reeducated

Goutham Yegappan

Conversations reimagining, rethinking, and reinventing modern education.

  1. 2d ago

    Why Humans Don't Think Like Economists | Dr. Colin Camerer | Behavioral Economist, Neuroeconomics Pioneer, and Professor of Behavioral Economics at California Institute of Technology | S13 Ep19 | #240

    For decades, economics was built around a simple assumption: people are rational. But what if that assumption is only partially true? In this episode, I sit down with Colin Camerer, one of the pioneers of behavioral economics and neuroeconomics, whose work helped transform economics into a discipline that takes psychology, cognition, emotion, and biology seriously. We begin with his unusual educational journey as a gifted student and trace how he became interested in the puzzles that traditional economic theory struggled to explain. Our conversation explores what economists mean by rationality, why people systematically deviate from rational models, and how behavioral economics emerged as an attempt to better understand real human decision-making. Colin explains concepts such as choice consistency, Bayesian reasoning, judgment under uncertainty, and the psychological forces that shape our choices. Along the way, we discuss financial markets, game theory, cooperation, incentives, and the limits of human prediction. We also examine the rise of neuroeconomics, cultural evolution, and artificial intelligence. Colin shares how technologies like AlphaGo reveal new forms of human learning and how AI may reshape the future of expertise, decision-making, and scientific discovery. This episode is an exploration of how humans think, why we make mistakes, and what economics can learn from psychology, neuroscience, and human behavior. Chapters: 00:00 – Introduction 01:00 – Growing Up as a Gifted Student 06:30 – Educational Acceleration and Early Learning 12:00 – Discovering Economics 16:20 – The Market Efficiency Hypothesis 18:30 – Why Behavioral Economics Emerged 19:37 – What Does It Mean to Be Rational? 25:00 – Choice Consistency and Bayes' Rule 31:00 – Why Humans Deviate from Rational Models 37:00 – Heuristics, Biases, and Judgment 43:00 – Game Theory and Strategic Thinking 49:00 – Cooperation, Competition, and Incentives 55:00 – Neuroeconomics and the Brain 01:01:00 – AI, Decision-Making, and Human Learning 01:07:00 – Cultural Evolution and Collective Intelligence 01:13:15 – AlphaGo and the Future of Expertise 01:15:30 – Closing Reflections Colin F. Camerer: https://www.hss.caltech.edu/people/colin-f-camererBooks & Media Mentioned Books Thinking, Fast and Slow — Daniel KahnemanJudgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases — Kahneman, Slovic & TverskyThe Foundations of Statistics — Leonard SavageThinkers Referenced Daniel KahnemanAmos TverskyEugene FamaHerbert SimonJohn NashJohn von NeumannGames & Technologies AlphaGoChessGo

    1h 16m

  2. 3d ago

    Who Should Decide a Child's Education? | Jishnu Das | Development Economist and Professor of Public Policy at Georgetown University | Season 13 Episode 18 | #239

