Talentless

Welcome to Talentless 👋, the podcast that’s all HR, all talent, and zero fluff—the official show for recruiters, by recruiters! If you’re in the people business, this is your one-stop shop for everything that matters. Hosted Industry Leaders Ashley King and Desiree Goldey, we’re here to dig into the heart of what makes workplaces tick (and sometimes, blow up). From talent acquisition tips that actually work to the real talk on DEI and workforce trauma reshaping our industry, we’re not afraid to get into the messy, the meaningful, and the downright motivating. Buckle up—this is where you become the best in the business.

  1. 49m ago

    Active or Passive: The Recruiter Line That Decides Who Survives AI

    Amit Parmar, Co-Founder & CEO, Cliquify LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/parmar79 | Company: cliquify.me Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/cliquify/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@cliquify Somewhere around minute thirty-four of this episode, Amit Parmar describes the best recruiter he ever managed: a guy who refused to look at the applicants. He would take the req, go out into the world, find the right person, and disposition the inbound pile afterward. As a TA leader running dashboards, Amit hated it. Looking back, he thinks that recruiter was the only one doing the actual job. That is where this conversation lands, and almost none of it is where it started. Amit is the co-founder and CEO of Cliquify, an employer brand storytelling platform used by global enterprises, and he spent eighteen years in the seats before that, starting in HR transformation at IBM. He came on to talk about what storytelling actually means for recruiters, and his definition is refreshingly small: stop rewriting the job description and go ask the hiring manager what kind of leader they are, because that is the only thing the candidate actually wants to know. Desiree’s immediate response is the funniest and most damning moment in the episode. She is not sure most hiring managers could answer it. Ashley then flips the whole premise, arguing the storytelling that matters most is not recruiter to candidate at all. It is recruiter to hiring manager, and she walks through a candidate she pushed forward that week who failed a technical screen, circled back on their own to fix it, and just got called the best performer that manager has seen on a role that sat open for two and a half years. An AI screen would have ended that story at the failed question. From there it gets loose, and better. Amit describes an industry approaching bots talking to bots, applicants gaming systems at a scale nobody has seen, ATSs stacking filters on filters. Desiree calls out clients who cannot get headcount approved but can get five new tools approved, and names the actual failure: nobody diagnosed the original problem before buying the solution. Ashley coins the Competitive Plateau, the point where a high-volume worker has cycled through every competitor in their market and stops choosing jobs on fifty cents an hour, and then says out loud that products profit off recruiter dysfunction, forgetting for one glorious second that she is saying it to a product CEO. He takes it well, because he agrees. Amit’s counter is that the order everyone uses is wrong: it is not people, process, tech. It is strategy, then process, then the people who fit that process, then tech as an enabler. And underneath all of it, the reason we keep buying shiny things, is that humans innovate because we are lazy, and a recruiter with fifty open reqs does not have time for strategy. Stay for the last ten minutes, where Amit opens up Cleo, the tool Cliquify uses to tell a recruiter in Budapest exactly which four companies are taking their data scientists, and Ashley delivers a history lesson on how your job posting ended up on Indeed without anyone ever posting it there. In this episode: What storytelling actually means, stripped of the buzzword, and the one question to ask a hiring manager that changes a job post Why the storytelling that moves the needle most is recruiter to hiring manager, not recruiter to candidate Ashley’s real example of a candidate who failed the screen and became the best hire on a two-and-a-half-year-old req What the Edelman trust data actually says, and why "people trust their employer" is a ranking, not a win The Competitive Plateau: what happens when a high-volume worker has already worked for every competitor in town Bots talking to bots, and the ATS filter stack built to clean up a mess we created Why companies can get five tools approved but not one more recruiter Strategy, process, people, tech, and why everyone runs that order backward Humans innovate because we are lazy, and what that means for every product purchase in TA Why products sell you symptom relief, and how root cause analysis always defaults to "top of funnel" Active versus passive recruiters, and Amit’s case that one of them has about a year left How Cleo maps who is stealing your data scientists in Hungary, and what Cliquify will not use AI for How your job posting got on Indeed without anyone ever posting it there Resources & Links Amit Parmar on LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/parmar79 Cliquify: cliquify.me (also cliquify.ai, both redirect) People Brand Collective, where Amit is a founding board member James Ellis, name-checked by Desiree on employer brand Desiree’s book, Leadership is a Practice, Not a Personality, out October 27, 2026 Catch Talentless at RecFest USA (Nashville, Sept 23-24) and HR Tech this fall

