all, really! Because of my job, summer is the busiest time of year for me. I help to oversee a program that, in the summer, involves me overseeing 150 middle- and high- schoolers everyday for a month, not to mention their undergraduate advisors that have their own set of worries and wishes and life happenings to attend to. I absolutely love this job… and it is also the most tiring part of my year. I get home from work each day in July ready to fall into bed, and the next thing I know, I’m up to do it all again. And this is just from ONE MONTH of doing this. All of this is to say: please thank the K12 teachers in your lives. They are truly God’s strongest soldiers. July is also an emotionally draining time because it marks the anniversary of my mother’s passing. I know what you’re thinking: how many times is DeeSoul going to work his dead mom into a story? And all I can say is, if you knew this woman like I did, she’d be on your mind all of the time too. The Dead Mom’s Club is a strange one to be in, especially as a poet, but I am grateful for the work of many poet friends that has gotten me through the past year of that transition. While I am noticing that poets have a LOT to unpack about their parents, I am always so inspired by the endless ways we can talk about the people who have molded us into the people we are. Some other things that happened this summer: I was named a 2025 Ruth Lilly & Dorthy Sargent Rosenberg Fellow AND I had the awesome opportunity to be a Sun Valley Writers’ Conference Fellow, thanks to the invitation of my former professor. The experience was so much more insightful than I even expected it would be, and it was nice to imagine, at least for a few days, what kind of world we could live in if writers were regarded in the way we regard our doctors and lawyers and other kinds of well-regarded people. It was also very strange to be in a place marked by so much wealth and where so many of the attendees looked… not like me. There was an interesting thought that occurred to me, not just about who gets to write and have their work lauded as a writer, but what demographics of people are afforded the time to read and then shape conversations about literature. As I found out during The Sealey Challenge, having the time to maintain a consistent reading is a privilege. My ability to read 31 books in one month was greatly aided by having a job that’s workload decreases greatly in August. Many of us suffering under capitalism do not get this same kind of break, and that kind of obstacle really limits the conversations we can have with folks. Imagine a world where work wasn’t our life, where we were afforded the time to go and learn more about our interests, reading or television or gaming or knitting or dancing or so much more, a world that valued our artistic enrichment as much as it capitalizes on our productivity. A bit of a tangent, I know, sorry, but what a thought! The Sealey Challenge (and a breakdown of what I read) As mentioned above, the other major part of my summer was participating in the Sealey Challenge. It has been a while since I attempted this challenge, frankly due to the stamina it requires, but I was motivated by the Open Books fundraiser for the Sameer Project. I documented my reading journey on my instagram story and posted daily reflections on the books I read, but something I got several questions about was my “archetypes” category in my reading journal. I’ve briefly touched on it before, but the archetypes thing comes from a talk I attended by Franny Choi at the Watering Hole Writing Retreat. In this talk, Choi presented us with four kinds of collections poetry books can fall under, and being a visual learner, I synthesized this into a kind of graph for myself. This framing has helped me think about the ways I put collections into conversation by considering two dimensions that comprise the book-shaping experience: What drives the collection (concept or emotions) and what dictates the ordering collection (are the poems ordered in a way that makes logical sense or emotional sense?). These two dimensions create four possible kinds of books you could encounter, but as I found through my reading, it does not encompass what every book is trying to do, requiring a flexibility of these archetypes. Below, I will offer a more specific explanation of the book archetypes I encountered and which books (for me) fell under them. I think it is important to note, however, that the way one receives a book is subjective, despite the author’s intentions. How I classify a book may not be the way you classify a book, and that’s okay! I think it is more important that you form a vocabulary for work that suits you and helps you to put things in conversation with one another. The Speaker’s Journey The first four of these archetypes are taken from those presented in Choi’s talk: The Speaker’s Journey, The Essay, The Playlist, and The Formula. Of these, I believe the Speaker’s Journey is perhaps the quickest to identify, although I complicated the category a bit for myself later on. Although the “properties” for these categories are flexible, collections in this archetype seemed to me to be ordered in a way that was logical for the speaker. This does not necessarily mean we started at the beginning, but there is some kind of narrative that the reader is led through. The collections are driven emotionally by the stakes of the narrative and the speaker’s relationships. In short, the collection is telling us a story of the speaker in verse that we piece together as we move forward. Examples from My Sealey Challenge: * Cold Thief Place by Esther Lin * Love Locks by Kieron Walquist ★ * Root Fractures by Diana Khoi Nguyen ★ * Stag’s Leap by Sharon Olds * So Long this Wound Stayed Open by Juliana Chang The Essay The second archetype, The Essay, can sometimes be a bit harder to pin down, but I generally interpret it as a collection that is prompted by a central question, argument, or artifact, with poems circulating around that central point. For example, I would categorize my own collection, The Laughing Barrel, in this archetype (and yes, this is a shameless plug). The central artifact, the laughing barrel, is an image that encapsulates the absurdity of racism and the thin line between joy and survival Black people face, and the poems in the book (as much as I can help it) respond back to that image. Collections in this archetype are often ordered in a seemingly logical way as they build the argument, and some poems in these collections may serve to support the work’s argument, as opposed to standing on their own. In this same vein, they are driven by their concept or question and seek to speak back to it throughout the work. Examples from My Sealey Challenge: * We Contain Landscapes by Patrycja Humienik * Bint بنت by Ghinawa Jawhari * Judas Goat by Gabrielle Bates * Survived By: An Atlas of Disapperance by Stephanie Niu * Black Bell by Alison C. Rollins ★ * Composition by Junious Ward The Playlist The third archetype, The Playlist, is all about vibes. Instead of communicating a clear narrative like the Speaker’s Journey or an argument like the Essay, the Playlist often centers itself around a feeling — love, loss, loneliness, anger, hope. These collections are more interested in walking us through an emotional journey than a hero’s journey. Poems in these collections are often ordered in a way that centers the emotional arc, the momentum that carries readers from one poem to the next. Poems in these collections (with exceptions, of course) do not lean on each other as much as they seek to uphold the emotional umbrella of the work. Examples from My Sealey Challenge: Ghost Of by Diana Khoi Nguyen ★ The Black Unicorn by Audre Lorde Testify by Douglas Manuel I Would Define the Sun by Stephanie Niu Fieldnotes on Ordinary Love by Keith S. Wilson ★ I Do Everything I’m Told by Megan Fernandes Flip by Victoria Mbabazi Night Sky With Exit Wounds by Ocean Vuong Mizna | Catastrophe, Volume 25.1 (Periodical) ★ Kingdom Animalia by Aracelis Girmay Spells of My Name by I.S. Jones ★ Brood by Kimiko Hahn the space between men by Mia S. Willis The Formula The last of the original four, the Formula, is the most “you know it when you see it” of the bunch. This archetype encompasses collections with very specific kinds of rules for themselves. I actually don’t have any books from the challenge that I read that fall under this category, but one I read earlier this year would be American Sonnets for my Past and Future Assassin by Terrance Hayes. In this collection, every poem shares the same title, and they are all sonnets that rope into heroic sonnets. This tight formal constraint, like those of other collections in this archetype, rules the book and its structure. While not always as concerned with an argument or narrative, there is an emphasis on play and engagement. The Soundtrack As I progressed farther into my challenge, I realized that the four archetypes w

    14 min

About

In this podcast, poet DeeSoul Carson speaks to writers about craft, processes, and the work that keeps them writing. deesoulpoetry.substack.com