The NeoLiberal Round

Renaldo Mckenzie

Life is about people/how people relate. Yet life is what we make it or allow others to make of it for us creating privileges. The Neoliberal Round is a think tank exploring life. We're interdisciplinary and dynamic; concerning ourselves with global issues and problems so as to serve the world today to solve tomorrow's challenges, by making popular what was the monopoly. We will be bold and deliberate in our reflections on truths, lifting up issues of ethics/human values. Visit The Neoliberal, https://theneoliberal.com. Donate here: https://donate.stripe.com/7sYcN48uybAA2OEb9V93y06

  1. 1d ago

    Breaking News Update: Fifth Circuit Withdraws Opinion in John Anthony Castro Case, Then Issues a New Ruling

    Renaldo McKenzie, Content Chief at The Neoliberal, reports on his interview with John Anthony Castro, a 2024 US GOP Presidential Candidate who is now a political prisoner after suing Donald Trump for violating Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. His lawsuit and candidacy were upended due to the indictment and subsequent imprisonment. Renaldo spoke with John Monday afternoon, which was published as an article in The Neoliberal Journals at theneoliberal.com and The Neoliberal Post at renaldocmckenzie.com. There is also the actual interview available on the podcast and YouTube Channel entitled: BREAKING NEWS: JOHN A CASTRO SPEAKS FROM FEDERAL PRISON ABOUT HIS LATEST LEGAL BATTLE FOR FREEDOMHere is an excerpt of the commentary: There has been a significant new development in John Anthony Castro's fight for freedom. On Friday, the U.S. On Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit withdrew its previous opinion. It granted rehearing in John Castro's federal case. Castro argues the move validates serious legal deficiencies he identified in the appellate court's original reasoning. But by Monday, August 17, 2026, the situation had shifted again. Rather than granting John Castro the relief he believes should follow from problems with the original opinion, the panel issued a revised opinion that attempts to preserve the result while changing portions of its reasoning. In our latest conversation with John Castro, the former Republican presidential candidate described the extraordinary sequence of events and explained why he believes the substituted opinion creates new legal problems rather than resolving the old ones. The central dispute concerns a sentencing enhancement imposed on Castro for allegedly exercising a leadership role in criminal activity. According to Castro, the Fifth Circuit's original opinion reasoned that the leadership enhancement could stand without a finding that another person was criminally responsible. John Castro attacked that reasoning in his petition for rehearing. His argument was strikingly simple: How can someone legally be considered the leader of criminal activity if the government and the district court never established that another criminally responsible participant whom he led existed? As Castro summarized the problem during our interview, the original reasoning effectively made him: “a leader of no one.” Then came Friday's dramatic development. The panel withdrew its opinion and granted rehearing. For Castro, the withdrawal was an important acknowledgment that something was seriously wrong with the original decision. It is important, however, to distinguish withdrawing or replacing an opinion from a judicial admission that the court was legally “wrong” on every disputed issue. The precise meaning of Friday's order must ultimately be determined from the language of the court's order itself. What happened next is where the controversy deepened. By Monday, August 17, the Fifth Circuit had issued a substituted opinion. Castro argues that instead of correcting the underlying problem, the panel attempted to strengthen—or, in his words, “beef up”—its reasoning by adding a new rationale. According to Castro's description of the substituted opinion, the panel now reasons that, based upon the record as a whole, it was plausible that at least one other person was involved or criminally responsible. But Castro says that creates an entirely different constitutional and appellate problem: Where did that factual finding come from? Castro argues that the district court never expressly made the finding upon which the appellate panel now relies. From Withdrawal to a Substituted Opinion: By Monday, the Court Had Changed Its Reasoning Subscribe on any stream. Find your stream at https://anchor.fm/theneoliberal Renaldo is author of Neoliberalism, Globalization, Income Inequality, Poverty and Resusrance

    Breaking News Update: Fifth Circuit Withdraws Opinion in John Anthony Castro Case, Then Issues a New Ruling
  2. 1d ago

