Power Unit

Mark

Covering automotive icons, the stories behind the machines and great drives. Direct automotive analysis & market reporting. pwrunit.substack.com

Episodes

  1. 4d ago

    Toyota Built Its Name on Never Breaking. Now What?

    Toyota’s entire reputation rests on one claim: its trucks last. According to iSeeCars, the Tundra tops all full-size pickups with a 28.2% chance of reaching 250,000 miles. But today, the third-generation Tundra’s twin-turbo V6 is under three separate engine recalls covering more than 270,000 vehicles. While Consumer Reports still ranks Toyota number one overall for brand reliability, J.D. Power’s 2026 Vehicle Dependability Study of three-year-old trucks left the Tundra completely off the podium, ranking Ram, Chevrolet, Ford, and GMC in the top spots. In this episode of Power Unit, we dig beneath the headlines and corporate press releases to answer two central questions: how did a brand built on trucks that last end up here, and does the reputation still hold? IN THIS EPISODE: • The V8 to V6 Transition: Why Toyota dropped the 5.7L 3UR-FE for the twin-turbo V35A-FTS. • The Chronology: From the first failure reports in March 2022 to NHTSA safety recall 24V-381. • The Remedy Shift: Why Toyota moved from 70,000+ full engine replacements to the acoustic accelerometer “hammer” inspection. • The Third Recall (26V-320): What Toyota’s February 2026 findings reveal about timing chain tension and bearing load. • Independent Teardowns: Analyzing Eric at I Do Cars’ findings and what physical engine wear patterns show. • The Scoreboard: Why Consumer Reports and J.D. Power disagree on modern Tundra reliability. • The Domestic Mirror: Examining GM’s 597,000-vehicle L87 6.2L V8 recall and Ford’s 153 recalls in 2025. • The Owner & Buyer Playbook: NHTSA VIN checks, warranty realities, and how to evaluate a used third-gen Tundra. • The Final Verdict: Is the Tundra’s reputation permanently stained? CHAPTERS: 00:00 - The 250,000-Mile Benchmark vs. Three Recalls 01:11 - Replacing the Tried & True 5.7L V8 01:38 - The Failure Timeline: March 2022 to May 2024 02:30 - The Remedy Change: Accelerometer & Controlled Hits 03:06 - The Third Recall & Bearing Pressure 03:48 - Independent Teardown Analysis 05:10 - The Scoreboard: Consumer Reports vs. J.D. Power 06:43 - A History of Brand Recoveries 07:16 - Three Perspectives: Defending, Piling On, or Deflecting 08:30 - GM L87 6.2L & Ford Recalls: The Industry Context 10:19 - What Tundra Owners and Used Buyers Need to Know 11:37 - The Verdict: Does the Reputation Hold? CITATIONS & DATA SOURCES: • iSeeCars Longest-Lasting Cars Study • Consumer Reports Brand Reliability Rankings (Dec 2025) • J.D. Power U.S. Vehicle Dependability Study (2026) • NHTSA Recall Campaigns: 24V-381 & 26V-320 CONNECT WITH POWER UNIT: YouTube: @pwrunit This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit pwrunit.substack.com

  2. Sep 28

    Built in America, Banned Anyway: Why Polestar Got Kicked Out of the U.S.

    The Volvo EX90 and the Polestar 3 are built in the same South Carolina factory under the same Chinese parent company, Geely. One is on U.S. dealer lots. The other was banned. This episode explains how the Commerce Department’s Connected Vehicle Rule changed what makes a car “foreign,” and what it means for Chinese automakers, U.S. carmakers, and your next car purchase. For decades, building in America made a car domestic. In 2026, the deciding factor is where a vehicle’s software comes from. In this episode: * The September 2026 letter from U.S. automakers, suppliers, and dealers urging President Trump to keep Chinese automakers out, even those building in the U.S. * The Connected Vehicle Rule (15 CFR 791): software restrictions starting with model year 2027, hardware restrictions starting with model year 2030 * Volvo vs. Polestar: same ownership, same plant, different outcomes, and the differences in their software setups that may explain it (Commerce has not published its reasoning) * How trade fights used to work, from the 1963 Chicken Tax to the 1981 Japanese import cap, and why the “build it here” playbook no longer works * What this means for BYD, Xiaomi, Leapmotor, and American car buyers Power Unit is automotive industry analysis for people who want to understand what’s happening behind the headlines. Watch the video version on YouTube. Connect with Power Unit: YouTube: Power Unit If you found this analysis valuable, please follow the show and leave a rating or review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit pwrunit.substack.com

  3. Sep 17

    The $3,500 Screen Scam: Why Car Touchscreens Are Built to Fail

    In-car infotainment systems are now responsible for one out of every four problems reported in new vehicles. While mechanical reliability, engines, and suspensions improve every year, dashboard touchscreens are the only major component getting worse right off the lot. In this episode, we break down the hard manufacturing numbers behind the “Software-Defined Vehicle” (SDV) trend. We cover how automakers use off-the-shelf supplier displays to slash interior Bill of Materials (BOM) costs—replacing expensive switchgear, precision knobs, and complex wiring harnesses with a single panel—only to mark it back up as a $2,000 to $3,500 “Technology Package.” We also trace the 40-year failure cycle of digital dashboards: why GM had to scrap the 1986 Buick Riviera’s touchscreen CRT, how Ford’s 2011 MyFord Touch resulted in a $7 million class-action lawsuit, and why Euro NCAP regulations and brands like Volkswagen and Porsche are finally forcing physical controls back into the cockpit. Inside the breakdown: * The BOM Trick: Why swapping physical switches for glass saves automakers millions while adversely impacting the driving experience * The 5-Year Hardware Lag: Why brand-new cars run on sluggish, obsolete mobile chips * The 40-Year Cycle: The recurring failures of 1986, 2011, and today’s all-touchscreen trend * The 2-Second Test: A simple rule to evaluate any new car interior before you buy Are you ready to see real buttons and knobs return to the dashboard, or do you prefer the clean look of all-screen interiors? Share your take in the comments. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit pwrunit.substack.com

  4. Sep 5

    Forgotten Icons: The Menacing 1990s Nissan You Weren't Supposed to Have

    When most enthusiasts think of 1990s Japanese icons, the R32 Skyline GT-R and Mark IV Supra get all the glory. But hidden on a quiet residential street in Japan sits a very different kind of legend: the Y33 Nissan Gloria Gran Turismo. With its quad round headlights, British tourer stance, and a twin-turbo V6 pushing power through a Z32-derived chassis, the Y32 captures peak Bubble Era engineering. Beneath the sheet metal, it also carries one of Nissan’s sharpest internal rivalries: the conservative, chauffeur-driven Cedric versus the Prince-bred, performance-focused Gloria. In this first episode of Forgotten Icons, we unpack why Nissan built two identical flagships for competing dealer networks, how structural engineering preserved the pillarless hardtop look, and why aging highway racers transformed this executive cruiser into underground VIP royalty on the Hanshin Expressway. In this episode: The dealership divide: Prince Motors DNA vs. Bluebird conservatism Bubble Economy over-engineering: VQ30DET power, multi-link suspension, and hidden B-pillars The rise of bippu (VIP) culture: How Kansai street racers claimed the Y33 Which side of the showroom floor are you taking: the sinister, quad-round Gloria or the formal chrome of the Cedric? Join the discussion in the comments. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit pwrunit.substack.com

About

Covering automotive icons, the stories behind the machines and great drives. Direct automotive analysis & market reporting. pwrunit.substack.com