Scientific Animism

Chad O

The world is alive, and we are its witnesses! Meaning, myth, & spiritual community based in reality, no supernatural opinions required or forbidden newsletter.scientificanimism.org

  1. FEB 2

    Release the Rancid Reservoir and Dig a Brand New Well

    Maybe we’re never going to fully tear down the master’s house. Maybe we’re never going to fully out the old. Maybe the new gets layered over the old by degrees and half-measures and one beautiful, laborious story at a time. Share the vision widely enough, get enough others to buy into the new fiction, so that you can cover over the old, cover over part of the old, fill in gaps in the old, create new edges of possibility in the old. Make the revolution irresistible. Scientific Animism is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. I sing my kids a Bright Eyes song as a lullaby. The Bottom of Everything. An excerpt: We must take all of the medicinestoo expensive now to sell;set fire to the preacherwho is promising us hell. Doesn’t it feel so-very-Gen-X? Very this-or-that, us-vs-them, out-with-the-old-in-with-the-new? Enough with that dualistic angst. I don’t want my kids repeating lines about setting anyone on fire. For any reason. Instead we can release the rancid reservoir. That wisdom tradition got a bit polluted, didn’t it? Lots of people getting poisoned by that body of water now. Time to release it. Time to destroy the dam; drain the reservoir. Release those old attachments. Let the stream run wild again; let the delicate displaced ecosystems and populations regrow. It gave more life, fostered more entangled interbeing, when it was small and free. Before it got captured; redirected; dammed and swollen and stagnated to serve the needs of empire. Time to dig a brand new well. The future appears by degrees. We discover it, invent it, story-tell and consensus-build and conjure it into existence, one possibility at a time. We layer it onto what already exists; a new city over the ruins of the old; saplings over McMansions over old-growth. Christianity, religion—these are for sure the master’s tools. Tools of empire. Tools used largely to oppress, to control, to justify all manner of genocidal violence. But as Alnoor Ladha says in the video linked at the top, in our current context, we’re not going to be able to amputate Christianity (he said this of capital). The master’s tools may be the only ones that people understand. “So instead of trying to amputate it, how do you work with it?” How do we “co-opt, Jiu-Jitsu, hack, dismantle existing structures, and use that system—including capital, including rationality, including…” Christianity & religion? For Christianity, this makes me think of smaller, more humble manifestations of the belief system. It makes me think of Nathan Evan Fox’s Hillbilly Hymn: Or Jordan Smart’s Who Would Jesus Bomb? It makes me think of Sophie Strand’s book, The Madonna Secret (about which admittedly I’ve only regrettably listened to interviews so far) and her thoughts about the illiterate Aramaic storyteller: And the “decolonize for Jesus” work of Sarah Augustine. Release the rancid reservoir. Don’t try to amputate the whole belief system. Work with it; transform it; use its own logic to denounce its violent impulses. Don’t leave all biblical interpretation to the wolves. This is not work for everyone. I’m not sure it’s for me. But I’m grateful to everyone out there doing it. And religion as a whole? Can we co-opt that tool of empire more broadly, beyond Christianity? Can we dig a brand new well? I think that’s what we’re doing here. I think that’s the stream I’m trying to tap into. The work of Robin Wall Kimmerer, of Richard Powers, of The Emerald and Sophie Strand and The Great Simplification. Of Joanna Macy. That’s the political-spiritual practice—praxis—that Alnoor Ladha speaks of. We’re digging a brand new well. The spiritual complement to our political work. Scientific Animism is a brand new well, or maybe a “new ancient emerging possibility” Let’s co-imagine it. Let’s co-enact it. Thanks for being here with me, friend. Can’t wait to see where you take this. Thanks for reading. Thanks for listening. Catch you next time. Get full access to Scientific Animism at newsletter.scientificanimism.org/subscribe