    In this episode, I sit down with Jishnu Das, a development economist and professor at Georgetown University, to explore what economics can teach us about education, human behavior, and social policy. We begin by unpacking the economist's way of thinking through "if-then" models and how these frameworks shape debates about college, educational investment, and public policy. Along the way, we discuss why American higher education is unusual compared to much of the world, how economists think about uncertainty and future decision-making, and why education can be understood as a form of insurance against an unpredictable future. The conversation then shifts toward one of the most important questions in education: who should have the authority to make decisions about a child's schooling? Drawing on decades of research in Pakistan and other low-income contexts, Jishnu challenges assumptions about whether poor parents can make informed educational choices. We explore public versus private schools, the role of parental preferences, educational inequality, and the long-standing tension between family authority and state authority. From Martin Luther in the sixteenth century to contemporary school boards, we examine how societies have wrestled with this question for centuries. What stayed with me most was Jishnu's argument that educational progress is ultimately about creating more inclusive and deliberative systems. We discuss Hirschman's concepts of exit and voice, Habermas and deliberative democracy, community institutions such as Panchayats and Seva Mandir, colonial education in India, and the challenge of respecting multiple forms of knowledge. The episode closes with findings from an eighteen-year study tracking 5,000 children across Pakistan and what it reveals about the long-term value of education, migration, earnings, and human opportunity. Chapters: 00:00 – Introduction 01:27 – Why Economics and Education Need Each Other 05:00 – The Power of Economic "If-Then" Thinking 11:00 – Why American Higher Education Is So Unusual 13:20 – Human Capital Beyond Wages 16:05 – Public vs. Private Schools 20:10 – Do Poor Parents Know What's Best for Their Children? 21:50 – Externalities, Public Goods, and Educational Policy 25:00 – Bourdieu, Cultural Capital, and the Limits of Economics 26:20 – Uncertainty, Risk, and Education as Insurance 29:15 – Tracking 5,000 Children Across Pakistan for 18 Years 31:20 – Parents, Schools, and Educational Authority 37:00 – Exit, Voice, and Community Accountability 41:20 – Deliberative Democracy and Educational Progress 46:30 – Seva Mandir, Panchayats, and Local Decision-Making 50:10 – Colonial Education and Macaulay's Legacy 54:15 – Measuring Educational Success 57:00 – Education, Economic Mobility, and Spillover Effects 01:00:00 – Migration, Opportunity, and Long-Term Outcomes 01:04:00 – Why We May Be Underinvesting in Education 01:05:30 – Closing ReflectionsJishnu Das:https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/contact/0031Q000021vmDOQAY/jishnu-das Books & Documents Mentioned Exit, Voice, and Loyalty — Albert O. HirschmanWeapons of the Weak — James C. ScottMacaulay's Minute on Education (1835) Thinkers Referenced Gary BeckerPierre BourdieuJürgen HabermasAlbert O. HirschmanJames C. ScottMartin LutherThomas Babington Macaulay

    1h 6m

  3. Jun 15

    You See What You Know | Johanna Drucker | Breslauer Professor of Bibliographical Studies in the Department of Information Studies at UCLA | Season 13 Episode 17 | #238

    In this episode, I sit down with Johanna Drucker, Breslauer Professor of Bibliographical Studies at UCLA and one of the leading scholars working at the intersection of visual culture, information design, digital humanities, and the history of knowledge. We explore a deceptively simple question: what does it mean to know something? Johanna argues that visual forms are not merely ways of presenting knowledge but are themselves ways of producing it. From scientific illustrations and maps to graphs, typography, architecture, and works of art, she shows how every visual representation shapes what we are able to perceive and understand. Our conversation examines the hidden assumptions embedded within information graphics, the limitations of objectivity, and why all visualizations involve choices about what to include, emphasize, and ignore. We discuss the relationship between seeing and knowing, the role of subjectivity in human understanding, and why experiences, perceptions, and aesthetic judgments often contain forms of knowledge that resist quantification. Along the way, we explore architecture, social media, art, mathematics, scientific observation, and the growing divide between empirical and humanistic ways of understanding the world. What stayed with me most was Johanna’s argument that education should not simply train people to process information but should help them cultivate richer ways of perceiving reality. As artificial intelligence increasingly takes over routine tasks, she suggests that distinctly human capacities such as curiosity, creativity, observation, conversation, drawing, movement, and reflective experience may become even more important. This episode is ultimately an exploration of perception itself and a reminder that learning begins not only with what we know, but with what we learn to see. Chapters: 00:00 – Introduction 01:03 – What Is Visual Epistemology? 03:13 – Scientific Illustration and Learning Through Observation 06:12 – Why We See What We Know 07:20 – The Historical Elevation of Words Over Images 10:10 – Objective Knowledge vs. Lived Experience 12:01 – Why Information Graphics Are Never Neutral 15:18 – Teaching People How to Read Visualizations 18:23 – Beyond Critique: Building Better Ways of Seeing 21:14 – Social Media, Creativity, and New Visual Forms 24:09 – Time, Culture, and Changing Forms of Communication 25:20 – Humanistic Knowledge vs. Empirical Knowledge 28:25 – Architecture, Beauty, and Perception 31:17 – Aesthetics as a Foundation of Knowledge 34:07 – Language, Images, and Wittgenstein 36:22 – Schooling, Measurement, and Experiential Learning 39:02 – AI and the Future of Human Creativity 43:16 – What Art Does That Nothing Else Can Do 45:15 – Why Experiential Learning Matters 47:35 – Drawing, Watercolor, and Artistic Practice 50:20 – Finding the Through-Line Across Disciplines 51:24 – Social Physics and Human Relationships 56:10 – Curiosity, Pedagogy, and Lifelong Learning 59:30 – Managing Creative Energy and Burnout 01:02:05 – Experiencing Life Without Judgment 01:03:58 – Closing Reflections Books & Media Mentioned Wittgenstein's Gallery — Johanna DruckerThe Meaning of Life — Monty PythonLife of Brian — Monty PythonThinkers Referenced Ernst GombrichLudwig WittgensteinRené DescartesWilliam IvinsWilliam Carlos Williams

