Solomon & Smith

Solomon & Smith

Solomon & Smith discuss literature, philosophy, history, film, and the meaning of the universe.

  1. Jul 17

    Was Paradise Already Lost? | Achsah Guibbory on Milton’s Theology of Desire

    Please help us to keep having these conversations by supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/solomonsmith/membership In this conversation, Achsah Guibbory joins Jack and Milo to discuss John Donne, John Milton, love, sex, sin, marriage, desire, Paradise Lost, and the problem of whether erotic love can ever be holy. Donne and Milton are two of the great Johns of seventeenth-century English poetry, claimed by some to be entirely different men. Donne is witty, erotic, devotional, cynical, sacred, obscene, metaphysical, and impossible to pin down. Milton is austere, sublime, political, theological, revolutionary, authoritarian, and not much fun at a party. Yet both poets return, in radically different ways, to the same infinity: love. The discussion begins with the word itself. What did “love” mean in the seventeenth century, before Darwin, before Freud, and before modern romantic individualism? How did English poetry inherit older distinctions between erotic love, spiritual love, charity, friendship, desire, marriage, and the love of God? And why does one little English monosyllable have to carry so much metaphysical weight? Guibbory places Donne and Milton against the long Christian tradition that associated sex with sin, chastity with holiness, and desire with the Fall. Augustine looms large: original sin, shame, bodily rebellion, and the problem of sexual desire after Eden. But Donne, in poems such as *The Good-Morrow*, *The Ecstasy*, *The Canonization*, *The Sun Rising*, and *A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning*, offers something stranger and more daring: the possibility that bodily love might itself become spiritual. The conversation then turns to Milton’s *Paradise Lost*. What is sex like before the Fall? Do Adam and Eve desire one another in Eden, or is their prelapsarian love something more equal, mutual, peaceful, and almost desireless? What changes after the fruit is eaten? Why does Milton describe postlapsarian sex as the “seal of guilt”? And why does Adam fall so quickly once Eve has fallen? Along the way we discuss Milton’s bower scene, Eve’s reflection in the lake, Adam’s loneliness, Satan’s resentment, hierarchy, equality, the strange ending of *Paradise Regained*, and whether Milton gives Satan some of his own political instincts. We also talk about Donne’s contradictions, Milton’s unresolved tensions, Thomas Browne, Kafka's weird humour, and why great writers are often most alive when they have not fully solved themselves. Expect reflections on: John Donne and John Milton as rival poets of love Achsah Guibbory on Donne, Milton, sex, and theology Augustine, original sin, chastity, and sexual shame Erotic love, spiritual love, charity, and marriage Donne’s love poetry and the holiness of consummated desire Milton’s *Paradise Lost* and sex before the Fall Adam, Eve, equality, hierarchy, and the bower scene Desire as lack, danger, or spiritual possibility Satan, resentment, monarchy, and Milton’s politics The difference between Donne’s lyric contradictions and Milton’s epic resolutions The “seal of guilt” and sex after the Fall Milton’s divorce tracts and the nightmare of “household captivity” Paradise, the New Jerusalem, and whether we really want a world without desire If you enjoy long-form conversations on poetry, literature, theology, philosophy, seventeenth-century writing, erotic love, sin, Milton, Donne, and the strange borderlands between body and soul, subscribe to the channel and leave a comment below. Who writes love better: John Donne or John Milton? And can erotic love ever be holy? Chapters: 00:00:00 Sex, sin, and Donne’s dangerous poetry 00:01:16 Introduction 00:06:32 Achsah Guibbory appears 00:11:06 Milton’s youthful love poem 00:16:02 Donne versus Milton 00:20:23 What does “love” mean? 00:27:03 Augustine’s sexual legacy 00:29:02 Donne’s sacred eroticism 00:31:17 Plato, Genesis, and desire 00:35:14 Sex before the Fall 00:44:33 Desire, lack, and Satan 00:49:41 Milton’s unresolved epic 00:52:41 Donne’s contradictions 00:56:30 Paradise Regained and grace 01:01:16 Adam’s desire 01:12:20 Eve and Adam fall 01:14:16 Sex after the Fall 01:22:52 The Messiah's Daughter 01:33:23 Marriage, divorce, and captivity Correction: 2:00 It is, in fact, Barnard.