  2. 6d ago

    Just Send The Email: What Hiring Transparency Actually Takes

    Just Send The Email: What Hiring Transparency Actually Takes Alex Feder, Founder of Ghosted.work LinkedIn · Ghosted (ghosted.work/trace, free, public beta) Desiree and Ashley flip the usual Talentless lens this week. Instead of coaching recruiters, they sit down with someone who just spent a year living on the other side of the desk. Alex Feder, founder of Ghosted.work, walks through the exact frustration that pushed him to start building: getting ghosted himself, realizing "we didn't design the system" but that AI and application volume have amplified every crack already in it, and eventually teaching himself to build software rather than just posting about it on LinkedIn. He walks through Trace, his new tool that turns a candidate's own inbox into an organized Trello-style board of every application in flight, and makes a pointed case for why it's different from the "top ghosters" call-out sites already out there (his read: those sites are running on a handful of anonymous submissions, not real data). The middle of the conversation is where it gets uncomfortable in a good way. Alex defines transparency as something close to plain communication, not full disclosure: "the answer is not silence." Ashley pushes further, naming what's actually happening when a company goes quiet, "the human is broken, the human doesn't want to have to say no," and tells her own recent ghosting story: a company sent her a rejection letter before she'd even interviewed, then called back days later asking to schedule the interview they'd already rejected her from. Desiree and Ashley also get into the fake-job problem (Alex has watched response rates on some listings sit under 1%), a company Ashley knew of that posted fake jobs on LinkedIn purely to farm followers, and the emerging mess of AI applying to jobs that were never real in the first place. They close on the practical and the philosophical. Alex makes the case for homework assignments and live presentations over rapid-fire interview questions, because they're hard to fake even with AI help. Ashley pitches "Rate My Recruiter" and connects candidate experience directly to closing the wealth gap, arguing that hiring the long-term unemployed is one of the highest-leverage moves a company can make without waiting on any legislation. If you needed a reminder that the person on the other end of your ATS is a person, this is the episode. In this episode: Why Alex built Ghosted.work after his own brutal year of job searching, and why he built Trace as a second, narrower product instead of scaling the first What "transparency in hiring" actually means in practice, from both the candidate side and the recruiter side Ashley's own ghosting story: rejected before the interview, then invited back to interview for the role she'd already been rejected from The fake-job problem, response rates under 1%, and a real (anonymized) story about a company posting fake listings just to farm LinkedIn followers AI on both sides of the hiring table, and Alex's line: "these are two cars racing to a red light" Why Alex is skeptical of the existing "call out the ghosters" sites and how Trace's approach differs Homework assignments and live presentations as a harder-to-fake alternative to standard interview questions Ashley's "Rate My Recruiter" pitch and the case for hiring the long-term unemployed as a wealth-gap lever Resources/Links: Ghosted.work: https://ghosted.work/ Trace: https://ghosted.work/trace Alex Feder on LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/alexfeder Desiree's book, Leadership is a Practice, Not a Personality, out October 2026 Talentless at RecFest and HR Tech this fall

