Solomon & Smith

Solomon & Smith

Solomon & Smith discuss literature, philosophy, history, film, and the meaning of the universe.

  1. Aug 4

    The Greatest Books You’ve Never Read (1800-2000) | Adam Walter’s Picks

    *- Adam's list is pasted below -* Please help us to keep having these conversations by supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/solomonsmith/membership In this video Adam discusses his favourite works of fiction decade by decade, starting in 1800 and going 200 years, decade by decade, until they reach the borders of our present century. If you would like to be interviewed by us about your favourite books, please send an email. 1800s Elective Affinities - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe 1810s The Golden Pot - E.T.A. Hoffmann 1820s Melmoth the Wanderer - Charles Maturin 1830s The Charterhouse of Parma - Stendhal 1840s Lost Illusions - Honoré de Balzac 1850s Sylvie - Gérard de Nerval 1860s Our Mutual Friend - Charles Dickens 1870s Demons - Fyodor Dostoevsky 1880s The Posthumous Memoirs of Brás Cubas - Machado de Assis 1890s The Christ and Antichrist Trilogy - Dmitry Merezhkovsky 1900s Hadji Murat - Leo Tolstoy 1910s In Search of Lost Time - Marcel Proust 1920s Rakes of the Old Court - Mateiu Caragiale 1930s A Glastonbury Romance - John Cowper Powys 1940s The Death of Virgil - Hermann Broch 1950s Memoirs of Hadrian - Marguerite Yourcenar 1960s Riders in the Chariot - Patrick White 1970s The Obscene Bird of Night - José Donoso 1980s Repetition - Peter Handke 1990s The Rehearsals - Vladimir Sharov 0:00 Introduction 2:23 Adam arrives 7:27 1800s 10:22 1810s 14:28 1820s 18:40 1830s 21:55 1840s 27:42 1850s 30:30 1860s 36:04 1870s 42:30 1880s 44:18 1890s 48:32 1900s 51:12 1910s 59:40 1920s 1:03:19 1930s 1:06:46 1940s 1:10:46 1950s 1:12:55 1960s 1:15:41 1970s 1:21:58 1980s 1:23:35 1990s 1:28:45 Conclusion

  2. Jul 31

    The Greatest Playwright of the 17th Century (after Shakespeare) | Elaine Hobby

    Please help us continue having these discussions by supporting us over on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/SolomonSmith Elaine Hobby is one of the foremost experts in the work of Aphra Behn: the greatest playwright of the Restoration, and one of the greatest woman writers of all. In this conversation, Jack and Milo talk to Elaine specifically about Aphra Behn's theatre: how did it differ from her contemporaries; what made it so great; how did a woman who began her career as a spy in the employ of Charles II find her way to the stage; and what was the secret to her enduring popular success? The discussion also covers the history of the Restoration stage, returning as it did from the ban under Cromwell's Commonwealth. How did women end up acting, a profession once restricted to men? How did Charles II's personal tastes influence the theatre? We also analyse the types and plots used by Behn in her plays, and the way she bends traditional structure to her art. Was her theatre entirely comic? Or does it contain a pathos, or even a subversive character? Subscribe if you enjoy discussions of literature, philosophy, history, and the greatest plays ever written. Topics discussed: Elaine Hobby's fascination with Aphra Behn and her period Women on the stage The backstory of Aphra Behn Her travels and her espionage The nature of the Restoration Stage Behn's early hits The Lucky Chance The Feigned Courtesans The Rover, her biggest and most enduring hit The Emperor of the Moon Rakes, racounteurs, and clever women Aphra Behn's ideas on marriage and friendship If you enjoyed the conversation, please like, subscribe, and leave a comment telling us your favourite Behn play - or if you're planning on reading her after watching! 0:00 Introduction 7:09 Elaine Hobby Arrives 15:21 Feminism and the Rediscovery of Women Writers 22:40 Charles II, the Restoration, and Women on Stage 33:04 The Mysterious Early Life of Aphra Behn 38:02 Espionage, Antwerp and the Surinam Question 48:05 What Made Behn’s Plays Different? 55:05 The Rover: Sex, Money, Women 1:10:53 Behn and the Marriage Comedy 1:17:30 Reading and Performing Restoration Drama Today 1:24:00 The Emperor of the Moon and Theatrical Spectacle 1:42:59 Why Behn Still Matters The music used is Fanny Hensel's Piano Trio, performed by the Claremont Trio under the following license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