  2. Jul 10

    Who REALLY Wrote the Quran? | Gabriel Said Reynolds

    Please help us continue having these discussions by supporting us over on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/SolomonSmith Who wrote the Quran? Did it flow directly from God? Did Muhammad compose it? Did several authors compose it over several centuries? Does it have the characteristics of a dictated text, or a written text? How simple or complicated is the story of the Quran's origins? In this episode, Jack and Milo are joined by Islamic studies scholar Gabriel Said Reynolds to explore one of the most controversial questions in Islamic Studies. The conversation examines the traditional Islamic account of the Quran alongside modern academic perspectives. Reynolds argues that the evidence may point toward a more complex process of composition than is commonly assumed, challenging the long-standing Western, secular scholarly consensus that Muhammad himself was the sole human author. Topics include: • Who wrote the Quran? • Did Muhammad write the Quran? • The traditional Islamic narrative of revelation • Academic theories of Quranic authorship • How the Quran was compiled and transmitted • Why the Quran is arranged by surah length rather than chronology • The relationship between the Quran, the Torah, and the Gospel • The emergence of Classical Arabic • The literary qualities and inimitability (i'jaz) of the Quran • Early Islamic history • Historical-critical approaches to the Quran • Western scholarship on the origins of Islam If you enjoy long-form conversations on religion, philosophy, history, and literature, consider subscribing for more discussions with scholars.

  3. Jul 3

    This Philosopher Believed in Magic | James D. Reid on Novalis

    Please help us to keep having these conversations by supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/solomonsmith/membership In this conversation, James D. Reid joins Jack and Milo to discuss Novalis: poet, philosopher, natural scientist, early German Romantic, and perhaps the greatest pen name in literary history. Novalis — born Georg Philipp Friedrich Freiherr von Hardenberg — died of tuberculosis just before his twenty-ninth birthday, yet left behind one of the strangest and most suggestive bodies of work in European Romanticism. Reid discusses Novalis as a thinker who refuses ordinary divisions between philosophy, poetry, religion, science, nature, and love. Was he a poet doing philosophy, a philosopher writing poetry, or some bizarre contortion of the two: a philosopher for whom poetry was the only possible means of philosophizing. The discussion begins with Novalis’s life and intellectual world: Kant, Fichte, Schlegel, Schleiermacher, Schelling, the Freiberg Mining Academy, early German Romanticism, and the extraordinary range of Novalis’s unfinished projects. Reid explains why Novalis should not be reduced to the familiar image of the death-haunted mystical poet, and why his notebooks, fragments, novels, and poems reveal a more precise and incisive mind. Much of the conversation centres on Kant and the imagination. Reid explains how the German Romantics inherit Kant’s "subjective turn," but extend the imagination far beyond perception and art, into science, morality, politics, religion, and our most basic orientation toward the world. We discuss Fichte, the thing-in-itself, appearances, language, and the Romantic conviction that reality is not simply found, but partly shaped by how human beings attend to it. The second half of the conversation turns to Novalis’s *Hymns to the Night*, the death of Sophie von Kühn, erotic longing, Christianity, mysticism, darkness, mediation, and the possibility that poetry can do philosophical work which ordinary propositional prose cannot. Reid discusses the challenge of translating Novalis, the relation between philosophy and poetry, the *Monologue*, magical idealism, and the idea that words do not merely describe a world, but help give us one. Expect reflections on: Novalis as poet, philosopher, scientist, and early Romantic Kant, Fichte, imagination, and the thing-in-itself The fragment as philosophical and literary form Why Novalis is more than a mystical death-haunted poet The *Hymns to the Night* and the death of Sophie von Kühn Christianity, mediation, religion, and heterodoxy Night, eroticism, death, and mysticism Poetry as philosophy, and philosophy as a literary form The problem of translating beauty and precision Plato, Descartes, Nietzsche, Wagner, Wittgenstein, and the sciences Magical idealism and the possibility of poetising the world Mountains, language, ecology, and seeing the world as a “you” If you enjoy long-form conversations on literature, philosophy, German Romanticism, theology, poetry, metaphysics, and the strange borderlands between science and spirit, subscribe to the channel and leave a comment below. Is Novalis the greatest literary pen name? And can poetry think things that philosophy cannot? 00:00:00 Words, world, and magical idealism 00:02:00 Introduction to James D. Reid and Novalis 00:08:17 James arrives 00:15:44 Poetic epigraph 00:18:06 Who was Novalis? 00:21:54 Novalis, fragments, and Romantic “memes” 00:24:16 Kant's imagination 00:35:31 Fichte, subjectivity, and things in themselves 00:40:49 Language and perception 00:43:13 Novalis or Hardenberg? 00:46:21 Friedrich Schlegel and the early Romantic circle 00:47:17 What made Novalis unique? 00:52:07 *Hymns to the Night*: origins and textual history 00:58:24 Was Novalis a Christian? 01:08:02 Erotic night, death, and mysticism 01:18:04 Translating Novalis: poetry as philosophy 01:24:14 Kant and the night 01:30:01 The *Monologue* and language 01:31:44 Plato, Descartes, and philosophy as literature 01:34:14 Wagner, Nietzsche, and Romanticism after Novalis 01:37:00 Why philosophers distrust poetry 01:44:41 What is magical idealism? 01:49:01 The magical power of words 01:54:47 Mountains, ecology, and seeing nature as a “you” 01:58:40 The blue flower, longing, and *Heinrich von Ofterdingen* 02:01:37 How James D. Reid came to Novalis 02:08:10 Conclusion

