Weighed in the Balance

Jonathan Brooks & Co
  • 0.0 (0)
  • CHRISTIANITY

Weighed in the Balance, the show where we weigh claims against scripture and see if they hold up, of if they fall flat. 

  1. KJV Onlyism Debate Wrap-Up: Psalm 12, Calvinism, and Audience Questions

    4D AGO

    KJV Onlyism Debate Wrap-Up: Psalm 12, Calvinism, and Audience Questions

    Send us Fan Mail Welcome back to Weighed in the Balance, where we examine whether claims can hold up to scrutiny. In today’s episode, we wrap up the debate between Mitch Canupp and Nathan Cravatt—but the most interesting part is just beginning: the audience questions. We cover:  Nathan Cravatt’s final speech and whether it actually addressed the debate question  The credibility issue and historical claims about James I of England Whether the debate truly engaged textual criticism  A deep dive into Psalm 12 and the Hebrew grammar behind a major KJV-only argument  Why masculine vs. feminine forms matter for interpretation  A problematic answer involving the Holocaust and why it fails theologically  How Scripture speaks about God’s preservation of His people  The difference between the canon of Scripture and textual transmission We also reflect on a broader principle:  Even long-held beliefs should be examined carefully and honestly in light of truth. If you enjoy careful, charitable theological analysis, consider liking the video and subscribing—it really helps more people discover these discussions. Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    58 min
  2. He Got King James COMPLETELY Backwards…

    MAR 31

    He Got King James COMPLETELY Backwards…

    Send us Fan Mail In this episode, we continue analyzing the 2021 debate on King James Onlyism—and take a closer look at a historical claim that simply doesn’t hold up. Was James I of England a Presbyterian but not a Calvinist? Did he reject the Geneva Bible because of Calvinist theology? The historical record tells a very different story. Drawing from the Hampton Court Conference and the contemporary account by William Barlow, we examine what King James actually said—and why he objected to the Geneva Bible’s marginal notes. This episode is a reminder of two crucial skills:  Verify historical claims  Follow the logic of arguments carefully If you do those two things, you’ll avoid most bad arguments—especially on topics like Bible translation. 📌 Topics Covered:  King James and Presbyterianism  The Geneva Bible controversy  The real reason behind the King James Version  Calvinism vs. church polity  Evaluating historical claims responsibly Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    40 min
  3. The Fatal Flaw in King James Onlyism (It Doesn’t Hold Up)

    MAR 24

    The Fatal Flaw in King James Onlyism (It Doesn’t Hold Up)

    Send us Fan Mail Weighed in the Balance helps Christians evaluate arguments and discern truth. In an age of well-produced, eloquently spoken, and highly persuasive claims, this channel asks a simple question: Is this true? In this episode, we continue analyzing the debate between Nathan Cravatt and Mitch Canupp, focusing on a critical question: Which manuscript tradition is most trustworthy? But as the discussion unfolds, a deeper issue emerges: inconsistency. Can the arguments for King James Onlyism be applied universally? Or do they collapse under their own weight? We explore:  Lower vs. higher criticism  Internal vs. external evidence  The “law of first mention”  The claim that “Egypt = bad”  Why inconsistency may undermine the entire position Ultimately, this episode isn’t just about Bible translations—it’s about learning how to evaluate arguments carefully and honestly. 👍 Like, comment, and subscribe for more thoughtful theological analysis. Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    49 min
  4. KJV-Onlyism Falls Apart Here (1 John 5:7 & Revelation 16:5 Explained)

    MAR 17

    KJV-Onlyism Falls Apart Here (1 John 5:7 & Revelation 16:5 Explained)

    Send us Fan Mail In this episode, we continue analyzing the 2021 debate on KJV-onlyism and examine two key passages—1 John 5:7 and Revelation 16:5—that raise serious challenges for the position. While the King James Version remains a faithful and valuable translation, elevating it to the only acceptable English Bible creates major apologetic, theological, and interpretive problems. We also address common misconceptions about the New King James Version and its textual basis. Quick clarification: While there are a few minor differences between the KJV and NKJV (such as “God” vs “Lord” in some places), these remain within the Textus Receptus tradition and do not indicate a shift to the Majority or Critical Text. If you enjoy careful, charitable theological discussion, consider subscribing and joining the conversation in the comments. Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    50 min
  5. The Five Types of KJV-Onlyism (And Why One Debate Completely Fell Apart)

    MAR 10

    The Five Types of KJV-Onlyism (And Why One Debate Completely Fell Apart)

