This week, Lisa and David talk about Dr. Oz new drinking guidelines; Pete Hegseth seeks to punish Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) by reducing his retirement rank and pension; oil CEOs call Venezuela “uninvestable”; Trump administration to halt billions of dollars in federal funding for social services programs in five states: Minnesota, New York, California, Illinois and Colorado; ChatGPT wants you to share your medical records; wild AI company valuations; CES reporting; Masterclass phenomenon; Uvalde trial; Trump pulling U.S. out of dozens of international groups; Elon Musk’s Grok produces sexualized photos of women and minors; Gen-Z slang; how to become a nicer person; and more. Jonathon Stray Regarding Renee Nicole Good’s ICE Shooting … for conflict analysis purposes, the thing to understand is that this is a textbook-perfect “scissor,” a situation where each side believes the evidence is so clear that they cannot comprehend how someone else could see differently. I am quite sure most of my readers will think this is insane. Surely the video makes the facts plain to all. What I am telling you is that, empirically, it does not. Added Context for Venezuela Situation Following the U.S. military’s January 2026 capture of Nicolás Maduro, major oil executives have rejected President Trump’s demands for immediate billion-dollar investments, labeling the country “uninvestable” despite the administration’s claims of a successful takeover of the nation’s oil resources. * Exxon President’s Stance: At a White House roundtable on January 9, 2026, ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods explicitly stated that Venezuela is currently “uninvestable.” He emphasized that the legal and commercial frameworks are too unstable and noted that Exxon’s assets had been seized by the Venezuelan government twice in the past. * Oil Industry “Pissed Off” / Volatility: While President Trump has publicly urged oil companies to invest $100 billion, many executives have expressed deep skepticism. Beyond the public “smiles” for the White House, analysts report the industry is wary of the “aboveground risks,” including the lack of durable legal protections and the massive costs required to fix rotting infrastructure. * Trump’s Claims of Commitments: While Trump claimed companies are ready to spend “billions and billions,” most CEOs—including those from Exxon and ConocoPhillips—have stopped short of making any financial commitments. They have only offered to send “technical teams” to assess the damage, which is a far cry from a capital investment. * Chevron’s Position: Chevron is indeed the only U.S. major currently operating in Venezuela. Lisa’s claim that this “f***s that up” reflects the industry’s concern that the U.S. military intervention and subsequent “quarantine” of oil shipments could disrupt Chevron’s existing joint ventures and safety protocols. * The “Kidnapping” of Maduro: On January 3, 2026, U.S. special forces conducted “Operation Absolute Resolve,” a military raid in Caracas that captured Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. They were flown to New York to face narcotrafficking charges. While the U.S. calls it a “law enforcement action,” the Venezuelan government and international critics have labeled it a kidnapping. * Proceeds of Oil Sales: The Trump administration has announced that the U.S. is currently managing the sale of Venezuelan crude. Proceeds are being held in U.S. Treasury accounts, with the administration stating the funds will be released to Venezuela only when they determine the country is “ready.” Oil Tankers As of mid-January 2026, the situation regarding the “ghost boats” is a central flashpoint in the U.S. intervention in Venezuela. There is significant chaos surrounding the U.S. maritime blockade, which has shifted from the Caribbean to the North Atlantic. The “Maranara” (MV Marinera) Incident This vessel has become the face of the current legal and military standoff. * The Rebranding: After evading U.S. forces in the Caribbean in late December 2025, the crew famously repainted the hull to change its name from Bella 1 to Marinera and hoisted a Russian flag. * The Seizure: On January 7, 2026, U.S. Special Forces and the Coast Guard cutter Munro intercepted the Marinera in the North Atlantic, between Iceland and Scotland. * The Russian Escort: the tanker was reportedly being shadowed by a Russian submarine and naval vessels before the U.S. moved in. Russia has formally protested the seizure as “piracy,” claiming the ship was legally registered under its flag as of January 1. Scale of the Blockade The U.S. is currently enforcing what President Trump calls a “complete blockade” to ensure all Venezuelan oil profits flow through U.S.-controlled accounts. Can we just take their oil? Lisa’s question—“Can we just take their oil?”