The NEC4 Brief

Gather

Hosted by Ben and Glenn, The NEC4 Brief is a monthly podcast that unpacks the ins and outs of the NEC4 contract, one clause, one issue, one real world example at a time. Each episode takes a practical look at how the contract actually works on site, not just on paper. From compensation events and early warnings to risk allocation and programme management, Ben and Glenn translate legal jargon into everyday lessons for contractors, project managers and quantity surveyors. It’s straight talking, experience led insight from two practitioners who’ve seen how NEC4 plays out in the real world: the good, the bad and the “that’s not what the contract says.

Episodes

  1. FEB 2

    If Your Z Clause Needs Latin, It Probably Needs A Bin

    Send us a text What if the clause you add to gain control actually costs you bidders, time, and money? We dive deep into NEC4’s option Z and show how to make additional conditions work for you rather than against you. Drawing on years of training, live project experience, and industry engagement, we unpack where Z clauses fit in NEC’s modular design and how to decide whether you need them at all. The through-line is discipline: define the mischief, try Scope or Contract Data first, then draft sparingly in plain English if—and only if—the contract truly needs an extra rule. We tackle the high-friction areas that drive disputes and tender withdrawals. You’ll hear why keeping constraints like working hours in the Scope preserves flexibility for critical one-offs, how halving time bars can create administrative chaos and miss valuable savings, and why pushing pre-contract errors onto contractors rarely delivers “certainty” once pricing and behaviour adjust. We also address governance head-on: if boards slow replies, extend reply periods transparently rather than deleting the project manager’s obligations. And we confront the cultural signal of deleting clause 10.2; removing “mutual trust and cooperation” tells bidders everything they need to know, and none of it helps. To balance cost certainty with value for money, we bring in Abrahamson’s risk principles—allocate to those with control, insurability, and efficiency incentives—and translate them into practical checks: scope quality, market appetite, team capacity, and insurance availability. Style matters too: use NEC’s defined terms, present tense, and active voice; avoid Latin and copy-paste Frankenstein’s monsters that conflict with core clauses. The payoff for this care is real: clearer bids, faster decisions, fewer disputes, and a healthier supply chain willing to lean in. If you care about fair risk, cleaner processes, and better prices, this one’s for you. Listen, share with your commercial and legal teams, and tell us where Z clauses have helped—or hurt—on your projects. Subscribe, leave a review, and send your questions for our upcoming session on contract data. View the webinar: https://www.gatherinsights.com/en/webinars Join the LinkedIn Group: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/2893228/

    1 hr
  2. JAN 28

    Making The Accepted Programme Work For You Under NEC4

    Send us a text A schedule on the wall won’t run your project. A living, accepted NEC4 programme will. We unpack how to turn the programme into a central management tool that reflects reality, accelerates decisions, and shrinks the space where disputes grow. From acceptance rules and deemed acceptance to resource clarity and client interfaces, we walk through the mechanics that make NEC’s prospective approach to change actually work on site. We dig into the lifecycle from tender to completion, why monthly (or faster) updates matter, and how to structure submissions so acceptance becomes routine rather than a negotiation. You’ll hear a clear breakdown of the consequences of acceptance and non‑acceptance, including when withholding triggers extra duties and how silence can lead to treated acceptance. We also tackle a frequent flashpoint: programmes that show planned completion beyond the completion date. You’ll learn why that can still be acceptable, how to separate acceptable from desirable, and how a realistic plan helps mitigation more than a neat fiction ever could. On change, we show how to represent compensation events on the programme before implementation without conceding liability, supported by a concise narrative that explains cause and impact. We compare approaches to time risk allowance and make the case for embedding TRA within activity durations while distinguishing it clearly from float to comply with NEC4 and protect assessments. Rounding out the guide, we share pragmatic fixes for common blockers: missing resource statements, out‑of‑date logic, unpaired planned and contract dates, and overcomplicated models that stall acceptance. If you want fewer surprises, stronger CE assessments, cleaner payments under Options A and C, and faster decisions across the board, this is your playbook for making the NEC4 programme work for you. Subscribe, share with your team, and tell us: what’s the one programme habit you’ll change this week? View the webinar: https://www.gatherinsights.com/en/webinars Join the LinkedIn Group: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/2893228/

    1h 2m

About

Hosted by Ben and Glenn, The NEC4 Brief is a monthly podcast that unpacks the ins and outs of the NEC4 contract, one clause, one issue, one real world example at a time. Each episode takes a practical look at how the contract actually works on site, not just on paper. From compensation events and early warnings to risk allocation and programme management, Ben and Glenn translate legal jargon into everyday lessons for contractors, project managers and quantity surveyors. It’s straight talking, experience led insight from two practitioners who’ve seen how NEC4 plays out in the real world: the good, the bad and the “that’s not what the contract says.