    1h 4m

  4. Jun 15

    From Credential Society to Learning Society | Mitchell L. Stevens | Organizational Sociologist and Professor at Stanford University | Season 13 Episode 16 | #237

    In this episode, I sit down with Mitchell Stevens, an organizational sociologist and professor at Stanford University, to explore how education became one of the defining institutions of modern society. We begin by unpacking a distinction that fundamentally reshapes how we think about the topic: schooling, education, and learning are not the same thing. Mitchell argues that much of our public discourse treats these concepts as interchangeable, leading us to measure years spent in school rather than the broader ways people develop knowledge, skills, and understanding throughout their lives. Our conversation traces the historical rise of the American "schooled society," from universal public schooling to the postwar expansion of higher education and the emergence of college as the primary pathway into adulthood. We discuss how credentials became the dominant mechanism for sorting people into labor markets, why alternative pathways largely disappeared, and how this credential-focused system shaped both educational policy and cultural expectations. Mitchell also explores apprenticeship systems, vocational pathways, lifelong learning traditions, and the growing movement to imagine alternatives to the college-for-all model. What stayed with me most is Mitchell's vision of a learning society. As artificial intelligence challenges long-standing assumptions about skills, work, and schooling, he argues that we may need to rethink education not simply as preparation for employment, but as a lifelong process of self-development, community participation, and human flourishing. This episode is an invitation to imagine what education could become if we stopped equating learning with credentials and started building institutions around learning itself. Chapters: 00:00 – Introduction 02:57 – Discovering Homeschooling and Alternative Education 06:45 – Schooling, Education, and Learning: What's the Difference? 10:42 – How America Became a Schooled Society 15:10 – The Rise of College as a Path to Adulthood 20:04 – Credential Society vs. Learning Society 21:30 – Apprenticeships, Vocational Pathways, and Alternative Routes 25:57 – Lifelong Learning Beyond School 28:16 – The Limits of Skills-Based Hiring 32:21 – Education as Self-Fashioning and Human Development 35:39 – The Hidden Benefits of Schooling 39:07 – AI, Work, and the Future of Learning 44:03 – Beyond Critique: Imagining New Educational Futures 47:32 – Closing Reflections Mitchell L. Stevenshttps://ed.stanford.edu/faculty/stevens4

    48 min

  5. Jun 11

    The Groundhog Day of EdTech | Justin Reich | Director of the MIT Teaching Systems Lab and Educational Researcher at MIT | Season 13 Episode 15 | #236

