We Can Do Better

Fran Quigley

Fran Quigley is a law professor who goes with his students every week to eviction court, representing people facing forcible removal from their homes. They are among the tens of millions of people in the U.S. who are behind on their rent or already homeless, who are forced to skip filling prescriptions, and who often go hungry—despite living in the richest nation in the world. We can do better. Other nations already do far better, and the U.S. has often done better in the past. This podcast lifts up the many people and organizations working to make housing, healthcare, and a decent life enforceable human rights.

Episódios

  1. há 3 dias

    The Fox is Guarding the Henhouse – And We Can Fix That

    Last week, on NBC’s Meet the Press, our new U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche was asked “Can you pledge that the Justice Department will always act independently of the White House?” His reply? “ No, I’m not going to pledge that.” Once again, the Trump administration does us a favor. It unmasks the inherent corruption that had been more politely hidden by previous presidents. As more fully developed in a Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy article I researched and wrote back in 2010, called Torture, Impunity, and the Need for Independent Prosecutorial Oversight of the Executive Branch, our current system de facto grants impunity for the President of the United States. Because the President gets to appoint–and fire at any time– the only person who can initiate federal prosecutions: the Attorney General, the head of the Justice Department. The fox is guarding the henhouse. But we can fix that. Specifically, we can independently elect our Attorney General. An independently elected prosecutor is already the dominant model in local communities, where 95% of criminal cases are filed and adjudicated. Mayors don’t have control over the person and agency who might file criminal charges against them. State-level attorneys general are also usually elected, so they can similarly hold governors accountable, as can local prosecutors. At the federal level, it seems very possible that, given our divided electorate, we could be electing a president from one party and an Attorney General from a different party. We have a lot of split ticket voters, and we like putting guardrails around our top leaders. How do we do this? Likely through a constitutional amendment of Article II, § 3 which states the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” But that is not fully settled. The framers did not specifically address the question of whether the Attorney General would be appointed by the President. And in fact they were very concerned about putting checks on the power of any one branch of government. And the first Congress did not see presidential control of federal prosecutions as a constitutional mandate. So there is an argument that we may not need a constitutional amendment. And there are some other anti-impunity options explored in the article, including a strong independent counsel law. But even if a constitutional amendment proves necessary, it is worth it . We need to root out the inherent corruption in our system, where at the highest level of government the fox pretends to guard the henhouse.

  2. 13 de ago.

    Voters in States and Cities Get It: Workers Deserve a Living Wage

    Many of the people we see in eviction court losing their homes are working long hours at difficult jobs. But they work in retail, the home healthcare sector, in food service work, etc.--where their employers do not pay them wages high enough to keep themselves housed.  So that is why we welcome this week to We Can Do Better David Cooper of the Economic Policy Institute. EPI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan think tank working for the last 30 years to counter rising inequality, low wages and weak benefits for working people.   David shares with us how, at a time when the national minimum wage is stagnant at a shameful sub-living wage of $7.25 per hour, dozens of states and localities are raising the wage themselves, including many this year alone. Among the 30 states with higher wages are several “red” states, reflecting the strong bipartisan public support for living wages for all workers.  David shares with us the reams of evidence countering the false claims that increased wages lead to widespread jobs losses and sharply higher prices. We also discuss the ripple effects of higher minimum wages on public health and safety, including protecting our clients and others from domestic violence.  David tells us why President Trump’s no taxes on tips/overtime changes are “gimmicks,” filled with false promises that usually do not meaningfully help those workers. What would help those workers is guaranteeing that their hard work meets the needs of their households for rent, utility, food, and other necessities. What is needed is a long-overdue national minimum wage increase.

  3. 31 de jul.

