SCOTUStalk

SCOTUSblog

4,3 (125)
Política

SCOTUStalk is a nonpartisan podcast about the Supreme Court for lawyers and non-lawyers alike, brought to you by SCOTUSblog. SCOTUStalk is hosted by Amy Howe and produced and edited by Ellena Erskine. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

17/05/2023

The shadow docket with Steve Vladeck

Since 2017, the Supreme Court has significantly increased its use of the process by which the justices hear and resolves emergency appeals, sometimes known as the shadow docket. These decisions are made without oral argument and often come in short unsigned orders. Stephen Vladeck, the Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts at the University of Texas School of Law, has closely tracked that change and its impact on the court as an institution in recent years. Vladeck joins Amy to discuss his new book The Shadow Docket. We are taking a hiatus from our regularly scheduled episodes this spring. We hope to be back soon. (Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
28/02/2023

Section 230 and the internet

In the first week of the February session, the justices heard oral arguments in two cases about the scoop of liability tech companies may face for user content. Amy is joined by Megan Iorio of the Electronic Privacy Information Center to break down those arguments in Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh. EPIC filed an amicus brief in Gonzalez in support of neither party. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from. (Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
13/02/2023

SCOTUS Spotlight: Daniel Geyser

In another edition of our series of interviews with Supreme Court advocates, Amy sits down with Daniel Geyser, head of the Supreme Court practice at Haynes Boone. Geyser has argued 15 cases before the court, including two this term. He shares his thoughts on how to take advantage of the new argument structure and his advice for first time advocates. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from. (Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
30/01/2023

What’s going on with Munsingwear?

In an essay published in The New York Times this fall, two law professors, Lisa Tucker and Stefanie Lindquist, argued that the Supreme Court is increasingly setting aside significant decisions from the lower courts as if they never happened. The court is invalidating these decisions in brief procedural orders under what’s known as “Munsingwear vacatur.” Amy sits down with Tucker and Lindquist to hear more about the trend. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from. (Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
17/01/2023

Three decades covering the Supreme Court

After more than three decades covering the Supreme Court, Marcia Coyle has announced her retirement from the National Law Journal. Amy sits down with Coyle to discuss her career, her book, and how covering the court has changed over the years. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from. (Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
19/12/2022

Looking back at the term so far

The end of the calendar year means we’re about a third of the way through the SCOTUS year. Amy sits down with SCOTUSblog editor James Romoser to discuss the first three months of the 2022 term. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from. (Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
05/12/2022

The 800-pound gorilla

UCLA election law professor Richard Hasen joins Amy to explain Moore v. Harper, the case in which North Carolina legislators ask the justices to consider a theory that would give state legislatures near complete power to regulate federal elections without interference from state courts. Hasen breaks down the theory, known as the independent state legislature theory, and points to important briefs and potential outcomes to keep an eye out for. Moore v. Harper will be argued Wednesday, Dec. 7. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from. (Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
21/11/2022

Can a web designer refuse to design websites for same-sex weddings?

On Dec. 5 the justices will hear oral argument in 303 Creative v. Elenis, a clash between free speech rights and LGBTQ rights. Bloomberg News Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr joins Amy to explain the case and what to expect at oral argument. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from. (Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ver tudo (97)

4,3

de 5

125 avaliações

Entertaining

04/08/2022

foxbos85

Great listening format for those who love all things SCOTUS
The best!

01/07/2022

steviehr

Such a great resource on SCOTUS news. Really informative and engaging. I love it!
Barely understand and often fail to articulate the law in question

05/07/2022

Empact

I’m a follower of the Court, read rulings and amici briefings, and followed this show in hopes of getting an even-handed view of the subjects. You won’t find it here. For example, in the EPA v. West Virginia, they did not even discuss the central basis for the decision, which is that the law as passed by Congress did not support the actions that the EPA was taking, until the last minute. It’s insane and misleading to evaluate the decision without focussing on this central issue, just adding it as an asterisk at the end of the show. If the power rests in the people, as expressed through their representatives in Congress, and Congress did not pass the law, on what basis was the administrative state acting? By fiat? As a dictator? The Court exists in part as a guard against abuses of power such as this, and to not even discuss this central question, is to do a disservice to the listeners. You’re better off reading the rulings and briefings themselves, or the syllabi.
Not really non partisan

01/07/2022

This Ken

Is seems that when a group claims to be non partisan what they really mean is they promote a far leftist agenda. Lies are the only way to promote a leftist agenda so claiming to be non partisan fits their MO.

SCOTUStalk is a nonpartisan podcast about the Supreme Court for lawyers and non-lawyers alike, brought to you by SCOTUSblog. SCOTUStalk is hosted by Amy Howe and produced and edited by Ellena Erskine. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Criado por

SCOTUSblog
Anos de atividade

2019 - 2023
Episódios

97
Classificação

Livre
Site do podcast

SCOTUStalk

Governo

Governo

Semanal

SCOTUStalk

The shadow docket with Steve Vladeck

Section 230 and the internet

SCOTUS Spotlight: Daniel Geyser

What’s going on with Munsingwear?

Three decades covering the Supreme Court

Looking back at the term so far

The 800-pound gorilla

Can a web designer refuse to design websites for same-sex weddings?

Entertaining

The best!

Barely understand and often fail to articulate the law in question

Not really non partisan

Sobre

Informações

Você também pode gostar de

SCOTUStalk

Episódios

The shadow docket with Steve Vladeck

Section 230 and the internet

SCOTUS Spotlight: Daniel Geyser

What’s going on with Munsingwear?

Three decades covering the Supreme Court

Looking back at the term so far

The 800-pound gorilla

Can a web designer refuse to design websites for same-sex weddings?

Classificações e avaliações

Sobre

Informações

Você também pode gostar de