  3. Jul 28

    The Greatest Films of Every 5 Years (part two - 1970-2024) | Jack and Milo’s Picks

    Please help us continue having these discussions by supporting us over on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/SolomonSmith - Our full lists are pasted below - 1970-1974 Jack's Pick: Amarcord, dir. Federico Fellini Milo's Pick: Aguirre, the Wrath of God, dir. Werner Herzog 1975-1979 Jack's Pick: Monty Python's Life of Brian, dir. Terry Jones Milo's Pick: All That Jazz, dir. Bob Fosse 1980-1984 Jack's Pick: Koyaanisqatsi, dir. Godfrey Reggio Milo's Pick: The Draughtsman's Contract, dir. Peter Greenaway 1985-1989 Jack's Pick: Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown, dir. Pedro Almodóvar Milo's Pick: Ran, dir. Akira Kurosawa 1990-1994 Jack's Pick: 32 Short Films About Glenn Gould, dir. François Girard Milo's Pick: The Long Day Closes, dir. Terence Davies 1995-1999 Jack's Pick: Eyes Wide Shut, dir. Stanley Kubrick Milo's Pick: The Thin Red Line, dir. Terrence Malick 2000-2004 Jack's Pick: Mulholland Drive, dir. David Lynch Milo's Pick: The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, dir. Peter Jackson 2005-2009 Jack's Pick: King Kong, dir. Peter Jackson Milo's Pick: My Winnipeg, dir. Guy Maddin 2010-2014 Jack's Pick: The Master, dir. Paul Thomas Anderson Milo's Pick: The Master, dir. Paul Thomas Anderson 2015-2019 Jack's Pick: The Love Witch, dir. Anna Biller Milo's Pick: A Hidden Life, dir. Terrence Malick 2020-2024 Jack's Pick: Killers of the Flower Moon, dir. Martin Scorsese Milo's Pick: ??? 00:00:00 Introduction 00:02:42 1970-1974 00:14:47 1975-1979 00:27:26 1980-1984 00:42:45 1985-1989 00:58:39 1990-1994 01:16:57 1995-1999 01:42:26 2000-2004 02:02:27 2005-2009 02:16:29 2010-2014 02:22:48 2015-2019 02:34:34 2020-2024 02:42:07 The Final Film

  4. Jul 24

    You’ve Never Heard of Russia’s Strangest Literary Genius | Oliver Ready on Dostoevsky and Sharov

    Oliver Ready is one of the world's greatest translators of Russian literature, most famous for his translation of Fyodor Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment. In this conversation with Jack and Milo, he speaks about what makes Dostoevsky's prose so distinctive, direct, and contemporary, and why Vladimir Sharov may be the greatest Russian novelist you've never read. The discussion covers Dostoevsky's literary reputation, Nabokov's famous criticism of his work, the art of literary translation, Russian history, and, in the latter part, Sharov's astonishing novels, which blend theology, politics, history, and surreal imagination into something unlike anything else in modern literature. Subscribe if you enjoy discussions of literature, philosophy, history, and the greatest novels ever written. Topics discussed: Oliver Ready's translation of Crime and Punishment What makes Dostoevsky's writing unique Nabokov vs. Dostoevsky Vladimir Sharov's extraordinary novels Before and During The Rehearsals Russian literature and literary translation Soviet history, theology, and magical realism How translators recreate style across languages Books Mentioned Crime and Punishment — Fyodor Dostoevsky The Brothers Karamazov — Fyodor Dostoevsky Notes from Underground — Fyodor Dostoevsky The Double — Fyodor Dostoevsky Before and During — Vladimir Sharov The Rehearsals — Vladimir Sharov Be as Children — Vladimir Sharov The Master and Margarita — Mikhail Bulgakov If you enjoyed the conversation, please like, subscribe, and leave a comment telling us your favourite Russian novel—or whether you're planning to read Vladimir Sharov after watching. 00:00:00 General Introduction 00:04:00 Vladimir Sharov Synopsis and Discussion 00:13:10 Oliver Ready Arrives, Discussion of Insomnia 00:17:44 Poetic Epigraph 00:20:14 Dostoevsky's Reputation, Nabokov's Slander 00:24:40 Translating Crime and Punishment, prose style etc. 00:39:05 Do certain authors suit English better than others? 00:42:37 Translating Sharov vs. Dostoevsky 00:45:55 Post Soviet Literary Culture, Sharov's place in it 00:50:12 Sharov's uncompromising style and voice 00:54:20 Does Sharov make sense to a non-Russian? 01:00:43 Before and During, and the Religiosity of Communism 01:06:00 Innocence, Experience, and the Gulags 01:10:47 Master and Margarita, Russian History as Commentary to the Bible 01:18:38 Sharov, Magic Realism, and originality 01:24:20 What was Sharov like? 01:31:44 The Russian Tradition of the Fantastical 01:36:38 Sharov's fairytales, Sharov's crowds, Sharov's walks 01:41:28 Ready's first exposure to Sharov 01:45:00 White Moss, Reductive 'Problematic' criticism of other cultures 01:48:25 Sharov 'Not Obvious Enough'

