Trees in Space

Nathan Hanks & Jason Smith

Join Nate and Jason as they blast off into the cinematic universe, watching and reviewing everything from cult classics to new releases. Each episode starts with their take on the film, a few laughs, and some spicy hot takes. Then they dive into critic and audience reviews, reveal the Rotten Tomatoes scores, and finally give their own rating—using a totally original and extremely scientific scale of 🌳 trees (good) and 🪵 stumps (not so good). Whether you're into action, horror, rom-coms, or “so-bad-it’s-good” flicks, Trees in Space is your new go-to movie hangout spot. Subscribe, grab some popcorn, and let the forest of film opinions grow.

  1. قبل ٤ ساعات

    Does Jason Pee? Deep Questions from Friday the 13th Part 2

    Welcome back to Trees in Space, the movie review podcast where we hack our way through films of all genres and tell you which ones are “worthy of the forest” and which deserve no more than a rotting stump. In this episode, hosts Nate and Jason bravely enter the woods of questionable horror logic as they revisit Friday the 13th Part 2—the 1981 (oops, Nate calls it 1982!) slasher sequel that brought Jason Voorhees out of the lake and onto dry land… despite having already killed him off in the original. The guys break down everything from confusing timelines (Was Jason supposed to be 12? 33? Bad at math? Yes!) to continuity errors that’ll make your head spin faster than a machete swing. They debate essential cinematic issues like: Did we really need that four-minute flashback? (Spoiler: no.) Is farmhand-strength Jason scary, or just a guy with a flour sack on his head who struggles with Paul in a fistfight? And what’s the deal with the world’s worst plumbing, cars that break down on cue, and counselors who apparently don’t notice their cars being towed away right in front of them? Expect a hilarious exchange about the film’s logic gaps, counting errors, brown underwear (seriously), which on-screen scares land—and which kills are strictly for the stunt bump. Plus: one host defends the movie’s place in the Friday the 13th mythos, while the other recommends it only as a form of light torture… for your least favorite sibling. Get ready, because this isn’t just a review—this is an autopsy with jokes, messy plot threads, and just enough campfire storytelling to make you paranoid the next time you hear a twig snap. Grab your hockey mask, fire up your skepticism, and join us for a romp through the hilariously flawed woods of Friday the 13th Part 2 on Trees in Space!

    ٢٨ من الدقائق
  2. ٦ أكتوبر

    Purple Hair, Exploding Hookers, and Lawn Mower Mayhem—Frankenhooker Explained

    Welcome back to Trees in Space, where we bravely plow through every bizarre movie genre the universe can throw at us—armed only with questionable nostalgia, overly honest hot takes, and the kinds of jokes that only make sense to people who may or may not still be thirteen at heart. This week, your hosts Nate and Jason take a hilariously awkward deep dive into the cult-classic oddity that is Frankenhooker (1990). Imagine: a medical school dropout, a tragic lawnmower “accident,” a fiancée whose head ends up in a fish tank, and a super-convoluted plan to reassemble lost love with... let’s just call them “parts” from New York’s finest streetwalkers—and a lot of super crack. Yes, you read that right. Nate and Jason duke it out over whether Frankenhooker is a misunderstood B-movie treasure or a monstrous mishmash of questionable prosthetics and even more questionable plot choices. Expect breakdowns of the film’s delightfully terrible special effects, philosophical debates on purple hair, explosive reviews (literally... exploding people everywhere), and a heartfelt appreciation for practical effects over bad CGI—all with a splash of 90s VHS charm. By the end, you'll have heard five-star worship, one-star rants, and a ratings system so convoluted even Jason has trouble explaining the difference between “four trees and a stump” and “one tree with a stump.” If you’re in the mood for a review that's as weirdly captivating as the film itself, you’re in for a treat. So grab your remote-controlled lawnmower, pour one out for Elizabeth’s head, and get ready: it’s time for Trees in Space to go where no (sane) reviewer has gone before—into the wild, stitched-together world of Frankenhooker.

