Read Beat (...and repeat)

Steve Tarter

If you're like me, you like to know things but how much time to invest? That's the question. Here's the answer: Read Beat--Interviews with authors of new releases. These aren't book reviews but short (about 25-30 minutes on the average) chats with folks that usually have taken a lot of time to research a topic, enough to write a book about it. Hopefully, there's a topic or two that interests you. I try to come up with subjects that fascinate me or I need to know more about. Hopefully, listeners will agree. I'm Steve Tarter, former reporter for the Peoria Journal Star and a contributor to WCBU-FM, the Peoria public radio outlet, from 20202 to 2024. I post regularly on stevetarter.substack.com. 

  1. "Tigers Between Empires" by Jonathan Slaght

    2 NGÀY TRƯỚC

    "Tigers Between Empires" by Jonathan Slaght

    It’s a familiar story: the animals we’ve all known since we were children, the lions, tigers, and elephants, all disappearing from the wilds due to loss of habitat, hunters, or a changing environment. So how gratifying is it to learn that in one part of the world, a wintry forest area between Russia and China, that the Siberian tiger is actually making a comeback? That’s what Jonathan Slaght writes about in Tigers Between Empires: The Improbable Return of Great Cats to the Forests of Russia and China. The proper reference for the Siberian cat is Amur tiger for animals that live in the Amur River basin, which forms part of the border between Russia and China.  By whatever name, they are an endangered species. In the final years of the Cold War, only a few hundred of these great cats remained. And make no mistake, the Siberian tiger is a great cat. It weighs in at almost 700 pounds, and can reach 11 feet in length. A tiger can leap up to 15 feet in the air and drag or carry prey weighing 1,000 pounds. It can devour 60 pounds of meat at one sitting--but seldom does  A meal can take many days to find in the wild, especially with changing political conditions. When the Soviet Union fell, catastrophe arrived, with poaching and logging taking a fast, astonishing toll on an already vulnerable species. Slaght, who now travels the globe for the Wildlife Conservation Society, charts the incredible story of a 35-year program that brought Russian and American scientists together to help save the tigers.  He shows how this coalition laid the foundations of new tiger research across Asia, transforming public opinion around tigers from something to be feared and hunted to creatures we must protect. Today, tigers occupy only 7 percent of the land they did 100 years ago, disappearing from the wild across Bali to Iran. In the ongoing global crisis of species destruction, Slaght brings us hope for the future. Slaght gives credit to the people who worked on the project over the years, Americans like Dale Miquelle and John Goodrich along with several Russian scientists. Slaght’s account of how the tiger project progressed reveals that conservation is not for the weak of heart. Tagging a wild tiger so that it can be tracked for research purposes is no simple matter. Is there enough tranquilizer in the dart to do the job? What about the aim? What about confronting an enraged tiger caught in a trap? There’s also endless waiting for researchers to find their tigers. Dealing with shortages in the field was made even worse with the collapse of the Society Union,  a time when the research project was just coming together. Slaght cited another possible success story is underway with the relocation of Amur tigers to Kazakhstan. Tigers are being reintroduced into the Balkhash Nature Reserve, an environment that closely mirrors where tigers roamed many years ago.  Slaght’s first book, Owls of the Eastern Ice, also documents a conservation story. But the difference between owl and tiger is one of territory. While the owl secures only a small part of the forest, one lone Siberian tiger ranges in an area that might encompass more than 500 square miles. While powerful hunters, tigers are at the mercy of the environment. With the recent outbreak of African Swine Fever striking down Russia’s population of wild boar, a favorite tiger dish, the great cats have had to turn to villages for food. When tigers confront an angry public, it never turns out well for the tiger. Yet Slaght believes progress is being made. If not for the animals' sake, for our own. International collaboration is essential to conservation, he noted.