  5. Jul 21

    The Greatest Films of Every 5 Years (part one - 1915-1969) | Jack and Milo’s Picks

    Please help us continue having these discussions by supporting us over on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/SolomonSmith - Our full lists are pasted below - 1915-1919 Jack's Pick: Intolerance, dir. D.W. Griffith Milo's Pick: Terje Vigen, dir. Victor Sjörström 1920-1924 Jack's Pick: Häxan, dir. Benjamin Christensen Milo's Pick: Die Niebelungen, dir. Fritz Lang 1925-1929 Jack's Pick: Sunrise, dir. F.W. Murnau Milo's Pick: Napoleon, dir. Abel Gance 1930-1934 Jack's Pick: M, dir. Fritz Lang Milo's Pick: Twentieth Century, dir. Howard Hawks 1935-1939 Jack's Pick: The Adventures of Robin Hood, dir. Michael Curtiz Milo's Pick: Olympia Part 1 (prelude), dir. Leni Riefenstahl 1940-1944 Jack's Pick: Fantasia, dir. Various Milo's Pick: Ivan the Terrible Part 1, dir. Sergei Eisenstein 1945-1949 Jack's Pick: It's a Wonderful Life, dir. Frank Capra Milo's Pick: The Third Man, dir. Carol Reed 1950-1954 Jack's Pick: Singin' in the Rain, dir. Stanley Donen Milo's Pick: Early Summer, dir. Yasujiro Ozu 1955-1959 Jack's Pick: Madhumati, dir. Bimal Roy Milo's Pick: The Cranes are Flying, dir. Mikhail Kalatozov 1960-1964 Jack's Pick: Lawrence of Arabia, dir. David Lean Milo's Pick: Dr Strangelove, dir. Stanley Kubrick 1965-1969 Jack's Pick: Andrei Rublev, dir. Andrei Tarkovsky Milo's Pick: Playtime, dir. Jacques Tati 00:00:00 Introduction 00:05:24 1915-1919 00:11:57 1920-1924 00:21:20 1925-1929 00:29:20 1930-1934 00:38:53 1935-1939 00:50:44 1940-1944 01:02:53 1945-1949 01:18:03 1950-1954 (Milo late 50s) 01:32:27 1955-1959 (Milo early 50s) 01:47:56 1960-1964 02:05:23 1965-1969