    ٢٧ من الدقائق
  3. ٢٩ سبتمبر

    Sneakers Examined: Heists, Hackers, Humor, and a Legendary Cast

    We’ve laced up for another week of movie magic, and this episode is packed with throwbacks, witticisms, and everything Robert Redford. On the latest episode of Trees in Space, Jason and Nate take on the 1992 hacker heist comedy-thriller, Sneakers. From its legendary cast to its very ‘90s depiction of tech, we cracked open what makes this cult classic (and maybe the occasional Volkswagen) tick.Here’s what you’ll uncover in this episode:5 Keys You'll Learn This Week:What Sets “Sneakers” Apart: Get a breakdown of the plot and why this hacker heist stands out among other 90s thrillers.Why the Cast Has Us Geeking Out: Jason and Nate wax poetic about legends like Redford, Sidney Poitier, Dan Aykroyd (in a role you might not expect), and a younger Ben Kingsley lookalike.Is It a Heist or a Laugh Attack? The hosts debate if “Sneakers” lands as a true thriller or if it’s more about clever one-liners and quirky team dynamics.Tech Talk – 90s Style: They question just how plausible the hacking and code-breaking tech really is, and whether you could, in fact, crawl through those drop ceilings (spoiler: don’t try this at the office).Nostalgia vs. New Eyes: Was this the “Ocean’s Eleven” before “Ocean’s Eleven”? How does it hold up decades later, and does the younger generation buy into the ‘92 hype?Fun Fact from the Episode: Did you know Dan Aykroyd’s conspiracy-loving character foreshadows his future gig as a paranormal/pseudoscience host on the History Channel? Only on Trees in Space do you get that kind of full-circle movie trivia!As always, Jason and Nate don’t entirely agree—was this a forest of movie greatness, or was it more like sitting on a lonely stump? Tune in for the banter, stay for the honest reviews, and learn why Robert Redford is your grandma’s George Clooney.Ready to join the hacking, high-jinks, AND hilarity? 👉 WATCH THE FULL EPISODE ON YOUTUBE Or hit reply and tell us your favorite heist movie (bonus points if it includes a broken Volkswagen)!Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe—feed the aggregate monster! We’ll see you next week, and remember: in the world of Trees in Space, there are never too many secrets…unless you don’t press play.Thanks for being part of our movie-loving crew! The Trees in Space Team 🌲✨

    ٣٠ من الدقائق
  4. ٢٢ سبتمبر

    We Watched Barb Wire So You Don’t Have To—But Wow, the Boobs…

    Welcome back, space cadets! On this episode of "Trees in Space," your hosts Jason and Nate dive headfirst—boobs first?—into the wonderfully weird 1996 cult "classic," Barb Wire. That’s right, it’s Pamela Anderson in full pleather regalia, mysterious contracts about who can show what on screen, and a plot that somehow fuses Casablanca with post-apocalyptic biker chic and a dollop of Nazi cosplay for good measure. This week, Jason confesses he didn’t even realize Barb Wire was a comic book movie, while Nate admits he was way ahead of the curve—having watched it originally, although not as a fan of Pamela. (Apparently, blue-eyed blondes just remind him too much of his sister. Ew?) The duo tackles everything from the movie’s deeply confusing timeline (why does the "future" look like 1986?) to its smoking hot, gravity-defying fashion choices, to that age-old cinematic question: why can Pamela show all the boobage but everyone else is stuck with pasties? Was Barb Wire secretly trying to channel the classic romance of Casablanca? Did the plot get lost somewhere between the strip club and the retina scanner? And what exactly is “plot armor”—or maybe just plot underwear? Our fearless hosts dig through the darkness (literal and metaphorical), debate the acting chops of the cast (Pam’s not the worst! Who knew?!), and argue whether this movie deserves a full tree or just a lonely stump on their patented rating scale. If you’re ready for a hilariously honest breakdown of a “campy, breasty” sci-fi romp packed with flying bullets and questionable dialogue, tune in! And remember: they watch the trash so you don’t have to—or so you know exactly when to jump in for the wardrobe malfunctions. Strap in. It’s going to be a wild ride—pleather optional.

    ٢٨ من الدقائق
  5. ٨ سبتمبر

    Breaking Down Major League: A Team So Bad, Even the Script Lost Hope

    Welcome back to Trees in Space, the podcast that reviews movies with the perfect blend of nostalgia, hot takes, and more than a few questionable jokes. In this episode, hosts Jason and Nate take a swing at the 1989 comedy classic "Major League"—but with a twist: one host has never actually seen the movie before, and the other was in high school when it came out (so cue the “back in my day” stories). Join the guys as they break down everything from Charlie Sheen’s wild haircut and Bob Uecker’s legendary one-liners, to why Cleveland stadiums proudly supported both baseball and football teams… and, of course, why Wesley Snipes was basically unrecognizable as a baby-faced no-name in this film. You’ll hear them debate whether Rachel Phelps, the villainous team owner, is really the bad guy or just a misunderstood business genius—and which of the many zany misfit players actually had the best redemption arc. They dive into fan reviews (both glowing and grumpy, and even one confused soul who thought The Rock starred in this), drop some behind-the-scenes trivia, and wrap it all up by rating the film with their unique "tree" system. If you've ever wondered how well Major League holds up or just want some baseball banter with your comedy, this episode’s got you covered. Grab your peanuts and Cracker Jacks, because this is one major league episode you won’t want to miss!

    ٢٨ من الدقائق

حول

Join Nate and Jason as they blast off into the cinematic universe, watching and reviewing everything from cult classics to new releases. Each episode starts with their take on the film, a few laughs, and some spicy hot takes. Then they dive into critic and audience reviews, reveal the Rotten Tomatoes scores, and finally give their own rating—using a totally original and extremely scientific scale of 🌳 trees (good) and 🪵 stumps (not so good). Whether you're into action, horror, rom-coms, or “so-bad-it’s-good” flicks, Trees in Space is your new go-to movie hangout spot. Subscribe, grab some popcorn, and let the forest of film opinions grow.