    BREAKING NEWS: JOHN A CASTRO SPEAKS FROM FEDERAL PRISON ABOUT HIS LATEST LEGAL BATTLE FOR FREEDOM

    In a recent telephone conversation on The Neoliberal Round Podcast, I spoke again with John Anthony Castro, the former Republican presidential candidate who gained national attention through litigation seeking to disqualify Donald Trump from the presidential ballot under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Castro is currently incarcerated following his federal tax conviction, which he continues to challenge through the federal appellate process.Castro describes himself as a political prisoner and argues that his prosecution, conviction, sentencing, and subsequent appellate proceedings contain serious constitutional and procedural irregularities. Those allegations remain contested legal claims, not established findings. Nevertheless, the questions he raises deserve careful examination because the legitimacy of American justice ultimately depends not merely on securing convictions, but on ensuring that constitutional protections apply equally—even to unpopular defendants and those who challenge powerful political figures.A Withdrawn Appellate OpinionA central development discussed during our conversation concerned the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.According to Castro, the appellate panel initially issued an opinion affirming his case but subsequently withdrew that opinion and substituted another after he petitioned for rehearing. Castro sees the withdrawal as significant because he believes his petition exposed fundamental defects in the panel's reasoning.One issue concerns the sentencing enhancement imposed on him for allegedly serving as a leader or organizer of criminal activity.Castro argues that the original appellate reasoning effectively permitted the enhancement without identifying another criminally responsible participant.As Castro put it during our conversation, the result would essentially make him:“a leader of no one.”He maintains that the substituted opinion attempts to repair this problem by reasoning that, based upon the record as a whole, it was plausible that at least one other person was criminally responsible.But Castro challenges the appellate court's authority to reach that conclusion.His argument is straightforward: appellate courts review factual findings; they ordinarily are not supposed to manufacture factual findings that the trial court itself never made.Castro therefore characterizes the substituted reasoning as impermissible “appellate fact-finding.”Whether the Fifth Circuit's reasoning legally constitutes improper appellate fact-finding is ultimately a question for the courts. But Castro believes the distinction could become central to his request for rehearing and, potentially, Supreme Court review.Linda Rivera, Brady Evidence, Motive, and BiasAnother major issue involves government witness Linda Rivera.Castro argues that information concerning Rivera's potential criminal exposure and any immunity or favorable treatment she may have received was not merely ordinary impeachment material.Instead, he argues that such information could demonstrate motive and bias.That distinction matters.Evidence that merely attacks a witness's general credibility is not necessarily identical to evidence suggesting that a witness had a personal incentive to cooperate with prosecutors, avoid prosecution, receive immunity, or otherwise provide testimony favorable to the government.Castro contends that the Fifth Circuit improperly blurred those categories.His position is that evidence demonstrating a witness's potential motive to testify favorably for prosecutors should have been evaluated differently from ordinary credibility evidence—and that failure to disclose constitutionally material evidence could implicate the government's obligations under Brady v. Maryland and related precedent Listen to the Interview or read it in The Neoliberal Journals at https://theneoliberal.com or via The Neoliberal Post at https://renaldocmckenzie.comEmail us at info@theneoliberal.com.

    BREAKING NEWS: JOHN A CASTRO SPEAKS FROM FEDERAL PRISON ABOUT HIS LATEST LEGAL BATTLE FOR FREEDOM
  3. Aug 7

    John Anthony Castro Continues Fight for Freedom, Appeals to Supreme Court and International Bodies

    Former Republican presidential candidate says he is a political prisoner as legal battle enters new phase. By Renaldo McKenzie | The Neoliberal. In this episode of The Neoliberal Round Podcast, Renaldo McKenzie examines the continuing incarceration and legal battle of John Anthony Castro, former GOP presidential candidate and president of AI Tax. Castro gained national attention after challenging Donald Trump’s eligibility for office under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. He later faced federal tax-related charges and now maintains that his prosecution and incarceration were politically motivated. In his latest conversation with Renaldo McKenzie, Castro discusses his continuing fight for freedom, his appeals through the federal courts, his plans involving the U.S. Supreme Court, and petitions submitted to international bodies, including the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention and the International Criminal Court. Castro also discusses allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, undisclosed agreements involving government witnesses, his filing of multiple Freedom of Information Act requests, and his belief that efforts continue to shape public opinion against him. Throughout the conversation, he reflects on faith, perseverance, imprisonment, justice, and his belief that his name will ultimately be cleared. Renaldo concludes the conversation with a prayer for Castro, his family, and for justice to prevail. The full article accompanying this episode is available in The Neoliberal Post and The Neoliberal Journals. Read more at RenaldoCMcKenzie.com and TheNeoliberal.com. For inquiries, comments, interviews, or information, email info@theneoliberal.com. The Neoliberal Round Podcast Hosted by Renaldo McKenzie News. Commentary. Politics. Philosophy. Culture. Power.Donate to us at https://donate.stripe.com/7sYcN48uybAA2OEb9V93y06 Call us 445-260-9198

