Questioning Medicine

Questioning Medicine

Join Andrew on a medical rollercoaster as we ask a medical question and answer it based on recent published papers.  

  1. 13H AGO

    424. GLP1 and NAION

    Li H-Y, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists and risk of optic nerve or vision-threatening events in patients with type 2 diabetes or cardiometabolic diseases: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2026 Mar 1; 49:526. DOI: 10.2337/dc25-1929. Heberer K, et al. New-onset nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and initiators of semaglutide in US veterans with type 2 diabetes. JAMA Ophthalmol 2026 Feb 12; [e-pub]. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.6262. Noh Y, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and risk of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2026 Feb 17; [e-pub]. DOI: 10.2337/dc25-2577.         Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy is the kind of diagnosis that makes every clinician's stomach drop: sudden, often permanent vision loss, and not much we can do about it. It has always been rare, but a growing body of work is now pointing to a possible link with one of the most widely discussed drug classes in medicine: GLP-1 receptor agonists.   Three new studies add fuel to that conversation. First, a large meta-analysis pooled 20 randomized trials with about 80,000 participants-mostly people with type 2 diabetes followed for roughly three years. In that dataset, GLP-1 agonists did not increase a composite of serious ocular events and did not show a signal for ischemic optic neuropathy specifically. On the surface, that sounds reassuring.   But the observational data tell a more worrying story. In a U.S. veterans cohort of around 100,000 patients with type 2 diabetes already on metformin, investigators compared add-on semaglutide to add-on empagliflozin over a median of two years. The rate of NAION was higher with semaglutide-about 123 versus 67 events per 100,000 person-years. A separate analysis using a U.K. primary care database of roughly 500,000 people with type 2 diabetes found a similar pattern: those starting a GLP-1 agonist had a higher 1-year risk of NAION than those starting a DPP-4 inhibitor (18.5 vs. 7.2 events per 100,000 person-years).   These new results line up with prior observational work suggesting roughly a doubling of NAION incidence among GLP-1 users. So why the disconnect with the meta-analysis of randomized trials? It's almost certainly about design rather than biology. None of the trials were built to capture rare, unexpected eye events: vision outcomes weren't prespecified, routine eye exams weren't mandated, and the definitions of ocular safety events were inconsistent. In that setting, a signal as uncommon as NAION can easily be undercounted or missed entirely.   What should clinicians do with this? For most patients, the cardiometabolic benefits of GLP-1 agonists will still far outweigh a very small absolute risk of a rare optic neuropathy. But when we start or continue these drugs, especially in patients who already have vascular risk factors for eye disease, it's reasonable to add one more line to the counseling script: there is a rare association with NAION, and any sudden change in vision warrants urgent evaluation. This isn't a reason to abandon GLP-1s-but it is a reminder that even our most promising therapies can carry risks we only discover once they're widely used.

    8 min
  2. 3D AGO

    422. Finerenone restores fertility?

    Lin Z, et al. Antifibrotic drug finerenone restores fertility in premature ovarian insufficiency. Science 2026 Feb 5; 391:eadz4075. DOI: 10.1126/science.adz4075.   Premature ovarian insufficiency is usually one of those diagnoses that shuts the door on fertility: ovarian function is lost before age 40, mature follicles are scarce to nonexistent, and we have no reliable way to turn things back on. In most textbooks, that's the end of the story.   A group in Hong Kong is now asking a different question: what if the problem isn't just the follicles, but the neighborhood they live in? In aged mice, they found that the ovarian stroma becomes fibrotic and stiff, and that this mechanical stiffness itself seems to suppress follicle maturation. Loosen up the stroma, and previously dormant follicles begin to wake up.   To turn that concept into something clinically relevant, the team screened nearly 1,300 drugs that are already approved for other human uses, looking for agents that could activate follicles in mice. Ten made the cut. One of them, finerenone-an oral nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist better known to nephrologists and cardiologists-also reduced collagen production in the ovarian stroma, effectively softening the tissue environment.   That observation led to a small, first-in-human trial. Fourteen women with POI-associated infertility received finerenone 20 mg twice weekly, with monthly ultrasound monitoring. Over 3 to 7 months, follicular development was seen in all participants, and eight produced mature oocytes. IVF was attempted when possible, and early embryos were obtained in three women; longer-term follow-up and pregnancy outcomes are still pending.   It's a fascinating mechanobiology story: instead of stimulating the follicle directly with gonadotropins or growth factors, the intervention targets the physical properties of the follicular niche. But there are important caveats. The study is tiny, uncontrolled, and POI is not an absolute guarantee of infertility-spontaneous ovulation and pregnancy do occasionally occur. Without a control group and without live-birth data, we cannot know yet how much of this signal represents true drug effect versus background noise.   For now, finerenone should stay firmly in the realm of clinical trials when it comes to fertility. But conceptually, this work opens a new front: treating infertility not just as an endocrine or genetic problem, but as a disease of tissue mechanics. If future studies confirm these findings, we may be looking at the beginnings of a paradigm shift in how we think about "irreversible" ovarian failure-and a new source of hope for patients who today are told their options are exhausted.