    11 min
  2. JAN 18

    Our 2026 Communal New Year’s Poem feels so much like a prayer ✨

    This Communal New Year’s Poem has become a bit of a tradition in the sense that I’ve tried to do it for the past two years. When does something become a tradition? Either way—it has felt especially important lately to begin a brand-new year with a reminder that we are all making our way through it together, whether we feel it all the time or not. The process is simple enough—I post a little prompt in a shared digital space inviting anyone who wants to participate; I collect responses either through direct message or a quick Google form and then weave them all together into one poem. Scientific Animism is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This year’s prompt came from the necessity of hope, and it was: What is one wish you have for our new year? It can be for yourself, for others, for your loved ones, for the earth, for the animals we love, for the *gestures at everything* You could also respond with a particular beautiful moment you experienced this last year. Be as creative as you’d like in one to three sentences. I got eight loving responses this year, and I’m so grateful to my community and contributors for daring to wish. Here is the poem we came up with together. I hope it feels as grounding for you as it did for me in putting it together. Thank you to Lisa Yoder, Meghan Phillips, Mary West, Shawna Stoltzfoos, Katie Joy Nellis, Ashley Novalis, Coral Rites, and Pam McMillin for their beautiful words and hearts. 2026 Communal New Year’s Poem May we continue to curl into ourselves,and through, like spiraling bramble andancient branches that forgetheir path amidst the misty thicket.We can only hope for bluebirdsightings and beads of rainto let all the parts that broke find a wayto mend togetherlike neighbors, living in peace and leaningon one another, holding each other.May we behold each other. May we find a healingof our individual and collective attention;a restoration of our ability to noticebeyond engineered algorithms.May we refuse all manufactured panic, and only actin the urgency of love and embrace ourselves like we would a new lover or an old friend -with curiosity, gentleness, humor,and grace. May we all allow ourselves to be movedby the wind of inspiration, forged by the fire of collectiveresponsibility, held by thedepth of the ocean, and groundedby the oneness of the earth.May we find peace and let thisslowing, this moontide current of awebe the hymn whisper-sungthroughout the year. Scientific Animism is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Scientific Animism at newsletter.scientificanimism.org/subscribe

    4 min
  3. 12/10/2025

    The Sophie Strand Interview: "Give me the magic beans. Spit in my eyes. Lay hands on me."