    John Anthony Castro Continues Fight for Freedom, Appeals to Supreme Court and International Bodies
  4. Jul 23

    CARIBBEAN THOUGHT LECTURE 8 PART 2: The Unfinished Revolution: Haiti, the Caribbean and Global Power

    In part two of Lecture 8, Professor Renaldo McKenzie continues the discussions on the efficacy and completion of Caribbean Independence and Haitian freedoms in light of global capital power and new colonial structures. Discussion Points:1. Who Made the Haitian Revolution? Many textbooks emphasize: Toussaint Louverture. But Haiti's revolution was made by: Enslaved Africans Field workers Maroons Women Vodou leaders Communities Collective resistance History belongs to the people. 2. Dutty Boukman Revolutionary Priest and Freedom Fighter Jamaican-born enslaved African Transported to Saint-Domingue Spiritual leader Led the famous Bois Caïman ceremony (1791)Inspired the beginning of the Haitian Revolution For many Haitians, Boukman represents African spiritual resistance. Image: Artistic depiction of Dutty Boukman 3. Cécile Fatiman The Forgotten Revolutionary Vodou priestess Remembered for: Bois Caïman ceremony Spiritual leadership African cosmology Mobilizing resistance Many European histories largely ignore her contribution. 4. Jean-Jacques Dessalines Founder of Haiti Unlike Toussaint Louverture: Rejected compromise with France. Demanded complete independence. Declared Haiti independent in 1804. Regarded by many Haitians as the true founder of the nation. Freedom required complete separation from the empire. 5. Toussaint Louverture Reconsidered: C.L.R. James elevated Louverture as the central revolutionary figure. Yet Haiti's revolution was not the work of one man. It was also the work of: African spirituality Vodou Collective resistance Maroons Women Rural communities Reducing the revolution to Louverture alone risks repeating colonial habits.6. The Revolution Never Ended After independence Haiti experienced: Diplomatic isolation Economic sanctions Foreign debt Elite betrayal U.S. occupation International intervention Political instability Political independence did not guarantee sovereignty. 7. Haiti in the Twenty-First Century: Pursuing independent paths have often encountered: Debt, sanctions, political pressure, regime destabilization, economic dependence, foreign intervention. Examples: Haiti, Cuba, Venezuela Jamaica 9. Jamaica Under Michael Manley navigated between Capitalism and Socialism. Independence is an ongoing struggle over: Sovereignty Debt Race Identity Memory Global power Key Takeaways Haiti transformed world history. Freedom was punished through debt. The Haitian Revolution was collective. African spirituality played a central role. Colonial narratives continue to shape Caribbean identity. Independence remains an unfinished struggle. Haiti remains central to understanding the Caribbean and global power. Recommended Readings The Black Jacobins — C. L. R. James Silencing the Past The Wretched of the Earth Neoliberalism, Globalization, Income Inequality, Poverty and Resistance Renaldo McKenzie is Professor at Jamaica Theological Seminary of Caribbean Thought and Author of "Neoliberalism, Globalization, Income Inequality, Poverty and Resistance". Visit The Neoliberal at https://theneoliberal.com and https://renaldocmckenzie.com Subscribe on any stream. Visit Jamaica Theological Seminary at https://jts.edu.jm email us at info@theneoliberal.com and renaldo.mckenzie@jts.edu.jm Call us at 1-445-260-9198

    CARIBBEAN THOUGHT LECTURE 8 PART 2: The Unfinished Revolution: Haiti, the Caribbean and Global Power

Trailers

5
out of 5
5 Ratings

About

Life is about people/how people relate. Yet life is what we make it or allow others to make of it for us creating privileges. The Neoliberal Round is a think tank exploring life. We're interdisciplinary and dynamic; concerning ourselves with global issues and problems so as to serve the world today to solve tomorrow's challenges, by making popular what was the monopoly. We will be bold and deliberate in our reflections on truths, lifting up issues of ethics/human values. Visit The Neoliberal, https://theneoliberal.com. Donate here: https://donate.stripe.com/7sYcN48uybAA2OEb9V93y06