    In this episode, I sit down with Justin Reich, Director of the MIT Teaching Systems Lab, to examine the recurring cycle of technological hype in education. We explore why every new wave of innovation from film strips to smartboards to ChatGPT arrives with promises of transformation, yet rarely produces the sweeping improvements people expect. Justin argues that educational technology follows a predictable pattern: excitement, overreach, weak evidence, and eventual normalization. Large language models may feel unprecedented, but the underlying dynamics are deeply familiar. Our conversation moves into what schools should actually do in moments of uncertainty. Rather than chasing “best practices” for AI literacy, Justin suggests that we don’t yet know what works—and pretending we do may cause more harm than good. He explains why schools must experiment locally, evaluate student work carefully, and resist the pressure to race toward adoption. We also discuss the idea of subtraction in schools: instead of constantly adding initiatives, educators may need to remove practices to make space for thoughtful experimentation. What stayed with me most is the call for humility. Schools are designed to conserve knowledge, not to chase every technological shift. If the past century of edtech teaches us anything, it is that transformation rarely comes from the tool itself. This episode invites listeners to slow down, question hype cycles, and think more carefully about what real learning actually requires. Chapters: 00:00 – Introduction 01:35 – From Classroom Teacher to MIT Researcher 05:00 – The “Groundhog Day” Pattern in EdTech 10:05 – Why Technology Rarely Transforms Schools 15:50 – AI in Classrooms: Arrival Without Adoption 21:30 – The Problem with “Best Practices” for AI 27:00 – Experimentation Over Certainty 32:15 – Subtraction in Schools: Doing Less to Do Better 38:20 – Discipline Differences and Local Context 44:00 – Improvement Science and Small Experiments 49:30 – Humility, Uncertainty, and the Future of AI 52:15 – Closing Reflections Justin Reich https://tsl.mit.edu/team/justin-reich/

    54 min

  6. Jun 9

    The Evolution of Money Over 2,500 Years | Barry Eichengreen | Professor of Economics and Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley | Season 13 Episode 14 | #235

    In this episode, I sit down with Barry Eichengreen, Professor of Economics and Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley, to trace the evolution of money across more than 2,500 years of history. We begin with the Lydian king Croesus and the invention of coinage, exploring how early societies transitioned from commodity money to state-backed currencies. Barry explains how monetary systems spread through empires, how technological innovations like paper money and credit transformed exchange, and how each shift reshaped global power. Our conversation then turns to the rise of dominant global currencies, from the Roman solidus to the British pound and eventually the U.S. dollar. We examine what it actually means for a currency to be “dominant,” why the dollar is used in transactions even when the United States is not involved, and what economic, political, and military conditions make a currency globally trusted. Barry outlines the advantages of dollar dominance, including lower borrowing costs, safe-haven flows, and geopolitical leverage, while also explaining the risks that come with debt, political instability, and institutional decline. What stayed with me most is the historical perspective. Monetary systems do not last forever. They evolve, rise, and sometimes collapse as technology, power, and institutions change. From coinage to fiat money to digital currencies and crypto, the story of money is ultimately a story about coordination, trust, and political authority. This episode places today’s debates about the dollar and digital currency into a much larger historical arc. Chapters: 00:00 – Introduction 01:37 – Writing Money Beyond Borders 03:30 – The Lydians and the Birth of Coinage 06:20 – From Commodity Money to Paper and Credit 10:00 – Money as Social Convention and State Authority 14:15 – Multiple Currencies and Local Systems 17:00 – Why Global Monetary Systems Rise and Fall Faster Over Time 21:40 – What Makes a Currency “Dominant”? 24:50 – The Dollar as Global Lingua Franca 27:55 – The Advantages of Dollar Dominance 31:40 – Debt, Political Stability, and Currency Decline 35:50 – Teaching Economics: Models vs. History 42:45 – Living in a World of Black Boxes 49:30 – Individuals Who Shape Monetary History 52:10 – Final Reflections on the Future of Money

