Last time we spoke about the disaster at Donetz. At the start of May 1942, Germany’s Operation Fridericus triggered a sudden counteroffensive from Kleist’s 1st Panzer Army toward Kharkov. The Soviets failed to detect the buildup and, when Kleist’s thrust hit, the 9th Army collapsed rapidly; reserves were poorly pre-positioned, fortifications were neglected, and the Southern Front’s air activity was negligible against Luftwaffe dominance. Soviet attempts to contain the breakthrough—through hurried tank corps moves and delayed redeployments—could not stop sealed penetrations or halt the German advance to key Donets crossings. Elsewhere, German plans to neutralize Soviet partisans (Operation Hannover) were disrupted by successful deception and intelligence leaks around Belov. Meanwhile, heavy siege artillery and Soviet preparations at Sevastopol signaled the next phase of the campaign. This episode is Operation Hanover Well hello there, welcome to the Eastern Front week by week podcast, I am your dutiful host Craig Watson. But, before we start I want to also remind you this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Perhaps you want to learn more about world war two? Kings and Generals have an assortment of episodes on world war two and much more so go give them a look over on Youtube. So please subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry for some more history related content, over on my channel, the Pacific War Channel you can find a few videos all the way from the Opium Wars of the 1800’s until the end of the Pacific War in 1945. Last week’s success at Kestenga had come at the price of growing friction between Dietl and Siilasvuo. This tension arose because the latter had issued orders that lacked approval from Army Command, and the Germans had formed the impression that Finnish troops were showing reluctance to take part in intense combat. The combined German and Finnish losses at Kestenga reached 5,500, while those at Zapadnaya Litsa totaled 3,200. In exchange, the Finnish 3rd Corps asserted that it had caused 15,000 Soviet casualties. The Finns also maintained that Soviet losses in the rear areas were likewise substantial because of artillery barrages and air strikes. Meanwhile the Mountain Corps Norway reported that it had inflicted 8,000 Soviet deaths at Zapadnaya Litsa. These differences in casualty figures—whether accurate or inflated—nonetheless illustrated the brutal, grinding character of the fighting in the far north, where rugged terrain, thick taiga forests, and an almost complete lack of roads compelled both sides to fight for every frozen streambed and forest path at extremely close quarters. The disagreement persisted into the current week. Irritated by Dietl’s decision to restrict his authority, Siilasvuo directed the removal of every Finnish unit from the German zone of operations. He further insisted that all horses and carts previously loaned to the Germans be returned inside three days. Such a step would have stripped the Army of Lapland of any logistical capacity whatsoever. Dietl was therefore forced to plead with Siilasvuo in the spirit of comradeship-in-arms so that the Germans would not be abandoned in a difficult situation. The incident highlighted a persistent weakness in Axis coalition operations: Finnish officers, mindful of their nation’s separate war goals centered on reclaiming the lands lost in 1940, resented being placed under German operational control and were unwilling to accept heavy losses for aims they viewed as serving purely German interests. The Finnish 3rd Corps had remained subordinated to the Army of Lapland throughout the winter because Mannerheim had continued to show interest in restarting joint Finnish–German actions aimed at Murmansk. In addition, the German 5th and 7th Mountain Divisions, which had been scheduled to relieve the Kestenga sector, had been unable to reach Finland because winter ice had sealed the Finnish ports. Faced with this emergency, Dietl insisted that every German formation be made fully self-sufficient and independent of Finnish assistance as quickly as possible. He also urged the OKH to speed up the arrival of the 7th Mountain Division, part of which was still tied down with Army Group North. The deeper strategic difficulty was one that Germany had never managed to solve: the Murmansk railway kept delivering Allied supplies far into the Soviet heartland, and as long as the Finns refused to push south against it, the Army of Lapland simply lacked both the manpower and the logistical reach to cut the line on its own. Back on the 21st, Convoy PQ 16 had departed. Comprising 35 merchant ships, 4 cruisers, and 3 destroyers, it ranked among the largest convoys yet sent to the USSR. During the voyage it would also be reinforced by three additional Soviet destroyers. The lengthening daylight hours rendered