  4. Jun 30

    The Greatest Novel of Every Decade (1800–2000) | Andrew Nixon’s Picks

    *- Andrew's list is pasted below -* Please help us to keep having these conversations by supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/solomonsmith/membership In this video Andrew discusses his favourite works of fiction decade by decade, starting in 1800 and going 200 years, decade by decade, until they reach the borders of our present century. If you would like to be interviewed by us about your favourite books, please send an email. Two bonus decades are available over on Patreon! 1800s Tales from Shakespeare - Mary & Charles Lamb 1810s Pride & Prejudice - Jane Austen 1820s A barren decade. 1830s The Pickwick Papers - Charles Dickens 1840s Vanity Fair - William Makepeace Thackeray 1850s Mada-- Bleak House - Charles Dickens 1860s Alice's Adventures in Wonderland - Lewis Carroll 1870s Middlemarch - George Eliot 1880s Treasure Island - Robert Louis Stevenson 1890s The Diary of a Nobody - George & Weedon Grossmith 1900s The Wind in the Willows - Kenneth Grahame 1910s Howard's End - E.M. Forster 1920s A High Wind in Jamaica - Richard Hughes 1930s A Handful of Dust - Evelyn Waugh 1940s Titus Groan - Mervyn Peake 1950s The Ginger Man - J.P. Donleavy 1960s The Lord of the Rings - J.R.R. Tolkien 1970s Watership Down - Richard Adams 1980s The Old Devils - Kingsley Amis 1990s Blue at the Mizzen (representing the full 20-book Aubrey-Maturin series) 00:00:00 Introduction 00:05:11 1800s 00:08:29 1810s 00:13:56 1820s 00:14:45 1830s 00:19:20 1840s 00:22:40 1850s 00:27:48 1860s 00:32:13 1870s 00:38:06 1880s 00:42:20 1890s 00:45:33 1900s 00:51:46 1910s 00:56:20 1920s 01:01:45 1930s 01:08:16 1940s 01:11:51 1950s 01:16:47 1960s 01:22:48 1970s 01:28:06 1980s 01:31:25 1990s 01:36:07 Conclusion

