LessWrong (30+ Karma)

LessWrong

Audio narrations of LessWrong posts.

  1. 2시간 전

    “OpenAI #15: More on OpenAI’s Paranoid Lawfare Against Advocates of SB 53” by Zvi

    A little over a month ago, I documented how OpenAI had descended into paranoia and bad faith lobbying surrounding California's SB 53. This included sending a deeply bad faith letter to Governor Newsom, which sadly is par for the course at this point. It also included lawfare attacks against bill advocates, including Nathan Calvin and others, using Elon Musk's unrelated lawsuits and vendetta against OpenAI as a pretext, accusing them of being in cahoots with Elon Musk. Previous reporting of this did not reflect well on OpenAI, but it sounded like the demand was limited in scope to a supposed link with Elon Musk or Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, links which very clearly never existed. Accusing essentially everyone who has ever done anything OpenAI dislikes of having united in a hallucinated ‘vast conspiracy’ is all classic behavior for OpenAI's Chief Global Affairs Officer Chris Lehane [...] --- Outline: (02:35) What OpenAI Tried To Do To Nathan Calvin (07:22) It Doesn't Look Good (10:17) OpenAI's Jason Kwon Responds (19:14) A Brief Amateur Legal Analysis Of The Request (21:33) What OpenAI Tried To Do To Tyler Johnston (25:50) Nathan Compiles Responses to Kwon (29:52) The First Thing We Do (36:12) OpenAI Head of Mission Alignment Joshua Achiam Speaks Out (40:16) It Could Be Worse (41:31) Chris Lehane Is Who We Thought He Was (42:50) A Matter of Distrust --- First published: October 13th, 2025 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/txTKHL2dCqnC7QsEX/openai-15-more-on-openai-s-paranoid-lawfare-against --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO. --- Images from the article: Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

    46분
  2. 2시간 전

    “Sublinear Utility in Population and other Uncommon Utilitarianism” by Alice Blair

    Content warning: Anthropics, Moral Philosophy, and Shrimp This post isn't trying to be self contained, since I have so many disparate thoughts about this. Instead, I'm trying to put a representative set of ideas forward, and I hope that if people are interested we can discuss this more in the comments. I also plan to turn this into a (probably small) sequence at some point. I've had a number of conversations about moral philosophy where I make some claim like Utility is bounded and asymptotically sublinear in number of human lives, but superlinear or ~linear in the ranges we will ever have to care about. Common reactions to this include: "Wait, what?" "Why would that be the case?" "This doesn't make any sense relative to my existing conceptions of classical utilitarianism, what is going on here?" So I have gotten the impression that this is a decently [...] --- Outline: (02:11) Aside: Utilitarianism (02:28) The More Mathy Pointer (03:15) Duplicate Simulations (05:50) Slightly Different Simulations (07:31) Utility Variation with Population (07:51) More is Better (08:06) In Some Domains, More is Superlinearly Better (08:41) But Value Space is Limited (09:21) What About The Other Animals? (10:55) What Does this Mean About Classical EA? (11:58) Other Curiosities The original text contained 3 footnotes which were omitted from this narration. --- First published: October 13th, 2025 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NRxn6R2tesRzzTBKG/sublinear-utility-in-population-and-other-uncommon --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO. --- Images from the article: Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

    13분

소개

Audio narrations of LessWrong posts.

좋아할 만한 다른 항목