    24 phút
  2. "Boss Lincoln" by Matthew Pinsker

    3 NGÀY TRƯỚC

    "Boss Lincoln" by Matthew Pinsker

    Abraham Lincoln has been characterized in many ways: as a father, statesman, lawyer, writer, speechmaker, and military leader. He served as U.S. President during this country’s Civil War, grappling under the intense pressure that could have split the nation in two permanently. There are probably more books written about Lincoln than about any other individual in U.S. history. Add one more. Matthew Pinsker, a history professor at Dickinson College in Carlisle, Pa., has written Boss Lincoln: The Partisan Life of Abraham Lincoln. This is a look at Lincoln the politician. Honest Abe may have split rails and freed the slaves, but he also practiced politics.  “Matthew Pinsker performs a small miracle by writing something fresh and important about Abraham Lincoln,” noted Alan Traylor, author of American Civil Wars, adding, “Pinsker reveals a pragmatic politician adept at building coalitions, doling out patronage, and even playing the dirty tricks of old-school politics.” Lincoln was a tireless politician at a time when politics was a little different from what it is now, said Pinsker, calling his subject a workaholic. In the 19th century, a politician wrote letters, made speeches, traveled by rail or stagecoach (or steamboat when it was appropriate), all the while cultivating political allies who could be called on to provide support when needed. Pinsker lays out how Lincoln hit the national stage when he made his first visit to Chicago in 1847 to speak at the River & Harbor Convention. The National Intelligencer, a Washington, D.C. paper, noted that “Mr. Lincoln … (made) some sound and sensible remarks.” The following year, Lincoln made a series of speeches in Massachusetts. This was 1848, a time of movements. You had the civil rights movement with the Underground Railroad transporting runaway slaves to safety, and a burgeoning women’s rights movement highlighted that year by a conference in Seneca Falls, N.Y., with Elizabeth Cady Stanton. “This was no era of good feeling,” noted Pinsker, pointing to political discontent that exceeded the polarization of our present period. This was a growing nation. By 1850, there were 30 states and 23 million people, of which three million were slaves. There were a variety of political parties in that era, such as the Free Soil Party, the Liberty Party, the Whig Party, the American Party, and the Union Party. The early 1850s found Lincoln heavily involved in patronage appointments. “By the mid-1850s, Lincoln the lawyer appeared to be almost everywhere,” stated Pinsker, noting that Lincoln averaged 150 days a year on the road. Pinsker follows Lincoln’s rise to the White House and through the Civil War, a time when he was forced to straddle a fence between those who wanted to save the South while others wanted to punish it for secession. Pinsker doesn't apologize for hanging the partisan label on Lincoln “It has always seemed an insult to call someone ‘partisan.’ The term feels like shorthand for petty combativeness. Lincoln’s partisanship was more dynamic and honorable. He fought with his opponents and endured their attacks but also learned how to bring people together to save a democratic nation,” noted Pinsker, adding that we need to think about that in these divided times.

    26 phút
  3. “Ms. Mebel Goes Back to the Chopping Block” by Jesse Sutanto

    22 THG 4

    “Ms. Mebel Goes Back to the Chopping Block” by Jesse Sutanto

    Jesse Sutanto has found a unique writing formula. The author of over a dozen books including the Aunties and Vera Wong (the previous interview with Sutanto came after the publication of Vera Wong’s Guide to Snooping (on a Dead Man) treats her writing like it’s a day job.  After writing an outline, she walks about her Indonesian home, which she shares with a husband, two children, and a nanny “talking to myself about what characters would say and do,” said Sutanto. Allowing about five weeks per book, she writes by day while her kids, ages seven and 11, are at school. “I write 2,000 words a day—usually writing every weekday before lunch time,” said Sutanto. After completing 40,000 words, she checks into a luxury hotel in Jakarta, recently declared the largest city in the world (its estimated population of 42 million tops Tokyo, the previous leader). There in her favorite hotel, she gets down to brass tacks or bold headlines (make that deadlines), and comes up with 12,000 words a day. In three days, she’s done. “I’ve followed this routine six or seven times,” she said. Sutanto’s latest effort is Ms. Mebel Goes Back to the Chopping Block. Mebel Tanadi is a doting Chinese Indonesian trophy wife who finds, at age 63, that her husband is leaving her for a much-younger woman, the couple’s private chef. Rather than wallow in her sorrow, Mebel enrolls in culinary school, and the adventure begins. Since the book delves into some of the intricacies of preparing fine dishes, I asked Sutanto if she was a foodie. It turns out that she had considered developing the culinary arts, herself, before opting for creative writing. But a good friend of hers did go to culinary school and became a major source for Chopping Block. Jesse said she didn’t think Chopping Block qualified as a cozy mystery (the label she used for Snooping), but rather, a coming-of-age mystery. Sutanto, who got her bachelor’s from the University of California and a master’s from Oxford (one of the settings for Chopping Block), grew up in Singapore where she spends time when she’s not in Indonesia writing books according to that formula that she’s shared with writer-friends, some of whom have followed her example. (Do the Hilton people know about this?)