  5. Jun 26

    Virgil is the Greatest Poet of Antiquity (Not Homer) | Wright & McGill on The Aeneid

    Please help us to keep having these conversations by supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/solomonsmith/membership In this conversation, Scott McGill and Susanna Wright join Jack and Milo to discuss their recent translation of Virgil’s *Aeneid*: one of the foundational poems of Roman literature, a work of exile, empire, grief, violence, duty, divine terror, and extraordinary poetic control. The conversation begins with the problem of collaboration: how do two translators produce one poem? McGill and Wright discuss the six-year process of translating the *Aeneid* together, from early divided drafts to an intensely collaborative line-by-line revision, and reflect on what it means to develop a single poetic voice out of two sensibilities. Much of the discussion centres on Virgil’s style: his elevation without bombast, his emotional restraint, his “majesty of sadness,” his difference from Ovid, and the challenge of translating a poem that is at once ancient, literary, musical, political, and deeply humane. We talk about Tennyson, Dryden, Emily Wilson, Homer, Ovid, alliteration, metre, syntax, wordplay, and the question of how far a translator should go in making an ancient poem feel modern. The conversation also explores the *Aeneid*’s relationship to Homer. Is Virgil merely reworking the *Iliad* and the *Odyssey*, or is he creating something radically new out of inherited material? We discuss Roman originality, translation as collaboration with the dead, the poem’s strange “cinematic universe” of myth, and the way Virgil turns Homeric models inside out. In the second half, we turn to the poem’s darkest and most difficult questions: Aeneas and Turnus, the shocking final killing, whether the poem is Augustan propaganda, the human cost of empire, and Virgil’s extraordinary capacity to extend pity even to enemies and monsters. The episode also ranges through Dido, Mezentius, Lausus, the fall of Troy, the shield of Aeneas, the future of Rome, and the burden of history. Expect reflections on: Virgil’s *Aeneid* and why it still matters How two translators collaborate on one poem The difference between Virgil, Homer, and Ovid Emily Wilson, translation, accessibility, and “otherness” The emotional gravity of Virgil’s Latin Dido, Aeneas, Turnus, Mezentius, and Lausus The ending of the *Aeneid* and the killing of Turnus Whether the *Aeneid* is Augustan propaganda Empire, violence, pity, duty, and the costs of history Alliteration, assonance, metre, syntax, and wordplay Roman originality and the creative use of the past The fall of Troy and the terror of the gods If you enjoy long-form conversations on classical literature, translation, poetry, mythology, philosophy, history, and the strange afterlives of ancient texts, subscribe to the channel and leave a comment below. What is your favourite translation of the *Aeneid*? Is Virgil’s ending a failure, a shock, or the whole point of the poem? 00:00:00 The Fall of Troy and the Terror of the Gods 00:01:06 Introduction to Scott McGill, Susanna Wright, and *The Aeneid* 00:08:04 Guests arrive: Rome, Christianity, and imperial continuity 00:11:47 Poetic epigraph 00:13:04 Two translators, one poem 00:18:38 English poetic traditions, Tennyson, and translation taste 00:22:07 The Emily Wilson Revolution 00:27:58 What is Virgil’s Latin like? 00:35:39 Virgil, Homer, and originality from the past 00:45:29 Turnus, Achilles, and the second Trojan War 00:47:53 The shocking ending of *The Aeneid* 00:53:26 Ecumenical pathos: Empathy in Virgil 00:59:35 The *Odyssey* and unending battle 01:06:46 The shadow of heroism 01:10:00 Ancient endings, unfinished poems, and Lucan 01:14:00 Sound, syntax, alliteration, and Virgilian texture 01:23:25 Roman history, prophecy, and the shield of Aeneas 01:29:36 First encounters with *The Aeneid* Ich ruf' zu dir, Herr (BWV 639) performed by Chiara Bertoglio and shortened for the video, under the following license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en