    54 min

  7. Jun 1

    Capitalism After Neoliberalism | Fred Block | Research Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Davis | Season 13 Episode 13 | #234

    In this episode, I sit down with Fred Block, Research Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Davis, to examine the relationship between markets and the state. We explore the persistent myth that markets operate independently of government intervention, and Fred argues that modern capitalism has always depended on public institutions, policy design, and state-backed innovation. From industrial development to technological breakthroughs, the role of government is far more central than popular economic narratives suggest. Our conversation moves into the rise of neoliberalism, the political shifts that reshaped economic governance, and the consequences of privileging market logic above all else. We discuss how innovation ecosystems rely on public investment, why the self-regulating market is largely a fiction, and how democratic institutions can guide economic transformation. Fred challenges the idea that state involvement distorts markets, instead showing how markets are structured, sustained, and stabilized through public authority. What stayed with me most is the recognition that economic systems are political systems. They are shaped by choices, institutions, and power. This episode invites listeners to reconsider what capitalism is, who builds it, and how democratic societies might reclaim a more intentional role in shaping economic life. Chapters: 00:00 – Introduction 02:10 – Fred Block’s Intellectual Background 07:30 – What Was Neoliberalism? 14:20 – The Myth of the Self-Regulating Market 21:40 – How States Actually Build Markets 29:10 – Innovation, Public Investment, and Hidden Government 36:25 – The Political Shift Toward Market Fundamentalism 43:15 – Inequality, Power, and Economic Institutions 50:30 – What Comes After Neoliberalism? 58:10 – Reclaiming Democratic Economic Governance 01:02:40 – Final Reflections & Closing Fred Block:- https://sociology.ucdavis.edu/people/fred-block

    1h 5m

  8. May 25

    Professional Capital and the Future of Teaching | Andy Hargreaves | Research Professor at Boston College and Professor Emeritus at the University of Toronto | Season 13 Episode 12 | #233

    In this episode, I sit down with Andy Hargreaves, Research Professor at Boston College and Professor Emeritus at the University of Toronto, to explore what meaningful educational change actually requires. We examine decades of reform efforts, from standardization and accountability to professional collaboration and leadership. Andy argues that many reform movements fail because they prioritize short-term metrics over long-term capacity building. Our conversation focuses on the idea of professional capital, the collective expertise, judgment, and collaboration that enable teachers to thrive. We discuss why teaching cannot be reduced to technical compliance, how leadership shapes school culture, and why sustainable improvement depends on trust, equity, and system-level coherence. Andy reflects on global reform movements, the tension between policy mandates and professional autonomy, and the importance of investing in human relationships within schools. What stayed with me most is the emphasis on sustainability. Educational change is not about quick wins or competitive ranking. It is about cultivating environments where educators can grow, collaborate, and respond thoughtfully to complex social realities. This episode invites listeners to reconsider what it truly means to reform education in a way that lasts. Chapters: 00:00 – Introduction 02:05 – Andy Hargreaves’ Journey into Educational Reform 07:10 – The Rise of Standards and Accountability 13:40 – Why Reform Movements Fail 19:30 – Professional Capital and Teacher Expertise 26:15 – Leadership, Trust, and School Culture 33:00 – Equity and System-Level Change 40:10 – Global Reform Trends and Lessons Learned 47:25 – Sustainability vs. Short-Term Results 54:10 – The Future of Teaching as a Profession 01:00:40 – Final Reflections & Closing Andy Hargreaves: https://www.andyhargreaves.com/

    1h 5m
See All (240)

Ratings & Reviews

4.4
out of 5
7 Ratings

About

Conversations reimagining, rethinking, and reinventing modern education.

Information

  • Creator
    Goutham Yegappan
  • Years Active
    2022 - 2026
  • Episodes
    240
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © Goutham Yegappan
  • Show Website
    reeducated