    24 phút
  4. “The 100 Greatest Literary Characters” by James Plath, Gail Sinclair, and Kirk Curnutt

    10 THG 4

    “The 100 Greatest Literary Characters” by James Plath, Gail Sinclair, and Kirk Curnutt

    The first thing that makes a reader read a book is the characters. That was John Gardner. If the characters come alive, the novel comes alive. That’s Gabriel Garcia Marquez. Given the importance of characters, James Plath, an English professor at Illinois Wesleyan University in Bloomington, Gail Sinclair, the executive director of the Winter Park Institute at Rollins College in Winter Park, Fla., and Kirk Curnutt, an English professor at Troy University in Troy, Ala., set about to identify the 100 greatest characters in literature. Such a daunting task required setting up some rules. One of those was that the authors decided against picking multiple characters from a single novel. So Mark Twain’s Jim didn’t make the list while Huck Finn did. Sherlock Holmes got the nod. Dr. Watson didn’t. Frankenstein’s monster made the list over his creator. On a separate list included in the book, each author listed 10 characters they deemed especially great. Plath listed the following: Don Quixote, Sherlock Holmes, Hester Prynne (The Scarlet Letter), Jay Gatsby, Alice in Wonderland, Harry Potter, Dracula, Ebenezer Scrooge, James Bond, and Jane Eyre. “I gravitated towards unique, richly imagined characters that have been embraced by pop culture in substantial or significant ways and are known by people who haven’t read the novels,” said Plath. Don Quixote is revered around the world, while tourists make a pilgrimage to 221B Baker Street in London to see where Sherlock Holmes hung his deerstalker. Hester Prynne was the perfect example of society’s double standard, said Plath. “It takes two people to have an affair, but only one is held accountable (the woman),” he said. Jay Gatsby came alive on Broadway recently, said Plath, while many knew the Alice in Wonderland story and characters, but few have probably read the Lewis Carroll work, he said. Harry Potter, on the other hand, got people reading again and now has his own theme park, noted Plath. Dracula’s storied fame has been broadened by the many films that have followed, something that has also heightened the character of James Bond, he said. Plath said he retained the Bond paperbacks he read as a kid and recently reread them, noticing that Ian Fleming’s 007 novels tend to be less detailed than the movies that have carried the franchise forward. “In the novels, Bond can be almost cruel at times,” he said. Ebenezer Scrooge represents the bad character who is transformed, while Jane Eyre may be the all-time romantic favorite, he said. Plath, who’s taught at Illinois Wesleyan since 1988, has taught American literature, journalism, creative writing, and film. He’s written several volumes of poetry and serves as president of the John Updike Society. Among the books he’s written are Conversations with John Updike (1994), Remembering Ernest Hemingway (1999), and John Updike’s Pennsylvania Interviews (2016).

    24 phút
  5. “Last of the Titans” by Richard Vinen

    3 THG 4

    “Last of the Titans” by Richard Vinen

    The date of June 18, 1940 proved to be the most important day in the lives of two of the best-known world leaders of the 20th century: Winston Churchill and Charles de Gaulle. World War II had taken an ugly turn in Europe with the fall of France, and both men took to BBC radio on that day to rally their respective sides, England and France, said Richard Vinen, author of The Last Titans: How Churchill and deGaulle Saved Their Nations and Transformed the World. “Both men made critical speeches. It was Churchill’s ‘finest hour’ speech and de Gaulle’s initial call for French resistance," said Vinen, a professor of history at King’s College, London. While Churchill’s famous call to arms (“Hitler knows that he will have to break us in this island or lose the war. If we can stand up to him, all Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science. Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, ‘This was their finest hour.’”) was the result of 40 years of public speaking in the House of Commons, de Gaulle took to the radio microphone for the first time, two days after arriving in London, having been evacuated from his conquered France. “Both Churchill and de Gaulle were radio stars,” said Vinen, referring to the four years of wartime speeches made by both men. BBC officials were impressed by de Gaulle’s efforts because he’d never had any experience as a radio broadcaster before. Both men also played a role in how their respective countries came to grips with a new world order that precluded empires and was now led by the United States. Vinen draws comparisons and similarities between the two men. “(Churchill) liked people and particularly the British. De Gaulle loved France, but he loved it as an abstraction separate from the French people,” he stated. As to his next effort, Vinen is taking measure of these interesting times. “I feel history is moving under our feet as we talk. I’d like to know what’s about to happen before I start trying to write about it,” he said.