    6 min
  3. FEB 25

    421. Scabies and DUKE criteria

    Stavropoulou E, et al. Reassessing the 2023 International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Duke clinical criteria for infective endocarditis: Impact of excluding fever and updating diagnostic definitions. Clin Infect Dis 2025 Dec 31; [e-pub]. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaf737.    Big takeaways About 35% of patients truly had IE. Fever showed up in 80% of patients both with and without IE, so it did not help distinguish them. Dropping fever from the criteria actually made them better:   Sensitivity improved: 77% (no-fever) vs 74% (standard). Specificity improved a lot: 80% vs 49%. "Possible IE" shrank from 39% to 17%, meaning fewer gray-zone cases. Only 0.4% of patients without IE were incorrectly labeled as having IE.  Both are widely used and both can work for regular (non-crusted) scabies.   The SCRATCH trial: who won? In the SCRATCH trial from France, researchers treated about 1000 people in 300 households with confirmed scabies. Each household was randomized to:   Whole-body 5% permethrin cream on days 0 and 10, or Oral ivermectin (weight-based) on days 0 and 10. They then checked who was cured at day 28.   Here's what they found: Household cure rates Permethrin: 88% cured Ivermectin: 72% cured Translation: For every 6 households treated with permethrin instead of ivermectin, one extra household was fully cured (NNT  6).   Index (main) patient cure rates Permethrin: 92% Ivermectin: 77% That's one extra person cured for about every 7 treated with permethrin instead of ivermectin (NNT  7).   Side effect Skin irritation-type reactions: 14% with permethrin vs 10% with ivermectin. So permethrin wins on cure, with a small trade-off in local skin reactions.

    12 min
  4. 12/15/2025

    418. Beta Blockers Post MI, PSA, Youtube,

    10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.005.40675327 All of the videos were found to be useful or very useful, 99% were of moderate or high reliability, and 99% had moderate to excellent educational quality  Prostate-specific antigen levels among participants receiving annual testing. JAMA Oncol 2025 Nov; 11:1341 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.3386.40965920 PSA levels at or above 4.0 ng/mL fell below that threshold on the next annual test 30% of the time. 10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00250-4. During 10 years of follow-up, patients in the PKA and TKA groups did not differ significantly in pain, function, or quality of lifehttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2508026?query=TOC Among patients who underwent CABG for an acute coronary syndrome, ticagrelor plus aspirin did not result in a lower incidence of death, myocardial infarction, stroke,  https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2509907?query=TOC In this trial, a high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine did not result in a significantly lower incidence of hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia than a standard dose among older adults.    https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2509834?query=TOC Among community-dwelling adults 65 to 79 years of age, there appeared to be fewer hospitalizations for influenza or pneumonia with high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine than with the standard dose but the NNT is like 1500!   https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12594118/ Afib should not be screened even if the authors say yes   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40997143/ defines the US cost-effectiveness threshold as $120 000 per quality-adjusted life year gained,    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40481660/ In CKD, electronic letter nudges for patients or primary care practices did not differ from no letters for prescriptions of guideline-recommended RASis or SGLT2is at 6 months.     https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S0140673625015922?returnurl=https:%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0140673625015922%3Fshowall%3Dtrue&referrer=https:%2F%2Fclinician.nejm.org%2F β-blocker therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction and mildly reduced (40–49%)    https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2512686#ap2&uccLastUpdatedDate=2025-12-12%2005%3A34%3A29.658%20%2B0000&rememberMe=false In this meta-analysis including individual-patient data from five randomized trials, beta-blocker therapy did not reduce the incidence of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or heart failure in patients with an LVEF of at least 50% after myocardial infarction without other indications for beta-blockers.

    41 min
4.9
out of 5
75 Ratings

About

Join Andrew on a medical rollercoaster as we ask a medical question and answer it based on recent published papers.  

You Might Also Like