  6. Jun 23

    Harry Potter Is Secretly About Class

    Harry Potter, the work of a 'socialist', is in love with the trappings of the upper-class. The wizarding world is based entirely on the aesthetics Britain's elite institutions. It is not the story of an outsider, but a fantasy about inheritance, privilege, and belonging to an ancient, racially pure elite. In this episode, we discuss Harry Potter as a British class allegory. We discuss - Hogwarts' resemblance to elite boarding schools and Oxford colleges - The contrast between the suburbian pleb Dursleys and the rustic pleb Weasleys - Harry Potter as an aristocrat trapped in suburbia - The relationship between magic, bloodlines, and social hierarchy - JK Rowling's internally conflicting attitudes toward modernity, tradition, and class - The influence of Charles Dickens and J.R.R. Tolkien on the Pottiverse - Hogwarts as an escape from modern, middle-class life and cultural rootlessness 00:00 Intro 01:21 The Hype 04:10 Rowling's main weaknesses 08:03 Rowling's main strengths 10:28 HP as Gay Allegory 12:26 HP as Class Allegory 16:01 The disdain for pleb mediocrity and modernity 22:25 British Class - Poshos magic, plebs muggles 25:50 British Elite Public Schools are the model of Hogwarts 28:35 Harry as member of master race aristocracy 32:32 Why isn't mudblood Hermione the main character? 35:55 Parallels with Star Wars and Superheroes 38:55 Harry as posh boy cannot fail 41:18 Malfoy as posh boy purist 44:57 Rowling as a socialist 47:00 Rowling as SJW

  7. Jun 19

    How Ovid Rewrote Greek Mythology Forever | Stephanie McCarter

    Please help us to keep having these conversations by supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/solomonsmith/membership In this episode of Solomon & Smith, Jack and Milo speak with classicist and translator Stephanie McCarter about her acclaimed translation of one of the most influential works in Western literature, Ovid's Metamorphoses. Ovid retold Greek myths of transformation, and in so doing transformed Greek mythology. We talk about why Roman writers saw translation as an act of cultural conquest, and about what is gained and lost when Latin poetry is brought across into modern English. McCarter discusses her approach to translating Ovid, her decision to render sexual violence explicitly rather than euphemistically, and why she believes no translation can ever be faithful. We discuss Roman attitudes toward Greece, the philosophy of transformation, the poetic differences between Ovid, Virgil, and Horace, the politics of translation, and why Ovid remains one of the most modern voices from the ancient world. Topics include: Ovid's Metamorphoses Ancient Greek mythology Roman literature Classical studies Translation theory "To translate is to conquer" Stephanie McCarter's Penguin translation The history of Rome and Greece Mythological retellings Poetry and meter Horace, Virgil, and Catullus The politics of storytelling Women in classical literature Sexual violence in ancient texts The philosophy of change and transformation 00:00:00 Translation as conquest 00:01:28 Introduction 00:05:00 Flux, Rome, and McCarter’s translation 00:10:07 Stephanie McCarter arrives 00:13:04 Poetic epigraph 00:14:34 English poetry, Dickinson, Byron, and Chaucer 00:16:45 Horace and the magic of Latin 00:21:51 Ovid in Latin: speed, play, and rhetoric 00:25:27 Virgil, allusion, and Ovidian style 00:30:30 Epic, epyllion, and the structure of the *Metamorphoses* 00:38:08 Greece, Rome, and translation as conquest 00:42:35 Translating Ovid: negotiation, constraint, and compensation 00:53:38 McCarter vs Mandelbaum: architecture and line 01:00:16 Apollo, Daphne, archaism, and poetic style 01:06:06 Puns, wordplay, Catullus, and the “fuckathon” 01:09:12 Sexual violence, legal language, and Roman readers 01:14:54 Arachne, power, Augustus, and exile 01:20:14 Ovid’s immortality and the final metamorphosis 01:21:27 Nature, flux, Lucretius, and the minded cosmos 01:29:58 Ovid, Shakespeare, and negative capability 01:36:30 First Encounters and Farewells

About

Solomon & Smith discuss literature, philosophy, history, film, and the meaning of the universe.