    The Housing Bill We Needed… Sort Of

    Earlier this month, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act became law. It is the first substantial housing bill to pass Congress in decades, and it is . . . OK.  In this episode, Jack and Fran discuss how the new law, like so many other reforms aimed at our housing crisis, focuses on increasing the supply of housing. Specifically, the Road to Housing Act will make it easier to get financing and construct new housing.  Which is fine.  But it won’t do much for the people we see in eviction court, and the millions of others who simply do not make enough money to afford market-rate housing.  Our nation’s leading housing experts  have been making this point for years.  As the title of a 2019 article by Alan Mallach, senior fellow at the Center for Community Progress, pointed out, “Rents Will Only Go So Low, No Matter How Much We Build.” Not that building more housing is a bad thing: we have an aging housing stock and more supply will lower the price of housing in many areas for some middle-income people. But, as the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities insisted last year, “Our Response to the Housing Crisis Must Include Rental Assistance, Not Just More Supply.” That is because 7 million households with income below the poverty line are paying more than half their income in rent: their recommended monthly housing cost is just $224 per month. No construction boom will lead to a for-profit landlord agreeing to anything close to that amount. Our clients living with disabilities and thus limited to a Supplemental Security Income check, face market rent that is more than 100% of their income. The same is true for many of our low-wage working clients, especially parents with young children.  So we need more and better subsidized housing, especially high-quality public housing and a full supply of housing subsidy vouchers for all who qualify, not just the one in four eligible households who receive it now.  A good detailed guide to the law’s changes is provided by the National Low-Income Housing Coalition here. So, on behalf of our eviction court clients, a polite golf clap for the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. But we will save our cheers for when real reform, like the Green New Deal for Public Housing Act, becomes law.

  4. 23 de jul.

    How One Law Change Can Dramatically Reduce Poverty

    In this episode, we examine a true silver bullet that can dramatically reduce poverty in the United States: pass a proposed law to update and improve our SSI program.  We start out the episode with the story of Dorothy (not her real name), one of our many eviction court clients who is unable to work because of disability. Like 7.4 million Americans, Dorothy’s sole income is her SSI, Supplemental Security Income, check. But that check is only $994–less than the average rent, not to mention other expenses. This amount condemns millions of people to live in poverty and, like Dorothy and so many others, to experience eviction and homelessness.  Our guest Stephen Nuñez, a researcher at the Roosevelt Institute, shows that we can do better. Stephen’s analysis of the SSI Restoration Act, introduced in Congress by Senator Elizabeth Warren and others, would boost the SSI monthly amount and dismantle nonsensical restrictions. The bottom line: This legislation would do a LOT to help Dorothy and so many others: more deserving people would get SSI, and a lot less people on SSI would be in poverty.    Here is some of the suggested reading mentioned in the episode: Estimating the Cost and Impacts of the SSI Restoration Act, by Stephen Nuñez, Jack Landry, https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/estimating-the-cost-and-impacts-of-the-ssi-restoration-act/ SSI Restoration Act of 2026 Overview:, Justice in Aging, https://justiceinaging.org/the-supplemental-security-income-ssi-restoration-act/ This One Neat Trick Can Reduce Homelessness https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/increase-ssi-reduce-homelessness

  5. 16 de jul.

    Might You Already be a Democratic Socialist?

    In this episode of We Can Do Better, we interview Jesse Brown, the first openly socialist candidate ever elected to the city council of Indianapolis in the heart of Republican-dominated Indiana. Jesse won his seat in 2023, with the endorsement of the Democratic Socialists of America , DSA, by defeating the sitting vice president of the council. Since then, democratic socialists have been on a roll. Zohran Mamdani in New York City and others are winning major mayoral elections and are poised to win more this year. Already in 2026, democratic socialists are defeating incumbents and winning open seats in primary wins that will likely yield a growing number of socialist members of Congress. Many of us want to see our government respond much better to the struggles of everyday people. And we want wealthy people and corporations to have far less riches and regular people to hold far more political power. What is “sewer socialism” and how does that service-focused history guide the new wave of elected socialist mayors like Mamdani? How does democratic socialism intersect with the care-for-others religious principles at the core of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and other religious and moral traditions? We engage with all these questions with Jesse Brown. Jesse is a former high school teacher, which seems to be good preparation for educating us about what democratic socialism is and is not. He shares with us how his single mom’s financial struggles and his family’s Christian faith led him to socialism, how he thinks democratic socialists are speaking to the same frustration that has led many voters to embrace Trump in the past, and how the democratic nature of socialism should prevent him or any other elected official from thinking they have all the answers for a community’s needs. A few articles and resources referenced in the episode: “Democratic Socialists are Winning in U.S. Cities With Message of Getting Stuff Done,” The GuardianJesse Brown’s Weekly NewsletterReligious Socialism: Faith in Action for a Better World

  6. 9 de jul.