    Send us Fan Mail In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we continue analyzing the debate between Nathan Cravatt and Mitch Canupp on King James Onlyism. By examining the different types of KJV-Only positions—from simple preference for the King James to claims that the KJV itself was re-inspired—we evaluate the arguments, evidence, and reasoning used in the debate. Along the way we look at textual criticism, the Textus Receptus, numerics claims, and how to critically evaluate theological arguments. If you enjoy careful and charitable theological discussions, consider subscribing and joining the conversation. Mark Ward on False Friends in the KJV: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1awUlUOhwfI Mark Ward on the language of the Westminster Standards: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnsMXQGORrA 00:00 Introduction 01:04 The Debate Question 03:10 Why KJV-Onlyism Is a Shrinking Position 05:02 The Five Types of KJV-Onlyism 05:45 1. “KJV Is the Best Translation” 09:01 2. The Textual Argument 12:37 3. Textus Receptus Only 17:20 4. The Inspired KJV View 19:25 5. The “New Revelation” Position 23:00 Why the Debaters Talk Past Each Other 26:10 The “Perfect Line of Manuscripts” Claim 30:25 The 1611 vs 1769 KJV Issue 34:40 How KJV-Only Arguments Use “Things That Are Different…” 39:02 The Psalm 138 Translation Issue 44:16 Evaluating the Debate Arguments 47:40 Emotional Appeals vs Evidence 49:40 “The Language Got Purer and Purer” Claim 52:30 Numerics vs Numerology 57:00 The WWII Chapter-Verse Claim 01:01:40 Misreading Romans Through Numerics 01:05:30 Erasmus and Codex Vaticanus 01:07:00 Is English the Closest Language to Hebrew? 01:09:10 Moderator Intervention Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    1h 9m
  6. Reformed Worship Explained: Normative vs Regulative Principle (with Ryan Biese)

    MAR 2

    Reformed Worship Explained: Normative vs Regulative Principle (with Ryan Biese)

    Send us Fan Mail What is worship, and who decides how it should be done? In this episode, Jonathan Brooks and Ryan Biese discuss the biblical definition of worship, the regulative principle, and how modern evangelical practices compare to historic Reformed theology. 00:00 Introduction and General Assembly discussion  12:55 What is worship? Definition and biblical meaning  16:28 Creation and redemption as grounds for worship  21:27 Normative principle of worship explained  25:55 Regulative principle of worship explained  28:16 Nadab and Abihu and unauthorized worship  29:54 Jeroboam, the golden calves, and false worship  33:21 How worship declines when not regulated by Scripture  37:49 Modern evangelical worship and emotionalism  39:47 Worship as response to objective truth Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    1h 4m
  7. Possibly the WORST King James Onlyism Speech I've Ever Heard

    FEB 24

    Possibly the WORST King James Onlyism Speech I've Ever Heard

    Send us Fan Mail In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, I respond to Mitch Canupp’s speech from the King James Only debate. His argument raises familiar claims about King James I, Westcott and Hort, and textual variants in modern Bible translations—but do those claims actually address the question being debated? We examine key passages such as John 7:8, Matthew 5:22, 1 Timothy 3:16, and the Comma Johanneum (1 John 5:7), and discuss how textual criticism works, what manuscript evidence exists, and why no central doctrine of Christianity depends on a disputed variant. My goal is not to attack individuals, but to evaluate arguments carefully, honestly, and in light of the best available evidence. Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    43 min
  8. Which Bible Is God’s Word? | KJV-Only Debate Review

    FEB 17

    Which Bible Is God’s Word? | KJV-Only Debate Review

    Send us Fan Mail In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we return to the 2021 debate between Mitch Canup and Nathan Cravat to examine the second major question: Which Bible on the market today contains the words of God? This question gets to the heart of the King James Only controversy and the doctrine of Scripture itself. If God has preserved His Word—as Christians confess—where do we find it today? Is it confined to one English translation, or is God’s Word preserved in the original languages and faithfully conveyed through accurate translations? In this episode, we carefully analyze Cravat’s opening argument, including: What it means to call a translation “the Word of God”Whether all translations are created equalHow textual variants actually affect the New TestamentThe difference between preservation and re-inspirationWhy less than 1% of textual variants meaningfully impact the textWe also discuss the importance of evidence, manuscript history, and theological consistency when evaluating claims about Bible preservation. If you’re interested in careful, charitable theological discussion—especially on issues like Bible translation, textual criticism, and KJV-Onlyism—you’re in the right place. Let me know your thoughts in the comments: Do you believe only one translation can rightly be called God’s Word? Why or why not? 👍 Like & subscribe if you find thoughtful theological analysis helpful.  🔔 New episodes released weekly. Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    34 min
See All (58)

About

Weighed in the Balance, the show where we weigh claims against scripture and see if they hold up, of if they fall flat. 

Information

  • Creator
    Jonathan Brooks & Co
  • Years Active
    2025 - 2026
  • Episodes
    58
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2026 Weighed in the Balance
  • Show Website
    Weighed in the Balance

You Might Also Like