    I still can’t believe Sophie Strand saw—and responded to!—my DM. Me! With my 150 subscribers. Her! With her 37 thousand. I’m humbled. Thanks for reading, listening, being here with me. Let’s co-imagine, co-enact, a more animate, entangled world together. Out of well-founded humility/fear—“Who am I to request an interview from her? Why on earth would she bother responding, let alone honoring, that request?”—I waited until the day before leaving for the conference/retreat where she was scheduled to speak. And she got back to me! Quickly! We sat beside each other at the welcome dinner; she recognized my name when we were introduced. And to be honest, after she was put in the uncomfortable position of interviewing a couple business bros the next morning, I think she was relieved to have a reason to leave. “Are you finding this interesting?” I leaned over and asked. We were listening to a panel discussion about how to improve the world by (checks notes) being a good boss. “No,” she said, sounding impossibly bored. “Do you want to go talk about animism now?” “Yes.” For those who don’t know: read Sophie Strand! She will cut you open. She will myceliate your wounds. She will weave your tattered edges back into the exuberant earth. Read her! My massive delay in publishing had a few causes. A baby born in June, a move across town in July. But also, if I’m being honest: I’ve been scared! This format—interview—is brand new for me. There’s the technical ignorance—how to transcribe? Manually, all myself? With an AI-assist? Hire someone? (that one, in the end)—but also: listening to it made me want to hide. I didn’t prepare or speak as well as I’d like; I thought maybe the whole thing needed to be chopped into bits, the just-Sophie bits, and reconstituted. Thanks to the friend who listened and assured me that it works. That it is good, and worth sharing, as-is (though I did edit some). I’m sorry I kept Sophie’s wisdom from you for so long. Here it is, in all it’s recorded-on-a-phone-in-a-dining-hall glory. (Another attendee stopped, listened, then, at Sophie’s invitation, sat at our table. You’ll hear her introduce herself.) I highly encourage listening to this one! Though I did clean the transcript and add thematic headings for easy reference/quoting, and for those who prefer to read. And an update on her health! She mentions in this interview that she got a terminal diagnosis just weeks before. She got a second opinion, and that diagnosis evaporated. (Though she’s still not better.) btw, do you want more interviews? did I do an ok job? reply to the email, or comment on the post, and let me know! Without further ado, the (transcript of) the interview: On a scale of 1-10, how much joy do you feel in your body right now? Chad: Let’s start, Sophie. I’ve got interview questions for you. On a scale of one to ten, how much joy do you feel in your body right now? Sophie: Pass. Chad: Fair. So, you wrote a book about bodies and health, and I also get the sense that you would rather not talk about bodies and health! Sophie: Yeah, it’s interesting. You write a book about illness, and then you’re asked to talk about illness. Our culture wants us to cannibalize our worst experiences and make them our identity. Simone Weil says that what we pay attention to we pray towards. And I worry that if all I do is talk about illness, I’m praying towards illness. I’m a little superstitious about that at this point. Chad: And not just superstitious! That question, “on a scale of one to 10, how much joy do you feel in your body?” — that was the title of one of your posts. And you talked powerfully about the nocebo effect. When you’re told that this sugar pill will benefit you: placebo effect. It benefits a bunch of people, even though it’s a sugar pill! Same thing, if you’re told that it has all these side effects, then you end up getting those side effects, even though it’s a sugar pill. And our entire medical system— Sophie: It’s bad theater. Chad: It’s bad theater, exactly. Sophie: It reinforces our mistrust in experiences that could be amelioratory. Chad: Yeah, but yeah, I also understand. I listened to another interview you did about this book, The Body is the Doorway, and you talked about sort of not wanting to become your illness. I’ve heard this from other people too. Like you’re supposed to become whatever that thing is, but you are like that thing personified. For some people, it’s like, “I’m a canceled person on the internet,” right? “Now all I get invited to talk about is being a canceled person on the internet,” where you’re, you’re whatever condition personified or reified and you’re supposed to monetize it. Sophie: Yeah, we live in a very, very scared culture. In a traumatized nervous system, you need to make sense of your environment so you can find safety. So you wanna be able to label people and things. I think that our over-identification with certain identity markers and our ways of simplifying other people into how they classify themselves is… I think it’s almost symptomatic of how traumatized our culture is. We wanna be able to simplify our environment so we understand who’s safe and who’s not safe, but that’s not how anyone works. Chad: A traumatized environment, but also the like the simplifying feels like part of the sort of reductionist, scientific, … Sophie: Yeah, absolutely. And also, we’re evolving all the time. We should have different identities every day. To only have one identity is to have only one way of traveling and that doesn’t feel very evolutionarily viable. We should have different identities every day Chad: I like that. So my first questions here were about body stuff. We can skip right past them. Sophie: We can totally talk about them. How has your (individual or extended) body been delighting you lately? Chad: Yeah, sure. How has your body been delighting you lately? Your individual body, but also as you talk about beautifully in the book, your extended body. Like the ecosystem of which you are a part. I’ll let you answer for both or either. Sophie: Yeah, it’s hard. I received almost like a very serious, perhaps terminal diagnosis in the past two weeks. So, it’s a very difficult… Like, that’s like a fun question. And I think there are ways in which this book represents a fossil of who I was. I think I’m in a place in my life where… How does my body delight me? * I’m glad I’ve been here for as long as I’ve been here. * I’m glad that I have so many connections. * That I’m able to drink coffee. * That I can go on a run still. I also know that could be obsolete really soon. I don’t know. I mean, I’m happy to be materially present. Today. Chad: I’m glad you’re materially present. Sophie: Yeah, but longer than that, I have no idea. Chad: Like you don’t know how long you will continue to be materially present. Sophie: Yeah, or like, or what will continue to be possible. I’m super, super glad that I’ve been able to live independently and live on my own for a while and to really be self-sufficient. I don’t know how much longer that will last, either. Sophie: I’d ask that you not put the diagnostic information in, maybe edit that out, just because I’m not sharing that super widely until I have more information. Chad: That’s fine. Sophie: Thank you. Chad: Yeah, totally. No normative bodies (Chad’s weird body shit) Chad: I don’t know if there’s space for this, but I also think it’s, I don’t know. You’re always supposed to talk about what’s going on with you. But the able-bodied interviewer… There’s a way that I tell myself the story, or I am told the story, of being able-bodied. And that we sort of downplay the way that everyone’s body has glitches. The frontlines of evolution Sophie: Yeah, there’s no such thing as a normative body. We’re all different. And in fact, that’s how evolution works. Every hand began as a glitch that was perfectly adapted to a shifting ecosystem. There’s no such thing as a normative body I always say that people who are really sick are on the bleeding edge, the front line of evolution. Like, something’s gonna work at some point! You’re an experiment. But everyone’s body is, you know—there’s no climactic organism. If evolution is working, it means that each person is a little bit different. And that can be a match or a mismatch with the environment. Chad: Yeah. The biggest weird body shit for me over the past two years has been: I tore my cornea like two years ago. I woke up in incredible pain. And then it just… Never. Heals? My eyelid fuses to my cornea while I sleep. And then when I open my eyes in the morning, it re-tears. Sophie: That’s really intense. Chad: I mean, it’s nowhere near as intense as what you’re going through. Sophie: There’s no trauma Olympics. Everyone is dealing with lots of stuff. Spiralic time Chad: It’s certainly not as all-consuming. But there are weeks of time where I can’t see clearly out of one eye. Sophie: It sounds like it’s also a spiral. It’s not linear, “sick—fix—better.” Chad: For sure. Sophie: It’s more like: “sometimes okay—maybe not,” you know? And it’s that spiralic time that I think is really important to remember with illness. Like, it’s not a straight trajectory up. Chad: Yeah. I went to a doctor about it initially, and it was like, “try these eye drops.” And I tried the eye drop for like, a year. Thinking “maybe I’ll make it long enough that the cornea will heal enough that my eyelid stops fusing to it. And then I won’t have to think about this anymore.” But after a year of that, and it just kept happening every few weeks, I was like—Okay. We’ll go back and see more doctors. It’s a very small version of what you’ve gone through. Sophie: Yeah, it’s the wound that refu

    1h 10m

About

The world is alive, and we are its witnesses! Meaning, myth, & spiritual community based in reality, no supernatural opinions required or forbidden newsletter.scientificanimism.org