  3. Sep 2

    Kill Your Indeed Habit: What Job Ads Actually Cost You

    Jason Pistulka, Founder & Principal Consultant, StratTech Talent Consulting and AdvisoryLinkedIn (linkedin.com/in/jasonpistulka) | Website (strattechconsulting.com) | Newsletter: The Talent Strategy Brief Jason Pistulka spent over 25 years in HR and recruiting including roles at Microsoft, Stora Enso, and CUNA Mutual Group, then a decade at HCA Healthcare (2014–2025), rising from Sr. Director of Talent Acquisition to AVP of Talent Acquisition Strategy, Operations & Candidate Engagement, where he led a national recruiting team of up to 600 people, managing over 40,000 open requisitions and more than 125,000 hires a year. Since 2019 he's run StratTech Talent Consulting and Advisory, and currently advises a long roster of HR tech companies including Joveo, Fountain, s free Google for Jobs audits and has made "kill the dependency on Indeed" something close to a personal mission statement. This one's a full teardown of where recruitment advertising money actually goes. Jason opens with the thing that amazes him most: most companies can't answer the basic question of what their ad spend is doing, because they're still relying on a candidate-filled dropdown menu nobody takes seriously. From there he walks through his own viral audit of Walmart's career site 14 million visitors a month, a resume-matching tool so broken it gave Jason's high-school-diploma son and a senior finance executive the exact same job matches, and no working Google for Jobs at the largest private employer in America. He doesn't spare Indeed either: this is the guy behind the widely-read "How Indeed Is Losing What Little Trust It Had of Both Candidates and Employers" article, and on the show he goes further, on record, calling out Indeed executives directly for dressing up a minimum spend requirement as "candidate experience."The back half turns practical and a little unhinged in the best way: Jason walks through how to actually audit ad spend (source tracking, cost-per-quality-application, conversion by channel), reveals that Bing quietly drove 11% of his traffic with better engagement than anyone expected, and then because apparently a slow weekend calls for it describes building a fully functioning ATS with automation from scratch in about ten hours, just to prove that the technology isn't the hard part legacy vendors want you to think it is. Ashley and Jason geek out hard on tech stacks, and it's a genuinely fun listen even before you get to the part where he says he built a chatbot that beats Phenom and Paradox. In this episode: Why most companies can't answer "what did that ad spend actually do"The Walmart career site teardown: 14M monthly visitors, no working Google for Jobs, a resume-matching tool that gives everyone the same jobsJason's viral takedown of Indeed, and why he says "the soul of Indeed rotted some time ago"The AI Apply bot problem, and why one of Jason's clients turned off Easy Apply entirelyThe 11%-of-traffic channel nobody believed in (hint: it's Bing)The ATS Jason built from scratch in one weekend, and what that means for legacy vendor pricingWhy ERP platforms like Workday, Oracle, and UKG consistently fail at recruiting's transactional volumeAshley's Talent Outside the Box segment on data hygiene vs. data integrity Resources/Links: StratTech Talent Consulting and Advisory: strattechconsulting.comThe Talent Strategy Brief (Jason's newsletter, weekly, 2,496+ subscribers)Article: "How Indeed Is Losing What Little Trust It Had of Both Candidates and Employers"Article: "Walmart is the Largest Private Employer in America. Their Career Site is Broken."Book: Leadership is a Practice, Not a Personality out October 2026Talentless at RecFest USA and HR Tech Conference this fall