    27 phút
  6. "CrimeReads" articles by Keith Roysdon

    27 THG 3

    "CrimeReads" articles by Keith Roysdon

    An upcoming story on the CrimeReads website (https://crimereads.com/) will look at the performances of movie/TV good guys who later took on bad-guy roles and vice versa. It can only be another story by Keith Roysdon, whose previous stories on CrimeReads include looks at writers Richard Matheson and Robert Bloch, a historic scan of Universal monsters, and a review of 1970s disaster movies. Having served as a reporter and editor in Muncie, Ind. for some 40 years, Roysdon has written three novels, most recently Seven Angels. Now living in Knoxville, Tenn., Roysdon is also a partner in Constellate Creatives (https://constellatecreatives.com/), a one-stop shop that seeks to help writers publish books with editing and marketing services. Marketing a book once it's published is the one thing new authors tend to dread, said Roysdon, happy to provide help in getting a new book noticed.  Roysdon said his offbeat entertainment stories are the result of an open-minded editor who sees the value in giving a creative talent free rein. “I’ve got to give Dwyer Murphy, my editor at CrimeReads, and everybody there, credit, because the more obscure thing that I can think of, it seems like they're on board with that,” he said.  Who but Roysdon would review Pray for the Wildcat, a TV movie from ABC made in the 1970s starring Andy Griffith as a corporate boardroom bully who makes life miserable for all those around him? This role flies in the face of the one most of us have for Griffith--good old Andy Taylor from Mayberry, said Roysdon. The movie’s cast includes William Shatner, Robert Reid, and Lorraine Gary, who played Chief Brodie’s wife in Jaws, said Roysdon. Other character shifts noted in the article focus on players like Angela Lansbury and Fred MacMurray, he said. The story will be published soon on CrimeReads. Writing stories for the crime website keeps Roysdon pretty busy in itself (he’s had more than 75 stories published), but along with the three novels, he also works on reading and editing other writers’ work on the growing Constellate site.  Recalling his time writing for the newspaper in Muncie where he did movie reviews from 1977 to 1990, a distinct period, said Roysdon, identifying it as a future project he’d like to tackle.  “It was a really good time for pictures, and that's something that I've considered writing about in the way of a movie book. But I don't know if I'll ever get around to it, because I've got so many other things I want to do,” said Roysdon. Whatever Roysdon decides to do, you know the result will be distinctive—and just slightly offbeat.

    24 phút
  7. "Making Democracy Count" by Ismar Volic

    19 THG 3

    "Making Democracy Count" by Ismar Volic

    "Making Democracy Count" by Ismar Volic Ismar Volic  is one math professor who wants to use mathematics to improve our democratic process. His book, Making Democracy Count: How Mathematics Improves Voting, Electoral Maps, and Representation, examines the mathematics that govern how our election systems work or, surprise, don’t work. Volic may be director of the Institute for Mathematics and Democracy at Wellesley College but this isn’t a math textbook. It’s a exploration on better ways to validate the voice of the majority .  If you’ve heard about topics like ranked choice voting or proportional representation, you may be aware of different approaches to elections. Volic provides the mathematical rationale for why we could be doing better when it comes to recognizing the voice of the people. Volić just returned from a trip to his native Bosnia, the country from which he immigrated in the 1990s. Having seen war in that country, he’s well-acquainted with the importance of maintaining democracy. Among the subjects Volic tackles in Making Democracy Count are how many of the ways we select candidates in the U.S., particularly when it comes to primaries, fall short, how blatantly devious gerrymandering is, and how dysfunctional the U.S. Electoral College is.  “Math is a clarifying way at looking at the world,” said Volic, who recognizes that his timing is reaching a wider audience than ever. “There is growing awareness of the faults in our voting systems, and I don’t mean fantasies of widespread voter fraud or conspiratorial voting machines,” he said. Instead of gerrymandered districts that elect one person each, multi-member congressional districts, each with the members elected through proportional representation, would be fairer, he said. In Volic’s home state of Massachusetts, each of the nine congressional districts is represented by one person, the winner of the district election.  That means the Mass. representation now consists entirely of Democrats even though 30 percent of the voters may have voted Republican. A fairer way of deciding on representation would be to have fewer districts—say three—with three representatives from each selected. You would have the same number of representatives: nine, but you’d have Republicans represented, as well. Conversely, Democrats, now excluded from Oklahoma's Republican slate of representatives, could have a voice under a system that used multi-representative districts. Such a system would provide easier access for third parties, as well, said Volic.