  6. Jul 17

    Was Paradise Already Lost? | Achsah Guibbory on Milton’s Theology of Desire

    Please help us to keep having these conversations by supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/solomonsmith/membership In this conversation, Achsah Guibbory joins Jack and Milo to discuss John Donne, John Milton, love, sex, sin, marriage, desire, Paradise Lost, and the problem of whether erotic love can ever be holy. Donne and Milton are two of the great Johns of seventeenth-century English poetry, claimed by some to be entirely different men. Donne is witty, erotic, devotional, cynical, sacred, obscene, metaphysical, and impossible to pin down. Milton is austere, sublime, political, theological, revolutionary, authoritarian, and not much fun at a party. Yet both poets return, in radically different ways, to the same infinity: love. The discussion begins with the word itself. What did “love” mean in the seventeenth century, before Darwin, before Freud, and before modern romantic individualism? How did English poetry inherit older distinctions between erotic love, spiritual love, charity, friendship, desire, marriage, and the love of God? And why does one little English monosyllable have to carry so much metaphysical weight? Guibbory places Donne and Milton against the long Christian tradition that associated sex with sin, chastity with holiness, and desire with the Fall. Augustine looms large: original sin, shame, bodily rebellion, and the problem of sexual desire after Eden. But Donne, in poems such as *The Good-Morrow*, *The Ecstasy*, *The Canonization*, *The Sun Rising*, and *A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning*, offers something stranger and more daring: the possibility that bodily love might itself become spiritual. The conversation then turns to Milton’s *Paradise Lost*. What is sex like before the Fall? Do Adam and Eve desire one another in Eden, or is their prelapsarian love something more equal, mutual, peaceful, and almost desireless? What changes after the fruit is eaten? Why does Milton describe postlapsarian sex as the “seal of guilt”? And why does Adam fall so quickly once Eve has fallen? Along the way we discuss Milton’s bower scene, Eve’s reflection in the lake, Adam’s loneliness, Satan’s resentment, hierarchy, equality, the strange ending of *Paradise Regained*, and whether Milton gives Satan some of his own political instincts. We also talk about Donne’s contradictions, Milton’s unresolved tensions, Thomas Browne, Kafka's weird humour, and why great writers are often most alive when they have not fully solved themselves. Expect reflections on: John Donne and John Milton as rival poets of love Achsah Guibbory on Donne, Milton, sex, and theology Augustine, original sin, chastity, and sexual shame Erotic love, spiritual love, charity, and marriage Donne’s love poetry and the holiness of consummated desire Milton’s *Paradise Lost* and sex before the Fall Adam, Eve, equality, hierarchy, and the bower scene Desire as lack, danger, or spiritual possibility Satan, resentment, monarchy, and Milton’s politics The difference between Donne’s lyric contradictions and Milton’s epic resolutions The “seal of guilt” and sex after the Fall Milton’s divorce tracts and the nightmare of “household captivity” Paradise, the New Jerusalem, and whether we really want a world without desire If you enjoy long-form conversations on poetry, literature, theology, philosophy, seventeenth-century writing, erotic love, sin, Milton, Donne, and the strange borderlands between body and soul, subscribe to the channel and leave a comment below. Who writes love better: John Donne or John Milton? And can erotic love ever be holy? Chapters: 00:00:00 Sex, sin, and Donne’s dangerous poetry 00:01:16 Introduction 00:06:32 Achsah Guibbory appears 00:11:06 Milton’s youthful love poem 00:16:02 Donne versus Milton 00:20:23 What does “love” mean? 00:27:03 Augustine’s sexual legacy 00:29:02 Donne’s sacred eroticism 00:31:17 Plato, Genesis, and desire 00:35:14 Sex before the Fall 00:44:33 Desire, lack, and Satan 00:49:41 Milton’s unresolved epic 00:52:41 Donne’s contradictions 00:56:30 Paradise Regained and grace 01:01:16 Adam’s desire 01:12:20 Eve and Adam fall 01:14:16 Sex after the Fall 01:22:52 The Messiah's Daughter 01:33:23 Marriage, divorce, and captivity Correction: 2:00 It is, in fact, Barnard.

  7. Jul 10

    Who REALLY Wrote the Quran? | Gabriel Said Reynolds

    Please help us continue having these discussions by supporting us over on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/SolomonSmith Who wrote the Quran? Did it flow directly from God? Did Muhammad compose it? Did several authors compose it over several centuries? Does it have the characteristics of a dictated text, or a written text? How simple or complicated is the story of the Quran's origins? In this episode, Jack and Milo are joined by Islamic studies scholar Gabriel Said Reynolds to explore one of the most controversial questions in Islamic Studies. The conversation examines the traditional Islamic account of the Quran alongside modern academic perspectives. Reynolds argues that the evidence may point toward a more complex process of composition than is commonly assumed, challenging the long-standing Western, secular scholarly consensus that Muhammad himself was the sole human author. Topics include: • Who wrote the Quran? • Did Muhammad write the Quran? • The traditional Islamic narrative of revelation • Academic theories of Quranic authorship • How the Quran was compiled and transmitted • Why the Quran is arranged by surah length rather than chronology • The relationship between the Quran, the Torah, and the Gospel • The emergence of Classical Arabic • The literary qualities and inimitability (i'jaz) of the Quran • Early Islamic history • Historical-critical approaches to the Quran • Western scholarship on the origins of Islam If you enjoy long-form conversations on religion, philosophy, history, and literature, consider subscribing for more discussions with scholars.

About

Solomon & Smith discuss literature, philosophy, history, film, and the meaning of the universe.