  4. Aug 26

    Stop Hiring Out of Panic

    Alycia M. Huston, Founder & CEO, The Culture Cru LinkedIn | Website: theculturecru.com | Instagram | Threads: @alyciahuston | YouTube Alycia M. Huston spent a decade co-founding and running a biopharma company in San Diego, sold it in 2014, and stayed on through the acquisition, watching two completely different operating systems try to merge into one. Now she runs The Culture Cru, working almost exclusively with founders and small-to-medium businesses on building intentional hiring and culture from the ground up, before the org chart outruns the people in it. This one's a masterclass in slowing down without slowing down. Alycia opens with a live story from a $25M founder client who was about to fill a VP seat out of pure urgency, until Alycia asked her one question that stopped the hire cold: does this person actually represent your mission when you're no longer in the room to reinforce it? Desiree and Alycia dig into why "urgency" and "precision" aren't opposites, why most founders think candidate experience is optional, and why one client's plan to let an AI bot handle all candidate screening ended exactly how you'd expect (spoiler: he hired Alycia three months later to clean it up). Alycia also brings her biopharma background into the conversation in a way that actually lands, borrowing the "phased approach" from clinical trials and applying it directly to hiring: proving out each stage with data before moving to the next, instead of skipping straight to "just get someone in the seat." She and Ashley also get into candidate anchor bias (how a bad timeline promise wrecks trust before day one even starts) and the founder mindset trap of assuming everyone should already want to work for you. In this episode: Why urgency and precision aren't in conflict, and how founders confuse "fast" with "right" The one question Alycia asks founders before they make a hire out of panic What she took from clinical trial "phased approach" and "preparatory research" and brought into hiring and culture work Why 60% of the founders she's worked with in the last six months still don't prioritize candidate experience The AI-bot screening story that ends about how you'd expect Why 80% of Alycia's actual work ends up being culture work, not hiring work How to diagnose a culture that's already broken (and why "listening" is a skill most talent people think they have and don't) The founder mindset trap: assuming everyone should already want to work for you Ashley's Talent Outside the Box segment on the psychology of cohort-style onboarding and retention Resources/Links: The Culture Cru: theculturecru.com The Culture Constellation (Alycia's newsletter) Book: Leadership is a Practice, Not a Personality — out October 2026 Talentless at RecFest USA and HR Tech Conference this fall

  5. Aug 19

    Merit Won't Get You Hired. Visibility Will.

    Abdurrahman "Muni" Muni, Founder @ Dreampath, Ex-Head of Global Talent Acquisition @ ApplyBoard LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ammuni Website: dreampath (site TBD, confirm URL with Muni) Booking link: calendly.com/muni-dreampath/careerchat Merit isn't dead, but it's not driving the bus alone anymore, and this episode is Desiree and Ashley pulling that apart with Abdurrahman "Muni" Muni, founder of Dreampath and former Head of Global Talent Acquisition at ApplyBoard, where he helped scale the company from 300 to 1,000 people in two years. Muni opens by self-introducing himself the way he actually talks to clients: if you're seven-plus years into your career and suddenly having an existential crisis in the job market, he's the guy who fixes that. From there the conversation moves through relationships versus resumes (and why the answer genuinely depends on which "group" a candidate falls into), what actually happens to an application once it hits an ATS, and Muni's central reframe: you are a business of one, your experience is your product, and target companies are your customers. Ashley brings the recruiter's side of the table, walking through what hiring managers actually mean when they say they want an "autonomous learner," and calling out the ugly reality of back-channel referrals, where a manager's cousin or neighbor gets fast-tracked past a legitimate process. She draws a hard line between a one-way relationship (an employee genuinely recommending a great company to a friend) and a two-way one (a manager strong-arming a recruiter into an interview because they personally know the candidate). The conversation also covers ageism and why Muni tells clients to stop spending emotional energy on bias they can't control, the return of the long resume as AI keyword-matching reshapes what gets screened in, and a real debate between performance-based hiring versus tenure-based hiring, including Ashley's blunt read that most companies claim to be meritocracies but are actually just capitalism for their friends. Talent Outside the Box closes the episode with Ashley going deep on why back-channeling candidates is functionally unethical outside of true C-suite hiring, and how it introduces anchor bias that sets candidates up to fail before they've even walked in the door.