—is the subject of intense international debate. * The U.S. Position: The administration argues these are “stateless” vessels or part of a “dark fleet” using fraudulent paperwork to fund “narco-terrorism.” They claim the right to seize them under U.S. federal court warrants. * The International View: Legal experts and nations like China and Russia argue that seizing a flagged vessel in international waters violates the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). They contend that a “flag of convenience” or a mid-voyage re-registration does not give the U.S. the right to board a ship without the flag state’s consent. The U.S. maintains that because it now “runs” Venezuela, any oil leaving the country without White House approval is effectively stolen property. Legal Basis for “Running” Venezuela The Trump administration’s claim that it now “runs” Venezuela is not based on a formal treaty or international recognition of U.S. sovereignty. Instead, the administration relies on a combination of executive power, domestic law-enforcement authority, and a theory of “interim custodianship” following the January 3 capture of Nicolás Maduro. The legal arguments used by the administration to justify its control are as follows: 1. Domestic Law Enforcement & Indictment The primary legal “hook” for the military operation (Operation Absolute Resolve) was a superseding federal indictment unsealed on January 3, 2026, in the Southern District of New York. * The Claim: The administration argues the U.S. is not “invading” but rather executing a lawful arrest warrant for a fugitive (Maduro) charged with narco-terrorism and drug trafficking. * The “Basis”: Attorney General Pamela Bondi and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have stated that because Maduro is a “criminal” and not a “legitimate head of state,” his arrest is a law enforcement matter rather than an act of war. 2. Denial of Legitimacy (The “Vacuum” Theory) The U.S. maintains that the Venezuelan government is currently “vacant” or “illegitimate.” * The Claim: Since the U.S. (and allies) rejected the results of the 2024 Venezuelan election as fraudulent, they contend that Maduro was an “usurper” with no sovereign immunity. * The “Basis”: By removing an “illegitimate” leader, the U.S. argues it is stepping into a vacuum to prevent “adversaries” (like Iran, Russia, and Hezbollah) from controlling the territory until a “proper transition” occurs. 3. Executive Orders & IEEPA To manage the oil and finances, the administration is using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the National Emergencies Act. * The Claim: On January 7, 2026, the White House issued a new Executive Order titled “Safeguarding Venezuelan Oil Revenue.” * The “Basis”: This order designates all Venezuelan oil revenues as “Foreign Government Deposit Funds” held in custodial accounts by the U.S. Treasury. The U.S. argues it has the legal authority to manage these assets as a “custodian” to ensure they are not used for “criminal purposes” and are eventually returned to a “legitimate” government. 4. Self-Defense (Article 51 of the UN Charter) In response to international criticism, U.N. Ambassador Mike Waltz has invoked Article 51 of the UN Charter, which allows for “inherent self-defense.” * The Claim: The administration argues that “drug cartels” and “non-state armed groups” operating in Venezuela constitute an “armed attack” against the United States (via the fentanyl/drug crisis). * The “Basis”: This expands the definition of “armed attack” to include narco-trafficking, justifying military action in Venezuelan territory without a formal declaration of war. Legal Challenges Most international legal experts, the UN Secretary-General, and constitutional scholars argue these bases are legally invalid: * UN Charter Article 2(4): Prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity of any state. Experts point out that drug trafficking has never legally reached the threshold of an “armed attack” justifying an invasion. * Sovereign Immunity: Under international law, sitting heads of state typically enjoy immunity from prosecution in foreign domestic courts, a principle the U.S. is currently bypassing by denying Maduro’s status as a leader. * U.S. Constitution: Critics argue that President Trump lacks the authority to “run” a foreign country or commit to a long-term military occupation without Congressional authorization, which has not been granted. Links: Outrage Overload Podcast Yergz Radio (yergzradio.com) Dare Talk Radio (daretalkradio.com) This Week in Outrage Substack (outrageoverload.net/twio) 5 states sue Trump administration for freezing social services funding (CBS News) Why I Won’t Be Giving ChatGPT Health My Medical Records (Life Hacker) Why is the U.S. pulling out of 31 U.N. groups? And what’s the impact? (NPR) Elon Musk’s Grok AI floods X with sexualized photos of women and minors (Reuters) Get