    34 phút
  8. “Winning the Earthquake” by Lorissa Rinehart

    17 THG 3

    “Winning the Earthquake” by Lorissa Rinehart

    The first woman to serve in the U.S. congress didn’t come from New York or Boston but from Montana. Jeannette Rankin served two terms in Congress—not in succession but terms separated by more than 20 years. Among her many distinctions is that she was the only legislator to cast votes against two world wars, once in 1917 and again in 1941. Lorissa Rinehart brings Rankin to life in her book, Winning the Earthquake, a reference to her stated belief you could no more win a war than win an earthquake. She was gerrymandered out of office the first time by all-powerful Anaconda Copper, a company that ran the state of Montana (until the copper ran out), and later by WWII proponents who couldn’t abide her not voting for war in the face of Pearl Harbor. But Rankin did more than cast votes for peace. Her organizational ability and eloquence helped get women the right to vote in Montana six years before the 19th Amendment was passed to allow women across the country to cast a ballot. In 1916, she made the extraordinary decision to visit New Zealand because she wanted to talk to those who lived in a country where women had been voting since 1893. But as Rinehart noted, her trip and stay in New Zealand was not a vacation. Instead, she booked a room in a boardinghouse and took on the role of an “American seamstress,” going house to house mending, stitching and fitting women’s dresses while talking with the people. Rankin learned about advances women had made in the country since obtaining the vote. After she was sworn in on April 2, 1917, one of Rankin’s first acts as a new congresswoman was to introduce the Susan B. Anthony Woman Suffrage amendment for consideration by the House. The amendment was first introduced in Congress in 1878. Although it had been debated several times through the years, it had only come to the floor for a vote once in 1887 and was defeated. During the two years of her House term, Rankin consistently advocated for the amendment's passage. She wrote newspaper columns and granted interviews to reporters to keep up publicity for woman suffrage.  While running for office in 1917, Rankin crossed the state of Montana and “spoke everywhere that would have her and many places that wouldn’t,” said Rinehart. “More and more, she began to fold talk of war into her speeches, often arguing that if women were required to send their sons to war, then surely they should be a party to the decision of whether the country should go at all.” When Rankin spoke at schools across the state, she sent students home with buttons and sashes that read, I WANT MY MOTHER TO VOTE. Rankin was a keen believer that a majority of Americans would always choose the best path. As a result, she opposed the Electoral College when it came to electing a president. She also spoke against redistricting practices designed to benefit a political party not the majority of the people. A champion of democratic reform who ran as a Republican, Rankin has been largely overlooked for the contributions she made in the 20th century, said Rinehart, adding: “Jeannette labored for what she believed to be right until her very last days, without expectation and always with the hope that her words and deeds might one day find resonance in the enduring chorus of an America she loved so dearly. If that time has not yet arrived, surely, she would have believed, it will soon.”

    27 phút

Xếp Hạng & Nhận Xét

4,7
/5
3 Xếp hạng

Giới Thiệu

If you're like me, you like to know things but how much time to invest? That's the question. Here's the answer: Read Beat--Interviews with authors of new releases. These aren't book reviews but short (about 25-30 minutes on the average) chats with folks that usually have taken a lot of time to research a topic, enough to write a book about it. Hopefully, there's a topic or two that interests you. I try to come up with subjects that fascinate me or I need to know more about. Hopefully, listeners will agree. I'm Steve Tarter, former reporter for the Peoria Journal Star and a contributor to WCBU-FM, the Peoria public radio outlet, from 20202 to 2024. I post regularly on stevetarter.substack.com.