  6. Aug 12

    Back to Basics Vol. 1

    In this episode, Desiree and Ashley ditch the guest chair and go one-on-one for a back-to-basics refresher — the terminology, habits, and blind spots that trip up even experienced recruiters. After a suitably unhinged icebreaker (where would you not want to die?), they dig into three fundamentals: the real difference between a prospect, an applicant, a candidate, and a new hire — and why mixing these up costs you money with vendors and credibility with hiring managers; how to actually vet a job description before it touches a sourcing tool, including how to spot an unedited AI-generated JD and the "Frankenstein role" problem (rockstar, ninja, unicorn); and a full walkthrough of how to build a comp business case with real, named data sources instead of a gut feeling. Ashley closes with a Talent Outside the Box segment on research showing how gendered language in job descriptions changes who applies. They ran out of time before hitting two more topics on the list — when to challenge a hiring manager, and what to do the moment a req lands on your desk — so consider this Part 1. In This Episode: 0:00 – Cold open: the "where would you haunt after you died" icebreaker 3:14 – Why they're doing a two-host, no-guest basics episode 4:02 – Prospect vs. applicant vs. candidate vs. new hire, defined for real 18:26 – The case for training recruiters instead of blaming them 22:07 – Did a hiring manager let AI write this JD? 23:40 – The "Frankenstein role" and why rockstar/ninja/unicorn JDs backfire 33:01 – Vague JDs create legal and operational liability, not just bad candidates 38:07 – Comp 101: BLS, Salary.com, LinkedIn, O*NET, and internal ATS data 44:14 – How to actually negotiate comp with a hiring manager who won't budge 48:56 – Talent Outside the Box: gendered language and who applies 52:26 – Where to find them + fall event schedule Resources & Links Mentioned: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (Bureau of Labor Statistics) O*NET Salary.com · LinkedIn (salary insights) · Glassdoor · Radford Kat Kidman (Kat Kibben) — job description writing expert Dr. Amanda Diekman — research on gendered language in job descriptions HR Data Labs — Desiree's consulting engagement Erin Risco — recommended follow for BLS/comp content Steve Levy — referenced for his "6/9/12 month" hiring manager question RecFest USA 2026 and HR Tech Conference — where to catch them this fall Note: This episode intentionally left two topics on the table , challenging a hiring manager, and the "got a req, now what" routine for a Part 2.

  7. Aug 5

    Why Has Recruiting Not Changed Since 1996?" with Matt Schalsey, CEO, PerfectHire

    Matt Schalsey, CEO of PerfectHire, joins Desiree and Ashley to argue that recruiters are basically salespeople and the hosts don't fully let him off the hook. Matt built PerfectHire after getting laid off one too many times as a sales enablement leader and deciding the real problem wasn't him, or the hiring managers, or even most recruiters, it was the systems everyone was forced to work inside of. His answer: an ATS/CRM built around the idea that hiring a CFO and hiring a BDR should never run through the same workflow. The conversation gets into where the "recruiting is sales" comparison holds up and where it falls apart. Matt's case: recruiters prospect, negotiate, multi-thread, and carry quota pressure just like sellers do. Ashley's counter: recruiting is "sales plus ethics" recruiters are asking candidates to trust them with their family, their income, and their life, not just a purchase decision, and that changes what "closing" should even mean. Desiree lands in the middle, coming from a sales background herself but pushing back on flattening recruiters into a one-to-one sales analogy when the industry still can't reliably prove ROI the way sales can. From there the conversation moves into the real 1996 problem: vanity metrics like time-to-fill, ATS systems that quietly penalize candidates for reapplying, sourcing tools companies pay for when the answer was already sitting in their own database, and the industry-wide habit of treating recruiting as a cost-center line item instead of a revenue function because most talent teams were never taught to prove their impact in the first place. Matt also breaks down PerfectHire's shift toward Agency Plus a combined CRM/ATS/business development platform built specifically for agency and embedded recruiters who've been trying to force agency workflows into tools like Bullhorn or in-house ATS platforms that were never built for that model. In this episode: Why Matt thinks recruiters and salespeople are more alike than most recruiters want to admit Ashley's "sales plus ethics" framework — and where the sales analogy breaks down Why most companies still can't put a real ROI number on a hire The compliance nightmare of ATS platforms silently blocking candidate reapplications Why "time to fill" needs to die as a metric How PerfectHire's Agency Plus platform is built for agency and embedded recruiters specifically Why picking tech vendors as "partners" instead of "products" changes everything Resources & Links: PerfectHire: theperfecthire.co Agency Plus: getperfecthire.com/agency Matt Schalsey on LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/matt-schalsey Talentless listeners get one free month of Agency Plus with code TALENTLESS Note: No Talent Outside the Box or Dum Dum of the Week this episode, Ashley had to duck out early for an emergency dentist appointment. She'll be back next week, tooth and all.