    How Public Pharma Can Fix Our Prescription Drug Crisis

    In this episode, we talk with Mara Heneghan about something called “Public Pharma,” which can fix our current prescription drug prices.  Mara is director of the Health and Political Economy Project at the New School’s Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy, where she works on health-focused policy and programs. Polling consistently shows a disturbing fact: 4 in every 10 Americans report skipping prescription doses because they can’t afford their cost, something we know can cost lives. Affording prescription drugs always ranks at the top of Americans’ concerns, and certainly a struggle that we see as very real for our low-income clients.  Mara tells us that she and others have been working on a fix: drug manufacturing can and should be treated as essential public infrastructure, instead of a platform for price gouging.  In fact, it is already being done. California’s CalRx is a state-backed initiative that produces CalRx-branded insulin pens, which are offered at pharmacies for approximately $11 per pen – a fraction of the roughly $80 or more per pen that patients typically pay for brand-name long-acting insulin.  CalRx is working on doing the same for albuterol, a medicine that is critical for children with asthma. Michigan and New York are contemplating following California’s lead in public manufacturing of medicines.  The public sector also is starting to leverage its purchasing power to lower drug prices. Not only is all this fully legal, the federal government actually has the right to license patents on critical medicines to generic manufacturers when those medicines are made unaffordable by monopoly-holding corporations. (See an explanation of that “1498 option below.) Our government has done this in the past, and should again. Here is some additional background about Public Pharma:   Prescription Drug Prices are a Problem–But TrumpRx is Not the Solution, by Victor Roy and Mara Heneghan, March 2026, https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2026-03-26/prescription-drug-prices-trumprx  The New School’s Institute on Race, Power, and the Political Economy,   https://racepowerpolicy.org/  Democracy Collaborative, Why We Need a Public Option in Pharma, https://www.democracycollaborative.org/whatwethink/medicine-for-all-the-case-for-a-public-option-in-the-pharmaceutical-industry Chris Morten,Who’s Afraid of Section 1498? https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2810/

  7. 1 de jul.

    Celebrating America's 250th: Reclaiming the Pursuit of Happiness

    This week, we are doing something different from welcoming an outside guest. For our episode on the week of the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, we are going to talk about an article Fran recently published on the website Common Dreams: Reclaiming the Pursuit of Happiness: Let’s Celebrate the Declaration’s 250th by Ending Poverty (https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/reclaiming-pursuit-of-happiness) To lead our conversation, we pulled out from behind the scenes our podcast’s guru and producer Jack Quigley.  Jack is a journalist and writer, now Chief Marketing Officer for 14 Regional Construction Trade Magazines.Jack takes over the questioning and asks Fran about his article, including:      •    The historical evidence showing that, by promising that our new government would fulfill “the pursuit of happiness” as an inalienable right, the founders meant a government guarantee of housing, healthcare, and meeting critical needs;     •    How civil rights like voting, free speech, etc. are completely dependent on fulfilling economic rights to housing, healthcare, etc.;     •    Why the record shows that the U.S. people, now and throughout history, are nowhere near as hostile to guaranteeing economic rights to housing, healthcare, etc. as we have been led to believe;     •    Why the U.S. ratifying the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights could solve our poverty crisis. The full article is available here: Reclaiming the Pursuit of Happiness: Let’s Celebrate the Declaration’s 250th by Ending Poverty (https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/reclaiming-pursuit-of-happiness)

Classificações e avaliações

5
de 5
3 avaliações

Sobre

Fran Quigley is a law professor who goes with his students every week to eviction court, representing people facing forcible removal from their homes. They are among the tens of millions of people in the U.S. who are behind on their rent or already homeless, who are forced to skip filling prescriptions, and who often go hungry—despite living in the richest nation in the world. We can do better. Other nations already do far better, and the U.S. has often done better in the past. This podcast lifts up the many people and organizations working to make housing, healthcare, and a decent life enforceable human rights.

Você também pode gostar de