submarine attacks too hazardous but favored the operations of naval bombers. On the 27th, 100 high-altitude Ju-88 bombers together with 8 He-111 torpedo bombers struck the convoy and succeeded in sinking only four vessels. Nevertheless, the attackers’ use of mixed altitudes had confused the defensive anti-aircraft fire and caused it to lose concentration. This same approach would be employed repeatedly over the following four days in a series of raids against the convoy. Altogether these air assaults sank 6 ships. One merchant vessel was lost to a German submarine, and another ship struck a Soviet mine upon reaching Murmansk. Moreover, many of the surviving merchant ships that made it into Soviet ports had sustained heavy damage. Despite these setbacks, the great majority of the convoy’s cargo arrived safely in Soviet harbors, proving that even under repeated Luftwaffe pressure the Arctic supply route stayed open. The tanks, aircraft, raw materials, and foodstuffs carried by PQ 16 and the convoys that followed were flowing straight into the Soviet war economy at a time when the Red Army was suffering enormous losses across several fronts at once. In parallel, Germany kept up its air offensive throughout May in an effort to disrupt the flow of supplies reaching Leningrad. On the 28th a large raid involving more than 100 aircraft targeted Kobona and Lednyovo. Yet only limited damage was caused, while ground-based flak batteries brought down 19 of the bombers. On the 29th another raid struck Osinevets but again produced only minor effects. Newly installed radars had helped Soviet fighters disrupt these attacks. After these disappointments, Luftwaffe focus shifted back to the frontline situation involving the Volkhov group of forces. The sole exception involved 15 Bf 109s that were detached from JG 54 and sent to the Finnish airfield at Petäjärvi. Their mission was to attack Soviet barge traffic on Lake Ladoga. Despite flying 104 sorties, however, they failed to sink even one vessel. The inability of these Bf 109s to produce results typified a wider Luftwaffe problem: fighter aircraft were ill-suited for anti-shipping strikes against scattered small craft operating near their own shore-based flak defenses, and the expanding Soviet radar network was steadily eroding the surprise on which such interdiction missions relied. Despite the German attempts, maritime traffic across Lake Ladoga continued to grow throughout the week as the ice disappeared. By the 28th the first convoy sailed from Novaia Ladoga to supply Leningrad. By December 1942 more than 200 ships would ply this supply route, transporting an estimated 779,586 tons of cargo. Half of that total would consist of foodstuffs. As Glantz records: “Of this cargo, 50 percent was foodstuffs, 15.4 percent coal, 16.7 percent lubricants, and 17.9 percent weaponry and other military cargoes. The foodstuffs primarily consisted of flour, grain, macaroni, butter, fat, meat, sugar, preserves, and chocolate. In addition, the city received 4,186 sheep and goats, 7,723 small cattle, 4,388 horses, 41,638 cubic meters of wood, 5,967 tons of various goods, and 1,300 tons of medical supplies.” Raw materials were also delivered to restart the military industry inside Leningrad. During the same period 310,000 combat replacements were shipped into the city, further transforming it into a fortress. At the same time 539,597 civilians and an additional 292,900 tons of factory equipment were evacuated from Leningrad. The opening of the lake route therefore marked a decisive change in Leningrad’s strategic situation. The city that had endured the most severe starvation of the winter—when daily rations had dropped to as little as 125 grams of bread for dependents—was gradually being reconnected to the rest of the Soviet war economy. The simultaneous evacuation of civilians and factory equipment alongside military resupply reflected a deliberate Soviet policy of adjusting Leningrad’s population to a level that could be fed and defended, while at the same time safeguarding the industrial capacity that had once made the city the second metropolis of the USSR. After all the indications of a Soviet withdrawal that had appeared the previous week, on May 24th Küchler informed Lindemann that it would be extremely unfortunate to allow the Russians to slip away. Consequently the 18th Army was ordered to launch an offensive to stop the 2nd Shock Army from escaping. Responsibility for the attack fell to the 1st and 38th Army Corps, which together fielded 5 infantry divisions, 1 motorized division, and the 2nd SS Infantry Brigade. The weather, however, had other plans. The ground was far too saturated to support an offensive. After observing still more troops leaving the pocket on the 25th, Lindemann asked the commander of the 38th Corps, Haenicke, whether he could launch an at