  8. Jul 22

    LinkedIn User #204,097: 39 Years of TA, Told Straight (with Steve Levy)

    Steve Levy is LinkedIn user #204,097. He co-founded ATAP. He was doing AI in hiring at Pitney Bowes before AI had a Wikipedia page. And unlike a lot of "thought leaders" in this space, he never stopped practicing, he's currently at R1 RCM building production AI/ML sourcing prompt stacks while simultaneously training the next generation of ocean lifeguards at Jones Beach (34 years and counting). If you don't know Steve, Desiree said it best in the intro: babe, what are you doing? Pause the episode. Google him. Come back. For our biggest episode of the year, Des and Ashley sat down with one of the actual founders of modern TA and asked him to zoom out. What did the profession get right? What did we get embarrassingly wrong? What's AI actually doing? And what do the recruiters listening right now need to be doing to survive what's coming? Steve came ready. This one is a masterclass wrapped in a roast wrapped in an hour of the funniest, sharpest TA conversation we've had all year. What You'll Learn Why "keeping your job vs. doing your job" is the single most important frame for TA right now The three problems AI won't solve: character, leadership, and knowledge Why resumes and job descriptions are both "big piles of monkey poop" (and what happens when you smush them together) The intake question that will stop any hiring manager cold: "What must this person deliver in the first 6, 12, 18 months to be considered a strong hire?" Why cost-per-hire is "the singularly dumbest metric" ever created The difference between excellence and perfection (and why we're chasing the wrong one) Steve's genius interview question for recruiters: "What would you do if LinkedIn went down?" Why "densely good" is now the new Talentless bar for candidate quality The Marquis de Sade School of Talent Acquisition intake technique (you have to hear it) Why board-director behaviors are the same behaviors great TA leaders need Best Quotes "You become so good at using a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail." — Steve "We have a character problem in TA. We have a leadership problem in TA. We have a knowledge problem in TA. AI is not going to solve any of this." — Steve "Resumes are a big pile of monkey poop. Job descriptions are a big pile of monkey poop. And we think that magically by smushing this stuff together, some system will produce a five-star Michelin meal." — Steve "We're not a service function. We're an excellence in performance function." — Steve "Striving for excellence motivates you. Striving for perfection is demoralizing." — Steve (quoting Harriet Braiker) "I'm not a psychic. I have no psychic abilities. You have to ask a lot of questions. You have to study. You have to learn." — Steve "I am here for a purpose, and the purpose is to grow into a mountain, not to shrink to a grain of sand." — Steve (quoting Og Mandino) "If your presence adds no value, then your absence makes no difference." — Ashley Where to Find Steve LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/levyrecruits (fair warning — if he hasn't touched your baby belly, he might not accept your connection request. IYKYK.) Recruiting Inferno Inc.: 30-year TA strategy practice ATAP: Association of Talent Acquisition Professionals — join it Lex Duo: lexduo.net — TA for TA, AI tools for in-house recruiters R1 RCM: r1rcm.com/careers/r37-lab hireEZ: Recruiter Therapy, For Recruiters By Recruiters Conference, Outbound Academy Also Mentioned Katrina Collier's The Robot-Proof Recruiter — Chapter 5 on intakes (Steve's rec) Harriet Braiker's The Disease to Please Og Mandino (the mountain quote) Connect with Talentless Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts Instagram • LinkedIn • TikTok • YouTube • BlueSky • Threads Newsletter: talentless.beehiiv.com Come see us at RecFest Nashville — announcing our session soon Got a #DumDumTalent story? Email desiree@talentlesspodcast.com

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
2 Ratings

About

Welcome to Talentless 👋, the podcast that’s all HR, all talent, and zero fluff—the official show for recruiters, by recruiters! If you’re in the people business, this is your one-stop shop for everything that matters. Hosted Industry Leaders Ashley King and Desiree Goldey, we’re here to dig into the heart of what makes workplaces tick (and sometimes, blow up). From talent acquisition tips that actually work to the real talk on DEI and workforce trauma reshaping our industry, we’re not afraid to get into the messy, the meaningful, and the downright motivating. Buckle up—this is where you become the best in the business.

More From WRKdefined